The following commit introduced a bug when checking for zero length extent
5946d08 ext4: check for overlapping extents in ext4_valid_extent_entries()
Zero length extent could pass the check if lblock is zero.
Adding the explicit check for zero length back.
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
fallocate() checks that the file is extent-based and returns
EOPNOTSUPP in case is not. Other tasks can convert from and to
indirect and extent so it's safe to check only after grabbing
the inode mutex.
Signed-off-by: Davide Italiano <dccitaliano@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Pulls block_write_begin() into fs/ext4/inode.c because it might need
to do a low-level read of the existing data, in which case we need to
decrypt it.
Signed-off-by: Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Ildar Muslukhov <ildarm@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
When xfstests' auto group is run on a bigalloc filesystem with a
4.0-rc3 kernel, e2fsck failures and kernel warnings occur for some
tests. e2fsck reports incorrect iblocks values, and the warnings
indicate that the space reserved for delayed allocation is being
overdrawn at allocation time.
Some of these errors occur because the reserved space is incorrectly
decreased by one cluster when ext4_ext_map_blocks satisfies an
allocation request by mapping an unused portion of a previously
allocated cluster. Because a cluster's worth of reserved space was
already released when it was first allocated, it should not be released
again.
This patch appears to correct the e2fsck failure reported for
generic/232 and the kernel warnings produced by ext4/001, generic/009,
and generic/033. Failures and warnings for some other tests remain to
be addressed.
Signed-off-by: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
In ext4_zero_range(), removing a file's entire block range from the
extent status tree removes all records of that file's delalloc extents.
The delalloc accounting code uses this information, and its loss can
then lead to accounting errors and kernel warnings at writeback time and
subsequent file system damage. This is most noticeable on bigalloc
file systems where code in ext4_ext_map_blocks() handles cases where
delalloc extents share clusters with a newly allocated extent.
Because we're not deleting a block range and are correctly updating the
status of its associated extent, there is no need to remove anything
from the extent status tree.
When this patch is combined with an unrelated bug fix for
ext4_zero_range(), kernel warnings and e2fsck errors reported during
xfstests runs on bigalloc filesystems are greatly reduced without
introducing regressions on other xfstests-bld test scenarios.
Signed-off-by: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Currently there is a bug in zero range code which causes zero range
calls to only allocate block aligned portion of the range, while
ignoring the rest in some cases.
In some cases, namely if the end of the range is past i_size, we do
attempt to preallocate the last nonaligned block. However this might
cause kernel to BUG() in some carefully designed zero range requests
on setups where page size > block size.
Fix this problem by first preallocating the entire range, including
the nonaligned edges and converting the written extents to unwritten
in the next step. This approach will also give us the advantage of
having the range to be as linearly contiguous as possible.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Since commit a9b8241594, we are allowed to merge unwritten extents,
so here these comments are wrong, remove it.
Signed-off-by: Xiaoguang Wang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
This reverts commit 14516bb7bb.
This was causing regression test failures with generic/285 with an ext3
filesystem using CONFIG_EXT4_USE_FOR_EXT23.
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
It is ridiculous practice to scan inode block by block, this technique
applicable only for old indirect files. This takes significant amount
of time for really large files. Let's reuse ext4_fiemap which already
traverse inode-tree in most optimal meaner.
TESTCASE:
ftruncate64(fd, 0);
ftruncate64(fd, 1ULL << 40);
/* lseek will spin very long time */
lseek64(fd, 0, SEEK_DATA);
lseek64(fd, 0, SEEK_HOLE);
Original report: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/16/620
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Currently ext4_inline_data_fiemap ignores requested arguments (start
and len) which may lead endless loop if start != 0. Also fix incorrect
extent length determination.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
path[depth].p_hdr can never be NULL for a path passed to us (and even if
it could, EXT_LAST_EXTENT() would make something != NULL from it). So
just remove the branch.
Coverity-id: 1196498
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Currently callers adding extents to extent status tree were responsible
for adding the inode to the list of inodes with freeable extents. This
is error prone and puts list handling in unnecessarily many places.
Just add inode to the list automatically when the first non-delay extent
is added to the tree and remove inode from the list when the last
non-delay extent is removed.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
In this commit we discard the lru algorithm for inodes with extent
status tree because it takes significant effort to maintain a lru list
in extent status tree shrinker and the shrinker can take a long time to
scan this lru list in order to reclaim some objects.
We replace the lru ordering with a simple round-robin. After that we
never need to keep a lru list. That means that the list needn't be
sorted if the shrinker can not reclaim any objects in the first round.
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>
Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Currently extent status tree doesn't cache extent hole when a write
looks up in extent tree to make sure whether a block has been allocated
or not. In this case, we don't put extent hole in extent cache because
later this extent might be removed and a new delayed extent might be
added back. But it will cause a defect when we do a lot of writes. If
we don't put extent hole in extent cache, the following writes also need
to access extent tree to look at whether or not a block has been
allocated. It brings a cache miss. This commit fixes this defect.
Also if the inode doesn't have any extent, this extent hole will be
cached as well.
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>
Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
For bigalloc filesystems we have to check whether newly requested inode
block isn't already part of a cluster for which we already have delayed
allocation reservation. This check happens in ext4_ext_map_blocks() and
that function sets EXT4_MAP_FROM_CLUSTER if that's the case. However if
ext4_da_map_blocks() finds in extent cache information about the block,
we don't call into ext4_ext_map_blocks() and thus we always end up
getting new reservation even if the space for cluster is already
reserved. This results in overreservation and premature ENOSPC reports.
Fix the problem by checking for existing cluster reservation already in
ext4_da_map_blocks(). That simplifies the logic and actually allows us
to get rid of the EXT4_MAP_FROM_CLUSTER flag completely.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
ext4_ext_remove_space() can incorrectly free a partial_cluster if
EAGAIN is encountered while truncating or punching. Extent removal
should be retried in this case.
It also fails to free a partial cluster when the punched region begins
at the start of a file on that unaligned cluster and where the entire
file has not been punched. Remove the requirement that all blocks in
the file must have been freed in order to free the partial cluster.
Signed-off-by: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Add some casts and rearrange a few statements for improved readability.
Some code can also be simplified and made more readable if we set
partial_cluster to 0 rather than to a negative value when we can tell
we've hit the left edge of the punched region.
Signed-off-by: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
The fix in commit ad6599ab3a ("ext4: fix premature freeing of
partial clusters split across leaf blocks"), intended to avoid
dereferencing an invalid extent pointer when determining whether a
partial cluster should be freed, wasn't quite good enough. Assure that
at least one extent remains at the start of the leaf once the hole has
been punched. Otherwise, the pointer to the extent to the right of the
hole will be invalid and a partial cluster will be incorrectly freed.
Set partial_cluster to 0 when we can tell we've hit the left edge of
the punched region within the leaf. This prevents incorrect freeing
of a partial cluster when ext4_ext_rm_leaf is called one last time
during extent tree traversal after the punched region has been removed.
Adjust comments to reflect code changes and a correction. Remove a bit
of dead code.
Signed-off-by: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
The partial_cluster variable is not always initialized correctly when
hole punching on bigalloc file systems. Although commit c063449394
("ext4: fix partial cluster handling for bigalloc file systems")
addressed the case where the right edge of the punched region and the
next extent to its right were within the same leaf, it didn't handle
the case where the next extent to its right is in the next leaf. This
causes xfstest generic/300 to fail.
Fix this by replacing the code in c0634493922 with a more general
solution that can continue the search for the first cluster to the
right of the punched region into the next leaf if present. If found,
partial_cluster is initialized to this cluster's negative value.
There's no need to determine if that cluster is actually shared; we
simply record it so its blocks won't be freed in the event it does
happen to be shared.
Also, minimize the burden on non-bigalloc file systems with some minor
code simplification.
Signed-off-by: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
ext4_ext_convert_to_initialized() can return more blocks than are
actually allocated from map->m_lblk in case where initial part of the
on-disk extent is zeroed out. Luckily this doesn't have serious
consequences because the caller currently uses the return value
only to unmap metadata buffers. Anyway this is a data
corruption/exposure problem waiting to happen so fix it.
Coverity-id: 1226848
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Besides the fact that this replacement improves code readability
it also protects from errors caused direct EXT4_S(sb)->s_es manipulation
which may result attempt to use uninitialized csum machinery.
#Testcase_BEGIN
IMG=/dev/ram0
MNT=/mnt
mkfs.ext4 $IMG
mount $IMG $MNT
#Enable feature directly on disk, on mounted fs
tune2fs -O metadata_csum $IMG
# Provoke metadata update, likey result in OOPS
touch $MNT/test
umount $MNT
#Testcase_END
# Replacement script
@@
expression E;
@@
- EXT4_HAS_RO_COMPAT_FEATURE(E, EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_METADATA_CSUM)
+ ext4_has_metadata_csum(E)
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82201
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
It is reasonable to prepend newly created index to older one.
[ Dropped no longer used function parameter newext. -tytso ]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
The EXT4_STATE_DELALLOC_RESERVED flag was originally implemented
because it was too hard to make sure the mballoc and get_block flags
could be reliably passed down through all of the codepaths that end up
calling ext4_mb_new_blocks().
Since then, we have mb_flags passed down through most of the code
paths, so getting rid of EXT4_STATE_DELALLOC_RESERVED isn't as tricky
as it used to.
This commit plumbs in the last of what is required, and then adds a
WARN_ON check to make sure we haven't missed anything. If this passes
a full regression test run, we can then drop
EXT4_STATE_DELALLOC_RESERVED.
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Now that the semantics of ext4_ext_find_extent() are much cleaner,
it's safe and more efficient to reuse the path object across the
multiple calls to ext4_ext_find_extent() in ext4_ext_shift_extents().
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
This adds additional safety in case for some reason we end reusing a
path structure which isn't big enough for current depth of the inode.
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Teach ext4_ext_drop_refs() to accept a NULL argument, much like
kfree(). This allows us to drop a lot of checks to make sure path is
non-NULL before calling ext4_ext_drop_refs().
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
In nearly all of the calls to ext4_ext_find_extent() where the caller
is trying to recycle the path object, ext4_ext_drop_refs() gets called
to release the buffer heads before the path object gets overwritten.
To simplify things for the callers, and to avoid the possibility of a
memory leak, make ext4_ext_find_extent() responsible for dropping the
buffers.
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Drop EXT4_EX_NOFREE_ON_ERR from ext4_ext_create_new_leaf(),
ext4_split_extent(), ext4_convert_unwritten_extents_endio().
This requires fixing all of their callers to potentially
ext4_ext_find_extent() to free the struct ext4_ext_path object in case
of an error, and there are interlocking dependencies all the way up to
ext4_ext_map_blocks(), ext4_swap_extents(), and
ext4_ext_remove_space().
Once this is done, we can drop the EXT4_EX_NOFREE_ON_ERR flag since it
is no longer necessary.
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
The function ext4_convert_initialized_extents() is only called by a
single function --- ext4_ext_convert_initalized_extents(). Inline the
code and get rid of the unnecessary bits in order to simplify the code.
Rename ext4_ext_convert_initalized_extents() to
convert_initalized_extents() since it's a static function that is
actually only used in a single caller, ext4_ext_map_blocks().
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Right now, there are a places where it is all to easy to leak memory
on an error path, via a usage like this:
struct ext4_ext_path *path = NULL
while (...) {
...
path = ext4_ext_find_extent(inode, block, path, 0);
if (IS_ERR(path)) {
/* oops, if path was non-NULL before the call to
ext4_ext_find_extent, we've leaked it! :-( */
...
return PTR_ERR(path);
}
...
}
Unfortunately, there some code paths where we are doing the following
instead:
path = ext4_ext_find_extent(inode, block, orig_path, 0);
and where it's important that we _not_ free orig_path in the case
where ext4_ext_find_extent() returns an error.
So change the function signature of ext4_ext_find_extent() so that it
takes a struct ext4_ext_path ** for its third argument, and by
default, on an error, it will free the struct ext4_ext_path, and then
zero out the struct ext4_ext_path * pointer. In order to avoid
causing problems, we add a flag EXT4_EX_NOFREE_ON_ERR which causes
ext4_ext_find_extent() to use the original behavior of forcing the
caller to deal with freeing the original path pointer on the error
case.
The goal is to get rid of EXT4_EX_NOFREE_ON_ERR entirely, but this
allows for a gentle transition and makes the patches easier to verify.
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
We accidently aliased EXT4_EX_NOCACHE and EXT4_GET_CONVERT_UNWRITTEN
falgs, which apparently was hiding a bug that was unmasked when this
flag aliasing issue was addressed (see the subsequent commit). The
reproduction case was:
fsx -N 10000 -l 500000 -r 4096 -t 4096 -w 4096 -Z -R -W /vdb/junk
... which would cause fsx to report corruption in the data file.
The fix we have is a bit of an overkill, but I'd much rather be
conservative for now, and we can optimize ZERO_RANGE_FL handling
later. The fact that we need to zap the extent_status cache for the
inode is unfortunate, but correctness is far more important than
performance.
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
If ext4_ext_find_extent() returns an error, we have to clear path1 or
path2 or else we would end up trying to free an ERR_PTR, which would
be bad.
Also eliminate some redundant code and mark the error paths as unlikely()
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
ext4_move_extents is too complex for review. It has duplicate almost
each function available in the rest of other codebase. It has useless
artificial restriction orig_offset == donor_offset. But in fact logic
of ext4_move_extents is very simple:
Iterate extents one by one (similar to ext4_fill_fiemap_extents)
->Iterate each page covered extent (similar to generic_perform_write)
->swap extents for covered by page (can be shared with IOC_MOVE_DATA)
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
This allows us to make mext_next_extent static and potentially get rid
of it.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
After commit f282ac19d8 we use different transactions for
preallocation and i_disksize update which result in complain from fsck
after power-failure. spotted by generic/019. IMHO this is regression
because fs becomes inconsistent, even more 'e2fsck -p' will no longer
works (which drives admins go crazy) Same transaction requirement
applies ctime,mtime updates
testcase: xfstest generic/019
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Currently we reserve only 4 blocks but in worst case scenario
ext4_zero_partial_blocks() may want to zeroout and convert two
non adjacent blocks.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Blocks in collapse range should be collapsed per cluster unit when
bigalloc is enable. If bigalloc is not enable, EXT4_CLUSTER_SIZE will
be same with EXT4_BLOCK_SIZE.
With this bug fixed, patch enables COLLAPSE_RANGE for bigalloc, which
fixes a large number of xfstest failures which use fsx.
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Ashish Sangwan <a.sangwan@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Inode's depth can be changed from here:
ext4_ext_try_to_merge() ->ext4_ext_try_to_merge_up()
We must use correct value.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Each caller of ext4_ext_dirty must hold i_data_sem,
The only exception is migration code, let's make it convenient.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Commit 27dd438542 ("ext4: introduce reserved space") reserves 2% of
the file system space to make sure metadata allocations will always
succeed. Given that, tracking the reservation of metadata blocks is
no longer necessary.
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
xfstests generic/091 is failing when mounting ext4 with data=journal.
I think that this regression is same problem that occurred prior to collapse
range issue. So ZERO RANGE also need to call ext4_force_commit as
collapse range.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Ashish Sangwan <a.sangwan@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Currently in ext4 there is quite a mess when it comes to naming
unwritten extents. Sometimes we call it uninitialized and sometimes we
refer to it as unwritten.
The right name for the extent which has been allocated but does not
contain any written data is _unwritten_. Other file systems are
using this name consistently, even the buffer head state refers to it as
unwritten. We need to fix this confusion in ext4.
This commit changes every reference to an uninitialized extent (meaning
allocated but unwritten) to unwritten extent. This includes comments,
function names and variable names. It even covers abbreviation of the
word uninitialized (such as uninit) and some misspellings.
This commit does not change any of the code paths at all. This has been
confirmed by comparing md5sums of the assembly code of each object file
after all the function names were stripped from it.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Currently EXT4_MAP_UNINIT is used in dioread_nolock case to mark the
cases where we're using dioread_nolock and we're writing into either
unallocated, or unwritten extent, because we need to make sure that
any DIO write into that inode will wait for the extent conversion.
However EXT4_MAP_UNINIT is not only entirely misleading name but also
unnecessary because we can check for EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN in the
dioread_nolock case instead.
This commit removes EXT4_MAP_UNINIT flag.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Once COLLAPSE RANGE is be disable for ext4 with bigalloc feature till finding
root-cause of problem. It will be enable with fixing that regression of
xfstest(generic 075 and 091) again.
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Ashish Sangwan <a.sangwan@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
When formatting with 1KB or 2KB(not aligned with PAGE SIZE) block
size, xfstests generic/075 and 091 are failing. The offset supplied to
function truncate_pagecache_range is block size aligned. In this
function start offset is re-aligned to PAGE_SIZE by rounding_up to the
next page boundary. Due to this rounding up, old data remains in the
page cache when blocksize is less than page size and start offset is
not aligned with page size. In case of collapse range, we need to
align start offset to page size boundary by doing a round down
operation instead of round up.
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Ashish Sangwan <a.sangwan@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
There is a bug in ext4_ext_shift_path_extents() where if we actually
manage to merge a extent we would skip shifting the next extent. This
will result in in one extent in the extent tree not being properly
shifted.
This is causing failure in various xfstests tests using fsx or fsstress
with collapse range support. It will also cause file system corruption
which looks something like:
e2fsck 1.42.9 (4-Feb-2014)
Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
Inode 20 has out of order extents
(invalid logical block 3, physical block 492938, len 2)
Clear? yes
...
when running e2fsck.
It's also very easily reproducible just by running fsx without any
parameters. I can usually hit the problem within a minute.
Fix it by increasing ex_start only if we're not merging the extent.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
Currently in ext4_collapse_range() and ext4_punch_hole() we're
discarding preallocation twice. Once before we attempt to do any changes
and second time after we're done with the changes.
While the second call to ext4_discard_preallocations() in
ext4_punch_hole() case is not needed, we need to discard preallocation
right after ext4_ext_remove_space() in collapse range case because in
the case we had to restart a transaction in the middle of removing space
we might have new preallocations created.
Remove unneeded ext4_discard_preallocations() ext4_punch_hole() and move
it to the better place in ext4_collapse_range()
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
We're already calling truncate_pagecache() before we attempt to do any
actual job so there is not need to truncate pagecache once more using
truncate_setsize() after we're finished.
Remove truncate_setsize() and replace it just with i_size_write() note
that we're holding appropriate locks.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Currently in ext4_collapse_range() when calling ext4_es_remove_extent() to
remove status extents we're passing (EXT_MAX_BLOCKS - punch_start - 1)
in order to remove all extents from start of the collapse range to the
end of the file. However this is wrong because we might miss the
possible extent covering the last block of the file.
Fix it by removing the -1.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
Currently we're passing -1 as lend argumnet for
filemap_write_and_wait_range() which is wrong since lend is signed type
so it would cause some confusion and we might not write_and_wait for the
entire range we're expecting to write.
Fix it by using LLONG_MAX instead.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
We should be using truncate_pagecache() instead of
truncate_pagecache_range() in the collapse range because we're
truncating page cache from offset to the end of file.
truncate_pagecache() also get rid of the private COWed pages from the
range because we're going to shift the end of the file.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Where are some places where logic guaranties us that extent we are
searching exits, but this may not be true due to on-disk data
corruption. If such corruption happens we must prevent possible
null pointer dereferences.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Unfortunately, we weren't checking to make sure of this the inode was
extent-based before attempt operate on it. Hilarity ensues.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
This commit tries to fix some byte order issues that is found by sparse
check.
$ make M=fs/ext4 C=2 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__
...
CHECK fs/ext4/extents.c
fs/ext4/extents.c:5232:41: warning: restricted __le32 degrades to integer
fs/ext4/extents.c:5236:52: warning: bad assignment (-=) to restricted __le32
fs/ext4/extents.c:5258:45: warning: bad assignment (-=) to restricted __le32
fs/ext4/extents.c:5303:28: warning: restricted __le32 degrades to integer
fs/ext4/extents.c:5318:18: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
fs/ext4/extents.c:5318:18: expected unsigned int [unsigned] [usertype] ex_start
fs/ext4/extents.c:5318:18: got restricted __le32 [usertype] ee_block
fs/ext4/extents.c:5319:24: warning: restricted __le32 degrades to integer
fs/ext4/extents.c:5334:31: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
...
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>
Cc: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Currently some file system have IS_SWAPFILE check in their fallocate
implementations and some do not. However we should really prevent any
fallocate operation on swapfile so move the check to vfs and remove the
redundant checks from the file systems fallocate implementations.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Currently in do_fallocate in collapse range case we're checking
whether offset + len is not bigger than i_size. However there is
nothing which would prevent i_size from changing so the check is
pointless. It should be done in the file system itself and the file
system needs to make sure that i_size is not going to change. The
i_size check for the other fallocate modes are also done in the
filesystems.
As it is now we can easily crash the kernel by having two processes
doing truncate and fallocate collapse range at the same time. This
can be reproduced on ext4 and it is theoretically possible on xfs even
though I was not able to trigger it with this simple test.
This commit removes the check from do_fallocate and adds it to the
file system.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Acked-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
All the checks IS_APPEND and IS_IMMUTABLE for the fallocate operation on
the inode are done in vfs. No need to do this again in ext4. Remove it.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
When mounting ext4 with data=journal option, xfstest shared/002 and
shared/004 are currently failing as checksum computed for testfile
does not match with the checksum computed in other journal modes.
In case of data=journal mode, a call to filemap_write_and_wait_range
will not flush anything to disk as buffers are not marked dirty in
write_end. In collapse range this call is followed by a call to
truncate_pagecache_range. Due to this, when checksum is computed,
a portion of file is re-read from disk which replace valid data with
NULL bytes and hence the reason for the difference in checksum.
Calling ext4_force_commit before filemap_write_and_wait_range solves
the issue as it will mark the buffers dirty during commit transaction
which can be later synced by a call to filemap_write_and_wait_range.
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Ashish Sangwan <a.sangwan@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Xfstests generic/311 and shared/298 fail when run on a bigalloc file
system. Kernel error messages produced during the tests report that
blocks to be freed are already on the to-be-freed list. When e2fsck
is run at the end of the tests, it typically reports bad i_blocks and
bad free blocks counts.
The bug that causes these failures is located in ext4_ext_rm_leaf().
Code at the end of the function frees a partial cluster if it's not
shared with an extent remaining in the leaf. However, if all the
extents in the leaf have been removed, the code dereferences an
invalid extent pointer (off the front of the leaf) when the check for
sharing is made. This generally has the effect of unconditionally
freeing the partial cluster, which leads to the observed failures
when the partial cluster is shared with the last extent in the next
leaf.
Fix this by attempting to free the cluster only if extents remain in
the leaf. Any remaining partial cluster will be freed if possible
when the next leaf is processed or when leaf removal is complete.
Signed-off-by: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Currently in ext4_fallocate() and ext4_zero_range() we're testing ret
variable along with new_size. However in ext4_fallocate() we just tested
ret before and in ext4_zero_range() if will always be zero when we get
there so there is no need to test it in both cases.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Introduce new FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE flag for fallocate. This has the same
functionality as xfs ioctl XFS_IOC_ZERO_RANGE.
It can be used to convert a range of file to zeros preferably without
issuing data IO. Blocks should be preallocated for the regions that span
holes in the file, and the entire range is preferable converted to
unwritten extents
This can be also used to preallocate blocks past EOF in the same way as
with fallocate. Flag FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE which should cause the inode
size to remain the same.
Also add appropriate tracepoints.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Move block allocation out of the ext4_fallocate into separate function
called ext4_alloc_file_blocks(). This will allow us to use the same
allocation code for other allocation operations such as zero range which
is commit in the next patch.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Currently in ext4_fallocate we would update inode size, c_time and sync
the file with every partial allocation which is entirely unnecessary. It
is true that if the crash happens in the middle of truncate we might end
up with unchanged i size, or c_time which I do not think is really a
problem - it does not mean file system corruption in any way. Note that
xfs is doing things the same way e.g. update all of the mentioned after
the allocation is done.
This commit moves all the updates after the allocation is done. In
addition we also need to change m_time as not only inode has been change
bot also data regions might have changed (unwritten extents). However
m_time will be only updated when i_size changed.
Also we do not need to be paranoid about changing the c_time only if the
actual allocation have happened, we can change it even if we try to
allocate only to find out that there are already block allocated. It's
not really a big deal and it will save us some additional complexity.
Also use ext4_debug, instead of ext4_warning in #ifdef EXT4FS_DEBUG
section.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>-
--
v3: Do not remove the code to set EXT4_INODE_EOFBLOCKS flag
fs/ext4/extents.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------------
1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
Commit 9cb00419fa, which enables hole punching for bigalloc file
systems, exposed a bug introduced by commit 6ae06ff51e in an earlier
release. When run on a bigalloc file system, xfstests generic/013, 068,
075, 083, 091, 100, 112, 127, 263, 269, and 270 fail with e2fsck errors
or cause kernel error messages indicating that previously freed blocks
are being freed again.
The latter commit optimizes the selection of the starting extent in
ext4_ext_rm_leaf() when hole punching by beginning with the extent
supplied in the path argument rather than with the last extent in the
leaf node (as is still done when truncating). However, the code in
rm_leaf that initially sets partial_cluster to track cluster sharing on
extent boundaries is only guaranteed to run if rm_leaf starts with the
last node in the leaf. Consequently, partial_cluster is not correctly
initialized when hole punching, and a cluster on the boundary of a
punched region that should be retained may instead be deallocated.
Signed-off-by: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Code deallocating the extent path referenced by an argument to
ext4_ext_handle_uninitialized_extents was made redundant with identical
code in its one caller, ext4_ext_map_blocks, by commit 3779473246.
Allocating and deallocating the path in the same function also makes
the code clearer.
Signed-off-by: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
This patch implements fallocate's FALLOC_FL_COLLAPSE_RANGE for Ext4.
The semantics of this flag are following:
1) It collapses the range lying between offset and length by removing any data
blocks which are present in this range and than updates all the logical
offsets of extents beyond "offset + len" to nullify the hole created by
removing blocks. In short, it does not leave a hole.
2) It should be used exclusively. No other fallocate flag in combination.
3) Offset and length supplied to fallocate should be fs block size aligned
in case of xfs and ext4.
4) Collaspe range does not work beyond i_size.
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Ashish Sangwan <a.sangwan@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Dongsu Park <dongsu.park@profitbricks.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Commit 3779473246 breaks the return of error codes from
ext4_ext_handle_uninitialized_extents() in ext4_ext_map_blocks(). A
portion of the patch assigns that function's signed integer return
value to an unsigned int. Consequently, negatively valued error codes
are lost and can be treated as a bogus allocated block count.
Signed-off-by: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Commit a115f749c1 (ext4: remove wait for unwritten extent conversion from
ext4_truncate) exposed a bug in ext4_ext_handle_uninitialized_extents().
It can be triggered by xfstest generic/299 when run on a test file
system created without a journal. This test continuously fallocates and
truncates files to which random dio/aio writes are simultaneously
performed by a separate process. The test completes successfully, but
if the test filesystem is mounted with the block_validity option, a
warning message stating that a logical block has been mapped to an
illegal physical block is posted in the kernel log.
The bug occurs when an extent is being converted to the written state
by ext4_end_io_dio() and ext4_ext_handle_uninitialized_extents()
discovers a mapping for an existing uninitialized extent. Although it
sets EXT4_MAP_MAPPED in map->m_flags, it fails to set map->m_pblk to
the discovered physical block number. Because map->m_pblk is not
otherwise initialized or set by this function or its callers, its
uninitialized value is returned to ext4_map_blocks(), where it is
stored as a bogus mapping in the extent status tree.
Since map->m_pblk can accidentally contain illegal values that are
larger than the physical size of the file system, calls to
check_block_validity() in ext4_map_blocks() that are enabled if the
block_validity mount option is used can fail, resulting in the logged
warning message.
Signed-off-by: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.11+
Commit f5a44db5d2 introduced a regression on filesystems created with
the bigalloc feature (cluster size > blocksize). It causes xfstests
generic/006 and /013 to fail with an unexpected JBD2 failure and
transaction abort that leaves the test file system in a read only state.
Other xfstests run on bigalloc file systems are likely to fail as well.
The cause is the accidental use of a cluster mask where a cluster
offset was needed in ext4_ext_map_blocks().
Signed-off-by: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com>
The missing casts can cause the high 64-bits of the physical blocks to
be lost. Set up new macros which allows us to make sure the right
thing happen, even if at some point we end up supporting larger
logical block numbers.
Thanks to the Emese Revfy and the PaX security team for reporting this
issue.
Reported-by: PaX Team <pageexec@freemail.hu>
Reported-by: Emese Revfy <re.emese@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
A corrupted ext4 may have out of order leaf extents, i.e.
extent: lblk 0--1023, len 1024, pblk 9217, flags: LEAF UNINIT
extent: lblk 1000--2047, len 1024, pblk 10241, flags: LEAF UNINIT
^^^^ overlap with previous extent
Reading such extent could hit BUG_ON() in ext4_es_cache_extent().
BUG_ON(end < lblk);
The problem is that __read_extent_tree_block() tries to cache holes as
well but assumes 'lblk' is greater than 'prev' and passes underflowed
length to ext4_es_cache_extent(). Fix it by checking for overlapping
extents in ext4_valid_extent_entries().
I hit this when fuzz testing ext4, and am able to reproduce it by
modifying the on-disk extent by hand.
Also add the check for (ee_block + len - 1) in ext4_valid_extent() to
make sure the value is not overflow.
Ran xfstests on patched ext4 and no regression.
Cc: Lukáš Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Commit ec22ba8e ("ext4: disable merging of uninitialized extents")
ensured that if either extent under consideration is uninit, we
decline to merge, and ext4_can_extents_be_merged() returns false.
So there is no need for the caller to then test whether the
extent under consideration is unitialized; if it were, we
wouldn't have gotten that far.
The comments were also inaccurate; ext4_can_extents_be_merged()
no longer XORs the states, it fails if *either* is uninit.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Commit ec22ba8e ("ext4: disable merging of uninitialized extents")
ensured that if either extent under consideration is uninit, we
decline to merge, and immediately return.
But right after that test, we test again for an uninit
extent; we can never hit this. So just remove the impossible
test and associated variable.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
After applied the commit (4a092d73), we have reduced the number of
source files that need to #include ext4_extents.h. But we can do
better.
This commit defines ext4_zeroout_es() in extents.c and move
EXT_MAX_BLOCKS into ext4.h in order not to include ext4_extents.h in
indirect.c and ioctl.c. Meanwhile we just need to include this file in
extent_status.c when ES_AGGRESSIVE_TEST is defined. Otherwise, this
commit removes a duplicated declaration in trace/events/ext4.h.
After applied this patch, we just need to include ext4_extents.h file
in {super,migrate,move_extents,extents}.c, and it is easy for us to
define a new extent disk layout.
Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
If ext_debugging is enabled and path[depth].p_ext is NULL, len
and lblock are printed non initialized
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi@etezian.org>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
reaim workfile.dbase test easily triggers warning in
ext4_da_update_reserve_space():
EXT4-fs warning (device ram0): ext4_da_update_reserve_space:365:
ino 12, allocated 1 with only 0 reserved metadata blocks (releasing 1
blocks with reserved 9 data blocks)
The problem is that (one of) tests creates file and then randomly writes
to it with O_SYNC. That results in writing back pages of the file in
random order so we create extents for written blocks say 0, 2, 4, 6, 8
- this last allocation also allocates new block for extents. Then we
writeout block 1 so we have extents 0-2, 4, 6, 8 and we release
indirect extent block because extents fit in the inode again. Then we
writeout block 10 and we need to allocate indirect extent block again
which triggers the warning because we don't have the reservation
anymore.
Fix the problem by giving back freed metadata blocks resulting from
extent merging into inode's reservation pool.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Add a new fiemap flag which forces the all of the extents in an inode
to be cached in the extent_status tree. This is critically important
when using AIO to a preallocated file, since if we need to read in
blocks from the extent tree, the io_submit(2) system call becomes
synchronous, and the AIO is no longer "A", which is bad.
In addition, for most files which have an external leaf tree block,
the cost of caching the information in the extent status tree will be
less than caching the entire 4k block in the buffer cache. So it is
generally a win to keep the extent information cached.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
When we read in an extent tree leaf block from disk, arrange to have
all of its entries cached. In nearly all cases the in-memory
representation will be more compact than the on-disk representation in
the buffer cache, and it allows us to get the information without
having to traverse the extent tree for successive extents.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
When we find an invalid extent tree block, report the block number of
the bad block for debugging purposes.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Refactor out the code needed to read the extent tree block into a
single read_extent_tree_block() function. In addition to simplifying
the code, it also makes sure that we call the ext4_ext_load_extent
tracepoint whenever we need to read an extent tree block from disk.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
If there are no items in the extent status tree, ext4_es_lru_add() is
a no-op. So it is not sufficient to call ext4_es_lru_add() before we
try to lookup an entry in the extent status tree. We also need to
call it at the end of ext4_ext_map_blocks(), after items have been
added to the extent status tree.
This could lead to inodes with that have extent status trees but which
are not in the LRU list, which means they won't get considered for
eviction by the es_shrinker.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
During large unlink operations on files with extents, we can use a lot
of CPU time. This adds a cond_resched() call when starting to examine
the next level of a multi-level extent tree. Multi-level extent trees
are rare in the first place, and this should rarely be executed.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
In ext4_ext_map_blocks(), if we have successfully allocated the data
blocks, but then run into trouble inserting the extent into the extent
tree, most likely due to an ENOSPC condition, determine the arguments
to ext4_free_blocks() in a simpler way which is easier to prove to be
correct.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Previously ext4_ext_truncate() was ignoring potential error returns
from ext4_es_remove_extent() and ext4_ext_remove_space(). This can
lead to the on-diks extent tree and the extent status tree cache
getting out of sync, which is particuarlly bad, and can lead to file
system corruption and potential data loss.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Both hole punch and truncate use ext4_ext_rm_leaf() for removing
blocks. Currently we choose the last extent as the starting
point for removing blocks:
ex = EXT_LAST_EXTENT(eh);
This is OK for truncate but for hole punch we can optimize the extent
selection as the path is already initialized. We could use this
information to select proper starting extent. The code change in this
patch will not affect truncate as for truncate path[depth].p_ext will
always be NULL.
Signed-off-by: Ashish Sangwan <a.sangwan@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Translate the bitfields used in various flags argument to strings to
make the tracepoint output more human-readable.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
No need to pass file pointer when we can directly pass inode pointer.
Signed-off-by: Ashish Sangwan <a.sangwan@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Eryu Guan