Now that btrfs_io_bio have access to btrfs_device we can safely
increment the device corruption counter on error. There is one notable
exception - repair bios for raid. Since those don't go through the
normal submit_stripe_bio callpath but through raid56_parity_recover thus
repair bios won't have their device set.
Scrub increments the corruption counter for checksum mismatch as well
but does not call this function.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/4857863.FCrPRfMyHP@liv/
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[BUG]
When a lot of subvolumes are created, there is a user report about
transaction aborted caused by slow anonymous block device reclaim:
BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -24)
WARNING: CPU: 17 PID: 17041 at fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1576 create_pending_snapshot+0xbc4/0xd10 [btrfs]
RIP: 0010:create_pending_snapshot+0xbc4/0xd10 [btrfs]
Call Trace:
create_pending_snapshots+0x82/0xa0 [btrfs]
btrfs_commit_transaction+0x275/0x8c0 [btrfs]
btrfs_mksubvol+0x4b9/0x500 [btrfs]
btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_transid+0x174/0x180 [btrfs]
btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0x11c/0x180 [btrfs]
btrfs_ioctl+0x11a4/0x2da0 [btrfs]
do_vfs_ioctl+0xa9/0x640
ksys_ioctl+0x67/0x90
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x1a/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x110
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
---[ end trace 33f2f83f3d5250e9 ]---
BTRFS: error (device sda1) in create_pending_snapshot:1576: errno=-24 unknown
BTRFS info (device sda1): forced readonly
BTRFS warning (device sda1): Skipping commit of aborted transaction.
BTRFS: error (device sda1) in cleanup_transaction:1831: errno=-24 unknown
[CAUSE]
The anonymous device pool is shared and its size is 1M. It's possible to
hit that limit if the subvolume deletion is not fast enough and the
subvolumes to be cleaned keep the ids allocated.
[WORKAROUND]
We can't avoid the anon device pool exhaustion but we can shorten the
time the id is attached to the subvolume root once the subvolume becomes
invisible to the user.
Reported-by: Greed Rong <greedrong@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CA+UqX+NTrZ6boGnWHhSeZmEY5J76CTqmYjO2S+=tHJX7nb9DPw@mail.gmail.com/
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
vfs_inode is used only for the inode number everything else requires
btrfs_inode.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ use btrfs_ino ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Instead of making multiple calls to BTRFS_I simply take btrfs_inode as
an input paramter.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
All of its children functions use btrfs_inode.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
All of its children take btrfs_inode so bubble up this requirement to
btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space's interface and stop calling BTRFS_I
internally.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Instead of calling BTRFS_I on the passed vfs_inode take btrfs_inode
directly.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It needs btrfs_inode so take it as a parameter directly.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It only uses btrfs_inode internally so take it as a parameter.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
No point in taking an inode only to get btrfs_fs_info from it, instead
take btrfs_fs_info directly.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Preparation to make btrfs_dirty_pages take btrfs_inode as parameter.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This function really needs a btrfs_inode and not a generic vfs one. Take
it as a parameter and get rid of superfluous BTRFS_I() calls.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Take btrfs_inode directly and stop using superfulous BTRFS_I calls.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Simply forwards its argument so let's get rid of one extra BTRFS_I by
taking btrfs_inode directly.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
All children now take btrfs_inode so convert it to taking it as a
parameter as well.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Gets rid of superfulous BTRFS_I() calls and prepare for converting
btrfs_run_delalloc_range to using btrfs_inode.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Simply gets rid of superfluous BTRFS_I() calls.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Gets rid of superfluous BTRFS_I() calls.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Preparation to converting btrfs_run_delalloc_range to using btrfs_inode
without BTRFS_I() calls.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It really wants btrfs_inode.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It doesn't really need vfs_inode but btrfs_inode.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It only uses vfs inode for assigning it to the async_chunk function.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It only really uses btrfs_inode.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It really wants btrfs_inode and is prepration to converting
run_delalloc_nocow to taking btrfs_inode.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It just forwards its argument to __btrfs_qgroup_release_data.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
All but 3 uses require vfs_inode so convert the logic to have
btrfs_inode be the main inode struct.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Majority of its uses are for btrfs_inode so take it as an argument
directly.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It simpy forwards its inode argument to __btrfs_add_ordered_extent which
already takes btrfs_inode.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
All its children functions take btrfs_inode so convert it to taking
btrfs_inode.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Preparation to converting its callers to taking btrfs_inode.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It has only 2 uses for the vfs_inode - insert_inline_extent and
i_size_read. On the flipside it will allow converting its callers to
btrfs_inode, so convert it to taking btrfs_inode.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It passes btrfs_inode to its callee so change the interface.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The function btrfs_check_can_nocow() now has two completely different
call patterns.
For nowait variant, callers don't need to do any cleanup. While for
wait variant, callers need to release the lock if they can do nocow
write.
This is somehow confusing, and is already a problem for the exported
btrfs_check_can_nocow().
So this patch will separate the different patterns into different
functions.
For nowait variant, the function will be called check_nocow_nolock().
For wait variant, the function pair will be btrfs_check_nocow_lock()
btrfs_check_nocow_unlock().
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
These two functions have extra conditions that their callers need to
meet, and some not-that-common parameters used for return value.
So adding some comments may save reviewers some time.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[BUG]
When the data space is exhausted, even if the inode has NOCOW attribute,
we will still refuse to truncate unaligned range due to ENOSPC.
The following script can reproduce it pretty easily:
#!/bin/bash
dev=/dev/test/test
mnt=/mnt/btrfs
umount $dev &> /dev/null
umount $mnt &> /dev/null
mkfs.btrfs -f $dev -b 1G
mount -o nospace_cache $dev $mnt
touch $mnt/foobar
chattr +C $mnt/foobar
xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -b 4k 0 4k" $mnt/foobar > /dev/null
xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -b 4k 0 1G" $mnt/padding &> /dev/null
sync
xfs_io -c "fpunch 0 2k" $mnt/foobar
umount $mnt
Currently this will fail at the fpunch part.
[CAUSE]
Because btrfs_truncate_block() always reserves space without checking
the NOCOW attribute.
Since the writeback path follows NOCOW bit, we only need to bother the
space reservation code in btrfs_truncate_block().
[FIX]
Make btrfs_truncate_block() follow btrfs_buffered_write() to try to
reserve data space first, and fall back to NOCOW check only when we
don't have enough space.
Such always-try-reserve is an optimization introduced in
btrfs_buffered_write(), to avoid expensive btrfs_check_can_nocow() call.
This patch will export check_can_nocow() as btrfs_check_can_nocow(), and
use it in btrfs_truncate_block() to fix the problem.
Reported-by: Martin Doucha <martin.doucha@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The fiemap callback is not part of UAPI interface and the prototypes
don't have the __u64 types either.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It has only 4 uses of a vfs_inode for inode_sub_bytes but unifies the
interface with the non __ prefixed version. Will also makes converting
its callers to btrfs_inode easier.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Will enable converting btrfs_submit_compressed_write to btrfs_inode more
easily.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It has one VFS and 1 btrfs inode usages but converting it to btrfs_inode
interface will allow seamless conversion of its callers.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It really wants a btrfs_inode and will allow submit_compressed_extents
to be completely converted to btrfs_inode in follow up patches.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It really wants btrfs_inode and not a vfs inode.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It doesn't use the generic vfs inode for anything use btrfs_inode
directly.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It doesn't use the vfs inode for anything, can just as easily take
btrfs_inode. Follow up patches will convert callers as well.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[BUG]
The following simple workload from fsstress can lead to qgroup reserved
data space leak:
0/0: creat f0 x:0 0 0
0/0: creat add id=0,parent=-1
0/1: write f0[259 1 0 0 0 0] [600030,27288] 0
0/4: dwrite - xfsctl(XFS_IOC_DIOINFO) f0[259 1 0 0 64 627318] return 25, fallback to stat()
0/4: dwrite f0[259 1 0 0 64 627318] [610304,106496] 0
This would cause btrfs qgroup to leak 20480 bytes for data reserved
space. If btrfs qgroup limit is enabled, such leak can lead to
unexpected early EDQUOT and unusable space.
[CAUSE]
When doing direct IO, kernel will try to writeback existing buffered
page cache, then invalidate them:
generic_file_direct_write()
|- filemap_write_and_wait_range();
|- invalidate_inode_pages2_range();
However for btrfs, the bi_end_io hook doesn't finish all its heavy work
right after bio ends. In fact, it delays its work further:
submit_extent_page(end_io_func=end_bio_extent_writepage);
end_bio_extent_writepage()
|- btrfs_writepage_endio_finish_ordered()
|- btrfs_init_work(finish_ordered_fn);
<<< Work queue execution >>>
finish_ordered_fn()
|- btrfs_finish_ordered_io();
|- Clear qgroup bits
This means, when filemap_write_and_wait_range() returns,
btrfs_finish_ordered_io() is not guaranteed to be executed, thus the
qgroup bits for related range are not cleared.
Now into how the leak happens, this will only focus on the overlapping
part of buffered and direct IO part.
1. After buffered write
The inode had the following range with QGROUP_RESERVED bit:
596 616K
|///////////////|
Qgroup reserved data space: 20K
2. Writeback part for range [596K, 616K)
Write back finished, but btrfs_finish_ordered_io() not get called
yet.
So we still have:
596K 616K
|///////////////|
Qgroup reserved data space: 20K
3. Pages for range [596K, 616K) get released
This will clear all qgroup bits, but don't update the reserved data
space.
So we have:
596K 616K
| |
Qgroup reserved data space: 20K
That number doesn't match the qgroup bit range anymore.
4. Dio prepare space for range [596K, 700K)
Qgroup reserved data space for that range, we got:
596K 616K 700K
|///////////////|///////////////////////|
Qgroup reserved data space: 20K + 104K = 124K
5. btrfs_finish_ordered_range() gets executed for range [596K, 616K)
Qgroup free reserved space for that range, we got:
596K 616K 700K
| |///////////////////////|
We need to free that range of reserved space.
Qgroup reserved data space: 124K - 20K = 104K
6. btrfs_finish_ordered_range() gets executed for range [596K, 700K)
However qgroup bit for range [596K, 616K) is already cleared in
previous step, so we only free 84K for qgroup reserved space.
596K 616K 700K
| | |
We need to free that range of reserved space.
Qgroup reserved data space: 104K - 84K = 20K
Now there is no way to release that 20K unless disabling qgroup or
unmounting the fs.
[FIX]
This patch will change the timing of btrfs_qgroup_release/free_data()
call. Here it uses buffered COW write as an example.
The new timing | The old timing
----------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
btrfs_buffered_write() | btrfs_buffered_write()
|- btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data() | |- btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data()
|
btrfs_run_delalloc_range() | btrfs_run_delalloc_range()
|- btrfs_add_ordered_extent() |
|- btrfs_qgroup_release_data() |
The reserved is passed into |
btrfs_ordered_extent structure |
|
btrfs_finish_ordered_io() | btrfs_finish_ordered_io()
|- The reserved space is passed to | |- btrfs_qgroup_release_data()
btrfs_qgroup_record | The resereved space is passed
| to btrfs_qgroup_recrod
|
btrfs_qgroup_account_extents() | btrfs_qgroup_account_extents()
|- btrfs_qgroup_free_refroot() | |- btrfs_qgroup_free_refroot()
The point of such change is to ensure, when ordered extents are
submitted, the qgroup reserved space is already released, to keep the
timing aligned with file_write_and_wait_range().
So that qgroup data reserved space is all bound to btrfs_ordered_extent
and solve the timing mismatch.
Fixes: f695fdcef8 ("btrfs: qgroup: Introduce functions to release/free qgroup reserve data space")
Suggested-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This is to prepare for the incoming timing change of qgroup reserved
data space and ordered extent.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Function insert_reserved_file_extent() takes a long list of parameters,
which are all for btrfs_file_extent_item, even including two reserved
members, encryption and other_encoding.
This makes the parameter list unnecessary long for a function which only
gets called twice.
This patch will refactor the parameter list, by using
btrfs_file_extent_item as parameter directly to hugely reduce the number
of parameters.
Also, since there are only two callers, one in btrfs_finish_ordered_io()
which inserts file extent for ordered extent, and one
__btrfs_prealloc_file_range().
These two call sites have completely different context, where ordered
extent can be compressed, but will always be regular extent, while the
preallocated one is never going to be compressed and always has PREALLOC
type.
So use two small wrapper for these two different call sites to improve
readability.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The start argument for btrfs_free_reserved_data_space_noquota() is only
used to make sure the amount of bytes we decrement from the bytes_may_use
counter of the data space_info object is aligned to the filesystem's
sector size. It serves no other purpose.
All its current callers always pass a length argument that is already
aligned to the sector size, so we can make the start argument go away.
In fact its presence makes it impossible to use it in a context where we
just want to free a number of bytes for a range for which either we do
not know its start offset or for freeing multiple ranges at once (which
are not contiguous).
This change is preparatory work for a patch (third patch in this series)
that makes relocation of data block groups that are not full reserve less
data space.
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=51h/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'for-5.8-rc6-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux into master
Pull btrfs fixes from David Sterba:
"A few resouce leak fixes from recent patches, all are stable material.
The problems have been observed during testing or have a reproducer"
* tag 'for-5.8-rc6-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux:
btrfs: fix mount failure caused by race with umount
btrfs: fix page leaks after failure to lock page for delalloc
btrfs: qgroup: fix data leak caused by race between writeback and truncate
btrfs: fix double free on ulist after backref resolution failure
[BUG]
When running tests like generic/013 on test device with btrfs quota
enabled, it can normally lead to data leak, detected at unmount time:
BTRFS warning (device dm-3): qgroup 0/5 has unreleased space, type 0 rsv 4096
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 11 PID: 16386 at fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:4142 close_ctree+0x1dc/0x323 [btrfs]
RIP: 0010:close_ctree+0x1dc/0x323 [btrfs]
Call Trace:
btrfs_put_super+0x15/0x17 [btrfs]
generic_shutdown_super+0x72/0x110
kill_anon_super+0x18/0x30
btrfs_kill_super+0x17/0x30 [btrfs]
deactivate_locked_super+0x3b/0xa0
deactivate_super+0x40/0x50
cleanup_mnt+0x135/0x190
__cleanup_mnt+0x12/0x20
task_work_run+0x64/0xb0
__prepare_exit_to_usermode+0x1bc/0x1c0
__syscall_return_slowpath+0x47/0x230
do_syscall_64+0x64/0xb0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
---[ end trace caf08beafeca2392 ]---
BTRFS error (device dm-3): qgroup reserved space leaked
[CAUSE]
In the offending case, the offending operations are:
2/6: writev f2X[269 1 0 0 0 0] [1006997,67,288] 0
2/7: truncate f2X[269 1 0 0 48 1026293] 18388 0
The following sequence of events could happen after the writev():
CPU1 (writeback) | CPU2 (truncate)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
btrfs_writepages() |
|- extent_write_cache_pages() |
|- Got page for 1003520 |
| 1003520 is Dirty, no writeback |
| So (!clear_page_dirty_for_io()) |
| gets called for it |
|- Now page 1003520 is Clean. |
| | btrfs_setattr()
| | |- btrfs_setsize()
| | |- truncate_setsize()
| | New i_size is 18388
|- __extent_writepage() |
| |- page_offset() > i_size |
|- btrfs_invalidatepage() |
|- Page is clean, so no qgroup |
callback executed
This means, the qgroup reserved data space is not properly released in
btrfs_invalidatepage() as the page is Clean.
[FIX]
Instead of checking the dirty bit of a page, call
btrfs_qgroup_free_data() unconditionally in btrfs_invalidatepage().
As qgroup rsv are completely bound to the QGROUP_RESERVED bit of
io_tree, not bound to page status, thus we won't cause double freeing
anyway.
Fixes: 0b34c261e2 ("btrfs: qgroup: Prevent qgroup->reserved from going subzero")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Nikolay Borisov