It turns out if you call ldlm_pools_fini without completing the
ldlm_pools_init, then attempt to unregister not yet registered
shrinkers makes the kernel very unhappy.
So make sure we have them registered first.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ldebugfs_remove is usually called on directories with files passed in
as attributes, so simple debugfs_remove failes on them as not empty
Switch to debugfs_remove_recursive.
This fixes a number of problems where a new filesystem is mounted after
being unmounted first.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This helps to avoid use after free on unmount.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Apparently m86k cannot build if you include asm/irq.h before
linux/* includes and fixing it there is hard.
So just move asm/irq.h include to where it does not cause any problems.
Thanks to Geert Uytterhoeven for getting to the root of it.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
Compile-Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Remove initialization of a variable that is immediately reassigned.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
type T;
identifier x;
constant C;
expression e;
@@
T x
- = C
;
x = e;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Remove initialization of a variable that is immediately reassigned.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
type T;
identifier x;
constant C;
expression e;
@@
T x
- = C
;
x = e;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Remove initialization of a variable that is immediately reassigned.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
type T;
identifier x;
constant C;
expression e;
@@
T x
- = C
;
x = e;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Remove initialization of a variable that is immediately reassigned.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
type T;
identifier x;
constant C;
expression e;
@@
T x
- = C
;
x = e;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Remove initialization of a variable that is immediately reassigned.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
type T;
identifier x;
constant C;
expression e;
@@
T x
- = C
;
x = e;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
!x is more normal for kzalloc failure in the kernel.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
expression x;
statement S1, S2;
@@
x = kzalloc(...);
if (
- x == NULL
+ !x
) S1 else S2
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
!x is more normal for kzalloc failure in the kernel.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
expression x;
statement S1, S2;
@@
x = kzalloc(...);
if (
- x == NULL
+ !x
) S1 else S2
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
!x is more normal for kzalloc failure in the kernel.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
expression x;
statement S1, S2;
@@
x = kzalloc(...);
if (
- x == NULL
+ !x
) S1 else S2
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
!x is more normal for kzalloc failure in the kernel.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
expression x;
statement S1, S2;
@@
x = kzalloc(...);
if (
- x == NULL
+ !x
) S1 else S2
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
!x is more normal for kzalloc failure in the kernel.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
expression x;
statement S1, S2;
@@
x = kzalloc(...);
if (
- x == NULL
+ !x
) S1 else S2
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
!x is more normal for kzalloc failure in the kernel.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
expression x;
statement S1, S2;
@@
x = kzalloc(...);
if (
- x == NULL
+ !x
) S1 else S2
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
!x is more normal for kzalloc failure in the kernel.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
expression x;
statement S1, S2;
@@
x = kzalloc(...);
if (
- x == NULL
+ !x
) S1 else S2
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
!x is more normal for kzalloc failure in the kernel.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
expression x;
statement S1, S2;
@@
x = kzalloc(...);
if (
- x == NULL
+ !x
) S1 else S2
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
!x is more normal for kzalloc failure in the kernel.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
expression x;
statement S1, S2;
@@
x = kzalloc(...);
if (
- x == NULL
+ !x
) S1 else S2
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
!x is more normal for kzalloc failure in the kernel.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
expression x;
statement S1, S2;
@@
x = kzalloc(...);
if (
- x == NULL
+ !x
) S1 else S2
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
!x is more normal for kzalloc failure in the kernel.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
expression x;
statement S1, S2;
@@
x = kzalloc(...);
if (
- x == NULL
+ !x
) S1 else S2
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
!x is more normal for kzalloc failure in the kernel.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
expression x;
statement S1, S2;
@@
x = kzalloc(...);
if (
- x == NULL
+ !x
) S1 else S2
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Fixed explicit initialization of global pointer variable.
GCC takes care of this implicitly.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <dmachon.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Removed {} for single statement if block
Signed-off-by: Prasanna Karthik <mkarthi3@visteon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Switch printks with IP addresses to use vsprintf extension %pI4.
Suggested-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Luis de Bethencourt <luis@debethencourt.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Fix typo "packe" to "packet".
Signed-off-by: Luis de Bethencourt <luis@debethencourt.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Fix all checkpatch.pl warnings:
WARNING: unnecessary whitespace before a quoted newline
Signed-off-by: Luis de Bethencourt <luis@debethencourt.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Fix all checkpatch.pl warnings:
WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
Signed-off-by: Luis de Bethencourt <luis@debethencourt.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Removing all checkpatch.pl warnings:
WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
Signed-off-by: Luis de Bethencourt <luis@debethencourt.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This patch removes the warnings reported by checkpatch.pl on the line
over 80 characters.
Signed-off-by: Sunghoon Cho <ywhsbliss@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This patch adds a blank line right after a struct declaration.
Signed-off-by: Sunghoon Cho <ywhsbliss@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This patch removes the warnings reported by checkpatch.pl regarding
prohibited spaces between function name and open parenthesis.
Signed-off-by: Sunghoon Cho <ywhsbliss@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Remove variable that is defined but never used.
Signed-off-by: Chaehyun Lim <chaehyun.lim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Remove if statement that has no any codes.
Signed-off-by: Chaehyun Lim <chaehyun.lim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Fix coding style error by placing spaces around '=' as suggested by
checkpatch.pl script.
Signed-off-by: Sunil Shahu <shshahu@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Luis de Bethencourt <luis@debethencourt.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This patch addresses the checkpatch warning advising the usage of the
BIT macro for Bit shift operation.
Signed-off-by: Hari Prasath Gujulan Elango <hgujulan@visteon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This patch removes a ununsed variable msg_len and its associated code.
Signed-off-by: Hari Prasath Gujulan Elango <hgujulan@visteon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This patch removes the ununsed variable 'priv' at multiple instances and
all its associated code where its assigned a value.
Signed-off-by: Hari Prasath Gujulan Elango <hgujulan@visteon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This patch the removes the redundant assignement of the variable ret as
its being overwritren before being used anywhere.
Signed-off-by: Hari Prasath Gujulan Elango <hgujulan@visteon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This patch removes a unused variable timeout and the associated code.
Signed-off-by: Hari Prasath Gujulan Elango <hgujulan@visteon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This patch removes a couple of ununsed variable.The lines in which these
variables are assigned are also removed as they are not necessary.
Signed-off-by: Hari Prasath Gujulan Elango <hgujulan@visteon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This patch removes ununsed if..else... code blocks. Its actually some
dead code.
Signed-off-by: Hari Prasath Gujulan Elango <hgujulan@visteon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This patch removes the redundant initialization of the variable 'st' as
it is reassigned a new value before its being used anywhere else.
Signed-off-by: Hari Prasath Gujulan Elango <hgujulan@visteon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This patch removes a unused variable 'u16RespLen' that is assigned a
value that is never used. The line that does the assignment is also
removed.
Signed-off-by: Hari Prasath Gujulan Elango <hgujulan@visteon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Fix checkpatch warning found by checkpatch.pl
WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
Signed-off-by: Chaehyun Lim <chaehyun.lim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Fix checkpatch warning found by checkpatch.pl
WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
Signed-off-by: Chaehyun Lim <chaehyun.lim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Fix checkpatch warning found by checkpatch.pl
WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
Signed-off-by: Chaehyun Lim <chaehyun.lim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Fix checkpatch warning found by checkpatch.pl
WARNING: space prohibited between function name and open parenthesis '('
Signed-off-by: Chaehyun Lim <chaehyun.lim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Oleg Drokin