The original code forgot to check 'inherit', we should
gurantee that all the qgroups in the struct 'inherit' exist.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Step to reproduce:
mkfs.btrfs <disk>
mount <disk> <mnt>
btrfs quota enable <mnt>
btrfs qgroup assign 0/1 1/1 <mnt>
umount <mnt>
btrfs-debug-tree <disk> | grep QGROUP
If we want to add a qgroup relation, we should gurantee that
'src' and 'dst' exist, otherwise, such qgroup relation should
not be allowed to create.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
We use mutex lock to protect all the user change operations.
So when we are calling find_qgroup_rb() to check whether qgroup
exists, we don't have to hold spin_lock.
Besides, when enabling/disabling quota, it must be single thread
when operations come here. spin lock must be firstly used to
clear quota_root when disabling quota, while enabling quota, spin
lock must be used to complete the last assign work.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
The original code has one spin_lock 'qgroup_lock' to protect quota
configurations in memory. If we want to add a BTRFS_QGROUP_INFO_KEY,
it will be added to Btree firstly, and then update configurations in
memory,however, a race condition may happen between these operations.
For example:
->add_qgroup_info_item()
->add_qgroup_rb()
For the above case, del_qgroup_info_item() may happen just before
add_qgroup_rb().
What's worse, when we want to add a qgroup relation:
->add_qgroup_relation_item()
->add_qgroup_relations()
We don't have any checks whether 'src' and 'dst' exist before
add_qgroup_relation_item(), a race condition can also happen for
the above case.
To avoid race condition and have all the necessary checks, we introduce
a mutex lock 'qgroup_ioctl_lock', and we make all the user change operations
protected by the mutex lock.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Steps to reproduce:
mkfs.btrfs <disk>
mount <disk> <mnt>
btrfs quota enable <mnt>
btrfs sub create <mnt>/subv
i=1
while [ $i -le 10000 ]
do
dd if=/dev/zero of=<mnt>/subv/data_$i bs=1K count=1
i=$(($i+1))
if [ $i -eq 500 ]
then
btrfs quota disable $mnt
fi
done
dmesg
Obviously, this warn_on() is unnecessary, and it will be easily triggered.
Just remove it.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
The function btrfs_find_all_roots is responsible to allocate
memory for 'roots' and free it if errors happen,so the caller should not
free it again since the work has been done.
Besides,'tmp' is allocated after the function btrfs_find_all_roots,
so we can return directly if btrfs_find_all_roots() fails.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
If one of qgroup fails to reserve firstly, we should return immediately,
it is unnecessary to continue check.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
The check work has been done just before the function btrfs_clean_quota_tree
is called, it is not necessary to check it again, remove it.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Return ENOMEM rather trigger BUG_ON, fix it.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Steps to reproduce:
i=0
ncases=100
mkfs.btrfs <disk>
mount <disk> <mnt>
btrfs quota enable <mnt>
btrfs qgroup create 2/1 <mnt>
while [ $i -le $ncases ]
do
btrfs qgroup create 1/$i <mnt>
btrfs qgroup assign 1/$i 2/1 <mnt>
i=$(($i+1))
done
btrfs quota disable <mnt>
umount <mnt>
btrfsck <mnt>
You can also use the commands:
btrfs-debug-tree <disk> | grep QGROUP
You will find there are still items existed.The reasons why this happens
is because the original code just checks slots[0]==0 and returns.
We try to fix it by deleting the leaf one by one.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
The original code forget to check whether quota has been disabled firstly,
and it will return 'EINVAL' and return error to users if quota has been
disabled,it will be unfriendly and confusing for users to see that.
So just return directly if quota has been disabled.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
The header file will then be installed under /usr/include/linux so that
userspace applications can refer to Btrfs ioctls by name and use the same
structs used internally in the kernel.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Brandenburger <filbranden@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Currently you can just destroy a qgroup even though it is in use by other qgroups
or has qgroups assigned to it. This patch prevents destruction of qgroups unless
they are completely unused. Otherwise destroy will return EBUSY.
Reported-by: Eric Hopper <hopper@omnifarious.org>
Signed-off-by: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
If a qgroup that has still assignments is deleted by the user, the corresponding
relations are left in the tree. This leads to an unmountable filesystem.
With this patch, those relations are simple ignored.
Reported-by: Eric Hopper <hopper@omnifarious.org>
Signed-off-by: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
ulist_alloc() has the possibility of returning NULL.
So, it is necessary to check the return value.
Signed-off-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Btrfs send/receive uses the aux field to store inode numbers. On
32 bit machines this may become a problem.
Also fix all users of ulist_add and ulist_add_merged.
Reported-by: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Block <ablock84@googlemail.com>
This reverts commit 5986802c2f.
Both paths are not error paths but regular cases where non-qgroup
subvols are involved.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Wang Shilong