With Chrome running on 64-bit ARM devices, add ARM64 to the list of
supported architectures.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
[olof; Fixed up due to addition of COMPILE_TEST]
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
The ChromeOS EC LPC and chardev drivers depend on CROS_EC_PROTO but
MFD_CROS_EC select CROS_EC_PROTO instead. Mixing select and depends
on is bad practice as it may lead to circular Kconfig dependencies.
Since the platform devices that are matched with these drivers are
registered by the ChromeOS EC mfd driver, they really depend on
MFD_CROS_EC. And because this config option selects CROS_EC_PROTO,
that dependency is met as well. So make the drivers to depend on
MFD_CROS_EC instead of CROS_EC_PROTO.
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
This reverts commit d12bbcd3ea ("platform/chrome: Don't make
CHROME_PLATFORMS depends on X86 || ARM") since it was found to
not be the correct fix for the MFD_CROS_EC config unmet direct
dependencies warning.
The correct solution was to add the needed dependencies to the
MFD_CROS_EC symbol. Besides the revert, this patch extends the
CHROME_PLATFORMS symbol dependencies and adds || COMPILE_TEST
to allow drivers to have build coverage on other architectures.
Suggested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
The Chrome platform support depends on X86 || ARM because there are
only Chromebooks using those architectures. But only some drivers
depend on a given architecture, and the ones that do already have
a dependency on their specific Kconfig symbol entries.
An option is to also make CHROME_PLATFORMS depends on || COMPILE_TEST
but is more future proof to remove the dependency and let the drivers
be built in all architectures if possible to have more build coverage.
Acked-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
The MFD driver should only have the logic to instantiate its child devices
and setup any shared resources that will be used by the subdevices drivers.
The cros_ec MFD is more complex than expected since it also has helpers to
communicate with the EC. So the driver will only get more bigger as other
protocols are supported in the future. So move the communication protocol
helpers to its own driver as drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c.
Suggested-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
The ChromeOS EC is connected by LPC only on x86 platforms and no others,
so add a dependency describing that.
But also build the driver if the COMPILE_TEST option is enabled
to have build coverage in other architectures.
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
[olof: reworded commit message]
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
This patch adds a device interface to access the
Chrome OS Embedded Controller from user-space.
Signed-off-by: Bill Richardson <wfrichar@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Chromebooks have an Embedded Controller (EC) that is used to
implement various functions such as keyboard, power and battery.
The AP can communicate with the EC through different bus types
such as I2C, SPI or LPC.
The cros_ec mfd driver is then composed of a core driver that
register the sub-devices as mfd cells and provide a high level
communication interface that is used by the rest of the kernel
and bus specific interfaces modules.
Each connection method then has its own driver, which register
with the EC driver interface-agnostic interface.
Currently, there are drivers to communicate with the EC over
I2C and SPI and this driver adds support for LPC.
Signed-off-by: Bill Richardson <wfrichar@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
Tested-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
It makes sense to split out the Chromebook/Chromebox hardware platform
drivers to a separate subdirectory, since some of it will be shared
between ARM and x86.
This moves over the existing chromeos_laptop driver without making
any other changes, and adds appropriate Kconfig entries for the new
directory. It also adds a MAINTAINERS entry for the new subdir.
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@nebula.com>
Thierry Reding