Frontbuffer rendering and page flips can race with each other
and this can potentialy cause issues with PSR2 selective fetch.
And because pipe/crtc updates are time sentive we can't grab the
PSR lock after intel_pipe_update_start() and before
intel_pipe_update_end().
So here adding the lock and unlock functions and calls, the
proper PSR2 selective fetch handling will come in a separated patch.
v2:
- fixed new functions documentation
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220405155344.47219-2-jose.souza@intel.com
PSR2 apparently requires some planes to be enabled for some
silly reason, and so we are now trying to turn PSR off before
planes go off. Except during a full modeset that is handled
less clearly through reorganization of the modeset sequence.
That is not great as it makes the code mode complex, and
prevents us from doing nice things such as just turning off
all the planes at the very start of the modeset. So let's
move the PSR pre_plane_update() thing to a spot where it
will handle both full modesets and everything else.
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211022103304.24164-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
PSR always had a requirement to only be enabled if there is active
planes but not following that never caused any issues.
But that changes in Alderlake-P, leaving PSR enabled without
active planes causes transcoder/port underruns.
Similar behavior was fixed during the pipe disable sequence by
commit 84030adb9e ("drm/i915/display: Disable audio, DRRS and PSR before planes").
intel_dp_compute_psr_vsc_sdp() had to move from
intel_psr_enable_locked() to intel_psr_compute_config() because we
need to be able to disable/enable PSR from atomic states without
connector and encoder state.
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210922215242.66683-3-jose.souza@intel.com
We were not completely following the selective fetch programming
sequence, here some things we were doing wrong:
- not programming plane selective fetch a PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL registers
when doing a modeset
- programming PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL out of vblank
With this changes the last remainig underrun found in Alderlake-P is
fixed.
Bspec: 55229
Tested-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210922215242.66683-2-jose.souza@intel.com
This introduces the following function that can exit and activate a psr
source when intel_psr is already enabled.
- intel_psr_pause(): Pause current PSR. It deactivates current psr state.
- intel_psr_resume(): Resume paused PSR. It activates paused psr state.
v2: Address Jose's review comment.
- Remove unneeded changes around the intel_psr_enable().
- Add intel_psr_post_exit() which processes waiting until PSR is idle
and WA for SelectiveFetch.
v3: Address Jose's review comment.
- Rename intel_psr_post_exit() to intel_psr_wait_exit_locked().
- Move WA_1408330847 to intel_psr_disable_locked()
- If the PSR is paused by an explicit intel_psr_paused() call, make the
intel_psr_flush() not to activate PSR.
v4: Address Jose's review comment.
- In order to avoid the scenario of PSR is not active but there is a
scheduled psr->work, it changes the check routine of intel_psr_pause()
for PSR's enablement from "psr->active" to "psr->enable".
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210608085415.515342-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
So far if we had a mismatch between the state asked and what was
programmed in hardware for PSR, this mismatch would go unnoticed.
So here adding the PSR to the hardware configuration readout,
EDP_PSR_CTL and EDP_PSR2_CTL can't be directly read because its state
flips due to other factors like frontbuffer modifications and CRC.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210418002126.87882-1-jose.souza@intel.com
It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and
DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder
supportable PSR.
And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to
intel_dp's intel_psr structure.
It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting
multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of
enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with
a single transcoder PSR case yet.
v2: Fix indentation and add comments
v3: Remove Blank line
v4: Rebased
v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment.
- Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector()
v6: Address Anshuman's review comments
- Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of
a single pipe PSR
v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder
PSR on BDW+
v8: Address Anshuman's review comments
- Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn()
v9: Fix commit message
v10: Rebased
v11: Address Jose's review comment.
- Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl().
- In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private.
- Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR.
v12: Address Jose's review comment.
- Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into
commit_pipe_config().
- Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original
on i915_psr_sink_status_show().
- Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function.
- In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on
intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder.
- Add an whitespace to comments.
v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment.
- Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro.
- In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe,
fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush().
- Remove redundant or unneeded codes.
- Update comments.
v14: Address Jose's review comment
- Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and
for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro.
- Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure.
- Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support.
- Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from
psr_compute_config().
- Remove redundant or unneeded codes.
v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from
intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl()
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com>
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
Replace the previous approach to force compute the initial PSR state
after i915 take over from firmware by the better and recently added
initial_fastset_check() hook.
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201102221048.104294-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Another step towards PSR2 selective fetch, here programming plane
selective fetch registers and MAN_TRK_CTL enabling selective fetch but
for now it is fetching the whole area of the planes.
The damaged area calculation will come as next and final step.
v2:
- removed warn on when no plane is visible in state
- removed calculations using plane damaged area in
intel_psr2_program_plane_sel_fetch()
v3:
- do not shift 16 positions the plane dst coordinates, only src is
shifted
v4:
- only setting PLANE_SEL_FETCH_CTL_ENABLE and MCURSOR_MODE in
PLANE_SEL_FETCH_CTL
v5:
- not masking bits for cursor
BSpec: 55229
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201007195238.53955-3-jose.souza@intel.com
All GEN12 platforms supports PSR2 selective fetch but not all GEN12
platforms supports PSR2 hardware tracking(aka RKL).
This feature consists in software programming registers with the
damaged area of each plane this way hardware will only fetch from
memory those areas and sent the PSR2 selective update blocks to panel,
saving even more power.
But as initial step it is only enabling the full frame fetch at
every flip, the actual selective fetch part will come in a future
patch.
Also this is only handling the page flip side, it is still completely
missing frontbuffer modifications, that is why the
enable_psr2_sel_fetch parameter was added.
v3:
- calling intel_psr2_sel_fetch_update() during the atomic check phase
(Ville)
BSpec: 55229
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200810174144.76761-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
In order to use a common VSC SDP Colorimetry calculating code on PSR,
it uses a new psr vsc sdp compute routine.
Because PSR routine has its own scenario and timings of writing a VSC SDP,
the current PSR routine needs to have its own drm_dp_vsc_sdp structure
member variable on struct i915_psr.
In order to calculate colorimetry information, intel_psr_update()
function and intel_psr_enable() function extend a drm_connector_state
argument.
There are no changes to PSR mechanism.
v3: Replace a structure name to drm_dp_vsc_sdp from intel_dp_vsc_sdp
v4: Rebased
v8: Rebased
v10: When a PSR is enabled, it needs to add DP_SDP_VSC to
infoframes.enable.
It is needed for comparing between HW and pipe_state of VSC_SDP.
v11: If PSR is disabled by flag, it don't enable psr on pipe compute.
v12: Fix an inconsistent indenting
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200514060732.3378396-15-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
Commit 60c6a14b48 ("drm/i915/display: Force the state compute phase
once to enable PSR") was forcing the state compute too earlier
causing errors because not everything was initialized, so here
moving to the end of i915_driver_modeset_probe() when the display is
all initialized.
Also fixing the place where it disarm the force probe as during the
atomic check phase errors could happen like the ones due locking and
it would cause PSR to never be enabled if that happens.
Leaving the disarm to the atomic commit phase, intel_psr_enable() or
intel_psr_update() will be called even if the current state do not
allow PSR to be enabled.
v2: Check if intel_dp is null in intel_psr_force_mode_changed_set()
v3: Check intel_dp before get dev_priv
v4:
- renamed intel_psr_force_mode_changed_set() to
intel_psr_set_force_mode_changed()
- removed the set parameter from intel_psr_set_force_mode_changed()
- not calling intel_psr_set_force_mode_changed() from
intel_psr_enable/update(), directly setting it after the same checks
that intel_psr_set_force_mode_changed() does
- moved intel_psr_set_force_mode_changed() arm call to
i915_driver_modeset_probe() as it is a better for a PSR call, all the
functions calls happening between the old and the new function call
will cause issue
Fixes: 60c6a14b48 ("drm/i915/display: Force the state compute phase once to enable PSR")
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1151
Tested-by: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@google.com>
Reported-by: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@google.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200221212635.11614-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Recent improvements in the state tracking in i915 caused PSR to not be
enabled when reusing firmware/BIOS modeset, this is due to all initial
commits returning ealier in intel_atomic_check() as needs_modeset()
is always false.
To fix that here forcing the state compute phase in CRTC that is
driving the eDP that supports PSR once. Enable or disable PSR do not
require a fullmodeset, so user will still experience glitch free boot
process plus the power savings that PSR brings.
It was tried to set mode_changed in intel_initial_commit() but at
this point the connectors are not registered causing a crash when
computing encoder state.
v2:
- removed function return
- change arguments to match intel_hdcp_atomic_check
v3:
- replaced drm includes in intel_psr.h by forward declaration(Jani)
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112253
Reported-by: <s.zharkoff@gmail.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200106152128.195171-1-jose.souza@intel.com
No need to unmask PSR interrutpion if PSR is not enabled, better move
the call to intel_psr_enable_source().
v2: Renamed intel_psr_irq_control() to psr_irq_control() (Lucas)
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190820223325.27490-3-jose.souza@intel.com
Now that we have a new subdirectory for display code, continue by moving
modesetting core code.
display/intel_frontbuffer.h sticks out like a sore thumb, otherwise this
is, again, a surprisingly clean operation.
v2:
- don't move intel_sideband.[ch] (Ville)
- use tabs for Makefile file lists and sort them
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Acked-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190613084416.6794-3-jani.nikula@intel.com
José Roberto de Souza