Currently, there is very limited power management support
available in the upstream vfio_pci_core based drivers. If there
are no users of the device, then the PCI device will be moved into
D3hot state by writing directly into PCI PM registers. This D3hot
state help in saving power but we can achieve zero power consumption
if we go into the D3cold state. The D3cold state cannot be possible
with native PCI PM. It requires interaction with platform firmware
which is system-specific. To go into low power states (including D3cold),
the runtime PM framework can be used which internally interacts with PCI
and platform firmware and puts the device into the lowest possible
D-States.
This patch registers vfio_pci_core based drivers with the
runtime PM framework.
1. The PCI core framework takes care of most of the runtime PM
related things. For enabling the runtime PM, the PCI driver needs to
decrement the usage count and needs to provide 'struct dev_pm_ops'
at least. The runtime suspend/resume callbacks are optional and needed
only if we need to do any extra handling. Now there are multiple
vfio_pci_core based drivers. Instead of assigning the
'struct dev_pm_ops' in individual parent driver, the vfio_pci_core
itself assigns the 'struct dev_pm_ops'. There are other drivers where
the 'struct dev_pm_ops' is being assigned inside core layer
(For example, wlcore_probe() and some sound based driver, etc.).
2. This patch provides the stub implementation of 'struct dev_pm_ops'.
The subsequent patch will provide the runtime suspend/resume
callbacks. All the config state saving, and PCI power management
related things will be done by PCI core framework itself inside its
runtime suspend/resume callbacks (pci_pm_runtime_suspend() and
pci_pm_runtime_resume()).
3. Inside pci_reset_bus(), all the devices in dev_set needs to be
runtime resumed. vfio_pci_dev_set_pm_runtime_get() will take
care of the runtime resume and its error handling.
4. Inside vfio_pci_core_disable(), the device usage count always needs
to be decremented which was incremented in vfio_pci_core_enable().
5. Since the runtime PM framework will provide the same functionality,
so directly writing into PCI PM config register can be replaced with
the use of runtime PM routines. Also, the use of runtime PM can help
us in more power saving.
In the systems which do not support D3cold,
With the existing implementation:
// PCI device
# cat /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000\:01\:00.0/power_state
D3hot
// upstream bridge
# cat /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000\:00\:01.0/power_state
D0
With runtime PM:
// PCI device
# cat /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000\:01\:00.0/power_state
D3hot
// upstream bridge
# cat /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000\:00\:01.0/power_state
D3hot
So, with runtime PM, the upstream bridge or root port will also go
into lower power state which is not possible with existing
implementation.
In the systems which support D3cold,
// PCI device
# cat /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000\:01\:00.0/power_state
D3hot
// upstream bridge
# cat /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000\:00\:01.0/power_state
D0
With runtime PM:
// PCI device
# cat /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000\:01\:00.0/power_state
D3cold
// upstream bridge
# cat /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000\:00\:01.0/power_state
D3cold
So, with runtime PM, both the PCI device and upstream bridge will
go into D3cold state.
6. If 'disable_idle_d3' module parameter is set, then also the runtime
PM will be enabled, but in this case, the usage count should not be
decremented.
7. vfio_pci_dev_set_try_reset() return value is unused now, so this
function return type can be changed to void.
8. Use the runtime PM API's in vfio_pci_core_sriov_configure().
The device can be in low power state either with runtime
power management (when there is no user) or PCI_PM_CTRL register
write by the user. In both the cases, the PF should be moved to
D0 state. For preventing any runtime usage mismatch, pci_num_vf()
has been called explicitly during disable.
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sahu <abhsahu@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220518111612.16985-5-abhsahu@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
According to [PCIe v5 9.6.2] for PF Device Power Management States
"The PF's power management state (D-state) has global impact on its
associated VFs. If a VF does not implement the Power Management
Capability, then it behaves as if it is in an equivalent
power state of its associated PF.
If a VF implements the Power Management Capability, the Device behavior
is undefined if the PF is placed in a lower power state than the VF.
Software should avoid this situation by placing all VFs in lower power
state before lowering their associated PF's power state."
From the vfio driver side, user can enable SR-IOV when the PF is in D3hot
state. If VF does not implement the Power Management Capability, then
the VF will be actually in D3hot state and then the VF BAR access will
fail. If VF implements the Power Management Capability, then VF will
assume that its current power state is D0 when the PF is D3hot and
in this case, the behavior is undefined.
To support PF power management, we need to create power management
dependency between PF and its VF's. The runtime power management support
may help with this where power management dependencies are supported
through device links. But till we have such support in place, we can
disallow the PF to go into low power state, if PF has VF enabled.
There can be a case, where user first enables the VF's and then
disables the VF's. If there is no user of PF, then the PF can put into
D3hot state again. But with this patch, the PF will still be in D0
state after disabling VF's since detecting this case inside
vfio_pci_core_sriov_configure() requires access to
struct vfio_device::open_count along with its locks. But the subsequent
patches related to runtime PM will handle this case since runtime PM
maintains its own usage count.
Also, vfio_pci_core_sriov_configure() can be called at any time
(with and without vfio pci device user), so the power state change
and SR-IOV enablement need to be protected with the required locks.
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sahu <abhsahu@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220518111612.16985-3-abhsahu@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
VFIO PCI does a security check as part of hot reset to prove that the user
has permission to manipulate all the devices that will be impacted by the
reset.
Use a new API vfio_file_has_dev() to perform this security check against
the struct file directly and remove the vfio_group from VFIO PCI.
Since VFIO PCI was the last user of vfio_group_get_external_user() and
vfio_group_put_external_user() remove it as well.
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8-v3-f7729924a7ea+25e33-vfio_kvm_no_group_jgg@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
The last user of this function is in PCI callbacks that want to convert
their struct pci_dev to a vfio_device. Instead of searching use the
vfio_device available trivially through the drvdata.
When a callback in the device_driver is called, the caller must hold the
device_lock() on dev. The purpose of the device_lock is to prevent
remove() from being called (see __device_release_driver), and allow the
driver to safely interact with its drvdata without races.
The PCI core correctly follows this and holds the device_lock() when
calling error_detected (see report_error_detected) and
sriov_configure (see sriov_numvfs_store).
Further, since the drvdata holds a positive refcount on the vfio_device
any access of the drvdata, under the device_lock(), from a driver callback
needs no further protection or refcounting.
Thus the remark in the vfio_device_get_from_dev() comment does not apply
here, VFIO PCI drivers all call vfio_unregister_group_dev() from their
remove callbacks under the device_lock() and cannot race with the
remaining callers.
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/2-v4-c841817a0349+8f-vfio_get_from_dev_jgg@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Having a consistent pointer in the drvdata will allow the next patch to
make use of the drvdata from some of the core code helpers.
Use a WARN_ON inside vfio_pci_core_register_device() to detect drivers
that miss this.
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1-v4-c841817a0349+8f-vfio_get_from_dev_jgg@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
get_pf_vdev() tries to check if a PF is a VFIO PF by looking at the driver:
if (pci_dev_driver(physfn) != pci_dev_driver(vdev->pdev)) {
However now that we have multiple VF and PF drivers this is no longer
reliable.
This means that security tests realted to vf_token can be skipped by
mixing and matching different VFIO PCI drivers.
Instead of trying to use the driver core to find the PF devices maintain a
linked list of all PF vfio_pci_core_device's that we have called
pci_enable_sriov() on.
When registering a VF just search the list to see if the PF is present and
record the match permanently in the struct. PCI core locking prevents a PF
from passing pci_disable_sriov() while VF drivers are attached so the VFIO
owned PF becomes a static property of the VF.
In common cases where vfio does not own the PF the global list remains
empty and the VF's pointer is statically NULL.
This also fixes a lockdep splat from recursive locking of the
vfio_group::device_lock between vfio_device_get_from_name() and
vfio_device_get_from_dev(). If the VF and PF share the same group this
would deadlock.
Fixes: ff53edf6d6 ("vfio/pci: Split the pci_driver code out of vfio_pci_core.c")
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/0-v3-876570980634+f2e8-vfio_vf_token_jgg@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Expose vfio_pci_core_aer_err_detected() to be used by drivers as part of
their pci_error_handlers structure.
Next patch for mlx5 driver will use it.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220224142024.147653-15-yishaih@nvidia.com
Reviewed-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Invoke a new device op 'device_feature' to handle just the data array
portion of the command. This lifts the ioctl validation to the core code
and makes it simpler for either the core code, or layered drivers, to
implement their own feature values.
Provide vfio_check_feature() to consolidate checking the flags/etc against
what the driver supports.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220224142024.147653-9-yishaih@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
If 'vfio_pci_core_device::needs_pm_restore' is set (PCI device does
not have No_Soft_Reset bit set in its PMCSR config register), then the
current PCI state will be saved locally in
'vfio_pci_core_device::pm_save' during D0->D3hot transition and same
will be restored back during D3hot->D0 transition. For reset-related
functionalities, vfio driver uses PCI reset API's. These
API's internally change the PCI power state back to D0 first if
the device power state is non-D0. This state change to D0 will happen
without the involvement of vfio driver.
Let's consider the following example:
1. The device is in D3hot.
2. User invokes VFIO_DEVICE_RESET ioctl.
3. pci_try_reset_function() will be called which internally
invokes pci_dev_save_and_disable().
4. pci_set_power_state(dev, PCI_D0) will be called first.
5. pci_save_state() will happen then.
Now, for the devices which has NoSoftRst-, the pci_set_power_state()
can trigger soft reset and the original PCI config state will be lost
at step (4) and this state cannot be restored again. This original PCI
state can include any setting which is performed by SBIOS or host
linux kernel (for example LTR, ASPM L1 substates, etc.). When this
soft reset will be triggered, then all these settings will be reset,
and the device state saved at step (5) will also have this setting
cleared so it cannot be restored. Since the vfio driver only exposes
limited PCI capabilities to its user, so the vfio driver user also
won't have the option to save and restore these capabilities state
either and these original settings will be permanently lost.
For pci_reset_bus() also, we can have the above situation.
The other functions/devices can be in D3hot and the reset will change
the power state of all devices to D0 without the involvement of vfio
driver.
So, before calling any reset-related API's, we need to make sure that
the device state is D0. This is mainly to preserve the state around
soft reset.
For vfio_pci_core_disable(), we use __pci_reset_function_locked()
which internally can use pci_pm_reset() for the function reset.
pci_pm_reset() requires the device power state to be in D0, otherwise
it returns error.
This patch changes the device power state to D0 by invoking
vfio_pci_set_power_state() explicitly before calling any reset related
API's.
Fixes: 51ef3a004b ("vfio/pci: Restore device state on PM transition")
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sahu <abhsahu@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220217122107.22434-3-abhsahu@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
If 'vfio_pci_core_device::needs_pm_restore' is set (PCI device does
not have No_Soft_Reset bit set in its PMCSR config register), then
the current PCI state will be saved locally in
'vfio_pci_core_device::pm_save' during D0->D3hot transition and same
will be restored back during D3hot->D0 transition.
For saving the PCI state locally, pci_store_saved_state() is being
used and the pci_load_and_free_saved_state() will free the allocated
memory.
But for reset related IOCTLs, vfio driver calls PCI reset-related
API's which will internally change the PCI power state back to D0. So,
when the guest resumes, then it will get the current state as D0 and it
will skip the call to vfio_pci_set_power_state() for changing the
power state to D0 explicitly. In this case, the memory pointed by
'pm_save' will never be freed. In a malicious sequence, the state changing
to D3hot followed by VFIO_DEVICE_RESET/VFIO_DEVICE_PCI_HOT_RESET can be
run in a loop and it can cause an OOM situation.
This patch frees the earlier allocated memory first before overwriting
'pm_save' to prevent the mentioned memory leak.
Fixes: 51ef3a004b ("vfio/pci: Restore device state on PM transition")
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sahu <abhsahu@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220217122107.22434-2-abhsahu@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
We don't need to hold a reference to the group in the driver as well as
obtain a reference to the same group as the first thing
vfio_register_group_dev() does.
Since the drivers never use the group move this all into the core code.
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210924155705.4258-2-hch@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
The function prototype is missing an identifier name. Add one.
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210902212631.54260-1-colin.king@canonical.com
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
- Fix dma-valid return WAITED implementation (Anthony Yznaga)
- SPDX license cleanups (Cai Huoqing)
- Split vfio-pci-core from vfio-pci and enhance PCI driver matching
to support future vendor provided vfio-pci variants (Yishai Hadas,
Max Gurtovoy, Jason Gunthorpe)
- Replace duplicated reflck with core support for managing first
open, last close, and device sets (Jason Gunthorpe, Max Gurtovoy,
Yishai Hadas)
- Fix non-modular mdev support and don't nag about request callback
support (Christoph Hellwig)
- Add semaphore to protect instruction intercept handler and replace
open-coded locks in vfio-ap driver (Tony Krowiak)
- Convert vfio-ap to vfio_register_group_dev() API (Jason Gunthorpe)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=nzK7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'vfio-v5.15-rc1' of git://github.com/awilliam/linux-vfio
Pull VFIO updates from Alex Williamson:
- Fix dma-valid return WAITED implementation (Anthony Yznaga)
- SPDX license cleanups (Cai Huoqing)
- Split vfio-pci-core from vfio-pci and enhance PCI driver matching to
support future vendor provided vfio-pci variants (Yishai Hadas, Max
Gurtovoy, Jason Gunthorpe)
- Replace duplicated reflck with core support for managing first open,
last close, and device sets (Jason Gunthorpe, Max Gurtovoy, Yishai
Hadas)
- Fix non-modular mdev support and don't nag about request callback
support (Christoph Hellwig)
- Add semaphore to protect instruction intercept handler and replace
open-coded locks in vfio-ap driver (Tony Krowiak)
- Convert vfio-ap to vfio_register_group_dev() API (Jason Gunthorpe)
* tag 'vfio-v5.15-rc1' of git://github.com/awilliam/linux-vfio: (37 commits)
vfio/pci: Introduce vfio_pci_core.ko
vfio: Use kconfig if XX/endif blocks instead of repeating 'depends on'
vfio: Use select for eventfd
PCI / VFIO: Add 'override_only' support for VFIO PCI sub system
PCI: Add 'override_only' field to struct pci_device_id
vfio/pci: Move module parameters to vfio_pci.c
vfio/pci: Move igd initialization to vfio_pci.c
vfio/pci: Split the pci_driver code out of vfio_pci_core.c
vfio/pci: Include vfio header in vfio_pci_core.h
vfio/pci: Rename ops functions to fit core namings
vfio/pci: Rename vfio_pci_device to vfio_pci_core_device
vfio/pci: Rename vfio_pci_private.h to vfio_pci_core.h
vfio/pci: Rename vfio_pci.c to vfio_pci_core.c
vfio/ap_ops: Convert to use vfio_register_group_dev()
s390/vfio-ap: replace open coded locks for VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY_SET_KVM notification
s390/vfio-ap: r/w lock for PQAP interception handler function pointer
vfio/type1: Fix vfio_find_dma_valid return
vfio-pci/zdev: Remove repeated verbose license text
vfio: platform: reset: Convert to SPDX identifier
vfio: Remove struct vfio_device_ops open/release
...
Now that vfio_pci has been split into two source modules, one focusing on
the "struct pci_driver" (vfio_pci.c) and a toolbox library of code
(vfio_pci_core.c), complete the split and move them into two different
kernel modules.
As before vfio_pci.ko continues to present the same interface under sysfs
and this change will have no functional impact.
Splitting into another module and adding exports allows creating new HW
specific VFIO PCI drivers that can implement device specific
functionality, such as VFIO migration interfaces or specialized device
requirements.
Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210826103912.128972-14-yishaih@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
This is a preparation before splitting vfio_pci.ko to 2 modules.
As module parameters are a kind of uAPI they need to stay on vfio_pci.ko
to avoid a user visible impact.
For now continue to keep the implementation of these options in
vfio_pci_core.c. Arguably they are vfio_pci functionality, but further
splitting of vfio_pci_core.c will be better done in another series
Signed-off-by: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210826103912.128972-9-yishaih@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
igd is related to the vfio_pci pci_driver implementation, move it out of
vfio_pci_core.c.
This is preparation for splitting vfio_pci.ko into 2 drivers.
Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210826103912.128972-8-yishaih@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Split the vfio_pci driver into two logical parts, the 'struct
pci_driver' (vfio_pci.c) which implements "Generic VFIO support for any
PCI device" and a library of code (vfio_pci_core.c) that helps
implementing a struct vfio_device on top of a PCI device.
vfio_pci.ko continues to present the same interface under sysfs and this
change should have no functional impact.
Following patches will turn vfio_pci and vfio_pci_core into a separate
module.
This is a preparation for allowing another module to provide the
pci_driver and allow that module to customize how VFIO is setup, inject
its own operations, and easily extend vendor specific functionality.
At this point the vfio_pci_core still contains a lot of vfio_pci
functionality mixed into it. Following patches will move more of the
large scale items out, but another cleanup series will be needed to get
everything.
Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210826103912.128972-7-yishaih@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
The vfio_device structure is embedded into the vfio_pci_core_device
structure, so there is no reason for not including the header file in
the vfio_pci_core header as well.
Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210826103912.128972-6-yishaih@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
This is another preparation patch for separating the vfio_pci driver to
a subsystem driver and a generic pci driver. This patch doesn't change
any logic.
Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210826103912.128972-5-yishaih@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
This is a preparation patch for separating the vfio_pci driver to a
subsystem driver and a generic pci driver. This patch doesn't change any
logic.
The new vfio_pci_core_device structure will be the main structure of the
core driver and later on vfio_pci_device structure will be the main
structure of the generic vfio_pci driver.
Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210826103912.128972-4-yishaih@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
This is a preparation patch for separating the vfio_pci driver to a
subsystem driver and a generic pci driver. This patch doesn't change any
logic.
Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210826103912.128972-3-yishaih@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
This is a preparation patch for separating the vfio_pci driver to a
subsystem driver and a generic pci driver. This patch doesn't change any
logic.
Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210826103912.128972-2-yishaih@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Abhishek Sahu