Just do a quick check that the stolen memory address range doesn't
overflow our chosen integer type.
v2: Add add_overflows() to utils with the promise that gcc7 can do this
better than C and then maybe it will have a proper definition in core.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170130134721.5159-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Now that we have split out a header file for simple macros (that maybe
we can promote into a core header), move a few macros across from
i915_drv.h
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170105164148.26875-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
In order to defeat some circular dependencies between headers to allow use
of e.g. range_overflows() in a header, move the simple independent macros
into their own header.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170105153023.30575-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Chris Wilson