This patch adds code that performs transparent switch to Extended
SCA on addition of 65th VCPU in a VM. Disposal of ESCA is added too.
The entier ESCA functionality, however, is still not enabled.
The enablement will be provided in a separate patch.
This patch also uses read/write lock protection of SCA and its subfields for
possible disposal at the BSCA-to-ESCA transition. While only Basic SCA needs such
a protection (for the swap), any SCA access is now guarded.
Signed-off-by: Eugene (jno) Dvurechenski <jno@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
This patch generalizes access to the IPTE controls, which is a part of SCA.
This is to prepare for upcoming introduction of Extended SCA support.
Signed-off-by: Eugene (jno) Dvurechenski <jno@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
On s390, we've got to make sure to hold the IPTE lock while accessing
logical memory. So let's add an ioctl for reading and writing logical
memory to provide this feature for userspace, too.
The maximum transfer size of this call is limited to 64kB to prevent
that the guest can trigger huge copy_from/to_user transfers. QEMU
currently only requests up to one or two pages so far, so 16*4kB seems
to be a reasonable limit here.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Access register mode is one of the modes that control dynamic address
translation. In this mode the address space is specified by values of
the access registers. The effective address-space-control element is
obtained from the result of the access register translation. See
the "Access-Register Introduction" section of the chapter 5 "Program
Execution" in "Principles of Operations" for more details.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Yarygin <yarygin@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
During dynamic address translation the get_vcpu_asce()
function can be invoked several times. It's ok for usual modes, but will
be slow if CPUs are in AR mode. Let's call the get_vcpu_asce() once and
pass the result to the called functions.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Yarygin <yarygin@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
In access register mode, the write_guest() read_guest() and other
functions will invoke the access register translation, which
requires an ar, designated by one of the instruction fields.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Yarygin <yarygin@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
The kvm_s390_check_low_addr_protection() function is used only with real
addresses. According to the POP (the "Low-Address Protection"
paragraph in chapter 3), if the effective address is real or absolute,
the low-address protection procedure should raise a PROTECTION exception
only when the low-address protection is enabled in the control register
0 and the address is low.
This patch removes ASCE checks from the function and renames it to
better reflect its behavior.
Cc: Thomas Huth <thuth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Yarygin <yarygin@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
The patch introduces facilities and cpu_ids per virtual machine.
Different virtual machines may want to expose different facilities and
cpu ids to the guest, so let's make them per-vm instead of global.
Signed-off-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
As discussed on LKML http://marc.info/?i=54611D86.4040306%40de.ibm.com
ACCESS_ONCE might fail with specific compilers for non-scalar accesses.
Here is a set of patches to tackle that problem.
The first patch introduce READ_ONCE and ASSIGN_ONCE. If the data structure
is larger than the machine word size memcpy is used and a warning is emitted.
The next patches fix up several in-tree users of ACCESS_ONCE on non-scalar
types.
This merge does not yet contain a patch that forces ACCESS_ONCE to work only
on scalar types. This is targetted for the next merge window as Linux next
already contains new offenders regarding ACCESS_ONCE vs. non-scalar types.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
iQIcBAABAgAGBQJUkrVGAAoJEBF7vIC1phx8stkP/2LmN5y6LOseoEW06xa5MX4m
cbIKsZNtsGHl7EDcTzzuWs6Sq5/Cj7V3yzeBF7QGbUKOqvFWU3jvpUBCCfjMg37C
77/Vf0ZPrxTXXxeJ4Ykdy2CGvuMtuYY9TWkrRNKmLU0xex7lGblEzCt9z6+mZviw
26/DN8ctjkHRvIUAi+7RfQBBc3oSMYAC1mzxYKBAsAFLV+LyFmsGU/4iofZMAsdt
XFyVXlrLn0Bjx/MeceGkOlMDiVx4FnfccfFaD4hhuTLBJXWitkUK/MRa4JBiXWzH
agY8942A8/j9wkI2DFp/pqZYqA/sTXLndyOWlhE//ZSti0n0BSJaOx3S27rTLkAc
5VmZEVyIrS3hyOpyyAi0sSoPkDnjeCHmQg9Rqn34/poKLd7JDrW2UkERNCf/T3eh
GI2rbhAlZz3v5mIShn8RrxzslWYmOObpMr3HYNUdRk8YUfTf6d6aZ3txHp2nP4mD
VBAEzsvP9rcVT2caVhU2dnBzeaZAj3zeDxBtjcb3X2osY9tI7qgLc9Fa/fWKgILk
2evkLcctsae2mlLNGHyaK3Dm/ZmYJv+57MyaQQEZNfZZgeB1y4k0DkxH4w1CFmCi
s8XlH5voEHgnyjSQXXgc/PNVlkPAKr78ZyTiAfiKmh8rpe41/W4hGcgao7L9Lgiu
SI0uSwKibuZt4dHGxQuG
=IQ5o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/borntraeger/linux
Pull ACCESS_ONCE cleanup preparation from Christian Borntraeger:
"kernel: Provide READ_ONCE and ASSIGN_ONCE
As discussed on LKML http://marc.info/?i=54611D86.4040306%40de.ibm.com
ACCESS_ONCE might fail with specific compilers for non-scalar
accesses.
Here is a set of patches to tackle that problem.
The first patch introduce READ_ONCE and ASSIGN_ONCE. If the data
structure is larger than the machine word size memcpy is used and a
warning is emitted. The next patches fix up several in-tree users of
ACCESS_ONCE on non-scalar types.
This does not yet contain a patch that forces ACCESS_ONCE to work only
on scalar types. This is targetted for the next merge window as Linux
next already contains new offenders regarding ACCESS_ONCE vs.
non-scalar types"
* tag 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/borntraeger/linux:
s390/kvm: REPLACE barrier fixup with READ_ONCE
arm/spinlock: Replace ACCESS_ONCE with READ_ONCE
arm64/spinlock: Replace ACCESS_ONCE READ_ONCE
mips/gup: Replace ACCESS_ONCE with READ_ONCE
x86/gup: Replace ACCESS_ONCE with READ_ONCE
x86/spinlock: Replace ACCESS_ONCE with READ_ONCE
mm: replace ACCESS_ONCE with READ_ONCE or barriers
kernel: Provide READ_ONCE and ASSIGN_ONCE
ACCESS_ONCE does not work reliably on non-scalar types. For
example gcc 4.6 and 4.7 might remove the volatile tag for such
accesses during the SRA (scalar replacement of aggregates) step
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58145)
Commit 1365039d0c ("KVM: s390: Fix ipte locking") replace
ACCESS_ONCE with barriers. Lets use READ_ONCE instead.
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
1. We should flush TLBs for load control instruction emulation (stable)
2. A workaround for a compiler bug that renders ACCESS_ONCE broken (stable)
3. Fix program check handling for load control
4. Documentation Fix
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)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=kFKq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'kvm-s390-next-20141107' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvms390/linux into HEAD
KVM: s390: Fixes for kvm/next (3.19) and stable
1. We should flush TLBs for load control instruction emulation (stable)
2. A workaround for a compiler bug that renders ACCESS_ONCE broken (stable)
3. Fix program check handling for load control
4. Documentation Fix
ipte_unlock_siif uses cmpxchg to replace the in-memory data of the ipte
lock together with ACCESS_ONCE for the intial read.
union ipte_control {
unsigned long val;
struct {
unsigned long k : 1;
unsigned long kh : 31;
unsigned long kg : 32;
};
};
[...]
static void ipte_unlock_siif(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
union ipte_control old, new, *ic;
ic = &vcpu->kvm->arch.sca->ipte_control;
do {
new = old = ACCESS_ONCE(*ic);
new.kh--;
if (!new.kh)
new.k = 0;
} while (cmpxchg(&ic->val, old.val, new.val) != old.val);
if (!new.kh)
wake_up(&vcpu->kvm->arch.ipte_wq);
}
The new value, is loaded twice from memory with gcc 4.7.2 of
fedora 18, despite the ACCESS_ONCE:
--->
l %r4,0(%r3) <--- load first 32 bit of lock (k and kh) in r4
alfi %r4,2147483647 <--- add -1 to r4
llgtr %r4,%r4 <--- zero out the sign bit of r4
lg %r1,0(%r3) <--- load all 64 bit of lock into new
lgr %r2,%r1 <--- load the same into old
risbg %r1,%r4,1,31,32 <--- shift and insert r4 into the bits 1-31 of
new
llihf %r4,2147483647
ngrk %r4,%r1,%r4
jne aa0 <ipte_unlock+0xf8>
nihh %r1,32767
lgr %r4,%r2
csg %r4,%r1,0(%r3)
cgr %r2,%r4
jne a70 <ipte_unlock+0xc8>
If the memory value changes between the first load (l) and the second
load (lg) we are broken. If that happens VCPU threads will hang
(unkillable) in handle_ipte_interlock.
Andreas Krebbel analyzed this and tracked it down to a compiler bug in
that version:
"while it is not that obvious the C99 standard basically forbids
duplicating the memory access also in that case. For an argumentation of
a similiar case please see:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22278#c43
For the implementation-defined cases regarding volatile there are some
GCC-specific clarifications which can be found here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Volatiles.html#Volatiles
I've tracked down the problem with a reduced testcase. The problem was
that during a tree level optimization (SRA - scalar replacement of
aggregates) the volatile marker is lost. And an RTL level optimizer (CSE
- common subexpression elimination) then propagated the memory read into
its second use introducing another access to the memory location. So
indeed Christian's suspicion that the union access has something to do
with it is correct (since it triggered the SRA optimization).
This issue has been reported and fixed in the GCC 4.8 development cycle:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58145"
This patch replaces the ACCESS_ONCE scheme with a barrier() based scheme
that should work for all supported compilers.
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.16+
The ipte-locking should be done for each VM seperately, not globally.
This way we avoid possible congestions when the simple ipte-lock is used
and multiple VMs are running.
Suggested-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Due to the earlier check we know that ipte_lock_count must be 0.
No need to add a useless if. Let's make clear that we are going
to always wakeup when we execute that code.
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
The TPROT instruction can be used to check the accessability of storage
for any kind of logical addresses. So far, our handler only supported
real addresses. This patch now also enables support for addresses that
have to be translated via DAT first. And while we're at it, change the
code to use the common KVM function gfn_to_hva_prot() to check for the
validity and writability of the memory page.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
This patch adds a function for translating logical guest addresses into
physical guest addresses without touching the memory at the given location.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
The s390 architecture has a special protection mechanism that can
be used to prevent write access to the vital data in the low-core
memory area. This patch adds a new helper function that can be used
to check for such write accesses and in case of protection, it also
sets up the exception data accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
The new guest memory access function write_guest() and read_guest() can be
used to access guest memory in an architecture compliant way.
These functions will look at the vcpu's PSW and select the correct address
space for memory access and also perform correct address wrap around.
In case DAT is turned on, page tables will be walked otherwise access will
happen to real or absolute memory.
Any access exception will be recognized and exception data will be stored
in the vcpu's kvm_vcpu_arch.pgm member. Subsequently an exception can be
injected if necessary.
Missing are:
- key protection checks
- access register mode support
- program event recording support
This patch also adds write_guest_real(), read_guest_real(),
write_guest_absolute() and read_guest_absolute() guest functions which can
be used to access real and absolute storage. These functions currently do
not perform any access checks, since there is no use case (yet?).
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Eugene (jno) Dvurechenski