Add SPDX GPL-2.0 to all PCI files that specified the GPL version 2 license.
Remove the boilerplate GPL version 2 language, relying on the assertion in
b24413180f ("License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to
files with no license") that the SPDX identifier may be used instead of the
full boilerplate text.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
* pci/dpc:
PCI: Add Downstream Port Containment driver
PCI: Add Downstream Port Containment portdrv service type
PCI: Widen portdrv service type from 4 bits to 8 bits
* pci/resource:
alpha/PCI: Call iomem_is_exclusive() for IORESOURCE_MEM, but not IORESOURCE_IO
PCI: Supply CPU physical address (not bus address) to iomem_is_exclusive()
* pci/thunderbolt:
thunderbolt: Fix double free of drom buffer
Add the Downstream Port Containment (PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_DPC) portdrv service
type, available if the device has the DPC extended capability.
[bhelgaas: split to separate patch, changelog]
Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Now that pcie_port_acpi_setup() always returns 0, make it and its callers
void functions and stop checking the return values.
[bhelgaas: changelog]
Signed-off-by: Jon Derrick <jonathan.derrick@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Host bridges we discover via ACPI, i.e., PNP0A03 and PNP0A08 devices, may
have an _OSC method by which the OS can ask the platform for control of
PCIe features like native hotplug, power management events, AER, etc.
Previously, if we found a bridge without an ACPI device, we assumed we did
not have permission to use any of these PCIe features. That seems
unreasonably restrictive.
If we find no ACPI device, assume we can take control of all PCIe features.
The Intel Volume Management Device (VMD) is one such bridge with no ACPI
device. Prior to this change, users had to boot with "pcie_ports=native"
to get hotplug and other services to work below the VMD Root Port.
[bhelgaas: changelog]
Suggested-by: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jon Derrick <jonathan.derrick@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
This fixes a "no previous prototype" warning for pcie_port_acpi_setup()
found via "make W=1".
[bhelgaas: changelog]
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Move the evaluation of acpi_pci_osc_control_set() (to request control of
PCI Express native features) into acpi_pci_root_add() to avoid calling
it many times for the same root complex with the same arguments.
Additionally, check if all of the requisite _OSC support bits are set
before calling acpi_pci_osc_control_set() for a given root complex.
References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20232
Reported-by: Ozan Caglayan <ozan@pardus.org.tr>
Tested-by: Ozan Caglayan <ozan@pardus.org.tr>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
There is a design issue related to PCIe AER and _OSC that the BIOS
may be asked to grant control of the AER service even if some
Hardware Error Source Table (HEST) entries contain information
meaning that the BIOS really should control it. Namely,
pcie_port_acpi_setup() calls pcie_aer_get_firmware_first() that
determines whether or not the AER service should be controlled by
the BIOS on the basis of the HEST information for the given PCIe
port. The BIOS is asked to grant control of the AER service for
a PCIe Root Complex if pcie_aer_get_firmware_first() returns 'false'
for at least one root port in that complex, even if all of the other
root ports' HEST entries have the FIRMWARE_FIRST flag set (and none
of them has the GLOBAL flag set). However, if the AER service is
controlled by the kernel, that may interfere with the BIOS' handling
of the error sources having the FIRMWARE_FIRST flag. Moreover,
there may be PCIe endpoints that have the FIRMWARE_FIRST flag set in
HEST and are attached to the root ports in question, in which case it
also may be unsafe to ask the BIOS for control of the AER service.
For this reason, introduce a function checking if there's at least
one PCIe-related HEST entry with the FIRMWARE_FIRST flag set and
disable the native AER service altogether if this function returns
'true'.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
After commit 852972acff (ACPI: Disable
ASPM if the platform won't provide _OSC control for PCIe) control of
the PCIe Capability Structure is unconditionally requested by
acpi_pci_root_add(), which in principle may cause problems to
happen in two ways. First, the BIOS may refuse to give control of
the PCIe Capability Structure if it is not asked for any of the
_OSC features depending on it at the same time. Second, the BIOS may
assume that control of the _OSC features depending on the PCIe
Capability Structure will be requested in the future and may behave
incorrectly if that doesn't happen. For this reason, control of
the PCIe Capability Structure should always be requested along with
control of any other _OSC features that may depend on it (ie. PCIe
native PME, PCIe native hot-plug, PCIe AER).
Rework the PCIe port driver so that (1) it checks which native PCIe
port services can be enabled, according to the BIOS, and (2) it
requests control of all these services simultaneously. In
particular, this causes pcie_portdrv_probe() to fail if the BIOS
refuses to grant control of the PCIe Capability Structure, which
means that no native PCIe port services can be enabled for the PCIe
Root Complex the given port belongs to. If that happens, ASPM is
disabled to avoid problems with mishandling it by the part of the
PCIe hierarchy for which control of the PCIe Capability Structure
has not been received.
Make it possible to override this behavior using 'pcie_ports=native'
(use the PCIe native services regardless of the BIOS response to the
control request), or 'pcie_ports=compat' (do not use the PCIe native
services at all).
Accordingly, rework the existing PCIe port service drivers so that
they don't request control of the services directly.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Bjorn Helgaas