Commit Graph

2144 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Linus Torvalds dd81e1c7d5 powerpc fixes for 5.17 #2
- A series of bpf fixes, including an oops fix and some codegen fixes.
 
  - Fix a regression in syscall_get_arch() for compat processes.
 
  - Fix boot failure on some 32-bit systems with KASAN enabled.
 
  - A couple of other build/minor fixes.
 
 Thanks to: Athira Rajeev, Christophe Leroy, Dmitry V. Levin, Jiri Olsa, Johan Almbladh,
 Maxime Bizon, Naveen N. Rao, Nicholas Piggin.
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iQJHBAABCAAxFiEEJFGtCPCthwEv2Y/bUevqPMjhpYAFAmHtOJgTHG1wZUBlbGxl
 cm1hbi5pZC5hdQAKCRBR6+o8yOGlgLMeD/9eBHqMy+yhXfTw9mjAf8rVlsdY6Xjq
 2LYgHCJpeP0VjxBm8GcyFtAfJc778LyykU18xsi0WVsuwPmVdVwDfZpzxWJrYqeq
 6AuK9uRZAbEx6gZVCsWlk3Em7GyUEqHm5PTxKsDfbzh+hBTNQ8CcKKbCVmEZ+loA
 nWdaWJOZMpE4hQOx0Ph5JRAos/ZUEt2I57qZkRgvIEV+hroFrmdP1rnncdalnLHN
 pXsEn380Q+rpH+48HIpaTpl5+R8CvgFnnlI6/luZC6HoA8K6jph8FdOkkI9eU1v6
 TgdNMiNVIe1wRFzVp+nH7SGqL3l9X/UPS57hL52X+ccpHoioBW9CLPha06g/+UKT
 kJU3mYZg3jvQGrM9H/2R3P97UH9SwHE5SH0xcXj3ItH1NpOKpMO0h5UuWx+Ze8Wo
 zO80xbYLbALtEfx8JMCf95rnUVFL0n55xVJN+7+fs2hU3Be/ZpIyHfDujlHlbd1m
 o3KRhkg1a0RyGsun6Gd2vwLGaBbwYNWvgHM9IDeiAFdJ7HFpp1YrVGpQRkAIUbJS
 bzYiRczjbSof7c9WqLyKNatgNFO/JPI5vi1iNQ3u9Oh9fzjpv5Zok4vK534mOnqU
 QnhiqLJbY+yBpoAvSePGQTCCzDAnJq0r53n0d1O/2T1GcpX9MKM4YlL+Wu4m0yLn
 RcbOCTkmoqWZEw==
 =KjWT
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'powerpc-5.17-2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux

Pull powerpc fixes from Michael Ellerman:

 - A series of bpf fixes, including an oops fix and some codegen fixes.

 - Fix a regression in syscall_get_arch() for compat processes.

 - Fix boot failure on some 32-bit systems with KASAN enabled.

 - A couple of other build/minor fixes.

Thanks to Athira Rajeev, Christophe Leroy, Dmitry V. Levin, Jiri Olsa,
Johan Almbladh, Maxime Bizon, Naveen N. Rao, and Nicholas Piggin.

* tag 'powerpc-5.17-2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux:
  powerpc/64s: Mask SRR0 before checking against the masked NIP
  powerpc/perf: Only define power_pmu_wants_prompt_pmi() for CONFIG_PPC64
  powerpc/32s: Fix kasan_init_region() for KASAN
  powerpc/time: Fix build failure due to do_hard_irq_enable() on PPC32
  powerpc/audit: Fix syscall_get_arch()
  powerpc64/bpf: Limit 'ldbrx' to processors compliant with ISA v2.06
  tools/bpf: Rename 'struct event' to avoid naming conflict
  powerpc/bpf: Update ldimm64 instructions during extra pass
  powerpc32/bpf: Fix codegen for bpf-to-bpf calls
  bpf: Guard against accessing NULL pt_regs in bpf_get_task_stack()
2022-01-23 17:52:42 +02:00
Daniel Borkmann a672b2e36a bpf: Fix ringbuf memory type confusion when passing to helpers
The bpf_ringbuf_submit() and bpf_ringbuf_discard() have ARG_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM
in their bpf_func_proto definition as their first argument, and thus both expect
the result from a prior bpf_ringbuf_reserve() call which has a return type of
RET_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM_OR_NULL.

While the non-NULL memory from bpf_ringbuf_reserve() can be passed to other
helpers, the two sinks (bpf_ringbuf_submit(), bpf_ringbuf_discard()) right now
only enforce a register type of PTR_TO_MEM.

This can lead to potential type confusion since it would allow other PTR_TO_MEM
memory to be passed into the two sinks which did not come from bpf_ringbuf_reserve().

Add a new MEM_ALLOC composable type attribute for PTR_TO_MEM, and enforce that:

 - bpf_ringbuf_reserve() returns NULL or PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_ALLOC
 - bpf_ringbuf_submit() and bpf_ringbuf_discard() only take PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_ALLOC
   but not plain PTR_TO_MEM arguments via ARG_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM
 - however, other helpers might treat PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_ALLOC as plain PTR_TO_MEM
   to populate the memory area when they use ARG_PTR_TO_{UNINIT_,}MEM in their
   func proto description

Fixes: 457f44363a ("bpf: Implement BPF ring buffer and verifier support for it")
Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2022-01-19 01:21:46 +01:00
Daniel Borkmann 64620e0a1e bpf: Fix out of bounds access for ringbuf helpers
Both bpf_ringbuf_submit() and bpf_ringbuf_discard() have ARG_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM
in their bpf_func_proto definition as their first argument. They both expect
the result from a prior bpf_ringbuf_reserve() call which has a return type of
RET_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM_OR_NULL.

Meaning, after a NULL check in the code, the verifier will promote the register
type in the non-NULL branch to a PTR_TO_MEM and in the NULL branch to a known
zero scalar. Generally, pointer arithmetic on PTR_TO_MEM is allowed, so the
latter could have an offset.

The ARG_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM expects a PTR_TO_MEM register type. However, the non-
zero result from bpf_ringbuf_reserve() must be fed into either bpf_ringbuf_submit()
or bpf_ringbuf_discard() but with the original offset given it will then read
out the struct bpf_ringbuf_hdr mapping.

The verifier missed to enforce a zero offset, so that out of bounds access
can be triggered which could be used to escalate privileges if unprivileged
BPF was enabled (disabled by default in kernel).

Fixes: 457f44363a ("bpf: Implement BPF ring buffer and verifier support for it")
Reported-by: <tr3e.wang@gmail.com> (SecCoder Security Lab)
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2022-01-19 01:21:39 +01:00
Daniel Borkmann 6788ab2350 bpf: Generally fix helper register offset check
Right now the assertion on check_ptr_off_reg() is only enforced for register
types PTR_TO_CTX (and open coded also for PTR_TO_BTF_ID), however, this is
insufficient since many other PTR_TO_* register types such as PTR_TO_FUNC do
not handle/expect register offsets when passed to helper functions.

Given this can slip-through easily when adding new types, make this an explicit
allow-list and reject all other current and future types by default if this is
encountered.

Also, extend check_ptr_off_reg() to handle PTR_TO_BTF_ID as well instead of
duplicating it. For PTR_TO_BTF_ID, reg->off is used for BTF to match expected
BTF ids if struct offset is used. This part still needs to be allowed, but the
dynamic off from the tnum must be rejected.

Fixes: 69c087ba62 ("bpf: Add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper")
Fixes: eaa6bcb71e ("bpf: Introduce bpf_per_cpu_ptr()")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2022-01-19 01:21:34 +01:00
Daniel Borkmann d400a6cf1c bpf: Mark PTR_TO_FUNC register initially with zero offset
Similar as with other pointer types where we use ldimm64, clear the register
content to zero first, and then populate the PTR_TO_FUNC type and subprogno
number. Currently this is not done, and leads to reuse of stale register
tracking data.

Given for special ldimm64 cases we always clear the register offset, make it
common for all cases, so it won't be forgotten in future.

Fixes: 69c087ba62 ("bpf: Add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2022-01-19 01:21:29 +01:00
Daniel Borkmann be80a1d3f9 bpf: Generalize check_ctx_reg for reuse with other types
Generalize the check_ctx_reg() helper function into a more generic named one
so that it can be reused for other register types as well to check whether
their offset is non-zero. No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2022-01-19 01:21:24 +01:00
Naveen N. Rao b992f01e66 bpf: Guard against accessing NULL pt_regs in bpf_get_task_stack()
task_pt_regs() can return NULL on powerpc for kernel threads. This is
then used in __bpf_get_stack() to check for user mode, resulting in a
kernel oops. Guard against this by checking return value of
task_pt_regs() before trying to obtain the call chain.

Fixes: fa28dcb82a ("bpf: Introduce helper bpf_get_task_stack()")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.9+
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/d5ef83c361cc255494afd15ff1b4fb02a36e1dcf.1641468127.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
2022-01-15 12:21:23 +11:00
Christy Lee 343e53754b bpf: Fix incorrect integer literal used for marking scratched stack.
env->scratched_stack_slots is a 64-bit value, we should use ULL
instead of UL literal values.

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Christy Lee <christylee@fb.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220108005854.658596-1-christylee@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2022-01-11 09:52:08 -08:00
Yafang Shao 1e9d74660d bpf: Fix mount source show for bpffs
We noticed our tc ebpf tools can't start after we upgrade our in-house kernel
version from 4.19 to 5.10. That is because of the behaviour change in bpffs
caused by commit d2935de7e4 ("vfs: Convert bpf to use the new mount API").

In our tc ebpf tools, we do strict environment check. If the environment is
not matched, we won't allow to start the ebpf progs. One of the check is whether
bpffs is properly mounted. The mount information of bpffs in kernel-4.19 and
kernel-5.10 are as follows:

- kernel 4.19
$ mount -t bpf bpffs /sys/fs/bpf
$ mount -t bpf
bpffs on /sys/fs/bpf type bpf (rw,relatime)

- kernel 5.10
$ mount -t bpf bpffs /sys/fs/bpf
$ mount -t bpf
none on /sys/fs/bpf type bpf (rw,relatime)

The device name in kernel-5.10 is displayed as none instead of bpffs, then our
environment check fails. Currently we modify the tools to adopt to the kernel
behaviour change, but I think we'd better change the kernel code to keep the
behavior consistent.

After this change, the mount information will be displayed the same with the
behavior in kernel-4.19, for example:

$ mount -t bpf bpffs /sys/fs/bpf
$ mount -t bpf
bpffs on /sys/fs/bpf type bpf (rw,relatime)

Fixes: d2935de7e4 ("vfs: Convert bpf to use the new mount API")
Suggested-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220108134623.32467-1-laoar.shao@gmail.com
2022-01-11 10:48:17 +01:00
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen d53ad5d8b2 xdp: Move conversion to xdp_frame out of map functions
All map redirect functions except XSK maps convert xdp_buff to xdp_frame
before enqueueing it. So move this conversion of out the map functions
and into xdp_do_redirect(). This removes a bit of duplicated code, but more
importantly it makes it possible to support caller-allocated xdp_frame
structures, which will be added in a subsequent commit.

Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220103150812.87914-5-toke@redhat.com
2022-01-05 19:46:32 -08:00
Kris Van Hees a5bebc4f00 bpf: Fix verifier support for validation of async callbacks
Commit bfc6bb74e4 ("bpf: Implement verifier support for validation of async callbacks.")
added support for BPF_FUNC_timer_set_callback to
the __check_func_call() function.  The test in __check_func_call() is
flaweed because it can mis-interpret a regular BPF-to-BPF pseudo-call
as a BPF_FUNC_timer_set_callback callback call.

Consider the conditional in the code:

	if (insn->code == (BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL) &&
	    insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_timer_set_callback) {

The BPF_FUNC_timer_set_callback has value 170.  This means that if you
have a BPF program that contains a pseudo-call with an instruction delta
of 170, this conditional will be found to be true by the verifier, and
it will interpret the pseudo-call as a callback.  This leads to a mess
with the verification of the program because it makes the wrong
assumptions about the nature of this call.

Solution: include an explicit check to ensure that insn->src_reg == 0.
This ensures that calls cannot be mis-interpreted as an async callback
call.

Fixes: bfc6bb74e4 ("bpf: Implement verifier support for validation of async callbacks.")
Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees <kris.van.hees@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220105210150.GH1559@oracle.com
2022-01-05 13:38:22 -08:00
Daniel Borkmann e60b0d12a9 bpf: Don't promote bogus looking registers after null check.
If we ever get to a point again where we convert a bogus looking <ptr>_or_null
typed register containing a non-zero fixed or variable offset, then lets not
reset these bounds to zero since they are not and also don't promote the register
to a <ptr> type, but instead leave it as <ptr>_or_null. Converting to a unknown
register could be an avenue as well, but then if we run into this case it would
allow to leak a kernel pointer this way.

Fixes: f1174f77b5 ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2022-01-05 12:00:19 -08:00
David S. Miller e63a023489 Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next
Alexei Starovoitov says:

====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2021-12-30

The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree.

We've added 72 non-merge commits during the last 20 day(s) which contain
a total of 223 files changed, 3510 insertions(+), 1591 deletions(-).

The main changes are:

1) Automatic setrlimit in libbpf when bpf is memcg's in the kernel, from Andrii.

2) Beautify and de-verbose verifier logs, from Christy.

3) Composable verifier types, from Hao.

4) bpf_strncmp helper, from Hou.

5) bpf.h header dependency cleanup, from Jakub.

6) get_func_[arg|ret|arg_cnt] helpers, from Jiri.

7) Sleepable local storage, from KP.

8) Extend kfunc with PTR_TO_CTX, PTR_TO_MEM argument support, from Kumar.
====================

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-12-31 14:35:40 +00:00
Leon Huayra 9e6b19a66d bpf: Fix typo in a comment in bpf lpm_trie.
Fix typo in a comment in trie_update_elem().

Signed-off-by: Leon Huayra <hffilwlqm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211229144422.70339-1-hffilwlqm@gmail.com
2021-12-30 18:42:34 -08:00
Jakub Kicinski 3b80b73a4b net: Add includes masked by netdevice.h including uapi/bpf.h
Add missing includes unmasked by the subsequent change.

Mostly network drivers missing an include for XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211230012742.770642-2-kuba@kernel.org
2021-12-29 20:03:05 -08:00
KP Singh 0fe4b381a5 bpf: Allow bpf_local_storage to be used by sleepable programs
Other maps like hashmaps are already available to sleepable programs.
Sleepable BPF programs run under trace RCU. Allow task, sk and inode
storage to be used from sleepable programs. This allows sleepable and
non-sleepable programs to provide shareable annotations on kernel
objects.

Sleepable programs run in trace RCU where as non-sleepable programs run
in a normal RCU critical section i.e.  __bpf_prog_enter{_sleepable}
and __bpf_prog_exit{_sleepable}) (rcu_read_lock or rcu_read_lock_trace).

In order to make the local storage maps accessible to both sleepable
and non-sleepable programs, one needs to call both
call_rcu_tasks_trace and call_rcu to wait for both trace and classical
RCU grace periods to expire before freeing memory.

Paul's work on call_rcu_tasks_trace allows us to have per CPU queueing
for call_rcu_tasks_trace. This behaviour can be achieved by setting
rcupdate.rcu_task_enqueue_lim=<num_cpus> boot parameter.

In light of these new performance changes and to keep the local storage
code simple, avoid adding a new flag for sleepable maps / local storage
to select the RCU synchronization (trace / classical).

Also, update the dereferencing of the pointers to use
rcu_derference_check (with either the trace or normal RCU locks held)
with a common bpf_rcu_lock_held helper method.

Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211224152916.1550677-2-kpsingh@kernel.org
2021-12-29 17:54:40 -08:00
Haimin Zhang 3ccdcee284 bpf: Add missing map_get_next_key method to bloom filter map.
Without it, kernel crashes in map_get_next_key().

Fixes: 9330986c03 ("bpf: Add bloom filter map implementation")
Reported-by: TCS Robot <tcs_robot@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Haimin Zhang <tcs_kernel@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Joanne Koong <joannekoong@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1640776802-22421-1-git-send-email-tcs.kernel@gmail.com
2021-12-29 09:38:31 -08:00
Xiu Jianfeng 0dd668d208 bpf: Use struct_size() helper
In an effort to avoid open-coded arithmetic in the kernel, use the
struct_size() helper instead of open-coded calculation.

Signed-off-by: Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/160
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211220113048.2859-1-xiujianfeng@huawei.com
2021-12-21 15:35:48 -08:00
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi 3363bd0cfb bpf: Extend kfunc with PTR_TO_CTX, PTR_TO_MEM argument support
Allow passing PTR_TO_CTX, if the kfunc expects a matching struct type,
and punt to PTR_TO_MEM block if reg->type does not fall in one of
PTR_TO_BTF_ID or PTR_TO_SOCK* types. This will be used by future commits
to get access to XDP and TC PTR_TO_CTX, and pass various data (flags,
l4proto, netns_id, etc.) encoded in opts struct passed as pointer to
kfunc.

For PTR_TO_MEM support, arguments are currently limited to pointer to
scalar, or pointer to struct composed of scalars. This is done so that
unsafe scenarios (like passing PTR_TO_MEM where PTR_TO_BTF_ID of
in-kernel valid structure is expected, which may have pointers) are
avoided. Since the argument checking happens basd on argument register
type, it is not easy to ascertain what the expected type is. In the
future, support for PTR_TO_MEM for kfunc can be extended to serve other
usecases. The struct type whose pointer is passed in may have maximum
nesting depth of 4, all recursively composed of scalars or struct with
scalars.

Future commits will add negative tests that check whether these
restrictions imposed for kfunc arguments are duly rejected by BPF
verifier or not.

Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211217015031.1278167-4-memxor@gmail.com
2021-12-18 18:11:47 -08:00
Hao Luo 216e3cd2f2 bpf: Add MEM_RDONLY for helper args that are pointers to rdonly mem.
Some helper functions may modify its arguments, for example,
bpf_d_path, bpf_get_stack etc. Previously, their argument types
were marked as ARG_PTR_TO_MEM, which is compatible with read-only
mem types, such as PTR_TO_RDONLY_BUF. Therefore it's legitimate,
but technically incorrect, to modify a read-only memory by passing
it into one of such helper functions.

This patch tags the bpf_args compatible with immutable memory with
MEM_RDONLY flag. The arguments that don't have this flag will be
only compatible with mutable memory types, preventing the helper
from modifying a read-only memory. The bpf_args that have
MEM_RDONLY are compatible with both mutable memory and immutable
memory.

Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211217003152.48334-9-haoluo@google.com
2021-12-18 13:27:41 -08:00
Hao Luo 34d3a78c68 bpf: Make per_cpu_ptr return rdonly PTR_TO_MEM.
Tag the return type of {per, this}_cpu_ptr with RDONLY_MEM. The
returned value of this pair of helpers is kernel object, which
can not be updated by bpf programs. Previously these two helpers
return PTR_OT_MEM for kernel objects of scalar type, which allows
one to directly modify the memory. Now with RDONLY_MEM tagging,
the verifier will reject programs that write into RDONLY_MEM.

Fixes: 63d9b80dcf ("bpf: Introducte bpf_this_cpu_ptr()")
Fixes: eaa6bcb71e ("bpf: Introduce bpf_per_cpu_ptr()")
Fixes: 4976b718c3 ("bpf: Introduce pseudo_btf_id")
Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211217003152.48334-8-haoluo@google.com
2021-12-18 13:27:41 -08:00
Hao Luo cf9f2f8d62 bpf: Convert PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL to composable types.
Remove PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL and replace it with PTR_TO_MEM combined with
flag PTR_MAYBE_NULL.

Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211217003152.48334-7-haoluo@google.com
2021-12-18 13:27:41 -08:00
Hao Luo 20b2aff4bc bpf: Introduce MEM_RDONLY flag
This patch introduce a flag MEM_RDONLY to tag a reg value
pointing to read-only memory. It makes the following changes:

1. PTR_TO_RDWR_BUF -> PTR_TO_BUF
2. PTR_TO_RDONLY_BUF -> PTR_TO_BUF | MEM_RDONLY

Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211217003152.48334-6-haoluo@google.com
2021-12-18 13:27:41 -08:00
Hao Luo c25b2ae136 bpf: Replace PTR_TO_XXX_OR_NULL with PTR_TO_XXX | PTR_MAYBE_NULL
We have introduced a new type to make bpf_reg composable, by
allocating bits in the type to represent flags.

One of the flags is PTR_MAYBE_NULL which indicates a pointer
may be NULL. This patch switches the qualified reg_types to
use this flag. The reg_types changed in this patch include:

1. PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL
2. PTR_TO_SOCKET_OR_NULL
3. PTR_TO_SOCK_COMMON_OR_NULL
4. PTR_TO_TCP_SOCK_OR_NULL
5. PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL
6. PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL
7. PTR_TO_RDONLY_BUF_OR_NULL
8. PTR_TO_RDWR_BUF_OR_NULL

Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211217003152.48334-5-haoluo@google.com
2021-12-18 13:27:23 -08:00
Hao Luo 3c48073226 bpf: Replace RET_XXX_OR_NULL with RET_XXX | PTR_MAYBE_NULL
We have introduced a new type to make bpf_ret composable, by
reserving high bits to represent flags.

One of the flag is PTR_MAYBE_NULL, which indicates a pointer
may be NULL. When applying this flag to ret_types, it means
the returned value could be a NULL pointer. This patch
switches the qualified arg_types to use this flag.
The ret_types changed in this patch include:

1. RET_PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL
2. RET_PTR_TO_SOCKET_OR_NULL
3. RET_PTR_TO_TCP_SOCK_OR_NULL
4. RET_PTR_TO_SOCK_COMMON_OR_NULL
5. RET_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM_OR_NULL
6. RET_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_BTF_ID_OR_NULL
7. RET_PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL

This patch doesn't eliminate the use of these names, instead
it makes them aliases to 'RET_PTR_TO_XXX | PTR_MAYBE_NULL'.

Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211217003152.48334-4-haoluo@google.com
2021-12-18 12:48:08 -08:00
Hao Luo 48946bd6a5 bpf: Replace ARG_XXX_OR_NULL with ARG_XXX | PTR_MAYBE_NULL
We have introduced a new type to make bpf_arg composable, by
reserving high bits of bpf_arg to represent flags of a type.

One of the flags is PTR_MAYBE_NULL which indicates a pointer
may be NULL. When applying this flag to an arg_type, it means
the arg can take NULL pointer. This patch switches the
qualified arg_types to use this flag. The arg_types changed
in this patch include:

1. ARG_PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL
2. ARG_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL
3. ARG_PTR_TO_CTX_OR_NULL
4. ARG_PTR_TO_SOCKET_OR_NULL
5. ARG_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM_OR_NULL
6. ARG_PTR_TO_STACK_OR_NULL

This patch does not eliminate the use of these arg_types, instead
it makes them an alias to the 'ARG_XXX | PTR_MAYBE_NULL'.

Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211217003152.48334-3-haoluo@google.com
2021-12-18 12:47:24 -08:00
Christy Lee 496f332404 Only output backtracking information in log level 2
Backtracking information is very verbose, don't print it in log
level 1 to improve readability.

Signed-off-by: Christy Lee <christylee@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211216213358.3374427-4-christylee@fb.com
2021-12-16 19:44:34 -08:00
Christy Lee 2e5766483c bpf: Right align verifier states in verifier logs.
Make the verifier logs more readable, print the verifier states
on the corresponding instruction line. If the previous line was
not a bpf instruction, then print the verifier states on its own
line.

Before:

Validating test_pkt_access_subprog3() func#3...
86: R1=invP(id=0) R2=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
; int test_pkt_access_subprog3(int val, struct __sk_buff *skb)
86: (bf) r6 = r2
87: R2=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R6_w=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0)
87: (bc) w7 = w1
88: R1=invP(id=0) R7_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff))
; return get_skb_len(skb) * get_skb_ifindex(val, skb, get_constant(123));
88: (bf) r1 = r6
89: R1_w=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R6_w=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0)
89: (85) call pc+9
Func#4 is global and valid. Skipping.
90: R0_w=invP(id=0)
90: (bc) w8 = w0
91: R0_w=invP(id=0) R8_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff))
; return get_skb_len(skb) * get_skb_ifindex(val, skb, get_constant(123));
91: (b7) r1 = 123
92: R1_w=invP123
92: (85) call pc+65
Func#5 is global and valid. Skipping.
93: R0=invP(id=0)

After:

86: R1=invP(id=0) R2=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
; int test_pkt_access_subprog3(int val, struct __sk_buff *skb)
86: (bf) r6 = r2                      ; R2=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R6_w=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0)
87: (bc) w7 = w1                      ; R1=invP(id=0) R7_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff))
; return get_skb_len(skb) * get_skb_ifindex(val, skb, get_constant(123));
88: (bf) r1 = r6                      ; R1_w=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R6_w=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0)
89: (85) call pc+9
Func#4 is global and valid. Skipping.
90: R0_w=invP(id=0)
90: (bc) w8 = w0                      ; R0_w=invP(id=0) R8_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff))
; return get_skb_len(skb) * get_skb_ifindex(val, skb, get_constant(123));
91: (b7) r1 = 123                     ; R1_w=invP123
92: (85) call pc+65
Func#5 is global and valid. Skipping.
93: R0=invP(id=0)

Signed-off-by: Christy Lee <christylee@fb.com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2021-12-16 19:43:49 -08:00
Christy Lee 0f55f9ed21 bpf: Only print scratched registers and stack slots to verifier logs.
When printing verifier state for any log level, print full verifier
state only on function calls or on errors. Otherwise, only print the
registers and stack slots that were accessed.

Log size differences:

verif_scale_loop6 before: 234566564
verif_scale_loop6 after: 72143943
69% size reduction

kfree_skb before: 166406
kfree_skb after: 55386
69% size reduction

Before:

156: (61) r0 = *(u32 *)(r1 +0)
157: R0_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R2_w=invP0 R10=fp0 fp-8_w=00000000 fp-16_w=00\
000000 fp-24_w=00000000 fp-32_w=00000000 fp-40_w=00000000 fp-48_w=00000000 fp-56_w=00000000 fp-64_w=00000000 fp-72_w=00000000 fp-80_w=00000\
000 fp-88_w=00000000 fp-96_w=00000000 fp-104_w=00000000 fp-112_w=00000000 fp-120_w=00000000 fp-128_w=00000000 fp-136_w=00000000 fp-144_w=00\
000000 fp-152_w=00000000 fp-160_w=00000000 fp-168_w=00000000 fp-176_w=00000000 fp-184_w=00000000 fp-192_w=00000000 fp-200_w=00000000 fp-208\
_w=00000000 fp-216_w=00000000 fp-224_w=00000000 fp-232_w=00000000 fp-240_w=00000000 fp-248_w=00000000 fp-256_w=00000000 fp-264_w=00000000 f\
p-272_w=00000000 fp-280_w=00000000 fp-288_w=00000000 fp-296_w=00000000 fp-304_w=00000000 fp-312_w=00000000 fp-320_w=00000000 fp-328_w=00000\
000 fp-336_w=00000000 fp-344_w=00000000 fp-352_w=00000000 fp-360_w=00000000 fp-368_w=00000000 fp-376_w=00000000 fp-384_w=00000000 fp-392_w=\
00000000 fp-400_w=00000000 fp-408_w=00000000 fp-416_w=00000000 fp-424_w=00000000 fp-432_w=00000000 fp-440_w=00000000 fp-448_w=00000000
; return skb->len;
157: (95) exit
Func#4 is safe for any args that match its prototype
Validating get_constant() func#5...
158: R1=invP(id=0) R10=fp0
; int get_constant(long val)
158: (bf) r0 = r1
159: R0_w=invP(id=1) R1=invP(id=1) R10=fp0
; return val - 122;
159: (04) w0 += -122
160: R0_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R1=invP(id=1) R10=fp0
; return val - 122;
160: (95) exit
Func#5 is safe for any args that match its prototype
Validating get_skb_ifindex() func#6...
161: R1=invP(id=0) R2=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R3=invP(id=0) R10=fp0
; int get_skb_ifindex(int val, struct __sk_buff *skb, int var)
161: (bc) w0 = w3
162: R0_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R1=invP(id=0) R2=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R3=invP(id=0) R10=fp0

After:

156: (61) r0 = *(u32 *)(r1 +0)
157: R0_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0)
; return skb->len;
157: (95) exit
Func#4 is safe for any args that match its prototype
Validating get_constant() func#5...
158: R1=invP(id=0) R10=fp0
; int get_constant(long val)
158: (bf) r0 = r1
159: R0_w=invP(id=1) R1=invP(id=1)
; return val - 122;
159: (04) w0 += -122
160: R0_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff))
; return val - 122;
160: (95) exit
Func#5 is safe for any args that match its prototype
Validating get_skb_ifindex() func#6...
161: R1=invP(id=0) R2=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R3=invP(id=0) R10=fp0
; int get_skb_ifindex(int val, struct __sk_buff *skb, int var)
161: (bc) w0 = w3
162: R0_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R3=invP(id=0)

Signed-off-by: Christy Lee <christylee@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211216213358.3374427-2-christylee@fb.com
2021-12-16 18:16:41 -08:00
Jakub Kicinski 7cd2802d74 Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net
No conflicts.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2021-12-16 16:13:19 -08:00
Jakub Kicinski aef2feda97 add missing bpf-cgroup.h includes
We're about to break the cgroup-defs.h -> bpf-cgroup.h dependency,
make sure those who actually need more than the definition of
struct cgroup_bpf include bpf-cgroup.h explicitly.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211216025538.1649516-3-kuba@kernel.org
2021-12-16 14:57:09 -08:00
Daniel Borkmann e572ff80f0 bpf: Make 32->64 bounds propagation slightly more robust
Make the bounds propagation in __reg_assign_32_into_64() slightly more
robust and readable by aligning it similarly as we did back in the
__reg_combine_64_into_32() counterpart. Meaning, only propagate or
pessimize them as a smin/smax pair.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2021-12-16 19:45:56 +01:00
Daniel Borkmann 3cf2b61eb0 bpf: Fix signed bounds propagation after mov32
For the case where both s32_{min,max}_value bounds are positive, the
__reg_assign_32_into_64() directly propagates them to their 64 bit
counterparts, otherwise it pessimises them into [0,u32_max] universe and
tries to refine them later on by learning through the tnum as per comment
in mentioned function. However, that does not always happen, for example,
in mov32 operation we call zext_32_to_64(dst_reg) which invokes the
__reg_assign_32_into_64() as is without subsequent bounds update as
elsewhere thus no refinement based on tnum takes place.

Thus, not calling into the __update_reg_bounds() / __reg_deduce_bounds() /
__reg_bound_offset() triplet as we do, for example, in case of ALU ops via
adjust_scalar_min_max_vals(), will lead to more pessimistic bounds when
dumping the full register state:

Before fix:

  0: (b4) w0 = -1
  1: R0_w=invP4294967295
     (id=0,imm=ffffffff,
      smin_value=4294967295,smax_value=4294967295,
      umin_value=4294967295,umax_value=4294967295,
      var_off=(0xffffffff; 0x0),
      s32_min_value=-1,s32_max_value=-1,
      u32_min_value=-1,u32_max_value=-1)

  1: (bc) w0 = w0
  2: R0_w=invP4294967295
     (id=0,imm=ffffffff,
      smin_value=0,smax_value=4294967295,
      umin_value=4294967295,umax_value=4294967295,
      var_off=(0xffffffff; 0x0),
      s32_min_value=-1,s32_max_value=-1,
      u32_min_value=-1,u32_max_value=-1)

Technically, the smin_value=0 and smax_value=4294967295 bounds are not
incorrect, but given the register is still a constant, they break assumptions
about const scalars that smin_value == smax_value and umin_value == umax_value.

After fix:

  0: (b4) w0 = -1
  1: R0_w=invP4294967295
     (id=0,imm=ffffffff,
      smin_value=4294967295,smax_value=4294967295,
      umin_value=4294967295,umax_value=4294967295,
      var_off=(0xffffffff; 0x0),
      s32_min_value=-1,s32_max_value=-1,
      u32_min_value=-1,u32_max_value=-1)

  1: (bc) w0 = w0
  2: R0_w=invP4294967295
     (id=0,imm=ffffffff,
      smin_value=4294967295,smax_value=4294967295,
      umin_value=4294967295,umax_value=4294967295,
      var_off=(0xffffffff; 0x0),
      s32_min_value=-1,s32_max_value=-1,
      u32_min_value=-1,u32_max_value=-1)

Without the smin_value == smax_value and umin_value == umax_value invariant
being intact for const scalars, it is possible to leak out kernel pointers
from unprivileged user space if the latter is enabled. For example, when such
registers are involved in pointer arithmtics, then adjust_ptr_min_max_vals()
will taint the destination register into an unknown scalar, and the latter
can be exported and stored e.g. into a BPF map value.

Fixes: 3f50f132d8 ("bpf: Verifier, do explicit ALU32 bounds tracking")
Reported-by: Kuee K1r0a <liulin063@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2021-12-16 19:45:46 +01:00
Daniel Borkmann a82fe085f3 bpf: Fix kernel address leakage in atomic cmpxchg's r0 aux reg
The implementation of BPF_CMPXCHG on a high level has the following parameters:

  .-[old-val]                                          .-[new-val]
  BPF_R0 = cmpxchg{32,64}(DST_REG + insn->off, BPF_R0, SRC_REG)
                          `-[mem-loc]          `-[old-val]

Given a BPF insn can only have two registers (dst, src), the R0 is fixed and
used as an auxilliary register for input (old value) as well as output (returning
old value from memory location). While the verifier performs a number of safety
checks, it misses to reject unprivileged programs where R0 contains a pointer as
old value.

Through brute-forcing it takes about ~16sec on my machine to leak a kernel pointer
with BPF_CMPXCHG. The PoC is basically probing for kernel addresses by storing the
guessed address into the map slot as a scalar, and using the map value pointer as
R0 while SRC_REG has a canary value to detect a matching address.

Fix it by checking R0 for pointers, and reject if that's the case for unprivileged
programs.

Fixes: 5ffa25502b ("bpf: Add instructions for atomic_[cmp]xchg")
Reported-by: Ryota Shiga (Flatt Security)
Acked-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2021-12-14 19:33:06 -08:00
Daniel Borkmann 7d3baf0afa bpf: Fix kernel address leakage in atomic fetch
The change in commit 37086bfdc7 ("bpf: Propagate stack bounds to registers
in atomics w/ BPF_FETCH") around check_mem_access() handling is buggy since
this would allow for unprivileged users to leak kernel pointers. For example,
an atomic fetch/and with -1 on a stack destination which holds a spilled
pointer will migrate the spilled register type into a scalar, which can then
be exported out of the program (since scalar != pointer) by dumping it into
a map value.

The original implementation of XADD was preventing this situation by using
a double call to check_mem_access() one with BPF_READ and a subsequent one
with BPF_WRITE, in both cases passing -1 as a placeholder value instead of
register as per XADD semantics since it didn't contain a value fetch. The
BPF_READ also included a check in check_stack_read_fixed_off() which rejects
the program if the stack slot is of __is_pointer_value() if dst_regno < 0.
The latter is to distinguish whether we're dealing with a regular stack spill/
fill or some arithmetical operation which is disallowed on non-scalars, see
also 6e7e63cbb0 ("bpf: Forbid XADD on spilled pointers for unprivileged
users") for more context on check_mem_access() and its handling of placeholder
value -1.

One minimally intrusive option to fix the leak is for the BPF_FETCH case to
initially check the BPF_READ case via check_mem_access() with -1 as register,
followed by the actual load case with non-negative load_reg to propagate
stack bounds to registers.

Fixes: 37086bfdc7 ("bpf: Propagate stack bounds to registers in atomics w/ BPF_FETCH")
Reported-by: <n4ke4mry@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2021-12-14 19:33:06 -08:00
Paolo Abeni c8064e5b4a bpf: Let bpf_warn_invalid_xdp_action() report more info
In non trivial scenarios, the action id alone is not sufficient to
identify the program causing the warning. Before the previous patch,
the generated stack-trace pointed out at least the involved device
driver.

Let's additionally include the program name and id, and the relevant
device name.

If the user needs additional infos, he can fetch them via a kernel
probe, leveraging the arguments added here.

Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/ddb96bb975cbfddb1546cf5da60e77d5100b533c.1638189075.git.pabeni@redhat.com
2021-12-13 22:28:27 +01:00
Jiri Olsa f92c1e1836 bpf: Add get_func_[arg|ret|arg_cnt] helpers
Adding following helpers for tracing programs:

Get n-th argument of the traced function:
  long bpf_get_func_arg(void *ctx, u32 n, u64 *value)

Get return value of the traced function:
  long bpf_get_func_ret(void *ctx, u64 *value)

Get arguments count of the traced function:
  long bpf_get_func_arg_cnt(void *ctx)

The trampoline now stores number of arguments on ctx-8
address, so it's easy to verify argument index and find
return value argument's position.

Moving function ip address on the trampoline stack behind
the number of functions arguments, so it's now stored on
ctx-16 address if it's needed.

All helpers above are inlined by verifier.

Also bit unrelated small change - using newly added function
bpf_prog_has_trampoline in check_get_func_ip.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211208193245.172141-5-jolsa@kernel.org
2021-12-13 09:25:59 -08:00
Jiri Olsa bb6728d756 bpf: Allow access to int pointer arguments in tracing programs
Adding support to access arguments with int pointer arguments
in tracing programs.

Currently we allow tracing programs to access only pointers to
string (char pointer), void pointers and pointers to structs.

If we try to access argument which is pointer to int, verifier
will fail to load the program with;

  R1 type=ctx expected=fp
  ; int BPF_PROG(fmod_ret_test, int _a, __u64 _b, int _ret)
  0: (bf) r6 = r1
  ; int BPF_PROG(fmod_ret_test, int _a, __u64 _b, int _ret)
  1: (79) r9 = *(u64 *)(r6 +8)
  func 'bpf_modify_return_test' arg1 type INT is not a struct

There is no harm for the program to access int pointer argument.
We are already doing that for string pointer, which is pointer
to int with 1 byte size.

Changing the is_string_ptr to generic integer check and renaming
it to btf_type_is_int.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211208193245.172141-2-jolsa@kernel.org
2021-12-13 09:24:21 -08:00
Alexei Starovoitov f18a499799 bpf: Silence coverity false positive warning.
Coverity issued the following warning:
6685            cands = bpf_core_add_cands(cands, main_btf, 1);
6686            if (IS_ERR(cands))
>>>     CID 1510300:    (RETURN_LOCAL)
>>>     Returning pointer "cands" which points to local variable "local_cand".
6687                    return cands;

It's a false positive.
Add ERR_CAST() to silence it.

Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2021-12-11 18:08:19 -08:00
Jiapeng Chong 4674f21071 bpf: Use kmemdup() to replace kmalloc + memcpy
Eliminate the follow coccicheck warning:

./kernel/bpf/btf.c:6537:13-20: WARNING opportunity for kmemdup.

Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1639030882-92383-1-git-send-email-jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com
2021-12-11 17:57:33 -08:00
Hou Tao c5fb199374 bpf: Add bpf_strncmp helper
The helper compares two strings: one string is a null-terminated
read-only string, and another string has const max storage size
but doesn't need to be null-terminated. It can be used to compare
file name in tracing or LSM program.

Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211210141652.877186-2-houtao1@huawei.com
2021-12-11 17:40:23 -08:00
Jakub Kicinski be3158290d Merge https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next
Andrii Nakryiko says:

====================
bpf-next 2021-12-10 v2

We've added 115 non-merge commits during the last 26 day(s) which contain
a total of 182 files changed, 5747 insertions(+), 2564 deletions(-).

The main changes are:

1) Various samples fixes, from Alexander Lobakin.

2) BPF CO-RE support in kernel and light skeleton, from Alexei Starovoitov.

3) A batch of new unified APIs for libbpf, logging improvements, version
   querying, etc. Also a batch of old deprecations for old APIs and various
   bug fixes, in preparation for libbpf 1.0, from Andrii Nakryiko.

4) BPF documentation reorganization and improvements, from Christoph Hellwig
   and Dave Tucker.

5) Support for declarative initialization of BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY in
   libbpf, from Hengqi Chen.

6) Verifier log fixes, from Hou Tao.

7) Runtime-bounded loops support with bpf_loop() helper, from Joanne Koong.

8) Extend branch record capturing to all platforms that support it,
   from Kajol Jain.

9) Light skeleton codegen improvements, from Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi.

10) bpftool doc-generating script improvements, from Quentin Monnet.

11) Two libbpf v0.6 bug fixes, from Shuyi Cheng and Vincent Minet.

12) Deprecation warning fix for perf/bpf_counter, from Song Liu.

13) MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT unification and MIPS build fix for libbpf,
    from Tiezhu Yang.

14) BTF_KING_TYPE_TAG follow-up fixes, from Yonghong Song.

15) Selftests fixes and improvements, from Ilya Leoshkevich, Jean-Philippe
    Brucker, Jiri Olsa, Maxim Mikityanskiy, Tirthendu Sarkar, Yucong Sun,
    and others.

* https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (115 commits)
  libbpf: Add "bool skipped" to struct bpf_map
  libbpf: Fix typo in btf__dedup@LIBBPF_0.0.2 definition
  bpftool: Switch bpf_object__load_xattr() to bpf_object__load()
  selftests/bpf: Remove the only use of deprecated bpf_object__load_xattr()
  selftests/bpf: Add test for libbpf's custom log_buf behavior
  selftests/bpf: Replace all uses of bpf_load_btf() with bpf_btf_load()
  libbpf: Deprecate bpf_object__load_xattr()
  libbpf: Add per-program log buffer setter and getter
  libbpf: Preserve kernel error code and remove kprobe prog type guessing
  libbpf: Improve logging around BPF program loading
  libbpf: Allow passing user log setting through bpf_object_open_opts
  libbpf: Allow passing preallocated log_buf when loading BTF into kernel
  libbpf: Add OPTS-based bpf_btf_load() API
  libbpf: Fix bpf_prog_load() log_buf logic for log_level 0
  samples/bpf: Remove unneeded variable
  bpf: Remove redundant assignment to pointer t
  selftests/bpf: Fix a compilation warning
  perf/bpf_counter: Use bpf_map_create instead of bpf_create_map
  samples: bpf: Fix 'unknown warning group' build warning on Clang
  samples: bpf: Fix xdp_sample_user.o linking with Clang
  ...
====================

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210234746.2100561-1-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2021-12-10 15:56:13 -08:00
Paul Chaignon 345e004d02 bpf: Fix incorrect state pruning for <8B spill/fill
Commit 354e8f1970 ("bpf: Support <8-byte scalar spill and refill")
introduced support in the verifier to track <8B spill/fills of scalars.
The backtracking logic for the precision bit was however skipping
spill/fills of less than 8B. That could cause state pruning to consider
two states equivalent when they shouldn't be.

As an example, consider the following bytecode snippet:

  0:  r7 = r1
  1:  call bpf_get_prandom_u32
  2:  r6 = 2
  3:  if r0 == 0 goto pc+1
  4:  r6 = 3
  ...
  8: [state pruning point]
  ...
  /* u32 spill/fill */
  10: *(u32 *)(r10 - 8) = r6
  11: r8 = *(u32 *)(r10 - 8)
  12: r0 = 0
  13: if r8 == 3 goto pc+1
  14: r0 = 1
  15: exit

The verifier first walks the path with R6=3. Given the support for <8B
spill/fills, at instruction 13, it knows the condition is true and skips
instruction 14. At that point, the backtracking logic kicks in but stops
at the fill instruction since it only propagates the precision bit for
8B spill/fill. When the verifier then walks the path with R6=2, it will
consider it safe at instruction 8 because R6 is not marked as needing
precision. Instruction 14 is thus never walked and is then incorrectly
removed as 'dead code'.

It's also possible to lead the verifier to accept e.g. an out-of-bound
memory access instead of causing an incorrect dead code elimination.

This regression was found via Cilium's bpf-next CI where it was causing
a conntrack map update to be silently skipped because the code had been
removed by the verifier.

This commit fixes it by enabling support for <8B spill/fills in the
bactracking logic. In case of a <8B spill/fill, the full 8B stack slot
will be marked as needing precision. Then, in __mark_chain_precision,
any tracked register spilled in a marked slot will itself be marked as
needing precision, regardless of the spill size. This logic makes two
assumptions: (1) only 8B-aligned spill/fill are tracked and (2) spilled
registers are only tracked if the spill and fill sizes are equal. Commit
ef979017b8 ("bpf: selftest: Add verifier tests for <8-byte scalar
spill and refill") covers the first assumption and the next commit in
this patchset covers the second.

Fixes: 354e8f1970 ("bpf: Support <8-byte scalar spill and refill")
Signed-off-by: Paul Chaignon <paul@isovalent.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2021-12-10 09:13:19 -08:00
Jakub Kicinski 3150a73366 Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net
No conflicts.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2021-12-09 13:23:02 -08:00
Colin Ian King 73b6eae583 bpf: Remove redundant assignment to pointer t
The pointer t is being initialized with a value that is never read. The
pointer is re-assigned a value a littler later on, hence the initialization
is redundant and can be removed.

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211207224718.59593-1-colin.i.king@gmail.com
2021-12-08 23:14:12 -08:00
Alexei Starovoitov 29f2e5bd94 bpf: Silence purge_cand_cache build warning.
When CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF_MODULES is not set
the following warning can be seen:
kernel/bpf/btf.c:6588:13: warning: 'purge_cand_cache' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
Fix it.

Fixes: 1e89106da2 ("bpf: Add bpf_core_add_cands() and wire it into bpf_core_apply_relo_insn().")
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211207014839.6976-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
2021-12-06 18:24:34 -08:00
Hou Tao 866de40744 bpf: Disallow BPF_LOG_KERNEL log level for bpf(BPF_BTF_LOAD)
BPF_LOG_KERNEL is only used internally, so disallow bpf_btf_load()
to set log level as BPF_LOG_KERNEL. The same checking has already
been done in bpf_check(), so factor out a helper to check the
validity of log attributes and use it in both places.

Fixes: 8580ac9404 ("bpf: Process in-kernel BTF")
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211203053001.740945-1-houtao1@huawei.com
2021-12-04 10:10:24 -08:00
Alexei Starovoitov 78c1f8d063 libbpf: Reduce bpf_core_apply_relo_insn() stack usage.
Reduce bpf_core_apply_relo_insn() stack usage and bump
BPF_CORE_SPEC_MAX_LEN limit back to 64.

Fixes: 29db4bea1d ("bpf: Prepare relo_core.c for kernel duty.")
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211203182836.16646-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
2021-12-03 13:21:59 -08:00
Maxim Mikityanskiy 2fa7d94afc bpf: Fix the off-by-two error in range markings
The first commit cited below attempts to fix the off-by-one error that
appeared in some comparisons with an open range. Due to this error,
arithmetically equivalent pieces of code could get different verdicts
from the verifier, for example (pseudocode):

  // 1. Passes the verifier:
  if (data + 8 > data_end)
      return early
  read *(u64 *)data, i.e. [data; data+7]

  // 2. Rejected by the verifier (should still pass):
  if (data + 7 >= data_end)
      return early
  read *(u64 *)data, i.e. [data; data+7]

The attempted fix, however, shifts the range by one in a wrong
direction, so the bug not only remains, but also such piece of code
starts failing in the verifier:

  // 3. Rejected by the verifier, but the check is stricter than in #1.
  if (data + 8 >= data_end)
      return early
  read *(u64 *)data, i.e. [data; data+7]

The change performed by that fix converted an off-by-one bug into
off-by-two. The second commit cited below added the BPF selftests
written to ensure than code chunks like #3 are rejected, however,
they should be accepted.

This commit fixes the off-by-two error by adjusting new_range in the
right direction and fixes the tests by changing the range into the
one that should actually fail.

Fixes: fb2a311a31 ("bpf: fix off by one for range markings with L{T, E} patterns")
Fixes: b37242c773 ("bpf: add test cases to bpf selftests to cover all access tests")
Signed-off-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211130181607.593149-1-maximmi@nvidia.com
2021-12-03 21:44:42 +01:00
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi b12f031043 bpf: Fix bpf_check_mod_kfunc_call for built-in modules
When module registering its set is built-in, THIS_MODULE will be NULL,
hence we cannot return early in case owner is NULL.

Fixes: 14f267d95f ("bpf: btf: Introduce helpers for dynamic BTF set registration")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211122144742.477787-3-memxor@gmail.com
2021-12-02 13:39:46 -08:00