The PCI initialization in pci_subsys_init() is a mess. pci_numaq_init,
pci_acpi_init, pci_visws_init and pci_legacy_init are called and each
implementation checks and eventually modifies the global variable
pcibios_scanned.
x86_init functions allow us to do this more elegant. The pci.init
function pointer is preset to pci_legacy_init. numaq, acpi and visws
can modify the pointer in their early setup functions. The functions
return 0 when they did the full initialization including bus scan. A
non zero return value indicates that pci_legacy_init needs to be
called either because the selected function failed or wants the
generic bus scan in pci_legacy_init to happen (e.g. visws).
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
LKML-Reference: <43F901BD926A4E43B106BF17856F07559FB80CFE@orsmsx508.amr.corp.intel.com>
Acked-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Impact: cleanup
Now that arch/x86/pci/pci.h is used in a number of other places as well,
move the lowlevel x86 pci definitions into the architecture include files.
(not to be confused with the existing arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h file,
which provides public details about x86 PCI)
Tested on: X86_32_UP, X86_32_SMP and X86_64_SMP
Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
I don't know, if this new code boots, but at least it
compiles. Someone should really test it.
Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
Cc: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
move the include/asm-x86/mach-visws/ VISWS specific hardware
details include files into include/asm-x86/visws, to be used from
generic code.
No code changed.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
first step: make the VISWS subarch boot on a regular PC.
We take various shortcuts for that. We copy the generic arch setup file over
into the VISWS setup file.
This is the only step that is not expected to boot on a real VISWS.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
So far subsys_initcalls has been executed in this order depending on
the object order in the Makefile:
arch/x86/pci/visws.c:subsys_initcall(pcibios_init);
arch/x86/pci/numa.c:subsys_initcall(pci_numa_init);
arch/x86/pci/acpi.c:subsys_initcall(pci_acpi_init);
arch/x86/pci/legacy.c:subsys_initcall(pci_legacy_init);
arch/x86/pci/irq.c:subsys_initcall(pcibios_irq_init);
arch/x86/pci/common.c:subsys_initcall(pcibios_init);
This patch removes the ordering dependency. There is now only one
subsys_initcall function that contains subsystem initialization code
with a defined order.
Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
Acked-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
We want to allow different implementations of pci_raw_ops for standard
and extended config space on x86. Rather than clutter generic code with
knowledge of this, we make pci_raw_ops private to x86 and use it to
implement the new raw interface -- raw_pci_read() and raw_pci_write().
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Thomas Gleixner