SCMI message headers carry a sequence number and such field is sized to
allow for MSG_TOKEN_MAX distinct numbers; moreover zero is not really an
acceptable maximum number of pending in-flight messages.
Fix accordingly the checks performed on the value exported by transports
in scmi_desc.max_msg
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210712141833.6628-3-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Reported-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
[sudeep.holla: updated the patch title and error message]
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Kernel doc validation script still complains about the following:
|No description found for return value of 'scmi_get_protocol_device'
|No description found for return value of 'scmi_devm_notifier_register'
|No description found for return value of 'scmi_devm_notifier_unregister'
Fix adding missing Return kernel-doc statements.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210712143504.33541-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
The scmi_linux_errmap buffer access index is supposed to depend on the
array size to prevent element out of bounds access. It uses SCMI_ERR_MAX
to check bounds but that can mismatch with the array size. It also
changes the success into -EIO though scmi_linux_errmap is never used in
case of success, it is expected to work for success case too.
It is slightly confusing code as the negative of the error code
is used as index to the buffer. Fix it by negating it at the start and
make it more readable.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210707135028.1869642-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Since the hdr->protocol_id is set from the scmi_protocol_instance handle
just before the transfer, there is no need to initialise the same in
scmi_xfer_get_init. Remove the unnecessary initialisations.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210608140140.2042257-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com
Tested-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Re-using timed out xfers in a loop can lead to issue if completion was
not properly reinitialized. Move reinit_completion from scmi_xfer_get to
do_xfer to avoid the issue.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210606221232.33768-3-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
[sudeep.holla: moved reinit_completion instead of adding another one]
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
A successfully received delayed response could anyway report a failure at
the protocol layer in the message status field.
Add a check also for this error condition.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210608103056.3388-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Fixes: 58ecdf03db ("firmware: arm_scmi: Add support for asynchronous commands and delayed response")
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
During an async commands execution the Rx buffer length is at first set
to max_msg_sz when the synchronous part of the command is first sent.
However once the synchronous part completes the transport layer waits
for the delayed response which will be processed using the same xfer
descriptor initially allocated. Since synchronous response received at
the end of the xfer will shrink the Rx buffer length to the effective
payload response length, it needs to be reset again.
Raise the Rx buffer length again to max_msg_sz before fetching the
delayed response to ensure full response is read correctly from the
shared memory.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210601102421.26581-2-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Fixes: 58ecdf03db ("firmware: arm_scmi: Add support for asynchronous commands and delayed response")
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
[sudeep.holla: moved reset to scmi_handle_response as it could race with
do_xfer_with_response]
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Having added the support for SCMI protocols as modules in order to let
vendors extend the SCMI core with their own additions it seems odd to
then force SCMI drivers built on top to use a static device table to
declare their devices since this way any new SCMI drivers addition
would need the core SCMI device table to be updated too.
Remove the static core device table and let SCMI drivers to simply declare
which device/protocol pair they need at initialization time: the core will
then take care to generate such devices dynamically during platform
initialization or at module loading time, as long as the requested
underlying protocol is defined in the devicetree.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210316124903.35011-39-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Extend SCMI protocols accounting mechanism to address possible module
usage and add the support to possibly define new protocols as loadable
modules.
Keep the standard protocols built into the SCMI core.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210316124903.35011-38-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Notification private data is currently accessible via handle->notify_priv,
this data was indeed meant to be private to the notification core support
and not to be accessible by SCMI drivers. Make it private hiding it
inside instance descriptor struct scmi_info and accessible only via
dedicated helpers.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210316124903.35011-36-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Remove unused core scmi_xfer wrappers now that we have migrated all
protocols to the new interface based on protocol handles.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210316124903.35011-34-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Now that all the protocol private variable data have been moved out of
struct scmi_handle, mark all of its references as const.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210316124903.35011-32-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Port the SCMI base protocol to new protocol handles based interface.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210316124903.35011-11-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Add an helper to access from a protocol handle, the SCMI version data
which is exposed on sysfs. Such helper will be needed by SCMI base
protocol initialization once it will be moved to new protocol handles
scheme.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210316124903.35011-10-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Add new core SCMI transfer operations based on protocol handles to
enable protocols to builds and send their own protocol specific messages.
Keep old original scmi_xfer_ operations interface as wrappers around the
new interface in order to let coexist old and new interfaces to ease
protocol by protocol migration.
In order to support such migration the above wrappers and some
additional transient code is also introduced in this commit. It will be
later removed as a whole once the full migration of protocols and SCMI
drivers will have been completed.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210316124903.35011-9-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Convert all refactored events registration routines to use protocol
handles.
In order to maintain bisectability and to allow protocols and drivers
to be later ported to the new protocol handle interface one by one,
introduce here also some transient code that will be removed later
in order to ease such transition.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210316124903.35011-8-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Add a new refactored protocol events registration helper and invoke it
from the centralized initialization process triggered by get_ops() and
friends.
Also add a `get_num_sources` as a new optional callback amongst protocol
events operations. Finally remove events registration call-sites from
within the legacy protocol init routines.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210316124903.35011-7-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Expose to the SCMI drivers a new devres managed common protocols API
based on generic get/put methods and protocol handles.
All drivers still keep using the old API, no functional change.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210316124903.35011-4-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Add basic protocol handles definitions and private data helpers.
A protocol handle identifies a protocol instance initialized against a
specific handle, it embeds all the references to the core SCMI transfer
methods that will be needed by a protocol implementation to build and
send its own protocol specific messages using common core methods.
As such, in the interface, a protocol handle will be passed down from
the core to the protocol specific initialization callback at init time.
Anyways, at this point only definitions are introduced, all protocols
initialization code and SCMI drivers probing is still based on the old
interface, so no functional change.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210316124903.35011-3-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Extend common protocol registration routines and provide some new generic
protocols get/put helpers that can track protocols usage and automatically
perform the proper initialization and de-initialization on demand when
required.
Convert all standard protocols to use this new registration scheme while
keeping them all still using the usual initialization logic bound to SCMI
devices probing.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210316124903.35011-2-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
This change provides ARM SCMI Protocol based IIO device.
This driver provides support for Accelerometer and Gyroscope using
SCMI Sensor Protocol extensions added in the SCMIv3.0 ARM specification
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jyoti Bhayana <jbhayana@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210212172235.507028-2-jbhayana@google.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210309231259.78050-2-jbhayana@google.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Add SCMI voltage domain device name to the core list of supported protocol
devices so that it can be enumerated if the firmware supports it.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201119191051.46363-3-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
SCMI v3.0 introduces voltage domain protocol which provides commands to:
- Discover the voltage levels supported by a domain
- Get the configuration and voltage level of a domain
- Set the configuration and voltage level of a domain
Let us add support for the same.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201119191051.46363-2-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Few commands provide the list of description partially and require
to be called consecutively until all the descriptors are fetched
completely. In such cases, we don't release the buffers and reuse
them for consecutive transmits.
However, currently we don't reset the Rx size which will be set as
per the response for the last transmit. This may result in incorrect
response size being interpretted as the firmware may repond with size
greater than the one set but we read only upto the size set by previous
response.
Let us reset the receive buffer size to max possible in such cases as
we don't know the exact size of the response.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201012141746.32575-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com
Fixes: b6f20ff8bd ("firmware: arm_scmi: add common infrastructure and support for base protocol")
Reported-by: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
In preparation to enable building SCMI as a single module, let us move
the SCMI protocol registration call into the driver. This enables us
to also add unregistration of the SCMI protocols.
The main reason for this is to keep it simple instead of maintaining
it as separate modules and dealing with all possible initcall races
and deferred probe handling. We can move it as separate modules if
needed in future.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200907195046.56615-4-sudeep.holla@arm.com
Tested-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
In preparation to enable building scmi as a single module, let us move
the scmi bus {de-,}initialisation call into the driver.
The main reason for this is to keep it simple instead of maintaining
it as separate modules and dealing with all possible initcall races
and deferred probe handling. We can move it as separate modules if
needed in future.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200907195046.56615-3-sudeep.holla@arm.com
Tested-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Add SCMI device for system power protocol by just adding the name "syspower"
to the list of supported core protocol devices.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200907174657.32466-3-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Event reports are used to convey information describing events to the
registered user-callbacks: they are necessarily derived from the underlying
raw SCMI events' messages but they are not meant to expose or directly
mirror any of those messages data layout, which belong to the protocol
layer.
Using fixed size types for report fields, mirroring messages structure,
is at odd with this: get rid of them using more generic, equivalent,
typing.
Substitute scmi_event_header fixed size fields with generic types too and
shuffle around fields definitions to minimize implicit padding while
adapting involved functions.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200710133919.39792-3-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Initialize and enable SCMI notifications core support during bus/driver
probe phase, so that protocols can start registering their supported
events during their initialization.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200701155348.52864-5-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Commit e5bfb21d98 ("firmware: smccc: Add HAVE_ARM_SMCCC_DISCOVERY to
identify SMCCC v1.1 and above") introduced new config option to identify
the availability of SMCCC discoverability of version and features
transparently hiding the indirect dependency on ARM_PSCI_FW.
Commit 5a897e3ab4 ("firmware: arm_scmi: fix psci dependency") just
worked around the build dependency making SCMI SMC/HVC transport depend
on ARM_PSCI_FW at the time. Since it really just relies on SMCCC directly
and not on ARM_PSCI_FW, let us move to use CONFIG_HAVE_ARM_SMCCC_DISCOVERY
instead of CONFIG_ARM_PSCI_FW.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200625101937.51939-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com
Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Currently the trace event 'scmi_xfer_end' reports the status of the
transfer using the unsigned status field read from the firmware which
may not be easy to interpret. It may also miss to emit any timeouts
that happen in the driver resulting in emitting garbage in the status
field in those scenarios.
Let us use signed integer so that error values are emitted out after
they are mapped from firmware error formats to standard linux error
codes. While at this, also include any timeouts in the driver itself.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200609134503.55860-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com
Cc: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>
Cc: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
When CONFIG_ARM_PSCI_FW is disabled but CONFIG_HAVE_ARM_SMCCC is enabled,
arm-scmi runs into a link failure:
arm-linux-gnueabi-ld: drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.o: in function `smc_send_message':
smc.c:(.text+0x200): undefined reference to `arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit'
Change from HAVE_ARM_SMCCC to ARM_PSCI_FW config dependency for now.
We rely on PSCI bindings anyways for the conduit and this should be
fine.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200507144905.11397-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com
Fixes: 1dc6558062 ("firmware: arm_scmi: Add smc/hvc transport")
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Upon reception of an unexpected bogus delayed response, clear the channel
and bail-out safely.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200420152315.21008-5-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Fixes: 4d09852b6f ("firmware: arm_scmi: Add support for notifications message processing")
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Clear channel properly when done processing a delayed response.
This will let the platform firmware know that the channel is now free to
use it for any new delayed response or notification.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200420152315.21008-4-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
(sudeep.holla: Updated commit log to reflect that channel is now free for
platform to use)
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
When an unexpected response message is received we currently warn the user
and bail-out, ensure to also free the channel by invoking the transport
independent operation .clear_channel()
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200420152315.21008-3-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
SCMI transport operation .clear_notification() is indeed a generic method
to clear the channel in a transport dependent way, as such it could be a
useful helper also in other contexts.
Rename such method as .clear_channel(), renaming accordingly also its
already existent call-sites.
No functional change.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200420152315.21008-2-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Add the mechanisms to distinguish notifications from delayed responses
and command responses. Also add support to properly fetch notification
messages upon reception. Notifications processing does not continue any
further after the fetch phase.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200327143438.5382-5-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
[Reworked/renamed scmi_handle_xfer_delayed_resp()]
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
With all the plumbing in place, let's just add the separate dedicated
receive buffers to handle notifications that can arrive asynchronously
from the platform firmware to OS.
Also add one check to see if the platform supports any receive channels
before allocating the receive buffers: since those buffers are optionally
supported though, the whole xfer initialization is also postponed to be
able to check for their existence in advance.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200327143438.5382-2-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
[Changed parameters in __scmi_xfer_info_init()]
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Use the value of "arm,smc-id" property from the device tree as the first
argument for SMCCC call leaving all the other arguments as zero for now.
There is no Rx, only Tx because of smc/hvc not support Rx.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1583673879-20714-3-git-send-email-peng.fan@nxp.com
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
[sudeep.holla: reworded commit log/subject and fixed !HAVE_ARM_SMCCC build]
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
The SCMI specification is fairly independent of the transport protocol,
which can be a simple mailbox (already implemented) or anything else.
The current Linux implementation however is very much dependent on the
mailbox transport layer.
This patch makes the SCMI core code (driver.c) independent of the
mailbox transport layer and moves all mailbox related code to a new
file: mailbox.c and all struct shared_mem related code to a new file:
shmem.c.
We can now implement more transport protocols to transport SCMI
messages.
The transport protocols just need to provide struct scmi_transport_ops,
with its version of the callbacks to enable exchange of SCMI messages.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8698a3cec199b8feab35c2339f02dc232bfd773b.1580448239.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
The SCMI transport layer communicates via mailboxes and shared memory with
firmware running on a microcontroller. It is platform specific how long it
takes to pass a SCMI message. The most sensitive requests are coming from
CPUFreq subsystem, which might be used by the scheduler.
Thus, there is a need to measure these delays and capture anomalies.
This change introduces trace events wrapped around transfer code.
According to Jim's suggestion a unique transfer_id is to distinguish
similar entries which might have the same message id, protocol id and
sequence. This is a case then there are some timeouts in transfers.
Suggested-by: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Platform drivers now have the option to have the platform core create
and remove any needed sysfs attribute files. Using the same, let's add
the scmi firmware and protocol version attributes as well as vendor and
sub-vendor identifiers to sysfs.
It helps to identify the firmware details from the sysfs entries similar
to ARM SCPI implementation.
Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Now that scmi bus provides option to create named scmi device, let us
create the default devices with names. This will help to add names for
matching to respective drivers and eventually to add multiple devices
and drivers per protocol.
Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Now that the scmi bus supports adding multiple devices per protocol,
and since scmi_create_protocol_device calls scmi_mbox_chan_setup,
we must avoid allocating and initialising the mbox channel if it is
already initialised.
Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Currently only one scmi device is created for each protocol enumerated.
However, there is requirement to make use of some procotols by multiple
kernel subsystems/frameworks. One such example is SCMI PERFORMANCE
protocol which can be used by both cpufreq and devfreq drivers.
Similarly, SENSOR protocol may be used by hwmon and iio subsystems,
and POWER protocol may be used by genpd and regulator drivers.
In order to achieve that, let us extend the scmi bus to match based
not only protocol id but also the scmi device name if one is available.
Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Messages that are sent to platform, also known as commands and can be:
1. Synchronous commands that block the channel until the requested work
has been completed. The platform responds to these commands over the
same channel and hence can't be used to send another command until the
previous command has completed.
2. Asynchronous commands on the other hand, the platform schedules the
requested work to complete later in time and returns almost immediately
freeing the channel for new commands. The response indicates the success
or failure in the ability to schedule the requested work. When the work
has completed, the platform sends an additional delayed response message.
Using the same transmit buffer used for sending the asynchronous command
even for the delayed response corresponding to it simplifies handling of
the delayed response. It's the caller of asynchronous command that is
responsible for allocating the completion flag that scmi driver can
complete to indicate the arrival of delayed response.
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cristian Marussi