Commit Graph

6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Thomas Gleixner 9952f6918d treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 201
Based on 1 normalized pattern(s):

  this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
  it under the terms and conditions of the gnu general public license
  version 2 as published by the free software foundation this program
  is distributed in the hope it will be useful but without any
  warranty without even the implied warranty of merchantability or
  fitness for a particular purpose see the gnu general public license
  for more details you should have received a copy of the gnu general
  public license along with this program if not see http www gnu org
  licenses

extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier

  GPL-2.0-only

has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 228 file(s).

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>
Reviewed-by: Steve Winslow <swinslow@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Fontana <rfontana@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexios Zavras <alexios.zavras@intel.com>
Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190528171438.107155473@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-05-30 11:29:52 -07:00
Ben Dooks 9ac3e85a5c mailbox: pl320: remove __raw IO
The use of __raw IO accesors is not endian safe and should be used
sparingly. The relaxed variants should be as lightweight and also
are endian safe.

Note, this has not been run-time tested.

Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@linaro.org>
2016-06-24 13:32:31 +05:30
Paul Gortmaker 89f08f6440 arm: use subsys_initcall in non-modular pl320 IPC code
The drivers/mailbox/pl320-ipc.o is dependent on config PL320_MBOX
which is declared as a bool.  Hence the code is never going to be
modular.  So using module_init as an alias for __initcall can be
somewhat misleading.

Fix this up now, so that we can relocate module_init from
init.h into module.h in the future.  If we don't do this, we'd
have to add module.h to obviously non-modular code, and that
would be a worse thing.  Also add an inclusion of init.h, as
that was previously implicit.

Note that direct use of __initcall is discouraged, vs. one
of the priority categorized subgroups.  As __initcall gets
mapped onto device_initcall, our use of subsys_initcall (which
seems to make sense for IPC code) will thus change this
registration from level 6-device to level 4-subsys (i.e. slightly
earlier).  However no impact of that small difference is expected.

Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2015-06-16 14:12:35 -04:00
Suman Anna f2fc42b6ac mailbox: rename pl320-ipc specific mailbox.h
The patch 30058677 "ARM / highbank: add support for pl320 IPC"
added a pl320 IPC specific header file as a generic mailbox.h.
This file has been renamed appropriately to allow the
introduction of the generic mailbox API framework.

Acked-by: Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@calxeda.com>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
2014-10-08 10:39:33 +05:30
Mark Langsdorf 091930a2e6 mailbox, pl320-ipc: remove __init from probe function
Avoids a section mismatch.

Signed-off-by: Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@calxeda.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-03-04 14:23:11 +01:00
Rob Herring 300586778d ARM / highbank: add support for pl320 IPC
The pl320 IPC allows for interprocessor communication between the
highbank A9 and the EnergyCore Management Engine. The pl320 implements
a straightforward mailbox protocol.

Signed-off-by: Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@calxeda.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-02-02 00:01:15 +01:00