Commit Graph

56 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
David Sterba 31f6e769ce btrfs: make btrfs_assert_tree_locked static inline
The function btrfs_assert_tree_locked is used outside of the locking
code so it is exported, however we can make it static inine as it's
fairly trivial.

This is the only locking assertion used in release builds, inlining
improves the text size by 174 bytes and reduces stack consumption in the
callers.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-11-18 12:46:49 +01:00
David Sterba d6156218be btrfs: make locking assertion helpers static inline
I've noticed that none of the btrfs_assert_*lock* debugging helpers is
inlined, despite they're short and mostly a value update. Making them
inline shaves 67 from the text size, reduces stack consumption and
perhaps also slightly improves the performance due to avoiding
unnecessary calls.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-11-18 12:46:49 +01:00
David Sterba 602cbe91fb btrfs: move cond_wake_up functions out of ctree
The file ctree.h serves as a header for everything and has become quite
bloated. Split some helpers that are generic and create a new file that
should be the catch-all for code that's not btrfs-specific.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-09-09 14:59:15 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov 5044ed4f39 btrfs: Remove unused locking functions
Those were split out of btrfs_clear_lock_blocking_rw by
aa12c02778 ("btrfs: split btrfs_clear_lock_blocking_rw to read and write helpers")
however at that time this function was unused due to commit
5239834016 ("Btrfs: kill btrfs_clear_path_blocking"). Put the final
nail in the coffin of those 2 functions.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-09-09 14:58:59 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov 6e7ca09b58 btrfs: Fix deadlock caused by missing memory barrier
Commit 06297d8cef ("btrfs: switch extent_buffer blocking_writers from
atomic to int") changed the type of blocking_writers but forgot to
adjust relevant code in btrfs_tree_unlock by converting the
smp_mb__after_atomic to smp_mb.  This opened up the possibility of a
deadlock due to re-ordering of setting blocking_writers and
checking/waking up the waiter. This particular lockup is explained in a
comment above waitqueue_active() function.

Fix it by converting the memory barrier to a full smp_mb, accounting
for the fact that blocking_writers is a simple integer.

Fixes: 06297d8cef ("btrfs: switch extent_buffer blocking_writers from atomic to int")
Tested-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-25 17:34:08 +02:00
David Sterba 00801ae4bb btrfs: switch extent_buffer write_locks from atomic to int
The write_locks is either 0 or 1 and always updated under the lock,
so we don't need the atomic_t semantics.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-02 12:30:47 +02:00
David Sterba f3dc24c52a btrfs: switch extent_buffer spinning_writers from atomic to int
The spinning_writers is either 0 or 1 and always updated under the lock,
so we don't need the atomic_t semantics.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-02 12:30:47 +02:00
David Sterba 06297d8cef btrfs: switch extent_buffer blocking_writers from atomic to int
The blocking_writers is either 0 or 1 and always updated under the lock,
so we don't need the atomic_t semantics.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-02 12:30:47 +02:00
Qu Wenruo 31aab40207 btrfs: trace: Introduce trace events for all btrfs tree locking events
Unlike btrfs_tree_lock() and btrfs_tree_read_lock(), the remaining
functions in locking.c will not sleep, thus doesn't make much sense to
record their execution time.

Those events are introduced mainly for user space tool to audit and
detect lock leakage or dead lock.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-04-29 19:02:43 +02:00
Qu Wenruo 34e73cc930 btrfs: trace: Introduce trace events for sleepable tree lock
There are two tree lock events which can sleep:
- btrfs_tree_read_lock()
- btrfs_tree_lock()

Sometimes we may need to look into the concurrency picture of the fs.
For that case, we need the execution time of above two functions and the
owner of @eb.

Here we introduce a trace events for user space tools like bcc, to get
the execution time of above two functions, and get detailed owner info
where eBPF code can't.

All the overhead is hidden behind the trace events, so if events are not
enabled, there is no overhead.

These trace events also output bytenr and generation, allow them to be
pared with unlock events to pin down deadlock.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-04-29 19:02:43 +02:00
David Sterba ed1b4ed79d btrfs: switch extent_buffer::lock_nested to bool
The member is tracking simple status of the lock, we can use bool for
that and make some room for further space reduction in the structure.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-04-29 19:02:21 +02:00
David Sterba c79adfc085 btrfs: use assertion helpers for extent buffer write lock counters
Use the helpers where open coded. On non-debug builds, the warnings will
not trigger and extent_buffer::write_locks become unused and can be
moved to the appropriate section, saving a few bytes.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-04-29 19:02:21 +02:00
David Sterba e3f1538867 btrfs: add assertion helpers for extent buffer write lock counters
The write_locks are a simple counter to track locking balance and used
to assert tree locks.  Add helpers to make it conditionally work only in
DEBUG builds.  Will be used in followup patches.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-04-29 19:02:21 +02:00
David Sterba 5c9c799ab7 btrfs: use assertion helpers for extent buffer read lock counters
Use the helpers where open coded. On non-debug builds, the warnings will
not trigger and extent_buffer::read_locks become unused and can be
moved to the appropriate section, saving a few bytes.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-04-29 19:02:21 +02:00
David Sterba 58a2ddaedb btrfs: add assertion helpers for extent buffer read lock counters
The read_locks are a simple counter to track locking balance and used to
assert tree locks.  Add helpers to make it conditionally work only in
DEBUG builds.  Will be used in followup patches.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-04-29 19:02:21 +02:00
David Sterba afd495a826 btrfs: use assertion helpers for spinning readers
Use the helpers where open coded. On non-debug builds, the warnings will
not trigger and extent_buffer::spining_readers become unused and can be
moved to the appropriate section, saving a few bytes.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-04-29 19:02:21 +02:00
David Sterba 225948dedc btrfs: add assertion helpers for spinning readers
Add helpers for conditional DEBUG build to assert that the extent buffer
spinning_readers constraints are met. Will be used in followup patches.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-04-29 19:02:20 +02:00
David Sterba 843ccf9f46 btrfs: use assertion helpers for spinning writers
Use the helpers where open coded. On non-debug builds, the warnings will
not trigger and extent_buffer::spining_writers become unused and can be
moved to the appropriate section, saving a few bytes.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-04-29 19:02:20 +02:00
David Sterba e4e9fd0f32 btrfs: add assertion helpers for spinning writers
Add helpers for conditional DEBUG build to assert that the extent buffer
spinning_writers constraints are met. Will be used in followup patches.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-04-29 19:02:20 +02:00
David Sterba 970e74d961 btrfs: simplify waiting loop in btrfs_tree_lock
Currently, the number of readers and writers is checked and in case
there are any, wait and redo the locks. There's some duplication
before the branches go back to again label, eg. calling wait_event on
blocking_readers twice.

The sequence is transformed

loop:
* wait for readers
* wait for writers
* write_lock
* check readers, unlock and wait for readers, loop
* check writers, unlock and wait for writers, loop

The new sequence is not exactly the same due to the simplification, for
readers it's slightly faster. For the writers, original code does

* wait for writers
* (loop) wait for readers
*        wait for writers -- again

while the new goes directly to the reader check. This should behave the
same on a contended lock with multiple writers and readers, but can
reduce number of times we're waiting on something.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-02-25 14:13:28 +01:00
David Sterba aa12c02778 btrfs: split btrfs_clear_lock_blocking_rw to read and write helpers
There are many callers that hardcode the desired lock type so we can
avoid the switch and call them directly. Split the current function to
two. There are no remaining users of btrfs_clear_lock_blocking_rw so
it's removed.  The call sites will be converted in followup patches.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-02-25 14:13:27 +01:00
David Sterba b95be2d9fb btrfs: split btrfs_set_lock_blocking_rw to read and write helpers
There are many callers that hardcode the desired lock type so we can
avoid the switch and call them directly. Split the current function to
two but leave a helper that still takes the variable lock type to make
current code compile.  The call sites will be converted in followup
patches.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-02-25 14:13:27 +01:00
David Sterba 093258e6eb btrfs: replace waitqueue_actvie with cond_wake_up
Use the wrappers and reduce the amount of low-level details about the
waitqueue management.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-05-28 18:23:09 +02:00
David Sterba c1d7c514f7 btrfs: replace GPL boilerplate by SPDX -- sources
Remove GPL boilerplate text (long, short, one-line) and keep the rest,
ie. personal, company or original source copyright statements. Add the
SPDX header.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-04-12 16:29:51 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov 2e32ef87b0 btrfs: Relax memory barrier in btrfs_tree_unlock
When performing an unlock on an extent buffer we'd like to order the
decrement of extent_buffer::blocking_writers with waking up any
waiters. In such situations it's sufficient to use smp_mb__after_atomic
rather than the heavy smp_mb. On architectures where atomic operations
are fully ordered (such as x86 or s390) unconditionally executing
a heavyweight smp_mb instruction causes a severe hit to performance
while bringin no improvements in terms of correctness.

The better thing is to use the appropriate smp_mb__after_atomic routine
which will do the correct thing (invoke a full smp_mb or in the case
of ordered atomics insert a compiler barrier). Put another way,
an RMW atomic op + smp_load__after_atomic equals, in terms of
semantics, to a full smp_mb. This ensures that none of the problems
described in the accompanying comment of waitqueue_active occur.
No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-03-31 01:26:51 +02:00
David Sterba 7928d672ff btrfs: cleanup, remove stray return statements
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2016-01-07 14:30:52 +01:00
David Sterba ee86395458 btrfs: comment the rest of implicit barriers before waitqueue_active
There are atomic operations that imply the barrier for waitqueue_active
mixed in an if-condition.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2015-10-10 18:42:00 +02:00
David Sterba a83342aa0c btrfs: add comments to barriers before waitqueue_active
Reduce number of undocumented barriers out there.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2015-10-10 18:40:04 +02:00
Zhaolei 166f66d0bc btrfs: Add WARN_ON() for double lock in btrfs_tree_lock()
When a task trying to double lock a extent buffer, there are no
lockdep warning about it because this lock may be in "blocking_lock"
state, and make us hard to debug.

This patch add a WARN_ON() for above condition, it can not report
all deadlock cases(as lock between tasks), but at least helps us
some.

Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-08-09 07:07:14 -07:00
Chris Mason f82c458a2c btrfs: fix lockups from btrfs_clear_path_blocking
The fair reader/writer locks mean that btrfs_clear_path_blocking needs
to strictly follow lock ordering rules even when we already have
blocking locks on a given path.

Before we can clear a blocking lock on the path, we need to make sure
all of the locks have been converted to blocking.  This will remove lock
inversions against anyone spinning in write_lock() against the buffers
we're trying to get read locks on.  These inversions didn't exist before
the fair read/writer locks, but now we need to be more careful.

We papered over this deadlock in the past by changing
btrfs_try_read_lock() to be a true trylock against both the spinlock and
the blocking lock.  This was slower, and not sufficient to fix all the
deadlocks.  This patch adds a btrfs_tree_read_lock_atomic(), which
basically means get the spinlock but trylock on the blocking lock.

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Reported-by: Patrick Schmid <schmid@phys.ethz.ch>
cc: stable@vger.kernel.org #v3.15+
2014-11-19 10:34:35 -08:00
Chris Mason ea4ebde02e Btrfs: fix deadlocks with trylock on tree nodes
The Btrfs tree trylock function is poorly named.  It always takes
the spinlock and backs off if the blocking lock is held.  This
can lead to surprising lockups because people expect it to really be a
trylock.

This commit makes it a pure trylock, both for the spinlock and the
blocking lock.  It also reworks the nested lock handling slightly to
avoid taking the read lock while a spinning write lock might be held.

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-19 14:19:55 -07:00
Eric Sandeen 48a3b6366f btrfs: make static code static & remove dead code
Big patch, but all it does is add statics to functions which
are in fact static, then remove the associated dead-code fallout.

removed functions:

btrfs_iref_to_path()
__btrfs_lookup_delayed_deletion_item()
__btrfs_search_delayed_insertion_item()
__btrfs_search_delayed_deletion_item()
find_eb_for_page()
btrfs_find_block_group()
range_straddles_pages()
extent_range_uptodate()
btrfs_file_extent_length()
btrfs_scrub_cancel_devid()
btrfs_start_transaction_lflush()

btrfs_print_tree() is left because it is used for debugging.
btrfs_start_transaction_lflush() and btrfs_reada_detach() are
left for symmetry.

ulist.c functions are left, another patch will take care of those.

Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-05-06 15:55:23 -04:00
Liu Bo 39f9d028c9 Btrfs: save us a read_lock
This does not change the logic of code, but can save us a read_lock.

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-02-20 09:37:17 -05:00
Stefan Behrens aa2ffd0616 Btrfs: fix a misplaced address operator in a condition
This should obviously not be "if (&flag)" but "if (flag)".

Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
2012-08-28 16:53:23 -04:00
Chris Mason cbea5ac1ee Btrfs: reduce calls to wake_up on uncontended locks
The btrfs locks were unconditionally calling wake_up as the
locks were released.  This lead to extra thrashing on the waitqueue,
especially for locks that were dominated by readers.

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2012-07-23 15:36:18 -04:00
Jeff Mahoney 143bede527 btrfs: return void in functions without error conditions
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
2012-03-22 01:45:34 +01:00
Arne Jansen 5b25f70f42 Btrfs: add nested locking mode for paths
This patch adds the possibilty to read-lock an extent even if it is already
write-locked from the same thread. btrfs_find_all_roots() needs this
capability.

Signed-off-by: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
2012-01-04 16:12:29 +01:00
Chris Mason bd681513fa Btrfs: switch the btrfs tree locks to reader/writer
The btrfs metadata btree is the source of significant
lock contention, especially in the root node.   This
commit changes our locking to use a reader/writer
lock.

The lock is built on top of rw spinlocks, and it
extends the lock tracking to remember if we have a
read lock or a write lock when we go to blocking.  Atomics
count the number of blocking readers or writers at any
given time.

It removes all of the adaptive spinning from the old code
and uses only the spinning/blocking hints inside of btrfs
to decide when it should continue spinning.

In read heavy workloads this is dramatically faster.  In write
heavy workloads we're still faster because of less contention
on the root node lock.

We suffer slightly in dbench because we schedule more often
during write locks, but all other benchmarks so far are improved.

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-07-27 12:46:46 -04:00
David Sterba f2a97a9dbd btrfs: remove all unused functions
Remove static and global declarations and/or definitions. Reduces size
of btrfs.ko by ~3.4kB.

  text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
402081    7464     200  409745   64091 btrfs.ko.base
398620    7144     200  405964   631cc btrfs.ko.remove-all

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2011-05-06 12:34:03 +02:00
Tejun Heo 5a0e3ad6af include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h
percpu.h is included by sched.h and module.h and thus ends up being
included when building most .c files.  percpu.h includes slab.h which
in turn includes gfp.h making everything defined by the two files
universally available and complicating inclusion dependencies.

percpu.h -> slab.h dependency is about to be removed.  Prepare for
this change by updating users of gfp and slab facilities include those
headers directly instead of assuming availability.  As this conversion
needs to touch large number of source files, the following script is
used as the basis of conversion.

  http://userweb.kernel.org/~tj/misc/slabh-sweep.py

The script does the followings.

* Scan files for gfp and slab usages and update includes such that
  only the necessary includes are there.  ie. if only gfp is used,
  gfp.h, if slab is used, slab.h.

* When the script inserts a new include, it looks at the include
  blocks and try to put the new include such that its order conforms
  to its surrounding.  It's put in the include block which contains
  core kernel includes, in the same order that the rest are ordered -
  alphabetical, Christmas tree, rev-Xmas-tree or at the end if there
  doesn't seem to be any matching order.

* If the script can't find a place to put a new include (mostly
  because the file doesn't have fitting include block), it prints out
  an error message indicating which .h file needs to be added to the
  file.

The conversion was done in the following steps.

1. The initial automatic conversion of all .c files updated slightly
   over 4000 files, deleting around 700 includes and adding ~480 gfp.h
   and ~3000 slab.h inclusions.  The script emitted errors for ~400
   files.

2. Each error was manually checked.  Some didn't need the inclusion,
   some needed manual addition while adding it to implementation .h or
   embedding .c file was more appropriate for others.  This step added
   inclusions to around 150 files.

3. The script was run again and the output was compared to the edits
   from #2 to make sure no file was left behind.

4. Several build tests were done and a couple of problems were fixed.
   e.g. lib/decompress_*.c used malloc/free() wrappers around slab
   APIs requiring slab.h to be added manually.

5. The script was run on all .h files but without automatically
   editing them as sprinkling gfp.h and slab.h inclusions around .h
   files could easily lead to inclusion dependency hell.  Most gfp.h
   inclusion directives were ignored as stuff from gfp.h was usually
   wildly available and often used in preprocessor macros.  Each
   slab.h inclusion directive was examined and added manually as
   necessary.

6. percpu.h was updated not to include slab.h.

7. Build test were done on the following configurations and failures
   were fixed.  CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL was turned off for all tests (as my
   distributed build env didn't work with gcov compiles) and a few
   more options had to be turned off depending on archs to make things
   build (like ipr on powerpc/64 which failed due to missing writeq).

   * x86 and x86_64 UP and SMP allmodconfig and a custom test config.
   * powerpc and powerpc64 SMP allmodconfig
   * sparc and sparc64 SMP allmodconfig
   * ia64 SMP allmodconfig
   * s390 SMP allmodconfig
   * alpha SMP allmodconfig
   * um on x86_64 SMP allmodconfig

8. percpu.h modifications were reverted so that it could be applied as
   a separate patch and serve as bisection point.

Given the fact that I had only a couple of failures from tests on step
6, I'm fairly confident about the coverage of this conversion patch.
If there is a breakage, it's likely to be something in one of the arch
headers which should be easily discoverable easily on most builds of
the specific arch.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Guess-its-ok-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
2010-03-30 22:02:32 +09:00
Wu Fengguang d4a789474a Btrfs: fix typos in comments
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2009-04-02 16:46:06 -04:00
Chris Mason b9473439d3 Btrfs: leave btree locks spinning more often
btrfs_mark_buffer dirty would set dirty bits in the extent_io tree
for the buffers it was dirtying.  This may require a kmalloc and it
was not atomic.  So, anyone who called btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty had to
set any btree locks they were holding to blocking first.

This commit changes dirty tracking for extent buffers to just use a flag
in the extent buffer.  Now that we have one and only one extent buffer
per page, this can be safely done without losing dirty bits along the way.

This also introduces a path->leave_spinning flag that callers of
btrfs_search_slot can use to indicate they will properly deal with a
path returned where all the locks are spinning instead of blocking.

Many of the btree search callers now expect spinning paths,
resulting in better btree concurrency overall.

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2009-03-24 16:14:28 -04:00
Chris Mason 66d7e85ea7 Btrfs: Check for a blocking lock before taking the spin
This reduces contention on the extent buffer spin locks by testing for a
blocking lock before trying to take the spinlock.

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2009-03-24 16:14:27 -04:00
Chris Mason b9447ef80b Btrfs: fix spinlock assertions on UP systems
btrfs_tree_locked was being used to make sure a given extent_buffer was
properly locked in a few places.  But, it wasn't correct for UP compiled
kernels.

This switches it to using assert_spin_locked instead, and renames it to
btrfs_assert_tree_locked to better reflect how it was really being used.

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2009-03-09 11:45:38 -04:00
Chris Mason 4008c04a07 Btrfs: make a lockdep class for the extent buffer locks
Btrfs is currently using spin_lock_nested with a nested value based
on the tree depth of the block.  But, this doesn't quite work because
the max tree depth is bigger than what spin_lock_nested can deal with,
and because locks are sometimes taken before the level field is filled in.

The solution here is to use lockdep_set_class_and_name instead, and to
set the class before unlocking the pages when the block is read from the
disk and just after init of a freshly allocated tree block.

btrfs_clear_path_blocking is also changed to take the locks in the proper
order, and it also makes sure all the locks currently held are properly
set to blocking before it tries to retake the spinlocks.  Otherwise, lockdep
gets upset about bad lock orderin.

The lockdep magic cam from Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2009-02-12 14:09:45 -05:00
Chris Mason 284b066af4 Btrfs: don't use spin_is_contended
Btrfs was using spin_is_contended to see if it should drop locks before
doing extent allocations during btrfs_search_slot.  The idea was to avoid
expensive searches in the tree unless the lock was actually contended.

But, spin_is_contended is specific to the ticket spinlocks on x86, so this
is causing compile errors everywhere else.

In practice, the contention could easily appear some time after we started
doing the extent allocation, and it makes more sense to always drop the lock
instead.

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2009-02-09 16:22:03 -05:00
Chris Mason b4ce94de9b Btrfs: Change btree locking to use explicit blocking points
Most of the btrfs metadata operations can be protected by a spinlock,
but some operations still need to schedule.

So far, btrfs has been using a mutex along with a trylock loop,
most of the time it is able to avoid going for the full mutex, so
the trylock loop is a big performance gain.

This commit is step one for getting rid of the blocking locks entirely.
btrfs_tree_lock takes a spinlock, and the code explicitly switches
to a blocking lock when it starts an operation that can schedule.

We'll be able get rid of the blocking locks in smaller pieces over time.
Tracing allows us to find the most common cause of blocking, so we
can start with the hot spots first.

The basic idea is:

btrfs_tree_lock() returns with the spin lock held

btrfs_set_lock_blocking() sets the EXTENT_BUFFER_BLOCKING bit in
the extent buffer flags, and then drops the spin lock.  The buffer is
still considered locked by all of the btrfs code.

If btrfs_tree_lock gets the spinlock but finds the blocking bit set, it drops
the spin lock and waits on a wait queue for the blocking bit to go away.

Much of the code that needs to set the blocking bit finishes without actually
blocking a good percentage of the time.  So, an adaptive spin is still
used against the blocking bit to avoid very high context switch rates.

btrfs_clear_lock_blocking() clears the blocking bit and returns
with the spinlock held again.

btrfs_tree_unlock() can be called on either blocking or spinning locks,
it does the right thing based on the blocking bit.

ctree.c has a helper function to set/clear all the locked buffers in a
path as blocking.

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2009-02-04 09:25:08 -05:00
Chris Mason d397712bcc Btrfs: Fix checkpatch.pl warnings
There were many, most are fixed now.  struct-funcs.c generates some warnings
but these are bogus.

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2009-01-05 21:25:51 -05:00
Chris Mason d352ac6814 Btrfs: add and improve comments
This improves the comments at the top of many functions.  It didn't
dive into the guts of functions because I was trying to
avoid merging problems with the new allocator and back reference work.

extent-tree.c and volumes.c were both skipped, and there is definitely
more work todo in cleaning and commenting the code.

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2008-09-29 15:18:18 -04:00
Chris Mason 65b51a009e btrfs_search_slot: reduce lock contention by cowing in two stages
A btree block cow has two parts, the first is to allocate a destination
block and the second is to copy the old bock over.

The first part needs locks in the extent allocation tree, and may need to
do IO.  This changeset splits that into a separate function that can be
called without any tree locks held.

btrfs_search_slot is changed to drop its path and start over if it has
to COW a contended block.  This often means that many writers will
pre-alloc a new destination for a the same contended block, but they
cache their prealloc for later use on lower levels in the tree.

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2008-09-25 11:04:06 -04:00