In preparation to the introduction of the support for additional SoC,
the mvebu/common.h should be clear of Armada 370/XP-specific
definitions. Therefore, move the Armada 370/XP SMP specific
definitions to the armada-370-xp.h file.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
The mach-mvebu/common.h file contains prototypes of functions that
have been removed, so this commit removes the corresponding
prototypes.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
The ARMADA_XP_MAX_CPUS definition was in common.h, which as its name
says, is common to all mvebu SoCs. It is more logical to have this XP
specific definition in the already existing armada-370-xp.h header
file, especially in preparation to the addition of the support for
other SOCs in mach-mvebu.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Acked-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
Acked-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
This patch fixes conflicting types for 'set_cpu_coherent' and fixes the
following sparse warnings.
arch/arm/mach-mvebu/system-controller.c:42:38:
warning: symbol 'armada_370_xp_system_controller' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-mvebu/system-controller.c:49:38:
warning: symbol 'orion_system_controller' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-mvebu/system-controller.c:67:6:
warning: symbol 'mvebu_restart' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-mvebu/coherency.c:31:15:
warning: symbol 'coherency_phys_base' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-mvebu/coherency.c:48:5:
warning: symbol 'set_cpu_coherent' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-mvebu/coherency.c:123:12:
warning: symbol 'coherency_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-mvebu/pmsu.c:38:5: warning:
symbol 'armada_xp_boot_cpu' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-mvebu/pmsu.c:61:12: warning:
symbol 'armada_370_xp_pmsu_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-mvebu/platsmp.c:49:13: warning:
symbol 'set_secondary_cpus_clock' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-mvebu/platsmp.c:97:13: warning:
symbol 'armada_xp_smp_prepare_cpus' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-mvebu/hotplug.c:24:12: warning:
symbol 'armada_xp_cpu_die' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>
Acked-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Preparing to move the parsing of reboot= to generic kernel code forces
the change in reboot_mode handling to use the enum.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix arch/arm/mach-socfpga/socfpga.c]
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>
Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Russ Anderson <rja@sgi.com>
Cc: Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>
Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
The ->smp_init_cpus() function is called very early during boot, at a
point where dynamic I/O mappings are not yet possible. However, in the
Armada 370/XP implementation of this function, we have to get the
number of CPUs. We used to do that by accessing a hardware register,
which requires relying on a static I/O mapping set up by
->map_io(). Not only this requires hardcoding a virtual address, but
it also prevents us from removing the static I/O mapping.
So this commit changes the way used to get the number of CPUs: we now
use the Device Tree, which is a representation of the hardware, and
provides us the number of available CPUs. This is also more accurate,
because it potentially allows to boot the Linux kernel on only a
number of CPUs given by the Device Tree, instead of unconditionally on
all CPUs.
As a consequence, the coherency_get_cpu_count() function becomes no
longer used, so we remove it.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
This enables SMP support on the Armada XP processor. It adds the
mandatory functions to support SMP such as: the SMP initialization
functions in platsmp.c, the secondary CPU entry point in headsmp.S and
the CPU hotplug initial support in hotplug.c.
Signed-off-by: Yehuda Yitschak <yehuday@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
The Armada 370 and Armada XP SOCs have a power management service unit
which is responsible for powering down and waking up CPUs and other
SOC units. This patch adds support for this unit.
Signed-off-by: Yehuda Yitschak <yehuday@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
The Armada 370 and Armada XP SOCs have a coherency fabric unit which
is responsible for ensuring hardware coherency between all CPUs and
between CPUs and I/O masters. This patch provides the basic support
needed for SMP.
Signed-off-by: Yehuda Yitschak <yehuday@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
[ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk: ensure error check on of_property_read_u32]
[ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk: use mpic address instead of bus-unit's ]
[ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk: BUG_ON() if the of_iomap() fails for mpic]
[ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk: move mpic per-cpu register base ]
[ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk: number fetch should use irqd_to_hwirq()]
Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Lior Amsalem <alior@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
Acked-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Tested-by: Yehuda Yitschak <yehuday@marvell.com>
Tested-by: Lior Amsalem <alior@marvell.com>
Thomas Petazzoni