ARCv2 optimized memcpy uses PREFETCHW instruction for prefetching the
next cache line but doesn't ensure that the line is not past the end of
the buffer. PRETECHW changes the line ownership and marks it dirty,
which can cause data corruption if this area is used for DMA IO.
Fix the issue by avoiding the PREFETCHW. This leads to performance
degradation but it is OK as we'll introduce new memcpy implementation
optimized for unaligned memory access using.
We also cut off all PREFETCH instructions at they are quite useless
here:
* we call PREFETCH right before LOAD instruction call.
* we copy 16 or 32 bytes of data (depending on CONFIG_ARC_HAS_LL64)
in a main logical loop. so we call PREFETCH 4 times (or 2 times)
for each L1 cache line (in case of 64B L1 cache Line which is
default case). Obviously this is not optimal.
Signed-off-by: Eugeniy Paltsev <Eugeniy.Paltsev@synopsys.com>
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
ARCv2 optimized memset uses PREFETCHW instruction for prefetching the
next cache line but doesn't ensure that the line is not past the end of
the buffer. PRETECHW changes the line ownership and marks it dirty,
which can cause issues in SMP config when next line was already owned by
other core. Fix the issue by avoiding the PREFETCHW
Some more details:
The current code has 3 logical loops (ignroing the unaligned part)
(a) Big loop for doing aligned 64 bytes per iteration with PREALLOC
(b) Loop for 32 x 2 bytes with PREFETCHW
(c) any left over bytes
loop (a) was already eliding the last 64 bytes, so PREALLOC was
safe. The fix was removing PREFETCW from (b).
Another potential issue (applicable to configs with 32 or 128 byte L1
cache line) is that PREALLOC assumes 64 byte cache line and may not do
the right thing specially for 32b. While it would be easy to adapt,
there are no known configs with those lie sizes, so for now, just
compile out PREALLOC in such cases.
Signed-off-by: Eugeniy Paltsev <Eugeniy.Paltsev@synopsys.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org #4.4+
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
[vgupta: rewrote changelog, used asm .macro vs. "C" macro]
This uses a new set of annoations viz. ENTRY_CFI/END_CFI to enabel cfi
ops generation.
Note that we didn't change the normal ENTRY/EXIT as we don't actually
want unwind info in the trap/exception/interrutp handlers which use
these, as unwinder then gets confused (it keeps recursing vs. stopping).
Semantically these are leaf routines and unwinding should stop when it
hits those routines.
Before
------
28.52% 1.19% 9929 hackbench libuClibc-1.0.17.so [.] __write_nocancel
|
---__write_nocancel
|--8.95%--EV_Trap
| --8.25%--sys_write
| |--3.93%--sock_write_iter
...
|--2.62%--memset <==== [LEAF entry as no unwind info]
^^^^^^
After
-----
29.46% 1.24% 13622 hackbench libuClibc-1.0.17.so [.] __write_nocancel
|
---__write_nocancel
|--9.31%--EV_Trap
| --8.62%--sys_write
| |--4.17%--sock_write_iter
...
|--6.19%--sys_write
| --6.19%--sock_write_iter
| unix_stream_sendmsg
| |--1.62%--sock_alloc_send_pskb
| |--0.89%--sock_def_readable
| |--0.88%--_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore
| |--0.69%--memset
| | ^^^^^^ <==== [now in proper callframe]
| |
| --0.52%--skb_copy_datagram_from_iter
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
There are configurations which may not have LDD/STD
Signed-off-by: Claudiu Zissulescu <claziss@synopsys.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@synopsys.com>
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
With commit 9df62f0544 "arch: use ASM_NL instead of ';'" the generic
macros can handle the arch specific newline quirk. Hence we can get rid
of ARC asm macros and use the "C" style macros.
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
Hand optimised asm code for ARC700 pipeline.
Originally written/optimized by Joern Rennecke
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
Cc: Joern Rennecke <joern.rennecke@embecosm.com>
Arnd in his review pointed out that arch Kconfig organisation has several
deficiencies:
* Build time entries for things which can be runtime extracted from DT
(e.g. SDRAM size, core clk frequency..)
* Not multi-platform-image-build friendly (choice .. endchoice constructs)
* cpu variants support (750/770) is exclusive.
The first 2 have been fixed in subsequent patches.
Due to the nature of the 750 and 770, it is not possible to build for
both together, w/o special runtime glue code which would hurt
performance.
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>