This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-48-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-47-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-46-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-45-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-44-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
nand_release() is supposed be called after MTD device registration.
Here, only nand_scan() happened, so use nand_cleanup() instead.
There is no real Fixes tag applying here as the use of nand_release()
in this driver predates by far the introduction of nand_cleanup() in
commit d44154f969 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
which makes this change possible, hence pointing it as the commit to
fix for backporting purposes, even if this commit is not introducing
any bug.
Fixes: d44154f969 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-43-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-42-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
nand_cleanup() is supposed to be called on error after a successful
call to nand_scan() to free all NAND resources.
There is no real Fixes tag applying here as the use of nand_release()
in this driver predates by far the introduction of nand_cleanup() in
commit d44154f969 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
which makes this change possible, hence pointing it as the commit to
fix for backporting purposes, even if this commit is not introducing
any bug.
Fixes: d44154f969 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-41-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-40-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
On error, the oxnas probe path just frees the device which failed and
aborts the probe, leaving unreleased resources.
Fix this situation by calling mtd_device_unregister()/nand_cleanup()
on these.
Fixes: 6685924924 ("mtd: nand: Add OX820 NAND Support")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-38-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
nand_release() is supposed be called after MTD device registration.
Here, only nand_scan() happened, so use nand_cleanup() instead.
While at it, be consistent and move the function call in the error
path thanks to a goto statement.
Fixes: 6685924924 ("mtd: nand: Add OX820 NAND Support")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-37-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
All initialized and registered devices should be listed somewhere so
that we can unregister/free them in the _remove() path.
This patch is not a fix per-se but is needed to apply three other
fixes coming right after, explaining the Fixes/Cc: stable tags.
Fixes: 6685924924 ("mtd: nand: Add OX820 NAND Support")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-36-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-35-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
nand_release() is supposed be called after MTD device registration.
Here, only nand_scan() happened, so use nand_cleanup() instead.
There is no real Fixes tag applying here as the use of nand_release()
in this driver predates by far the introduction of nand_cleanup() in
commit d44154f969 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
which makes this change possible. However, pointing this commit as the
culprit for backporting purposes makes sense even if this commit is not
introducing any bug.
Fixes: d44154f969 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-34-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-33-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-32-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-31-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-30-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-29-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
nand_release() is supposed be called after MTD device registration.
Here, only nand_scan() happened, so use nand_cleanup() instead.
There is no real Fixes tag applying here as the use of nand_release()
in this driver predates the introduction of nand_cleanup() in
commit d44154f969 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
which makes this change possible. However, pointing this commit as the
culprit for backporting purposes makes sense even if this commit is not
introducing any bug.
Fixes: d44154f969 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-28-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-27-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-26-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-25-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-24-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
Cc: Harvey Hunt <harveyhuntnexus@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-23-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
nand_release() is supposed be called after MTD device registration.
Here, only nand_scan() happened, so use nand_cleanup() instead.
There is no real Fixes tag applying here as the use of nand_release()
in this driver predates the introduction of nand_cleanup() in
commit d44154f969 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
which makes this change possible. Hence, pointing it as the commit to
fix for backporting purposes, even if this commit is not introducing
any bug makes sense.
Fixes: d44154f969 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
Cc: Harvey Hunt <harveyhuntnexus@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-22-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-21-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Han Xu <han.xu@nxp.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-20-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-19-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-18-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-17-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-16-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-15-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-14-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
Not sure nand_cleanup() is the right function to call here but in any
case it is not nand_release(). Indeed, even a comment says that
calling nand_release() is a bit of a hack as there is no MTD device to
unregister. So switch to nand_cleanup() for now and drop this
comment.
There is no Fixes tag applying here as the use of nand_release()
in this driver predates by far the introduction of nand_cleanup() in
commit d44154f969 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
which makes this change possible. However, pointing this commit as the
culprit for backporting purposes makes sense even if it did not intruce
any bug.
Fixes: d44154f969 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-13-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-12-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-10-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-9-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-7-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-6-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Cc: Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-5-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-4-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-3-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused:
they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup().
Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and
nand_cleanup() directly.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-2-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
Add support for the hardware ECC BCH engine.
Please mind that this engine has an important limitation:
BCH implementation does not inform the user when an uncorrectable ECC
error occurs. To workaround this, we avoid using the hardware engine
in the read path and do the computation with the software BCH
implementation, which is faster than mixing hardware (for correction)
and software (for verification).
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519074549.23673-9-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
Add the Arasan NAND controller driver. This brings only NAND
controller support. The ECC engine being a bit subtle, hardware ECC
support will be added in a second time.
This work is based on contributions from Naga Sureshkumar Relli.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519074549.23673-8-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
There are cases where ECC bytes are not byte-aligned. Indeed, BCH
implies using a number of ECC bits, which are not always a multiple of
8. We then need a helper like nand_extract_bits() to extract these
syndromes from a buffer.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519074549.23673-5-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
The main NAND read page function can loop over "page reads" many times
in if the reading reports uncorrectable error(s) and if the chip
supports the read_retry feature.
In this case, the number of bitflips is summarized between
attempts. Fix this by re-initializing the entire mtd_ecc_stats object
each time we retry.
Suggested-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519074549.23673-4-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
It seems that several hardware ECC engine use a swapped representation
of bytes compared to software. This might having to do with how the
ECC engine is wired to the NAND controller or the order the bits are
passed to the hardware BCH logic.
This means that when the software BCH engine is working in conjunction
with data generated with hardware, sometimes we might need to swap the
bits inside bytes, eg:
0x0A = b0000_1010 -> b0101_0000 = 0x50
Make it possible by adding a boolean to the BCH initialization routine.
Regarding the implementation itself, this is a rather simple approach
that can probably be enhanced in the future by preparing the
->a_{mod,pow}_tab tables with the swapping in mind.
Suggested-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519074549.23673-3-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
There are four exported functions, all suffixed by _bch, which is
clearly not the norm. Let's rename them by prefixing them with bch_
instead.
This is a mechanical change:
init_bch -> bch_init
free_bch -> bch_free
encode_bch -> bch_encode
decode_bch -> bch_decode
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519074549.23673-2-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
There are controllers not able to just read data cycles on the
bus. There are controllers not able to do a change column.
If we want to support both, we need to check which operation is
supported first. This is the exact same mechanism that is in use for
parameter page reads (ONFI/JEDEC) as the same problem occurs.
Speed testing does not show any throughput penalty so we do not
optimize more than that. However it is likely that, in the future, a
more robust and exhaustive test will run at boot time to avoid
re-checking what is supported and what is not at every call.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130834.2918-1-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
Mimic what's done in nand_soft_waitrdy() and add one to the jiffies
timeout so we don't end up waiting less than actually required.
Reported-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Fixes: b0e137ad24 ("mtd: rawnand: Provide helper for polling GPIO R/B pin")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200518155237.297549-1-boris.brezillon@collabora.com
Now that exec_op() is implemented we can get rid of the legacy interface
implementation.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Tested-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200513172248.141402-4-boris.brezillon@collabora.com
Implement exec_op() so we can later get rid of the legacy interface
implementation.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Tested-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200513172248.141402-3-boris.brezillon@collabora.com
Let's not rely on the dummy_controller embedded in nand_chip.legacy
and explicitly inherit from nand_controller instead.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Tested-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200513172248.141402-1-boris.brezillon@collabora.com
The current code checks that the whole OOB area is erased.
This is a problem when JFFS2 cleanmarkers are added to the OOB, since it will
fail due to the usable OOB bytes not being 0xff.
Correct this by only checking that data and ECC bytes aren't 0xff.
Fixes: 02b88eea9f ("mtd: brcmnand: Add check for erased page bitflips")
Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200512082451.771212-1-noltari@gmail.com
Some controller using the instruction parse infrastructure might need
to know which CS a specific sub-operation is targeting. Let's propagate
this information.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200505101353.1776394-2-boris.brezillon@collabora.com
This patch renames functions and local variables.
This cleanup is done to get all functions starting by stm32_fmc2_nfc
in the FMC2 raw NAND driver when all functions will start by
stm32_fmc2_ebi in the FMC2 EBI driver.
Signed-off-by: Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@st.com>
Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/1589284068-4079-2-git-send-email-christophe.kerello@st.com
This change fixes crash observed on PM resume. This bug
was introduced in the change made for flash-edu support.
Fixes: a5d53ad26a ("mtd: rawnand: brcmnand: Add support for flash-edu for dma transfers")
Signed-off-by: Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
This is done by default in the raw NAND core (nand_base.c) but was
missing in the SPI-NAND core. Without these two lines the ecc_strength
and ecc_step_size values are not exported to the user through sysfs.
Fixes: 7529df4652 ("mtd: nand: Add core infrastructure to support SPI NANDs")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
This patch removes the constant FMC2_TIMEOUT_US.
FMC2_TIMEOUT_MS will be used each time that we need to wait (except
when the timeout value is set by the framework).
It was seen, during stress tests with the sequencer in an overloaded
system, that we could be close to 1 second, even if we never met this
value. To be safe, FMC2_TIMEOUT_MS is set to 5 seconds.
Signed-off-by: Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/1588756279-17289-4-git-send-email-christophe.kerello@st.com
Implement exec_op() so we can later get rid of the legacy
implementation.
It's worth noting that the new implementation assert/deassert the CE
pin on each operation, which might not be necessary. We also dropped
the extra reset done at chip selection time on DOC2001plus. If it's
needed we really should do something smarter, because having a reset
everytime we access the chip is not that great perf-wise.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200501143917.1388957-5-boris.brezillon@collabora.com
Single byte accesses normally go through read_byte() but we are about
to use this function in the exec_op() implementation and thus needs to
prepare for single byte reads.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200501143917.1388957-2-boris.brezillon@collabora.com
We have a dummy block_bad() implementation returning 0. Let's set the
NAND_NO_BBM_QUIRK flag and let the core take care of that.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200511064917.6255-3-boris.brezillon@collabora.com
We have a dummy block_bad() implementation returning 0. Let's set the
NAND_NO_BBM_QUIRK flag and let the core take care of that.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200511064917.6255-2-boris.brezillon@collabora.com
Some controllers with embedded ECC engines override the BBM marker with
data or ECC bytes, thus making bad block detection through bad block
marker impossible. Let's flag those chips so the core knows it shouldn't
check the BBM and consider all blocks good.
This should allow us to get rid of two implementers of the
legacy.block_bad() hook.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200511064917.6255-1-boris.brezillon@collabora.com
Some controller drivers do not support executing regular
nand_read/write_page_raw() helpers. For that, we created
nand_monolithic_read/write_page_raw() alternatives. Let's now allow
the driver to overload the ECC ->read/write_page_raw() hooks when
these hooks are supported.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200507105241.14299-14-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
Some controller drivers do not support executing regular
nand_read/write_page_raw() helpers. For that, we created
nand_monolithic_read/write_page_raw() alternatives. Let's now allow
the driver to overload the ECC ->read/write_page_raw() hooks.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200507105241.14299-13-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
The current nand_read/write_page_raw() helpers are already widely used
but do not fit the purpose of "constrained" controllers which cannot,
for instance, separate command/address cycles with data cycles.
Workaround this issue by proposing alternative helpers that can be
used by these controller drivers instead.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200507105241.14299-12-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
We already know that there are controllers not able to read the three
copies of the parameter page in one go. The workaround was to first
request the controller to assert command and address cycles on the
NAND bus to trigger a parameter page read, and then do a read
operation for each page.
But there are also controllers which are not able to split the
parameter page read between the command/address cycles and the actual
data operation.
Let's use a regular PARAMETER PAGE READ operation for the first
iteration and use eithe a CHANGE READ COLUMN or a simple DATA READ
operation for the following copies, depending on what the controller
supports. The default for non-exec-op compliant drivers remains
unchanged: use a SIMPLE READ.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200507105241.14299-11-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
We already know that there are controllers not able to read the three
copies of the parameter page in one go. The workaround was to first
request the controller to assert command and address cycles on the
NAND bus to trigger a parameter page read, and then do a simple read
operation for each page.
But there are also controllers which are not able to split the
parameter page read between the command/address cycles and the actual
data operation.
Let's use a regular PARAMETER PAGE READ operation for the first
iteration and use either a CHANGE READ COLUMN or a simple DATA READ
operation for the following copies, depending on what the controller
supports. The default behavior for non-exec-op compliant drivers
remains the same: DATA READ.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200507105241.14299-10-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
This can be used to discriminate between two path in the parameter
page detection: use data_in cycles (like before) if supported, use the
CHANGE READ COLUMN command otherwise.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200507105241.14299-9-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
Let's use a helper to clearly check if an operation is supported or not.
Return -ENOTSUPP when ->exec_op() is not implemented as we cannot know.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200507105241.14299-8-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
The logic in nand_do_read_ops() is to use a bufpoi variable, either
set to the original buffer, or set to a bounce buffer which in the end
happens to be chip->data_buf depending on the value of the
use_bounce_buf boolean. This is not a reason to call chip->data_buf
directly when we know that we are using the bounce buffer. Let's use
bufpoi instead to be consistent.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200507105241.14299-7-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
Both in nand_do_read_ops() and nand_do_write_ops() there is a boolean
called use_bufpoi which is set to true in case of unaligned request or
when there is a need for a DMA-able buffer. It basically means "use a
bounce buffer".
Depending on the value of use_bufpoi, the bufpoi variable is always
used and will either point to the original buffer or to the nand_chip
structure "internal data buffer" (this buffer is allocated with
kmalloc() on purpose so that it will be DMA-compliant).
In all cases bufpoi is used so the boolean name is misleading. Rename
use_bufpoi to be use_bouce_buf to be more accurate.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200507105241.14299-6-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
NAND controller drivers can set the NAND_USE_BOUNCE_BUFFER flag to a
chip 'option' field. With this flag, the core is responsible of
providing DMA-able buffers.
The current behavior is to not force the use of a bounce buffer when
the core thinks this is not needed. So in the end the name is a bit
misleading, because in theory we will always have a DMA buffer but in
practice it will not always be a bounce buffer.
Rename this flag NAND_USES_DMA to be more accurate.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200507105241.14299-4-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
Now that exec_op() is implemented we no longer need to implement the
legacy hooks.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200501090650.1138200-5-boris.brezillon@collabora.com
Now that we have our own controller struct we can keep the MMIO pointer
in there and use instead of using the chip->legacy.IO_ADDR_{R,W} fields.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200501090650.1138200-3-boris.brezillon@collabora.com
The CS553x companion chip embeds 4 NAND controllers. Declare them as
NAND controllers instead of NAND chips. That's done in preparation
of the transition to exec_op().
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200501090650.1138200-2-boris.brezillon@collabora.com
Before reworking a little bit the JEDEC detection code, let's
clean the coding style of an if statement to improve readability.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200428094302.14624-10-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
During detection the logic on the NAND bus is:
/* Regular ONFI detection */
1/ read the three NAND parameter pages
/* Extended parameter page detection */
2/ send "read the NAND parameter page" commands without reading
actual data
3/ move the column pointer to the extended page and read it
If fact, as long as there is nothing happening on the NAND bus between
1/ and 3/, the operation 2/ is redundant so remove it.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200428094302.14624-8-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
Miquel Raynal