Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Robin Holt 1b3a5d02ee reboot: move arch/x86 reboot= handling to generic kernel
Merge together the unicore32, arm, and x86 reboot= command line
parameter handling.

Signed-off-by: Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>
Cc: Russ Anderson <rja@sgi.com>
Cc: Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>
Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-07-09 10:33:29 -07:00
H. Peter Anvin 650513979a x86-64, reboot: Allow reboot=bios and reboot-cpu override on x86-64
With the revamped realmode trampoline code, it is trivial to extend
support for reboot=bios to x86-64.  Furthermore, while we are at it,
remove the restriction that only we can only override the reboot CPU
on 32 bits.

Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-jopx7y6g6dbcx4tpal8q0jlr@git.kernel.org
2012-06-17 10:51:01 -07:00
H. Peter Anvin 14d7ca5c57 x86: attempt reboot via port CF9 if we have standard PCI ports
Impact: Changes reboot behavior.

If port CF9 seems to be safe to touch, attempt it before trying the
keyboard controller.  Port CF9 is not available on all chipsets (a
significant but decreasing number of modern chipsets don't implement
it), but port CF9 itself should in general be safe to poke (no ill
effects if unimplemented) on any system which has PCI Configuration
Method #1 or #2, as it falls inside the PCI configuration port range
in both cases.  No chipset without PCI is known to have port CF9,
either, although an explicit "pci=bios" would mean we miss this and
therefore don't use port CF9.  An explicit "reboot=pci" can be used to
force the use of port CF9.

Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
2008-11-11 16:19:48 -08:00
H. Peter Anvin 1965aae3c9 x86: Fix ASM_X86__ header guards
Change header guards named "ASM_X86__*" to "_ASM_X86_*" since:

a. the double underscore is ugly and pointless.
b. no leading underscore violates namespace constraints.

Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
2008-10-22 22:55:23 -07:00
Al Viro bb8985586b x86, um: ... and asm-x86 move
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
2008-10-22 22:55:20 -07:00