There is a bit of mess between cros-ec mfd includes and platform
includes. For example, we have a linux/mfd/cros_ec.h include that
exports the interface implemented in platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c. Or
we have a linux/mfd/cros_ec_commands.h file that is non related to the
multifunction device (in the sense that is not exporting any function of
the mfd device). This causes crossed includes between mfd and
platform/chrome subsystems and makes the code difficult to read, apart
from creating 'curious' situations where a platform/chrome driver includes
a linux/mfd/cros_ec.h file just to get the exported functions that are
implemented in another platform/chrome driver.
In order to have a better separation on what the cros-ec multifunction
driver does and what the cros-ec core provides move and rework the
affected includes doing:
- Move cros_ec_commands.h to include/linux/platform_data/cros_ec_commands.h
- Get rid of the parts that are implemented in the platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c
driver from include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h to a new file
include/linux/platform_data/cros_ec_proto.h
- Update all the drivers with the new includes, so
- Drivers that only need to know about the protocol include
- linux/platform_data/cros_ec_proto.h
- linux/platform_data/cros_ec_commands.h
- Drivers that need to know about the cros-ec mfd device also include
- linux/mfd/cros_ec.h
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Acked-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Series changes: 3
- Fix dereferencing pointer to incomplete type 'struct cros_ec_dev' (lkp)
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
An MFD is a device that contains several sub-devices (cells). For instance,
the ChromeOS EC fits in this description as usually contains a charger and
can have other devices with different functions like a Real-Time Clock,
an Audio codec, a Real-Time Clock, ...
If you look at the driver, though, we're doing something odd. We have
two MFD cros-ec drivers where one of them (cros-ec-core) instantiates
another MFD driver as sub-driver (cros-ec-dev), and the latest
instantiates the different sub-devices (Real-Time Clock, Audio codec,
etc).
MFD
------------------------------------------
cros-ec-core
|___ mfd-cellA (cros-ec-dev)
| |__ mfd-cell0
| |__ mfd-cell1
| |__ ...
|
|___ mfd-cellB (cros-ec-dev)
|__ mfd-cell0
|__ mfd-cell1
|__ ...
The problem that was trying to solve is to describe some kind of topology for
the case where we have an EC (cros-ec) chained with another EC
(cros-pd). Apart from that this extends the bounds of what MFD was
designed to do we might be interested on have other kinds of topology that
can't be implemented in that way.
Let's prepare the code to move the cros-ec-core part from MFD to
platform/chrome as this is clearly a platform specific thing non-related
to a MFD device.
platform/chrome | MFD
------------------------------------------
|
cros-ec ________|___ cros-ec-dev
| |__ mfd-cell0
| |__ mfd-cell1
| |__ ...
|
cros-pd ________|___ cros-ec-dev
| |__ mfd-cell0
| |__ mfd-cell1
| |__ ...
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
On many boards, communication between the kernel and the Embedded
Controller happens over an LPC bus. In these cases, the kernel config
CONFIG_CROS_EC_LPC is enabled. Some of these LPC boards contain a
Microchip Embedded Controller (MEC) that is different from the regular
EC. On these devices, the same LPC bus is used, but the protocol is
a little different. In these cases, the CONFIG_CROS_EC_LPC_MEC kernel
config is enabled. Currently, the kernel decides at compile-time whether
or not to use the MEC variant, and, when that kernel option is selected
it breaks the other boards. We would like a kind of runtime detection to
avoid this.
This patch adds that detection mechanism by probing the protocol at
runtime, first we assume that a MEC variant is connected, and if the
protocol fails it fallbacks to the regular EC. This adds a bit of
overload because we try to read twice on those LPC boards that doesn't
contain a MEC variant, but is a better solution than having to select the
EC variant at compile-time.
While here also fix the alignment in Kconfig file for this config option
replacing the spaces by tabs.
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@collabora.com>
Tested-by: Nick Crews <ncrews@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Nick Crews <ncrews@chromium.org>
The cros_ec_lpc_reg files are only used by the cros_ec_lpc core and
there isn't logical separation between them. So, merge those files into
the cros_ec_lpc also allowing us to drop the header file used for the
interface between the two.
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Crews <ncrews@chromium.org>
Fix sparse warning:
drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_debugfs.c:256:30: warning: symbol 'cros_ec_console_log_fops' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_debugfs.c:265:30: warning: symbol 'cros_ec_pdinfo_fops' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lightbar.c:550:24: warning: symbol 'cros_ec_lightbar_attr_group' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_sysfs.c:338:24: warning: symbol 'cros_ec_attr_group' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_vbc.c:104:24: warning: symbol 'cros_ec_vbc_attr_group' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lpc.c:408:25: warning: symbol 'cros_ec_lpc_pm_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
Adopt the SPDX license identifier headers to ease license compliance
management. Also remove the license boiler-plate and redundant driver
description.
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>
Use devm_mfd_add_devices() for adding cros-ec core MFD child devices. This
reduces the need of remove callback from platform/chrome for removing the
MFD child devices.
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
This commit allows cros_ec_lpc to register a direct IRQ instead of relying
on the ACPI notification chain to receive MKBP events.
This change is done in the interest of allowing reduced jitter in the
communication path between the CrOS EC and the host for receiving sensor
data.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Granata <egranata@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>
The cros-ec-lpc driver lives in drivers/platform because is platform
specific, however there are two includes (cros_ec_lpc_mec.h and
cros_ec_lpc_reg.h) that lives in include/linux/mfd. These two includes
are only used for the platform driver and are not really related to the
MFD subsystem, so move the includes from include/linux/mfd to
drivers/platform/chrome.
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>
Older models of Chromebooks did not describe the LPC EC in their ACPI
tables; starting with Strago-based devices Google is using GOOG0004 device
to describe EC LPC.
DMI-based match is fragile and does not work reliably, especially when
using custom firmware. It is also not needed when we can locate the right
ACPI device, so let's stop bailing out when DMI does not match but the
right ACPI device is present.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>
This patch adds generic device information to the DMI table of
the cros_ec_lpc driver, needed for Chromebooks/boxes using a
custom coreboot firmware.
The DMI info would not contain "Google_*" as BIOS version string,
instead the system vendor string would still be "GOOGLE", so this
seems to be a reasonable match for every Chromebook/box running
a custom firmware.
Signed-off-by: Salvatore Bellizzi <lkml@seppia.net>
Signed-off-by: Vittorio Gambaletta <linuxbugs@vittgam.net>
Signed-off-by: Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>
Chrome platform installed a Chrome EC notify handler which prevents
default EC GPE handler getting called. Add pm_system_wakeup to the
Chrome EC notify handler so wake up from s2idle can happen.
Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenkai Du <wenkai.du@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>
This patch adds device information to the DMI table of the cros_ec_lpc
driver for Google Glimmer devices. Since Google BIOS does not enumerate
devices in the LPC bus, the cros_ec_lpc driver checks for system
compatibility and registers the cros_ec device itself.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Escande <thierry.escande@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>
Commit 12278dc7c5 ("platform/chrome: cros_ec_lpc: Add support for
GOOG004 ACPI device") added support when the firmware reports the ACPI
device, there are some firmwares though that doesn't report this device
but have it. In such cases we need to instantiate the driver explicitly
if it is not instantiated through ACPI.
Fixes: 12278dc7c5 ("platform/chrome: cros_ec_lpc: Add support for GOOG004 ACPI device")
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Escande <thierry.escande@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>
Pointer request is being assigned but never used, so remove it. Cleans
up the clang warning:
drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lpc.c:68:2: warning: Value stored to
'request' is never read
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>
... and __initconst if applicable.
Based on similar work for an older kernel in the Grsecurity patch.
[JD: fix toshiba-wmi build]
[JD: add htcpen]
[JD: move __initconst where checkscript wants it]
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
The subset of wake-enabled host events is defined by the EC, but the EC
may still send non-wake host events if we're in the process of
suspending. Get the mask of wake-enabled host events from the EC and
filter out non-wake events to prevent spurious aborted suspend
attempts.
Signed-off-by: Shawn Nematbakhsh <shawnn@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Escande <thierry.escande@collabora.com>
Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>
This patch installs a notify handler to process MKBP events for EC
firmware directing them over ACPI.
Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Escande <thierry.escande@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>
This patch removes platform_device_register() call and adds an ACPI
device id structure. The driver is now automatically probed for devices
with a GOOG0004 ACPI entry.
Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Escande <thierry.escande@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>
This adds support for the ChromeOS LPC Microchip Embedded Controller
(mec1322) variant.
mec1322 accesses I/O region [800h, 9ffh] through embedded memory
interface (EMI) rather than LPC.
Signed-off-by: Shawn Nematbakhsh <shawnn@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Escande <thierry.escande@collabora.com>
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>
Call common functions for read / write to prepare support for future
LPC protocol variants which use different I/O ops than inb / outb.
Signed-off-by: Shawn Nematbakhsh <shawnn@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Escande <thierry.escande@collabora.com>
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>
Since the verion of ACPI in Google BIOS does not enumerate the devices
in the LPC bus, the cros_ec_lpc driver resorts to DMI data to check if
a system is supported by the driver and autoload if built as a module.
Add information about the Google Pixel 2 to the DMI device table.
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Commit 6db07b6336 ("mfd: cros_ec: Check result code from EC messages")
added a common cros_ec_check_result() function that can be used to check
the ec_msg->result for errors and warns about them.
Use the existing function instead of duplicating same check in the driver.
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Chromebooks can have more than one Embedded Controller so the
cros_ec device id has to be incremented for each EC registered.
Add a new structure to represent multiple EC as different char
devices (e.g: /dev/cros_ec, /dev/cros_pd). It connects to
cros_ec_device and allows sysfs inferface for cros_pd.
Also reduce number of allocated objects, make chromeos sysfs
class object a static and add refcounting to prevent object
deletion while command is in progress.
Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Add proto v3 support to the SPI, I2C, and LPC.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Barber <smbarber@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Reviewed-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Add support in cros_ec.c to handle EC host command protocol v3.
For v3+, probe for maximum shared protocol version and max
request, response, and passthrough sizes. For now, this will
always fall back to v2, since there is no bus-specific code
for handling proto v3 packets.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Barber <smbarber@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Commit 1b84f2a4cd ("mfd: cros_ec: Use fixed size arrays to transfer
data with the EC") modified the struct cros_ec_command fields to not
use pointers for the input and output buffers and use fixed length
arrays instead.
This change was made because the cros_ec ioctl API uses that struct
cros_ec_command to allow user-space to send commands to the EC and
to get data from the EC. So using pointers made the API not 64-bit
safe. Unfortunately this approach was not flexible enough for all
the use-cases since there may be a need to send larger commands
on newer versions of the EC command protocol.
So to avoid to choose a constant length that it may be too big for
most commands and thus wasting memory and CPU cycles on copy from
and to user-space or having a size that is too small for some big
commands, use a zero-length array that is both 64-bit safe and
flexible. The same buffer is used for both output and input data
so the maximum of these values should be used to allocate it.
Suggested-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Parent and device were pointing to the same device structure.
Parent is unused, removed.
Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Stephen Barber <smbarber@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Tested-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Puthikorn Voravootivat <puthik@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
The driver uses the inb() and outb() I/O functions so should
include the header file that has these functions definitions.
This patch fixes the following error when the header is not
explicitly included:
drivers/platform/chrome//cros_ec_lpc.c: In function ‘ec_response_timed_out’:
drivers/platform/chrome//cros_ec_lpc.c:40:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘inb’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
drivers/platform/chrome//cros_ec_lpc.c: In function ‘cros_ec_cmd_xfer_lpc’:
drivers/platform/chrome//cros_ec_lpc.c:75:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘outb’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lpc.c:272:3-8: No need to set .owner here. The core will do it.
Remove .owner field if calls are used which set it automatically
Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/platform_no_drv_owner.cocci
CC: Bill Richardson <wfrichar@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Chromebooks have an Embedded Controller (EC) that is used to
implement various functions such as keyboard, power and battery.
The AP can communicate with the EC through different bus types
such as I2C, SPI or LPC.
The cros_ec mfd driver is then composed of a core driver that
register the sub-devices as mfd cells and provide a high level
communication interface that is used by the rest of the kernel
and bus specific interfaces modules.
Each connection method then has its own driver, which register
with the EC driver interface-agnostic interface.
Currently, there are drivers to communicate with the EC over
I2C and SPI and this driver adds support for LPC.
Signed-off-by: Bill Richardson <wfrichar@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
Tested-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Enric Balletbo i Serra