So far during driver unload we called drm_framebuffer_cleanup() for the
fbdev fb, which only removes the fb from the drm fb list regardless of
its reference count, but leaves the fb bound on an active crtc. Since
the fb's backing storage was freed this could mean we scan some random
memory content out afterwards. It's not a big issue since the fb is
allocated from stolen memory and afaik there is no other user for that
than i915. It's still cleaner to properly unbind the fb and disable the
crtc, which is what drm_framebuffer_remove() does.
Note that after
commit 88891eb1e9eca0ba619518bed31580f91e9cf84d
Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Date: Mon Feb 10 18:00:38 2014 +0100
we call drm_framebuffer_cleanup() only after dropping the last reference
on the fb, but that won't happen since we don't unbind the fb. This
results in a drm core warn about a leaked fb.
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
In Jesse's patch to switch the fbdev framebuffer from an embedded
struct to a pointer the kfree in case of an error was missed. Fix this
up by using our own internal fb allocation helper directly instead of
reinventing that wheel.
We need a to_intel_framebuffer cast unfortunately since all the other
callers of _create still look better whith using a drm_framebuffer as
return pointer.
v2: Add an unlocked __intel_framebuffer_create function since our
dev->struct_mutex locking is too much a mess. With ppgtt we even need
it to take a look at the global gtt offset of pinned objects, since
the vma list might chance from underneath us. At least with the
current global gtt lookup functions. Reported by Mika.
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Now that it's a normally kmalloce buffer we can use the usual cleanup
paths. The upside here is that if we get the refcounting wrong will be
able to catch it, since the drm core will complain about leftover
framebuffers and kref about underflows.
v2: Kill intel_framebuffer_fini - no longer needed now that we
refcount all fbs properly and only confusing.
v3: We actually still need to call unregister_private to remove the fb
from the idr and drop the idr reference - the final unref doesn't do
that. So much for remembering my own fb liftime rules. Reported by
Imre Deak.
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> (v2)
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Allocate this struct instead, so we can re-use another allocated
elsewhere if needed.
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
[danvet: WARN_ON if there's no backing storage attached to an fb,
that's a bug.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Because whatever.*
* This should contain a fairly long list of issues and still
unresolved resgressions, but I didn't really get a vote.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Multiple definitions show up multiple times in modinfo output.
There's already an identical one in i915_drv.c along with other MODULE_*
definitions, so drop the lone one in intel_fbdev.c.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This should just be a debug. Add another debug msg to the inherit path
while we're at it.
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72098
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
If we use a stolen buffer, our probe callback shouldn't allocate a new
buffer; we should re-use the one from the BIOS instead if possible.
v2: fix locking (Jesse)
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Use the nice Kernel macro, it makes the code much more readable.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This file is all about the legacy fbdev support. If we want to extract
framebuffer functions, we better put those into a separate file.
Also rename functions accordingly, only two have used the intel_fb_
prefix anyway.
Reviewed-by: Chon Ming Lee <chon.ming.lee@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Imre Deak