Timeline barrier allows serialization between different timelines.
After calling i915_timeline_set_barrier with a request, all following
submissions on this timeline will be set up as depending on this request,
or barrier. Once the barrier has been completed it automatically gets
cleared and things continue as normal.
This facility will be used by the upcoming context SSEU code.
v2:
* Assert barrier has been retired on timeline_fini. (Chris Wilson)
* Fix mock_timeline.
v3:
* Improved comment language. (Chris Wilson)
v4:
* Maintain ordering with previous barriers set on the timeline.
v5:
* Rebase.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190205095032.22673-3-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com
To allow requests to forgo a common execution timeline, one question we
need to be able to answer is "is this request running?". To track
whether a request has started on HW, we can emit a breadcrumb at the
beginning of the request and check its timeline's HWSP to see if the
breadcrumb has advanced past the start of this request. (This is in
contrast to the global timeline where we need only ask if we are on the
global timeline and if the timeline has advanced past the end of the
previous request.)
There is still confusion from a preempted request, which has already
started but relinquished the HW to a high priority request. For the
common case, this discrepancy should be negligible. However, for
identification of hung requests, knowing which one was running at the
time of the hang will be much more important.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190129185452.20989-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Now that we pin timelines around use, we have a clearly defined lifetime
and convenient points at which we can track only the active timelines.
This allows us to reduce the list iteration to only consider those
active timelines and not all.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190128181812.22804-6-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Now that we have allocated ourselves a cacheline to store a breadcrumb,
we can emit a write from the GPU into the timeline's HWSP of the
per-context seqno as we complete each request. This drops the mirroring
of the per-engine HWSP and allows each context to operate independently.
We do not need to unwind the per-context timeline, and so requests are
always consistent with the timeline breadcrumb, greatly simplifying the
completion checks as we no longer need to be concerned about the
global_seqno changing mid check.
One complication though is that we have to be wary that the request may
outlive the HWSP and so avoid touching the potentially danging pointer
after we have retired the fence. We also have to guard our access of the
HWSP with RCU, the release of the obj->mm.pages should already be RCU-safe.
At this point, we are emitting both per-context and global seqno and
still using the single per-engine execution timeline for resolving
interrupts.
v2: s/fake_complete/mark_complete/
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190128181812.22804-5-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
If we restrict ourselves to only using a cacheline for each timeline's
HWSP (we could go smaller, but want to avoid needless polluting
cachelines on different engines between different contexts), then we can
suballocate a single 4k page into 64 different timeline HWSP. By
treating each fresh allocation as a slab of 64 entries, we can keep it
around for the next 64 allocation attempts until we need to refresh the
slab cache.
John Harrison noted the issue of fragmentation leading to the same worst
case performance of one page per timeline as before, which can be
mitigated by adopting a freelist.
v2: Keep all partially allocated HWSP on a freelist
This is still without migration, so it is possible for the system to end
up with each timeline in its own page, but we ensure that no new
allocation would needless allocate a fresh page!
v3: Throw a selftest at the allocator to try and catch invalid cacheline
reuse.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190128181812.22804-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Allocate a page for use as a status page by a group of timelines, as we
only need a dword of storage for each (rounded up to the cacheline for
safety) we can pack multiple timelines into the same page. Each timeline
will then be able to track its own HW seqno.
v2: Reuse the common per-engine HWSP for the solitary ringbuffer
timeline, so that we do not have to emit (using per-gen specialised
vfuncs) the breadcrumb into the distinct timeline HWSP and instead can
keep on using the common MI_STORE_DWORD_INDEX. However, to maintain the
sleight-of-hand for the global/per-context seqno switchover, we will
store both temporarily (and so use a custom offset for the shared timeline
HWSP until the switch over).
v3: Keep things simple and allocate a page for each timeline, page
sharing comes next.
v4: I was caught repeating the same MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM over and over
again in selftests.
v5: And caught red handed copying create timeline + check.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190128181812.22804-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Currently, the list of timelines is serialised by the struct_mutex, but
to alleviate difficulties with using that mutex in future, move the
list management under its own dedicated mutex.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190128102356.15037-5-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
We need to move to a more flexible timeline that doesn't assume one
fence context per engine, and so allow for a single timeline to be used
across a combination of engines. This means that preallocating a fence
context per engine is now a hindrance, and so we want to introduce the
singular timeline. From the code perspective, this has the notable
advantage of clearing up a lot of mirky semantics and some clumsy
pointer chasing.
By splitting the timeline up into a single entity rather than an array
of per-engine timelines, we can realise the goal of the previous patch
of tracking the timeline alongside the ring.
v2: Tweak wait_for_idle to stop the compiling thinking that ret may be
uninitialised.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180502163839.3248-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Tvrtko Ursulin