With the previous commit there is no need for the lowlevel driver any
more to specify it it uses two or three cells. So simplify accordingly.
The only non-trival change affects the pwm-rockchip driver: It used to only
support three cells if the hardware supports polarity. Now the default
number depends on the device tree which has to match hardware anyhow
(and if it doesn't the error is just a bit delayed as a PWM handle with
an inverted setting is catched when pwm_apply_state() is called).
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Before pwmchip_remove() returns the PWM is expected to be functional. So
remove the pwmchip before disabling the clock.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Since commit 5e5da1e9fb ("pwm: ab8500: Explicitly allocate pwm chip
base dynamically") all drivers use dynamic ID allocation explicitly. New
drivers are supposed to do the same, so remove support for driver
specified base IDs and drop all assignments in the low-level drivers.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
'duty' here is an unsigned int, thus checking for <0 will always
evaluate to false.
Fixes the following W=1 warning:
drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c:147:12: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Wtype-limits]
Cc: Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>
Cc: Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>
Cc: Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy <yendapally.reddy@broadcom.com>
Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com
Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
The owner member of struct pwm_ops must be set to THIS_MODULE to
increase the reference count of the module such that the module cannot
be removed while its code is in use.
Fixes: daa5abc41c ("pwm: Add support for Broadcom iProc PWM controller")
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
It is surprising for a PWM consumer when the variable holding the
requested state is modified by pwm_apply_state(). Consider for example a
driver doing:
#define PERIOD 5000000
#define DUTY_LITTLE 10
...
struct pwm_state state = {
.period = PERIOD,
.duty_cycle = DUTY_LITTLE,
.polarity = PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL,
.enabled = true,
};
pwm_apply_state(mypwm, &state);
...
state.duty_cycle = PERIOD / 2;
pwm_apply_state(mypwm, &state);
For sure the second call to pwm_apply_state() should still have
state.period = PERIOD and not something the hardware driver chose for a
reason that doesn't necessarily apply to the second call.
So declare the state argument as a pointer to a const type and adapt all
drivers' .apply callbacks.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Add support for the PWM controller present in Broadcom's iProc family of
SoCs. It has been tested on the Northstar+ bcm958625HR board.
Signed-off-by: Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy <yendapally.reddy@broadcom.com>
[thierry.reding@gmail.com: bunch of coding style fixes, cleanups]
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Uwe Kleine-König