The existing interface only has a pre-order callback. This change
adds an additional parameter for a post-order callback which will
be more useful for bus scans. ACPICA BZ 779.
Also update the external calls to acpi_walk_namespace.
http://www.acpica.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=779
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
As suggested by Dmitry Torokhov, convert the individual sysfs
attributes into an attribute group.
This change eliminates quite a bit of copy/paste code in the
error handling paths.
Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
Acked-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Crossword clues as haikus:
Snakes from the same brood
fighting Jackson on a plane?
sibilant siblings
I guess Will Shortz's job is still secure.
Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Linux/ACPI core files using internal.h all PREFIX "ACPI: ",
however, not all ACPI drivers use/want it -- and they
should not have to #undef PREFIX to define their own.
Add GPL commment to internal.h while we are there.
This does not change any actual console output,
asside from a whitespace fix.
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Completed a major update for the acpi_get_object_info external interface.
Changes include:
- Support for variable, unlimited length HID, UID, and CID strings
- Support Processor objects the same as Devices (HID,UID,CID,ADR,STA, etc.)
- Call the _SxW power methods on behalf of a device object
- Determine if a device is a PCI root bridge
- Change the ACPI_BUFFER parameter to ACPI_DEVICE_INFO.
These changes will require an update to all callers of this interface.
See the ACPICA Programmer Reference for details.
Also, update all invocations of acpi_get_object_info interface
Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
dock_remove() calls kfree() on dock_station so we should use
list_for_each_entry_safe() to avoid dereferencing freed memory.
Found by smatch (http://repo.or.cz/w/smatch.git/). Compile tested.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
This patch implements uevent suppress in kobject and removes it
from struct device, based on the following ideas:
1,Uevent sending should be one attribute of kobject, so suppressing it
in kobject layer is more natural than in device layer. By this way,
we can do it for other objects embedded with kobject.
2,It may save several bytes for each instance of struct device.(On my
omap3(32bit ARM) based box, can save 8bytes per device object)
This patch also introduces dev_set|get_uevent_suppress() helpers to
set and query uevent_suppress attribute in case to help kobject
as private part of struct device in future.
[This version is against the latest driver-core patch set of Greg,please
ignore the last version.]
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
According to kerneljanitors todo list all printk calls (beginning
a new line) should have an according KERN_* constant.
Those are the missing peaces here for the acpi subsystem.
Signed-off-by: Frank Seidel <frank@f-seidel.de>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Some devices trigger a DEVICE_CHECK on every evalutation of _STA. This
can also be seen in commit 8b59560a3b
(ACPI: dock: avoid check _STA method). If an undock is processed, the
dock driver sends a uevent and userspace might read the show_docked
property in sysfs. This causes an evaluation of _STA of the particular
device which causes the dock driver to immediately dock again.
In any case, evaluation of _STA (show_docked) does not necessarily mean
that we are docked, so check with the internal device structure.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12360
Signed-off-by: Holger Macht <hmacht@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
As of version 2.0, ACPI can return 64-bit integers. The current
acpi_evaluate_integer only supports 64-bit integers on 64-bit platforms.
Change the argument to take a pointer to an acpi_integer so we support
64-bit integers on all platforms.
lenb: replaced use of "acpi_integer" with "unsigned long long"
lenb: fixed bug in acpi_thermal_trips_update()
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
lenb: stripped patch down to what still applied to new dock.c
Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
add a sysfs file to present dock type. Suggested by Holger.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
an ATA bay can be in a dock and itself can be ejected separately.
This patch handles such eject bay. Found by Holger.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
dock's uevent reported itself, not ata. It might be difficult to find an
ata device just according to a dock. This patch introduces docking ops
for each device in a dock. when docking, dock driver can send device
specific uevent. This should help dock station too (not just bay)
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
dock driver can handle ata(bay) hotplug now. dock driver already handles
_EJ0 and _STA, so remove them. Also libata doesn't need register
notification handler anymore.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
The hotplug notification handler and drivers' notification handler all
run in one workqueue. Before hotplug removes an acpi device, the
device driver's notification handler is already be recorded to run just
after global notification handler. After hotplug notification handler
runs, acpica will notice a NULL notification handler and crash.
So now we run run hotplug in another workqueue and wait
for all acpi notication handlers finish.
This was found in battery hotplug, but actually all
hotplug can be affected.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
The battery driver already registers notification handler.
To avoid registering notification handler again,
introduce a notifier chain in global system notifier handler
and use it in dock driver.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Make the dock driver support bay and battery hotplug.
They are all regarded as dock, so handling can be unified.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
support _LCK method, which is a optional method for hotplug
lenb: we have not seen _LCK used in the field yet
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
commit 2a7feab28d3fc060d320eaba192e49dad1079b7e introduces a bug.
My thinkpad actually will send an eject_request and we should follow the
eject process to finish the eject, otherwise system still thinks the bay
is present.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
In some BIOSes, every _STA method call will send a notification again,
this cause freeze. And in some BIOSes, it appears _STA should be called
after _DCK. This tries to avoid calls _STA, and still keep the device
present check.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10431
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Some devices emit a ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK while physically unplugging
even if the software undock has already been done and dock_present() check
fails. However, the internal flags need to be cleared (complete_undock()).
Also, even notify userspace if the dock station suddently went away
without proper software undocking.
This happens on a Acer TravelMate 3000
Signed-off-by: Holger Macht <hmacht@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
commit 816c2eda3c ("dock: bay: Don't call
acpi_walk_namespace() when ACPI is disabled.") was merged between
2.6.26-rc8 and -rc9)
Due to rebasing the ACPI tree via quilt the same patch got applied again
via commit cc7e51666d ("dock: bay: Don't
call acpi_walk_namespace() when ACPI is disabled.")
Revert it, as it is obviously bogus.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Tim Pepper <lnxninja@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
begin_undock() is only called when triggered via a acpi notify handler
(pressing the undock button on the dock station), but complete_undock() is
always called after the eject. So if a undock is triggered through a sysfs
write, the flag DOCK_UNDOCKING has to be set for the dock station,
too. Otherwise this will freeze the system hard.
Signed-off-by: Holger Macht <hmacht@suse.de>
Acked-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
References: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302482
Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@novell.com>
Signed-off-by: Kay Sievers <kasievers@novell.com>
Signed-off-by: Frank Seidel <fseidel@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Send key=value pair along with the uevent instead of a plain value so that
userspace (udev) can handle it like common environment variables.
Signed-off-by: Holger Macht <hmacht@suse.de>
Acked-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@intel.com>
Cc: Stephan Berberig <s.berberig@arcor.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Data returned by acpi_get_name in acpi_buffer is not acpi_object and
therefore should not be cast to it, otherwise we'll get an nice oops
trying to print error message.
Also print name of the ACPI object corresponding to the docking station
and elevate severity of the message printed when _DCK fails to KERN_ERR.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
Cc: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Send an env along with our KOBJ_CHANGE uevent so that user space has
the option of checking for that to see if a dock or undock has occurred.
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Platform devices may not send uevents by default - override the setting
so that we can send uevents on dock/undock.
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Allow the driver to be loaded with an option that will allow userspace to
control whether the laptop is ejected immediately when the user presses the
button, or only when the syfs undock file is written.
if immediate_undock == 1, then when the user presses the undock button, the
laptop will send an event to userspace to notify userspace of the undock, but
then immediately undock without waiting for userspace. This is the current
behavior, and I set this to be the default.
if immediate_undock == 0, then when the user presses the undock button, the
laptop will send an event to userspace and do nothing. User space can query
the "flags" sysfs entry to determine if an undock request has been made by
the user (if bit 1 is set). User space will then need to write the undock
sysfs entry to complete the undocking process.
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Get rid of no release function warnings by switching to dynamically
allocating the platform_device and using the platform device release
routine in the base driver.
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
The driver tests the dock_station pointer for nonnull
to check whether it has initialized properly. But in
some cases dock_station will be non-null after being
freed when driver init fails. Fix by zeroing the
pointer after freeing.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Make uid sysfs file error path free memory, and cleanup sysfs file
when removing driver. Also fix CodingStyle violations.
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@intel.com>
Cc: Illya A. Volynets-Evenbakh <ilya@total-knowledge.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Use NULL instead of 0 for pointers:
drivers/acpi/dock.c:677:75: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
It is useful to know whether your laptop is docked or not,
but it is even more useful to know which docking station it's
docked to. Attached patch adds "uid" file to sysfs.
Tested on Dell Latitude D600 with D/Dock.
Patch is against official 2.6.20 release.
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
cosmetic only
Make "module name" actually match the file name.
Invoke with ';' as leaving it off confuses Lindent and gcc doesn't care.
Fix indentation where Lindent did get confused.
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
When determining if a device is on a dock station, we should
check the parent of the device as well.
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Send a uevent to indicate a device change whenever we dock or
undock, so that userspace may now check the dock status via sysfs.
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Holger Macht <hmacht@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Fix bug which will cause acpiphp to not be able to load when dock.ko
cannot load.
Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Add 2 sysfs files for user interface.
1) docked - 1/0 (read only) - indicates whether the software believes the
laptop is docked in a docking station.
2) undock - (write only) - writing to this file causes the software to
initiate an undock request to the firmware.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Philips <brandon@ifup.org>
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Make the dock station driver a platform device driver so that
we can create sysfs entries under /sys/device/platform.
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7303
Use a mutex instead of a spinlock for locking the
hotplug list because we need to call into the ACPI
subsystem which might sleep.
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Remove uevent dock notifications. There are no consumers
of these events at present, and uevents are likely not the
correct way to send this type of event anyway.
Until I get some kind of idea if anyone in userspace cares
about dock events, I will just not send any.
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
This reverts commit a5e1b94008.
Adrian Bunk points out that it has build errors, and apparently no
maintenance. Throw it out.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Create a driver which lives in the acpi subsystem to handle dock events.
This driver is not an "ACPI" driver, because acpi drivers require that the
object be present when the driver is loaded.
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Lin Ming