In order to consolidate the multiple ways to associate an IRQ chip with
a GPIO chip, move more fields into the new struct gpio_irq_chip.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
I don't remember how linux/gpio.h made the source, now it seems unused.
Remove it.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
The mentioned flags are dedicated solely for consumer API.
Replace them by explicit values.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
[Made a !bang clamp to (0,1) instead of infix ? operator]
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Currently we already have two pin configuration related callbacks
available for GPIO chips .set_single_ended() and .set_debounce(). In
future we expect to have even more, which does not scale well if we need
to add yet another callback to the GPIO chip structure for each possible
configuration parameter.
Better solution is to reuse what we already have available in the
generic pinconf.
To support this, we introduce a new .set_config() callback for GPIO
chips. The callback takes a single packed pin configuration value as
parameter. This can then be extended easily beyond what is currently
supported by just adding new types to the generic pinconf enum.
If the GPIO driver is backed up by a pinctrl driver the GPIO driver can
just assign gpiochip_generic_config() (introduced in this patch) to
.set_config and that will take care configuration requests are directed
to the pinctrl driver.
We then convert the existing drivers over .set_config() and finally
remove the .set_single_ended() and .set_debounce() callbacks.
Suggested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
By default all pins are configured to use a glitch filter. Writing 1 to the
certain bit of the specific register might be useful in case someone needs to
bypass the glitch filter completely for a given GPIO pin.
This patch adds support for that in the Intel Merrifield GPIO driver.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
We switch the default handler to be handle_bad_irq() instead of
handle_simple_irq() (which was not correct anyway).
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
There is a potential race when two threads do the writes to the same register
in parallel.
Prevent out of order in such case by protecting I/O access by spin lock.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Intel Merrifield platform has a special GPIO controller to
drive pads when they are muxed in corresponding mode.
Intel Merrifield GPIO IP is slightly different here and there
in comparison to the older Intel MID platforms. These differences
include in particular the shaked register offsets, specific
support of level triggered interrupts and wake capable sources,
as well as a pinctrl which is a separate IP.
Instead of uglifying existing driver I decide to provide a new
one slightly based on gpio-intel-mid.c. So, anyone can easily
compare what changes are happened to be here.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Brian J Wood <brian.j.wood@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Thierry Reding