This patch converts tcrypt to use the new HMAC template rather than the
hard-coded version of HMAC. It also converts all digest users to use
the new cipher interface.
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Now that crc32c has been fixed to conform with standard digest semantics,
we can use test_hash for it. I've turned the last test into a chunky
test.
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
This patch adds speed tests (benchmarks) for digest algorithms.
Tests are run with different buffer sizes (16 bytes, ... 8 kBytes)
and with each buffer multiple tests are run with different update()
sizes (e.g. hash 64 bytes buffer in four 16 byte updates).
There is no correctness checking of the result and all tests and
algorithms use the same input buffer.
Signed-off-by: Michal Ludvig <michal@logix.cz>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Force 32-bit alignment on keys in tcrypt test vectors. Also rearrange the
structure to prevent unnecessary padding.
Signed-off-by: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Add new test vectors to the AES test suite for AES CBC and AES with plaintext
larger than AES blocksize.
Signed-off-by: Jan Glauber <jan.glauber@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
The XTEA implementation was incorrect due to a misinterpretation of
operator precedence. Because of the wide-spread nature of this
error, the erroneous implementation will be kept, albeit under the
new name of XETA.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Grothe <ajgrothe@yahoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
From: Reyk Floeter <reyk@vantronix.net>
I recently had the requirement to do some benchmarking on cryptoapi, and
I found reyk's very useful performance test patch [1].
However, I could not find any discussion on why that extension (or
something providing a similar feature but different implementation) was
not merged into mainline. If there was such a discussion, can someone
please point me to the archive[s]?
I've now merged the old patch into 2.6.12-rc1, the result can be found
attached to this email.
[1] http://lists.logix.cz/pipermail/padlock/2004/000010.html
Signed-off-by: Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
Kazunori MIYAZAWA