This flag was historically used to indicate that a clk is a "basic" type
of clk like a mux, divider, gate, etc. This never turned out to be very
useful though because it was hard to cleanly split "basic" clks from
other clks in a system. This one flag was a way for type introspection
and it just didn't scale. If anything, it was used by the TI clk driver
to indicate that a clk_hw wasn't contained in the SoC specific clk
structure. We can get rid of this define now that TI is finding those
clks a different way.
Cc: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>
Cc: James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
Cc: <linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org>
Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Omit extra messages for a memory allocation failure in these
functions.
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
We're removing struct clk from the clk provider API, so switch
this code to using the clk_hw based provider APIs.
Cc: Chao Xie <chao.xie@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Some SOCes have this kind of the gate clock
1. There are some bits to control the gate not only one bit.
2. It is not always that "1" is to enable while "0" is to disable
when write register.
So we have to define the "mask", "enable_val", "disable_val" for
this kind of gate clock.
Signed-off-by: Chao Xie <chao.xie@marvell.com>
Acked-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
Stephen Boyd