Commit Graph

208 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Linus Torvalds 64de76ce8e for-6.5-rc3-tag
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iQIzBAABCgAdFiEE8rQSAMVO+zA4DBdWxWXV+ddtWDsFAmTCTAsACgkQxWXV+ddt
 WDvhYhAAluWrfM2ZzhY/tdDeKUNpf0NIAFGZIV4QP/2E43yIPC2+xMPqW/AnBnIP
 k28gOhgoH7LBP/cr0IrFHMz8Glges3cHz1UxFjJZgjiU3mAA0mgkIttPpzms7vqi
 3SVUxL2bJkebJy53nOpZcHlrcWveg+q0hTUslquCYBb3dA4gb61HBwzA2e0wKFeB
 wYw/gQtEy3TkHQPAxVjUF28ASoaroNKsE9QjfLZV0FDn0u0zBFxqpqj7bFUay++i
 sG3nPVZsqKcgIX7sUSwrpv4XAFu8fHz+GAQqCNqTxKCJ0ZZzsgzJtKs+12rv7dZC
 EvRt0jEt+DgwvmEy7j250TEbcI9rMaQuny8yt2j9sNKH/m9bW0BjptCtwghDoL89
 0D6qqicHbA+dJNq8/kDyxV6xC2Git2Ck0fpOfiU7YzhAFECZc/DkidvXa1keMUay
 usspO+YHOjDtlq0zJ0xixbxCseJfrj4habieVKZ/CnAvb84082ZiLcMxFqop/ewB
 WHKNB0O2+P78xoa7/Be6tp/w1HaaW8ZHvkPicD9d4khKJrXAKLNc/Xny4OqRT14z
 sWWaFuNjC7kIUT15EAQNj0wgymA7XcTL9gM1uuSO95PN+M3j4CleApzEvR3dn9FX
 gmoxuwVfVsJKKcwo6WFByqzu03kuSladEFasSHQAJbh3jyU9LUY=
 =Y/po
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'for-6.5-rc3-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux

Pull btrfs fixes from David Sterba:

 - fix accounting of global block reserve size when block group tree is
   enabled

 - the async discard has been enabled in 6.2 unconditionally, but for
   zoned mode it does not make that much sense to do it asynchronously
   as the zones are reset as needed

 - error handling and proper error value propagation fixes

* tag 'for-6.5-rc3-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux:
  btrfs: check for commit error at btrfs_attach_transaction_barrier()
  btrfs: check if the transaction was aborted at btrfs_wait_for_commit()
  btrfs: remove BUG_ON()'s in add_new_free_space()
  btrfs: account block group tree when calculating global reserve size
  btrfs: zoned: do not enable async discard
2023-07-27 11:44:08 -07:00
Filipe Manana d8ccbd2191 btrfs: remove BUG_ON()'s in add_new_free_space()
At add_new_free_space() we have these BUG_ON()'s that are there to deal
with any failure to add free space to the in memory free space cache.
Such failures are mostly -ENOMEM that should be very rare. However there's
no need to have these BUG_ON()'s, we can just return any error to the
caller and all callers and their upper call chain are already dealing with
errors.

So just make add_new_free_space() return any errors, while removing the
BUG_ON()'s, and returning the total amount of added free space to an
optional u64 pointer argument.

Reported-by: syzbot+3ba856e07b7127889d8c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/000000000000e9cb8305ff4e8327@google.com/
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-07-24 18:06:05 +02:00
Linus Torvalds 4667025951 for-6.5-rc2-tag
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iQIzBAABCgAdFiEE8rQSAMVO+zA4DBdWxWXV+ddtWDsFAmS4TjYACgkQxWXV+ddt
 WDt8yw//b6E+Ab0QBBS6Dl9R3euv+aqQUa35Lg8z2L89oLjNlX/yZSj4ZIZ/467A
 omDtCat1uwYSlzPgM7RtfvXew7ujULmK9UP5IdwEQgQ5qf+pIE50h78x64zCLG1R
 g2C9OMGvNxU8kOR2sRFaBJ+Lf8Mth8ipOzDl8XPE4m7t87tLYdpmVoHJKzNj/AcF
 UOruS8HilFYlc8Oqb/yxDPYeMmdUQaqahhq4tHkoIB/09aePaJwAiyhQ53v3TaAX
 oBvBBrV65WdHu3epfB9WcPQRyd09ov+e14UXAX7CepkZ0RdIpU1CcszPGHTtOP94
 fRaup2zFygolHSTMPFU3drtnI3CRIGntdfHFqDEH+M1ysvRxG4VUnAjWL6w9KZZC
 3z2G6cYoVxpcbCch5wpn/97cr6PowRABK0AoirrreU0VA2Vkdi45N5eoT/2DTEVT
 s5VirJsfC5IXCrvQf/h67jHlqk+23e+/uP8in+GWTgPEmddTSWNKCi9ZcHKQ/skf
 5U9Y3vkFFl68cQEwcB6vYMlbCiCxCuimz8AvGFrxkU9qmah6gcgTnXwKqneAbr3f
 jFwZvgh+E5ueK76/KLLWIKyfDx5cU8N/D5TlmZ+n/TAoWUFVs5V2ctB4EOsIotev
 EN7sriJGUkfGp+EAs4Xux4OKGx6IinyogdZmQN9HmNIlGks02qk=
 =yO9Y
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'for-6.5-rc2-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux

Pull btrfs fixes from David Sterba:
 "Stable fixes:

   - fix race between balance and cancel/pause

   - various iput() fixes

   - fix use-after-free of new block group that became unused

   - fix warning when putting transaction with qgroups enabled after
     abort

   - fix crash in subpage mode when page could be released between map
     and map read

   - when scrubbing raid56 verify the P/Q stripes unconditionally

   - fix minor memory leak in zoned mode when a block group with an
     unexpected superblock is found

  Regression fixes:

   - fix ordered extent split error handling when submitting direct IO

   - user irq-safe locking when adding delayed iputs"

* tag 'for-6.5-rc2-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux:
  btrfs: fix warning when putting transaction with qgroups enabled after abort
  btrfs: fix ordered extent split error handling in btrfs_dio_submit_io
  btrfs: set_page_extent_mapped after read_folio in btrfs_cont_expand
  btrfs: raid56: always verify the P/Q contents for scrub
  btrfs: use irq safe locking when running and adding delayed iputs
  btrfs: fix iput() on error pointer after error during orphan cleanup
  btrfs: fix double iput() on inode after an error during orphan cleanup
  btrfs: zoned: fix memory leak after finding block group with super blocks
  btrfs: fix use-after-free of new block group that became unused
  btrfs: be a bit more careful when setting mirror_num_ret in btrfs_map_block
  btrfs: fix race between balance and cancel/pause
2023-07-20 08:11:30 -07:00
Filipe Manana f1a07c2b4e btrfs: zoned: fix memory leak after finding block group with super blocks
At exclude_super_stripes(), if we happen to find a block group that has
super blocks mapped to it and we are on a zoned filesystem, we error out
as this is not supposed to happen, indicating either a bug or maybe some
memory corruption for example. However we are exiting the function without
freeing the memory allocated for the logical address of the super blocks.
Fix this by freeing the logical address.

Fixes: 12659251ca ("btrfs: implement log-structured superblock for ZONED mode")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-07-18 03:12:57 +02:00
Filipe Manana 0657b20c5a btrfs: fix use-after-free of new block group that became unused
If a task creates a new block group and that block group becomes unused
before we finish its creation, at btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(),
then when btrfs_mark_bg_unused() is called against the block group, we
assume that the block group is currently in the list of block groups to
reclaim, and we move it out of the list of new block groups and into the
list of unused block groups. This has two consequences:

1) We move it out of the list of new block groups associated to the
   current transaction. So the block group creation is not finished and
   if we attempt to delete the bg because it's unused, we will not find
   the block group item in the extent tree (or the new block group tree),
   its device extent items in the device tree etc, resulting in the
   deletion to fail due to the missing items;

2) We don't increment the reference count on the block group when we
   move it to the list of unused block groups, because we assumed the
   block group was on the list of block groups to reclaim, and in that
   case it already has the correct reference count. However the block
   group was on the list of new block groups, in which case no extra
   reference was taken because it's local to the current task. This
   later results in doing an extra reference count decrement when
   removing the block group from the unused list, eventually leading the
   reference count to 0.

This second case was caught when running generic/297 from fstests, which
produced the following assertion failure and stack trace:

  [589.559] assertion failed: refcount_read(&block_group->refs) == 1, in fs/btrfs/block-group.c:4299
  [589.559] ------------[ cut here ]------------
  [589.559] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/block-group.c:4299!
  [589.560] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
  [589.560] CPU: 8 PID: 2819134 Comm: umount Tainted: G        W          6.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-134+ #1
  [589.560] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.2-0-gea1b7a073390-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
  [589.560] RIP: 0010:btrfs_free_block_groups+0x449/0x4a0 [btrfs]
  [589.561] Code: 68 62 da c0 (...)
  [589.561] RSP: 0018:ffffa55a8c3b3d98 EFLAGS: 00010246
  [589.561] RAX: 0000000000000058 RBX: ffff8f030d7f2000 RCX: 0000000000000000
  [589.562] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff953f0878 RDI: 00000000ffffffff
  [589.562] RBP: ffff8f030d7f2088 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffa55a8c3b3c50
  [589.562] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff8f05850b4c00
  [589.562] R13: ffff8f030d7f2090 R14: ffff8f05850b4cd8 R15: dead000000000100
  [589.563] FS:  00007f497fd2e840(0000) GS:ffff8f09dfc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  [589.563] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  [589.563] CR2: 00007f497ff8ec10 CR3: 0000000271472006 CR4: 0000000000370ee0
  [589.563] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
  [589.564] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
  [589.564] Call Trace:
  [589.564]  <TASK>
  [589.565]  ? __die_body+0x1b/0x60
  [589.565]  ? die+0x39/0x60
  [589.565]  ? do_trap+0xeb/0x110
  [589.565]  ? btrfs_free_block_groups+0x449/0x4a0 [btrfs]
  [589.566]  ? do_error_trap+0x6a/0x90
  [589.566]  ? btrfs_free_block_groups+0x449/0x4a0 [btrfs]
  [589.566]  ? exc_invalid_op+0x4e/0x70
  [589.566]  ? btrfs_free_block_groups+0x449/0x4a0 [btrfs]
  [589.567]  ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20
  [589.567]  ? btrfs_free_block_groups+0x449/0x4a0 [btrfs]
  [589.567]  ? btrfs_free_block_groups+0x449/0x4a0 [btrfs]
  [589.567]  close_ctree+0x35d/0x560 [btrfs]
  [589.568]  ? fsnotify_sb_delete+0x13e/0x1d0
  [589.568]  ? dispose_list+0x3a/0x50
  [589.568]  ? evict_inodes+0x151/0x1a0
  [589.568]  generic_shutdown_super+0x73/0x1a0
  [589.569]  kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30
  [589.569]  btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 [btrfs]
  [589.569]  deactivate_locked_super+0x2e/0x70
  [589.569]  cleanup_mnt+0x104/0x160
  [589.570]  task_work_run+0x56/0x90
  [589.570]  exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x160/0x170
  [589.570]  syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x22/0x50
  [589.570]  ? __x64_sys_umount+0x12/0x20
  [589.571]  do_syscall_64+0x48/0x90
  [589.571]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc
  [589.571] RIP: 0033:0x7f497ff0a567
  [589.571] Code: af 98 0e (...)
  [589.572] RSP: 002b:00007ffc98347358 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a6
  [589.572] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00007f49800b8264 RCX: 00007f497ff0a567
  [589.572] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000557f558abfa0
  [589.573] RBP: 0000557f558a6ba0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007ffc98346100
  [589.573] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
  [589.573] R13: 0000557f558abfa0 R14: 0000557f558a6cb0 R15: 0000557f558a6dd0
  [589.573]  </TASK>
  [589.574] Modules linked in: dm_snapshot dm_thin_pool (...)
  [589.576] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Fix this by adding a runtime flag to the block group to tell that the
block group is still in the list of new block groups, and therefore it
should not be moved to the list of unused block groups, at
btrfs_mark_bg_unused(), until the flag is cleared, when we finish the
creation of the block group at btrfs_create_pending_block_groups().

Fixes: a9f189716c ("btrfs: move out now unused BG from the reclaim list")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-07-11 17:32:26 +02:00
Linus Torvalds cc423f6337 for-6.5-tag
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iQIzBAABCgAdFiEE8rQSAMVO+zA4DBdWxWXV+ddtWDsFAmSZ0YUACgkQxWXV+ddt
 WDuF9g/+OsEZflGYIZj11trG0l5HWApnINKqhZ524J0TNy9KxY0KOTqPCOg0O41E
 Vt7uJCMG06+ifvVEby8srjzUZxUutIuMeGIP91VyXUbt+CleAWunxnL8aKcTPS3T
 QxyGx0VmukO2UHYCXhXQLRXo/+zPcBxnk6UgVzcBCIOecOMTB1KCeblBmqd3q86f
 NVFse+BTkmtm86u/1rzEDqgY6lMHQ+jNoHhpRVGpzmSnSX8GELyOW3QnixS0LCo2
 no0vvW0QXkRJ+S68V5zBWlqa3xr21jOYcmON2Ra2G8Etsjx7W5XKS3I9k/4uonxb
 LbITmBwEZWt/aTzmLFT16S5M9BlRqH5Ffmsw7Ls+NDmdvH/f1zM8XeNAb7kpFTrn
 T3aALjkcd65/JFmgyVmzdt4BSmrUkYm0EEmLirQec86HJ4NlQJpJ2B7cfMWKPyal
 +VgaT4S+fLTc/HJD3nObMXTCxZrMf0sBUhU4/QXqL7TTjqqosSn26mlGNUocw7Ty
 HaESk7j2L9TMPt640r1G98j9ND7sWmyBmiYsah8F3MKZCIS892qhtFs0m5g2tA1F
 sjPv9u6M5Pi6ie5Eo8xs+SqKa7TPPVsbZ9XcMRBuzDc5AtUPAm6ii9QVwref8wTq
 qO379jDepgPj4HZkXMzQKxd6rw6wrF854304XhjHZefk+ChhIc4=
 =nN4X
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'for-6.5-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux

Pull btrfs updates from David Sterba:
 "Mainly core changes, refactoring and optimizations.

  Performance is improved in some areas, overall there may be a
  cumulative improvement due to refactoring that removed lookups in the
  IO path or simplified IO submission tracking.

  Core:

   - submit IO synchronously for fast checksums (crc32c and xxhash),
     remove high priority worker kthread

   - read extent buffer in one go, simplify IO tracking, bio submission
     and locking

   - remove additional tracking of redirtied extent buffers, originally
     added for zoned mode but actually not needed

   - track ordered extent pointer in bio to avoid rbtree lookups during
     IO

   - scrub, use recovered data stripes as cache to avoid unnecessary
     read

   - in zoned mode, optimize logical to physical mappings of extents

   - remove PageError handling, not set by VFS nor writeback

   - cleanups, refactoring, better structure packing

   - lots of error handling improvements

   - more assertions, lockdep annotations

   - print assertion failure with the exact line where it happens

   - tracepoint updates

   - more debugging prints

  Performance:

   - speedup in fsync(), better tracking of inode logged status can
     avoid transaction commit

   - IO path structures track logical offsets in data structures and
     does not need to look it up

  User visible changes:

   - don't commit transaction for every created subvolume, this can
     reduce time when many subvolumes are created in a batch

   - print affected files when relocation fails

   - trigger orphan file cleanup during START_SYNC ioctl

  Notable fixes:

   - fix crash when disabling quota and relocation

   - fix crashes when removing roots from drity list

   - fix transacion abort during relocation when converting from newer
     profiles not covered by fallback

   - in zoned mode, stop reclaiming block groups if filesystem becomes
     read-only

   - fix rare race condition in tree mod log rewind that can miss some
     btree node slots

   - with enabled fsverity, drop up-to-date page bit in case the
     verification fails"

* tag 'for-6.5-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux: (194 commits)
  btrfs: fix race between quota disable and relocation
  btrfs: add comment to struct btrfs_fs_info::dirty_cowonly_roots
  btrfs: fix race when deleting free space root from the dirty cow roots list
  btrfs: fix race when deleting quota root from the dirty cow roots list
  btrfs: tracepoints: also show actual number of the outstanding extents
  btrfs: update i_version in update_dev_time
  btrfs: make btrfs_compressed_bioset static
  btrfs: add handling for RAID1C23/DUP to btrfs_reduce_alloc_profile
  btrfs: scrub: remove btrfs_fs_info::scrub_wr_completion_workers
  btrfs: scrub: remove scrub_ctx::csum_list member
  btrfs: do not BUG_ON after failure to migrate space during truncation
  btrfs: do not BUG_ON on failure to get dir index for new snapshot
  btrfs: send: do not BUG_ON() on unexpected symlink data extent
  btrfs: do not BUG_ON() when dropping inode items from log root
  btrfs: replace BUG_ON() at split_item() with proper error handling
  btrfs: do not BUG_ON() on tree mod log failures at btrfs_del_ptr()
  btrfs: do not BUG_ON() on tree mod log failures at insert_ptr()
  btrfs: do not BUG_ON() on tree mod log failure at insert_new_root()
  btrfs: do not BUG_ON() on tree mod log failures at push_nodes_for_insert()
  btrfs: abort transaction at update_ref_for_cow() when ref count is zero
  ...
2023-06-26 11:41:38 -07:00
Qu Wenruo cb091225a5 btrfs: fix remaining u32 overflows when left shifting stripe_nr
There was regression caused by a97699d1d6 ("btrfs: replace
map_lookup->stripe_len by BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN") and supposedly fixed by
a7299a18a1 ("btrfs: fix u32 overflows when left shifting stripe_nr").
To avoid code churn the fix was open coding the type casts but
unfortunately missed one which was still possible to hit [1].

The missing place was assignment of bioc->full_stripe_logical inside
btrfs_map_block().

Fix it by adding a helper that does the safe calculation of the offset
and use it everywhere even though it may not be strictly necessary due
to already using u64 types.  This replaces all remaining
"<< BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN_SHIFT" calls.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20230622065438.86402-1-wqu@suse.com/

Fixes: a7299a18a1 ("btrfs: fix u32 overflows when left shifting stripe_nr")
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ update changelog ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-06-22 17:03:55 +02:00
Matt Corallo 160fe8f6fd btrfs: add handling for RAID1C23/DUP to btrfs_reduce_alloc_profile
Callers of `btrfs_reduce_alloc_profile` expect it to return exactly
one allocation profile flag, and failing to do so may ultimately
result in a WARN_ON and remount-ro when allocating new blocks, like
the below transaction abort on 6.1.

`btrfs_reduce_alloc_profile` has two ways of determining the profile,
first it checks if a conversion balance is currently running and
uses the profile we're converting to. If no balance is currently
running, it returns the max-redundancy profile which at least one
block in the selected block group has.

This works by simply checking each known allocation profile bit in
redundancy order. However, `btrfs_reduce_alloc_profile` has not been
updated as new flags have been added - first with the `DUP` profile
and later with the RAID1C34 profiles.

Because of the way it checks, if we have blocks with different
profiles and at least one is known, that profile will be selected.
However, if none are known we may return a flag set with multiple
allocation profiles set.

This is currently only possible when a balance from one of the three
unhandled profiles to another of the unhandled profiles is canceled
after allocating at least one block using the new profile.

In that case, a transaction abort like the below will occur and the
filesystem will need to be mounted with -o skip_balance to get it
mounted rw again (but the balance cannot be resumed without a
similar abort).

  [770.648] ------------[ cut here ]------------
  [770.648] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -22)
  [770.648] WARNING: CPU: 43 PID: 1159593 at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4122 find_free_extent+0x1d94/0x1e00 [btrfs]
  [770.648] CPU: 43 PID: 1159593 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G        W 6.1.0-0.deb11.7-powerpc64le #1  Debian 6.1.20-2~bpo11+1a~test
  [770.648] Hardware name: T2P9D01 REV 1.00 POWER9 0x4e1202 opal:skiboot-bc106a0 PowerNV
  [770.648] NIP:  c00800000f6784fc LR: c00800000f6784f8 CTR: c000000000d746c0
  [770.648] REGS: c000200089afe9a0 TRAP: 0700   Tainted: G        W (6.1.0-0.deb11.7-powerpc64le Debian 6.1.20-2~bpo11+1a~test)
  [770.648] MSR:  9000000002029033 <SF,HV,VEC,EE,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE>  CR: 28848282  XER: 20040000
  [770.648] CFAR: c000000000135110 IRQMASK: 0
	    GPR00: c00800000f6784f8 c000200089afec40 c00800000f7ea800 0000000000000026
	    GPR04: 00000001004820c2 c000200089afea00 c000200089afe9f8 0000000000000027
	    GPR08: c000200ffbfe7f98 c000000002127f90 ffffffffffffffd8 0000000026d6a6e8
	    GPR12: 0000000028848282 c000200fff7f3800 5deadbeef0000122 c00000002269d000
	    GPR16: c0002008c7797c40 c000200089afef17 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
	    GPR20: 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 c000200008bc5a98 0000000000000001
	    GPR24: 0000000000000000 c0000003c73088d0 c000200089afef17 c000000016d3a800
	    GPR28: c0000003c7308800 c00000002269d000 ffffffffffffffea 0000000000000001
  [770.648] NIP [c00800000f6784fc] find_free_extent+0x1d94/0x1e00 [btrfs]
  [770.648] LR [c00800000f6784f8] find_free_extent+0x1d90/0x1e00 [btrfs]
  [770.648] Call Trace:
  [770.648] [c000200089afec40] [c00800000f6784f8] find_free_extent+0x1d90/0x1e00 [btrfs] (unreliable)
  [770.648] [c000200089afed30] [c00800000f681398] btrfs_reserve_extent+0x1a0/0x2f0 [btrfs]
  [770.648] [c000200089afeea0] [c00800000f681bf0] btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x108/0x670 [btrfs]
  [770.648] [c000200089afeff0] [c00800000f66bd68] __btrfs_cow_block+0x170/0x850 [btrfs]
  [770.648] [c000200089aff100] [c00800000f66c58c] btrfs_cow_block+0x144/0x288 [btrfs]
  [770.648] [c000200089aff1b0] [c00800000f67113c] btrfs_search_slot+0x6b4/0xcb0 [btrfs]
  [770.648] [c000200089aff2a0] [c00800000f679f60] lookup_inline_extent_backref+0x128/0x7c0 [btrfs]
  [770.648] [c000200089aff3b0] [c00800000f67b338] lookup_extent_backref+0x70/0x190 [btrfs]
  [770.648] [c000200089aff470] [c00800000f67b54c] __btrfs_free_extent+0xf4/0x1490 [btrfs]
  [770.648] [c000200089aff5a0] [c00800000f67d770] __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x328/0x1530 [btrfs]
  [770.648] [c000200089aff740] [c00800000f67ea2c] btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0xb4/0x3e0 [btrfs]
  [770.648] [c000200089aff800] [c00800000f699aa4] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x8c/0x12b0 [btrfs]
  [770.648] [c000200089aff8f0] [c00800000f6dc628] reset_balance_state+0x1c0/0x290 [btrfs]
  [770.648] [c000200089aff9a0] [c00800000f6e2f7c] btrfs_balance+0x1164/0x1500 [btrfs]
  [770.648] [c000200089affb40] [c00800000f6f8e4c] btrfs_ioctl+0x2b54/0x3100 [btrfs]
  [770.648] [c000200089affc80] [c00000000053be14] sys_ioctl+0x794/0x1310
  [770.648] [c000200089affd70] [c00000000002af98] system_call_exception+0x138/0x250
  [770.648] [c000200089affe10] [c00000000000c654] system_call_common+0xf4/0x258
  [770.648] --- interrupt: c00 at 0x7fff94126800
  [770.648] NIP:  00007fff94126800 LR: 0000000107e0b594 CTR: 0000000000000000
  [770.648] REGS: c000200089affe80 TRAP: 0c00   Tainted: G        W (6.1.0-0.deb11.7-powerpc64le Debian 6.1.20-2~bpo11+1a~test)
  [770.648] MSR:  900000000000d033 <SF,HV,EE,PR,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE>  CR: 24002848  XER: 00000000
  [770.648] IRQMASK: 0
	    GPR00: 0000000000000036 00007fffc9439da0 00007fff94217100 0000000000000003
	    GPR04: 00000000c4009420 00007fffc9439ee8 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
	    GPR08: 00000000803c7416 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
	    GPR12: 0000000000000000 00007fff9467d120 0000000107e64c9c 0000000107e64d0a
	    GPR16: 0000000107e64d06 0000000107e64cf1 0000000107e64cc4 0000000107e64c73
	    GPR20: 0000000107e64c31 0000000107e64bf1 0000000107e64be7 0000000000000000
	    GPR24: 0000000000000000 00007fffc9439ee0 0000000000000003 0000000000000001
	    GPR28: 00007fffc943f713 0000000000000000 00007fffc9439ee8 0000000000000000
  [770.648] NIP [00007fff94126800] 0x7fff94126800
  [770.648] LR [0000000107e0b594] 0x107e0b594
  [770.648] --- interrupt: c00
  [770.648] Instruction dump:
  [770.648] 3b00ffe4 e8898828 481175f5 60000000 4bfff4fc 3be00000 4bfff570 3d220000
  [770.648] 7fc4f378 e8698830 4811cd95 e8410018 <0fe00000> f9c10060 f9e10068 fa010070
  [770.648] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
  [770.648] BTRFS: error (device dm-2: state A) in find_free_extent_update_loop:4122: errno=-22 unknown
  [770.648] BTRFS info (device dm-2: state EA): forced readonly
  [770.648] BTRFS: error (device dm-2: state EA) in __btrfs_free_extent:3070: errno=-22 unknown
  [770.648] BTRFS error (device dm-2: state EA): failed to run delayed ref for logical 17838685708288 num_bytes 24576 type 184 action 2 ref_mod 1: -22
  [770.648] BTRFS: error (device dm-2: state EA) in btrfs_run_delayed_refs:2144: errno=-22 unknown
  [770.648] BTRFS: error (device dm-2: state EA) in reset_balance_state:3599: errno=-22 unknown

Fixes: 47e6f7423b ("btrfs: add support for 3-copy replication (raid1c3)")
Fixes: 8d6fac0087 ("btrfs: add support for 4-copy replication (raid1c4)")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Signed-off-by: Matt Corallo <blnxfsl@bluematt.me>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-06-19 13:59:40 +02:00
Naohiro Aota 7e27180994 btrfs: reinsert BGs failed to reclaim
The reclaim process can temporarily fail. For example, if the space is
getting tight, it fails to make the block group read-only. If there are no
further writes on that block group, the block group will never get back to
the reclaim list, and the BG never gets reclaimed. In a certain workload,
we can leave many such block groups never reclaimed.

So, let's get it back to the list and give it a chance to be reclaimed.

Fixes: 18bb8bbf13 ("btrfs: zoned: automatically reclaim zones")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-06-19 13:59:38 +02:00
Naohiro Aota 93463ff7b5 btrfs: bail out reclaim process if filesystem is read-only
When a filesystem is read-only, we cannot reclaim a block group as it
cannot rewrite the data. Just bail out in that case.

Note that it can drop block groups in this case. As we did
sb_start_write(), read-only filesystem means we got a fatal error and
forced read-only. There is no chance to reclaim them again.

Fixes: 18bb8bbf13 ("btrfs: zoned: automatically reclaim zones")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-06-19 13:59:37 +02:00
Naohiro Aota a9f189716c btrfs: move out now unused BG from the reclaim list
An unused block group is easy to remove to free up space and should be
reclaimed fast. Such block group can often already be a target of the
reclaim process. As we check list_empty(&bg->bg_list), we keep it in the
reclaim list. That block group is never reclaimed until the file system
is filled e.g. up to 75%.

Instead, we can move unused block group to the unused list and delete it
fast.

Fixes: 18bb8bbf13 ("btrfs: zoned: automatically reclaim zones")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-06-19 13:59:37 +02:00
Naohiro Aota 3ed01616ba btrfs: delete unused BGs while reclaiming BGs
The reclaiming process only starts after the filesystem volumes are
allocated to a certain level (75% by default). Thus, the list of
reclaiming target block groups can build up so huge at the time the
reclaim process kicks in. On a test run, there were over 1000 BGs in the
reclaim list.

As the reclaim involves rewriting the data, it takes really long time to
reclaim the BGs. While the reclaim is running, btrfs_delete_unused_bgs()
won't proceed because the reclaim side is holding
fs_info->reclaim_bgs_lock. As a result, we will have a large number of
unused BGs kept in the unused list. On my test run, I got 1057 unused BGs.

Since deleting a block group is relatively easy and fast work, we can call
btrfs_delete_unused_bgs() while it reclaims BGs, to avoid building up
unused BGs.

Fixes: 18bb8bbf13 ("btrfs: zoned: automatically reclaim zones")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-06-19 13:59:37 +02:00
David Sterba 1d12680044 btrfs: drop gfp from parameter extent state helpers
Now that all extent state bit helpers effectively take the GFP_NOFS mask
(and GFP_NOWAIT is encoded in the bits) we can remove the parameter.
This reduces stack consumption in many functions and simplifies a lot of
code.

Net effect on module on a release build:

   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
1250432   20985   16088 1287505  13a551 pre/btrfs.ko
1247074   20985   16088 1284147  139833 post/btrfs.ko

DELTA: -3358

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-06-19 13:59:30 +02:00
David Sterba 7dde7a8ab3 btrfs: drop NOFAIL from set_extent_bit allocation masks
The __GFP_NOFAIL passed to set_extent_bit first appeared in 2010
(commit f0486c68e4 ("Btrfs: Introduce contexts for metadata
reservation")), without any explanation why it would be needed.

Meanwhile we've updated the semantics of set_extent_bit to handle failed
allocations and do unlock, sleep and retry if needed.  The use of the
NOFAIL flag is also an outlier, we never want any of the set/clear
extent bit helpers to fail, they're used for many critical changes like
extent locking, besides the extent state bit changes.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-06-19 13:59:30 +02:00
David Sterba fe1a598c42 btrfs: open code set_extent_dirty
The helper is used a few times, that it's setting the DIRTY extent bit
is still clear.

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-06-19 13:59:30 +02:00
Qu Wenruo 7561551e7b btrfs: scrub: try harder to mark RAID56 block groups read-only
Currently we allow a block group not to be marked read-only for scrub.

But for RAID56 block groups if we require the block group to be
read-only, then we're allowed to use cached content from scrub stripe to
reduce unnecessary RAID56 reads.

So this patch would:

- Make btrfs_inc_block_group_ro() try harder
  During my tests, for cases like btrfs/061 and btrfs/064, we can hit
  ENOSPC from btrfs_inc_block_group_ro() calls during scrub.

  The reason is if we only have one single data chunk, and trying to
  scrub it, we won't have any space left for any newer data writes.

  But this check should be done by the caller, especially for scrub
  cases we only temporarily mark the chunk read-only.
  And newer data writes would always try to allocate a new data chunk
  when needed.

- Return error for scrub if we failed to mark a RAID56 chunk read-only

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-05-17 11:59:46 +02:00
Qu Wenruo e9255d6c40 btrfs: scrub: remove the old scrub recheck code
The old scrub code has different entrance to verify the content, and
since we have removed the writeback path, now we can start removing the
re-check part, including:

- scrub_recover structure
- scrub_sector::recover member
- function scrub_setup_recheck_block()
- function scrub_recheck_block()
- function scrub_recheck_block_checksum()
- function scrub_repair_block_group_good_copy()
- function scrub_repair_sector_from_good_copy()
- function scrub_is_page_on_raid56()

- function full_stripe_lock()
- function search_full_stripe_lock()
- function get_full_stripe_logical()
- function insert_full_stripe_lock()
- function lock_full_stripe()
- function unlock_full_stripe()
- btrfs_block_group::full_stripe_locks_root member
- btrfs_full_stripe_locks_tree structure
  This infrastructure is to ensure RAID56 scrub is properly handling
  recovery and P/Q scrub correctly.

  This is no longer needed, before P/Q scrub we will wait for all
  the involved data stripes to be scrubbed first, and RAID56 code has
  internal lock to ensure no race in the same full stripe.

- function scrub_print_warning()
- function scrub_get_recover()
- function scrub_put_recover()
- function scrub_handle_errored_block()
- function scrub_setup_recheck_block()
- function scrub_bio_wait_endio()
- function scrub_submit_raid56_bio_wait()
- function scrub_recheck_block_on_raid56()
- function scrub_recheck_block()
- function scrub_recheck_block_checksum()
- function scrub_repair_block_from_good_copy()
- function scrub_repair_sector_from_good_copy()

And two more functions exported temporarily for later cleanup:

- alloc_scrub_sector()
- alloc_scrub_block()

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-04-17 18:01:24 +02:00
Filipe Manana 5758d1bd2d btrfs: remove bytes_used argument from btrfs_make_block_group()
The only caller of btrfs_make_block_group() always passes 0 as the value
for the bytes_used argument, so remove it.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-04-17 18:01:19 +02:00
Qu Wenruo 6ded22c1bf btrfs: reduce div64 calls by limiting the number of stripes of a chunk to u32
There are quite some div64 calls inside btrfs_map_block() and its
variants.

Such calls are for @stripe_nr, where @stripe_nr is the number of
stripes before our logical bytenr inside a chunk.

However we can eliminate such div64 calls by just reducing the width of
@stripe_nr from 64 to 32.

This can be done because our chunk size limit is already 10G, with fixed
stripe length 64K.
Thus a U32 is definitely enough to contain the number of stripes.

With such width reduction, we can get rid of slower div64, and extra
warning for certain 32bit arch.

This patch would do:

- Add a new tree-checker chunk validation on chunk length
  Make sure no chunk can reach 256G, which can also act as a bitflip
  checker.

- Reduce the width from u64 to u32 for @stripe_nr variables

- Replace unnecessary div64 calls with regular modulo and division
  32bit division and modulo are much faster than 64bit operations, and
  we are finally free of the div64 fear at least in those involved
  functions.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-04-17 18:01:14 +02:00
Qu Wenruo a97699d1d6 btrfs: replace map_lookup->stripe_len by BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN
Currently btrfs doesn't support stripe lengths other than 64KiB.
This is already set in the tree-checker.

There is really no meaning to record that fixed value in map_lookup for
now, and can all be replaced with BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN.

Furthermore we can use the fix stripe length to do the following
optimization:

- Use BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN_SHIFT to replace some 64bit division
  Now we only need to do a right shift.

  And the value of BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN itself is already too large for bit
  shift, thus if we accidentally use BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN to do bit shift,
  a compiler warning would be triggered.

  Thus this bit shift optimization would be safe.

- Use BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN_MASK to calculate the offset inside a stripe

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-04-17 18:01:14 +02:00
Naohiro Aota e15acc2588 btrfs: zoned: drop space_info->active_total_bytes
The space_info->active_total_bytes is no longer necessary as we now
count the region of newly allocated block group as zone_unusable. Drop
its usage.

Fixes: 6a921de589 ("btrfs: zoned: introduce space_info->active_total_bytes")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-03-15 20:51:07 +01:00
Josef Bacik df384da5a4 btrfs: use temporary variable for space_info in btrfs_update_block_group
We do

  cache->space_info->counter += num_bytes;

everywhere in here.  This is makes the lines longer than they need to
be, and will be especially noticeable when we add the active tracking in,
so add a temp variable for the space_info so this is cleaner.

Reviewed-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-03-15 20:51:06 +01:00
Filipe Manana 675dfe1223 btrfs: fix block group item corruption after inserting new block group
We can often end up inserting a block group item, for a new block group,
with a wrong value for the used bytes field.

This happens if for the new allocated block group, in the same transaction
that created the block group, we have tasks allocating extents from it as
well as tasks removing extents from it.

For example:

1) Task A creates a metadata block group X;

2) Two extents are allocated from block group X, so its "used" field is
   updated to 32K, and its "commit_used" field remains as 0;

3) Transaction commit starts, by some task B, and it enters
   btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups(). There it tries to update the block
   group item for block group X, which currently has its "used" field with
   a value of 32K. But that fails since the block group item was not yet
   inserted, and so on failure update_block_group_item() sets the
   "commit_used" field of the block group back to 0;

4) The block group item is inserted by task A, when for example
   btrfs_create_pending_block_groups() is called when releasing its
   transaction handle. This results in insert_block_group_item() inserting
   the block group item in the extent tree (or block group tree), with a
   "used" field having a value of 32K, but without updating the
   "commit_used" field in the block group, which remains with value of 0;

5) The two extents are freed from block X, so its "used" field changes
   from 32K to 0;

6) The transaction commit by task B continues, it enters
   btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups() which calls update_block_group_item()
   for block group X, and there it decides to skip the block group item
   update, because "used" has a value of 0 and "commit_used" has a value
   of 0 too.

   As a result, we end up with a block item having a 32K "used" field but
   no extents allocated from it.

When this issue happens, a btrfs check reports an error like this:

   [1/7] checking root items
   [2/7] checking extents
   block group [1104150528 1073741824] used 39796736 but extent items used 0
   ERROR: errors found in extent allocation tree or chunk allocation
   (...)

Fix this by making insert_block_group_item() update the block group's
"commit_used" field.

Fixes: 7248e0cebb ("btrfs: skip update of block group item if used bytes are the same")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.2+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-03-08 01:14:01 +01:00
Johannes Thumshirn 95cd356ca2 btrfs: fix percent calculation for bg reclaim message
We have a report, that the info message for block-group reclaim is
crossing the 100% used mark.

This is happening as we were truncating the divisor for the division
(the block_group->length) to a 32bit value.

Fix this by using div64_u64() to not truncate the divisor.

In the worst case, it can lead to a div by zero error and should be
possible to trigger on 4 disks RAID0, and each device is large enough:

  $ mkfs.btrfs  -f /dev/test/scratch[1234] -m raid1 -d raid0
  btrfs-progs v6.1
  [...]
  Filesystem size:    40.00GiB
  Block group profiles:
    Data:             RAID0             4.00GiB <<<
    Metadata:         RAID1           256.00MiB
    System:           RAID1             8.00MiB

Reported-by: Forza <forza@tnonline.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/e99483.c11a58d.1863591ca52@tnonline.net/
Fixes: 5f93e776c6 ("btrfs: zoned: print unusable percentage when reclaiming block groups")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ add Qu's note ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-03-06 19:28:19 +01:00
Boris Burkov 12148367d7 btrfs: fix potential dead lock in size class loading logic
As reported by Filipe, there's a potential deadlock caused by
using btrfs_search_forward on commit_root. The locking there is
unconditional, even if ->skip_locking and ->search_commit_root is set.
It's not meant to be used for commit roots, so it always needs to do
locking.

So if another task is COWing a child node of the same root node and
then needs to wait for block group caching to complete when trying to
allocate a metadata extent, it deadlocks.

For example:

[539604.239315] sysrq: Show Blocked State
[539604.240133] task:kworker/u16:6   state:D stack:0     pid:2119594 ppid:2      flags:0x00004000
[539604.241613] Workqueue: btrfs-cache btrfs_work_helper [btrfs]
[539604.242673] Call Trace:
[539604.243129]  <TASK>
[539604.243925]  __schedule+0x41d/0xee0
[539604.244797]  ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x12/0x70
[539604.245399]  ? rwsem_down_read_slowpath+0x185/0x490
[539604.246111]  schedule+0x5d/0xf0
[539604.246593]  rwsem_down_read_slowpath+0x2da/0x490
[539604.247290]  ? rcu_barrier_tasks_trace+0x10/0x20
[539604.248090]  __down_read_common+0x3d/0x150
[539604.248702]  down_read_nested+0xc3/0x140
[539604.249280]  __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x100 [btrfs]
[539604.250097]  btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x48/0x60 [btrfs]
[539604.250915]  btrfs_search_forward+0x59/0x460 [btrfs]
[539604.251781]  ? btrfs_global_root+0x50/0x70 [btrfs]
[539604.252476]  caching_thread+0x1be/0x920 [btrfs]
[539604.253167]  btrfs_work_helper+0xf6/0x400 [btrfs]
[539604.253848]  process_one_work+0x24f/0x5a0
[539604.254476]  worker_thread+0x52/0x3b0
[539604.255166]  ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
[539604.256047]  kthread+0xf0/0x120
[539604.256591]  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
[539604.257212]  ret_from_fork+0x29/0x50
[539604.257822]  </TASK>
[539604.258233] task:btrfs-transacti state:D stack:0     pid:2236474 ppid:2      flags:0x00004000
[539604.259802] Call Trace:
[539604.260243]  <TASK>
[539604.260615]  __schedule+0x41d/0xee0
[539604.261205]  ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x12/0x70
[539604.262000]  ? rwsem_down_read_slowpath+0x185/0x490
[539604.262822]  schedule+0x5d/0xf0
[539604.263374]  rwsem_down_read_slowpath+0x2da/0x490
[539604.266228]  ? lock_acquire+0x160/0x310
[539604.266917]  ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x12/0x70
[539604.267996]  ? lock_contended+0x19e/0x500
[539604.268720]  __down_read_common+0x3d/0x150
[539604.269400]  down_read_nested+0xc3/0x140
[539604.270057]  __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x100 [btrfs]
[539604.271129]  btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x48/0x60 [btrfs]
[539604.272372]  btrfs_search_slot+0x143/0xf70 [btrfs]
[539604.273295]  update_block_group_item+0x9e/0x190 [btrfs]
[539604.274282]  btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x1c4/0x4f0 [btrfs]
[539604.275381]  ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x45/0x280
[539604.276390]  btrfs_commit_transaction+0xee/0xed0 [btrfs]
[539604.277391]  ? lock_acquire+0x1a4/0x310
[539604.278080]  ? start_transaction+0xcb/0x6c0 [btrfs]
[539604.279099]  transaction_kthread+0x142/0x1c0 [btrfs]
[539604.279996]  ? __pfx_transaction_kthread+0x10/0x10 [btrfs]
[539604.280673]  kthread+0xf0/0x120
[539604.281050]  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
[539604.281496]  ret_from_fork+0x29/0x50
[539604.281966]  </TASK>
[539604.282255] task:fsstress        state:D stack:0     pid:2236483 ppid:1      flags:0x00004006
[539604.283897] Call Trace:
[539604.284700]  <TASK>
[539604.285088]  __schedule+0x41d/0xee0
[539604.285660]  schedule+0x5d/0xf0
[539604.286175]  btrfs_wait_block_group_cache_progress+0xf2/0x170 [btrfs]
[539604.287342]  ? __pfx_autoremove_wake_function+0x10/0x10
[539604.288450]  find_free_extent+0xd93/0x1750 [btrfs]
[539604.289256]  ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x50
[539604.289911]  ? btrfs_get_alloc_profile+0x127/0x2a0 [btrfs]
[539604.290843]  btrfs_reserve_extent+0x147/0x290 [btrfs]
[539604.291943]  btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xcb/0x3e0 [btrfs]
[539604.292903]  __btrfs_cow_block+0x138/0x580 [btrfs]
[539604.293773]  btrfs_cow_block+0x10e/0x240 [btrfs]
[539604.294595]  btrfs_search_slot+0x7f3/0xf70 [btrfs]
[539604.295585]  btrfs_update_device+0x71/0x1b0 [btrfs]
[539604.296459]  btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item+0xe0/0x340 [btrfs]
[539604.297489]  btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x1bf/0x490 [btrfs]
[539604.298335]  find_free_extent+0x6fa/0x1750 [btrfs]
[539604.299174]  ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x50
[539604.299950]  ? btrfs_get_alloc_profile+0x127/0x2a0 [btrfs]
[539604.300918]  btrfs_reserve_extent+0x147/0x290 [btrfs]
[539604.301797]  btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xcb/0x3e0 [btrfs]
[539604.303017]  ? lock_release+0x224/0x4a0
[539604.303855]  __btrfs_cow_block+0x138/0x580 [btrfs]
[539604.304789]  btrfs_cow_block+0x10e/0x240 [btrfs]
[539604.305611]  btrfs_search_slot+0x7f3/0xf70 [btrfs]
[539604.306682]  ? btrfs_global_root+0x50/0x70 [btrfs]
[539604.308198]  lookup_inline_extent_backref+0x17b/0x7a0 [btrfs]
[539604.309254]  lookup_extent_backref+0x43/0xd0 [btrfs]
[539604.310122]  __btrfs_free_extent+0xf8/0x810 [btrfs]
[539604.310874]  ? lock_release+0x224/0x4a0
[539604.311724]  ? btrfs_merge_delayed_refs+0x17b/0x1d0 [btrfs]
[539604.313023]  __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x2ba/0x1260 [btrfs]
[539604.314271]  btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x8f/0x1c0 [btrfs]
[539604.315445]  ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x12/0x70
[539604.316706]  btrfs_commit_transaction+0xa2/0xed0 [btrfs]
[539604.317855]  ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xa0
[539604.318544]  ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x50
[539604.319240]  create_subvol+0x53d/0x6e0 [btrfs]
[539604.320283]  btrfs_mksubvol+0x4f5/0x590 [btrfs]
[539604.321220]  __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x11b/0x180 [btrfs]
[539604.322307]  btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0xc6/0x150 [btrfs]
[539604.323295]  btrfs_ioctl+0x9f7/0x33e0 [btrfs]
[539604.324331]  ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x12/0x70
[539604.325137]  ? lock_release+0x224/0x4a0
[539604.325808]  ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x87/0xc0
[539604.326467]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x87/0xc0
[539604.327109]  do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
[539604.327875]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc
[539604.328792] RIP: 0033:0x7f05a7babaeb

This needs to use regular btrfs_search_slot() with some skip and stop
logic.

Since we only consider five samples (five search slots), don't bother
with the complexity of looking for commit_root_sem contention. If
necessary, it can be added to the load function in between samples.

Reported-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAL3q7H7eKMD44Z1+=Kb-1RFMMeZpAm2fwyO59yeBwCcSOU80Pg@mail.gmail.com/
Fixes: c7eec3d9aa ("btrfs: load block group size class when caching")
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-03-06 19:28:19 +01:00
Christoph Hellwig 1eb82ef873 btrfs: remove the bdev argument to btrfs_rmap_block
The only user in the zoned remap code is gone now, so remove the argument.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-02-15 19:38:55 +01:00
Boris Burkov cb0922f264 btrfs: don't use size classes for zoned file systems
When a file system has ZNS devices which are constrained by a maximum
number of active block groups, then not being able to use all the block
groups for every allocation is not ideal, and could cause us to loop a
ton with mixed size allocations.

In general, since zoned doesn't write into gaps behind where block
groups are writing, it is not susceptible to the same sort of
fragmentation that size classes are designed to solve, so we can skip
size classes for zoned file systems in general, even though there would
probably be no harm for SMR devices.

Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-02-13 17:50:34 +01:00
Boris Burkov c7eec3d9aa btrfs: load block group size class when caching
Since the size class is an artifact of an arbitrary anti fragmentation
strategy, it doesn't really make sense to persist it. Furthermore, most
of the size class logic assumes fresh block groups. That is of course
not a reasonable assumption -- we will be upgrading kernels with
existing filesystems whose block groups are not classified.

To work around those issues, implement logic to compute the size class
of the block groups as we cache them in. To perfectly assess the state
of a block group, we would have to read the entire extent tree (since
the free space cache mashes together contiguous extent items) which
would be prohibitively expensive for larger file systems with more
extents.

We can do it relatively cheaply by implementing a simple heuristic of
sampling a handful of extents and picking the smallest one we see. In
the happy case where the block group was classified, we will only see
extents of the correct size. In the unhappy case, we will hopefully find
one of the smaller extents, but there is no perfect answer anyway.
Autorelocation will eventually churn up the block group if there is
significant freeing anyway.

There was no regression in mount performance at end state of the fsperf
test suite, and the delay until the block group is marked cached is
minimized by the constant number of extent samples.

Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-02-13 17:50:34 +01:00
Boris Burkov 52bb7a2166 btrfs: introduce size class to block group allocator
The aim of this patch is to reduce the fragmentation of block groups
under certain unhappy workloads. It is particularly effective when the
size of extents correlates with their lifetime, which is something we
have observed causing fragmentation in the fleet at Meta.

This patch categorizes extents into size classes:

- x < 128KiB: "small"
- 128KiB < x < 8MiB: "medium"
- x > 8MiB: "large"

and as much as possible reduces allocations of extents into block groups
that don't match the size class. This takes advantage of any (possible)
correlation between size and lifetime and also leaves behind predictable
re-usable gaps when extents are freed; small writes don't gum up bigger
holes.

Size classes are implemented in the following way:

- Mark each new block group with a size class of the first allocation
  that goes into it.

- Add two new passes to ffe: "unset size class" and "wrong size class".
  First, try only matching block groups, then try unset ones, then allow
  allocation of new ones, and finally allow mismatched block groups.

- Filtering is done just by skipping inappropriate ones, there is no
  special size class indexing.

Other solutions I considered were:

- A best fit allocator with an rb-tree. This worked well, as small
  writes didn't leak big holes from large freed extents, but led to
  regressions in ffe and write performance due to lock contention on
  the rb-tree with every allocation possibly updating it in parallel.
  Perhaps something clever could be done to do the updates in the
  background while being "right enough".

- A fixed size "working set". This prevents freeing an extent
  drastically changing where writes currently land, and seems like a
  good option too. Doesn't take advantage of size in any way.

- The same size class idea, but implemented with xarray marks. This
  turned out to be slower than looping the linked list and skipping
  wrong block groups, and is also less flexible since we must have only
  3 size classes (max #marks). With the current approach we can have as
  many as we like.

Performance testing was done via: https://github.com/josefbacik/fsperf
Of particular relevance are the new fragmentation specific tests.

A brief summary of the testing results:

- Neutral results on existing tests. There are some minor regressions
  and improvements here and there, but nothing that truly stands out as
  notable.
- Improvement on new tests where size class and extent lifetime are
  correlated. Fragmentation in these cases is completely eliminated
  and write performance is generally a little better. There is also
  significant improvement where extent sizes are just a bit larger than
  the size class boundaries.
- Regression on one new tests: where the allocations are sized
  intentionally a hair under the borders of the size classes. Results
  are neutral on the test that intentionally attacks this new scheme by
  mixing extent size and lifetime.

The full dump of the performance results can be found here:
https://bur.io/fsperf/size-class-2022-11-15.txt
(there are ANSI escape codes, so best to curl and view in terminal)

Here is a snippet from the full results for a new test which mixes
buffered writes appending to a long lived set of files and large short
lived fallocates:

bufferedappendvsfallocate results
         metric             baseline       current        stdev            diff
======================================================================================
avg_commit_ms                    31.13         29.20          2.67     -6.22%
bg_count                            14         15.60             0     11.43%
commits                          11.10         12.20          0.32      9.91%
elapsed                          27.30         26.40          2.98     -3.30%
end_state_mount_ns         11122551.90   10635118.90     851143.04     -4.38%
end_state_umount_ns           1.36e+09      1.35e+09   12248056.65     -1.07%
find_free_extent_calls       116244.30     114354.30        964.56     -1.63%
find_free_extent_ns_max      599507.20    1047168.20     103337.08     74.67%
find_free_extent_ns_mean       3607.19       3672.11        101.20      1.80%
find_free_extent_ns_min            500           512          6.67      2.40%
find_free_extent_ns_p50           2848          2876         37.65      0.98%
find_free_extent_ns_p95           4916          5000         75.45      1.71%
find_free_extent_ns_p99       20734.49      20920.48       1670.93      0.90%
frag_pct_max                     61.67             0          8.05   -100.00%
frag_pct_mean                    43.59             0          6.10   -100.00%
frag_pct_min                     25.91             0         16.60   -100.00%
frag_pct_p50                     42.53             0          7.25   -100.00%
frag_pct_p95                     61.67             0          8.05   -100.00%
frag_pct_p99                     61.67             0          8.05   -100.00%
fragmented_bg_count               6.10             0          1.45   -100.00%
max_commit_ms                    49.80            46          5.37     -7.63%
sys_cpu                           2.59          2.62          0.29      1.39%
write_bw_bytes                1.62e+08      1.68e+08   17975843.50      3.23%
write_clat_ns_mean            57426.39      54475.95       2292.72     -5.14%
write_clat_ns_p50             46950.40      42905.60       2101.35     -8.62%
write_clat_ns_p99            148070.40     143769.60       2115.17     -2.90%
write_io_kbytes                4194304       4194304             0      0.00%
write_iops                     2476.15       2556.10        274.29      3.23%
write_lat_ns_max            2101667.60    2251129.50     370556.59      7.11%
write_lat_ns_mean             59374.91      55682.00       2523.09     -6.22%
write_lat_ns_min              17353.10         16250       1646.08     -6.36%

There are some mixed improvements/regressions in most metrics along with
an elimination of fragmentation in this workload.

On the balance, the drastic 1->0 improvement in the happy cases seems
worth the mix of regressions and improvements we do observe.

Some considerations for future work:

- Experimenting with more size classes
- More hinting/search ordering work to approximate a best-fit allocator

Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-02-13 17:50:34 +01:00
Josef Bacik efbf35a102 btrfs: fix uninitialized variable warning in btrfs_update_block_group
reclaim isn't set in the alloc case, however we only care about
reclaim in the !alloc case.  This isn't an actual problem, however
-Wmaybe-uninitialized will complain, so initialize reclaim to quiet the
compiler.

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-02-13 17:50:33 +01:00
David Sterba 0d7764ff58 btrfs: convert btrfs_block_group::needs_free_space to runtime flag
We already have flags in block group to track various status bits,
convert needs_free_space as well and reduce size of btrfs_block_group.

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-12-05 18:00:51 +01:00
David Sterba 428c8e0310 btrfs: simplify percent calculation helpers, rename div_factor
The div_factor* helpers calculate fraction or percentage fraction. The
name is a bit confusing, we use it only for percentage calculations and
there are two helpers.

There's a helper mult_frac that's for general fractions, that tries to
be accurate but we multiply and divide by small numbers so we can use
the div_u64 helper.

Rename the div_factor* helpers and use 1..100 percentage range, also drop
the case checking for percentage == 100, it's never hit.

The conversions:

* div_factor calculates tenths and the numbers need to be adjusted
* div_factor_fine is direct replacement

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-12-05 18:00:48 +01:00
David Sterba 43dd529abe btrfs: update function comments
Update, reformat or reword function comments. This also removes the kdoc
marker so we don't get reports when the function name is missing.

Changes made:

- remove kdoc markers
- reformat the brief description to be a proper sentence
- reword to imperative voice
- align parameter list
- fix typos

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-12-05 18:00:45 +01:00
Josef Bacik a0231804af btrfs: move extent-tree helpers into their own header file
Move all the extent tree related prototypes to extent-tree.h out of
ctree.h, and then go include it everywhere needed so everything
compiles.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-12-05 18:00:44 +01:00
Josef Bacik 07e81dc944 btrfs: move accessor helpers into accessors.h
This is a large patch, but because they're all macros it's impossible to
split up.  Simply copy all of the item accessors in ctree.h and paste
them in accessors.h, and then update any files to include the header so
everything compiles.

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ reformat comments, style fixups ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-12-05 18:00:42 +01:00
Josef Bacik c7f13d428e btrfs: move fs wide helpers out of ctree.h
We have several fs wide related helpers in ctree.h.  The bulk of these
are the incompat flag test helpers, but there are things such as
btrfs_fs_closing() and the read only helpers that also aren't directly
related to the ctree code.  Move these into a fs.h header, which will
serve as the location for file system wide related helpers.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-12-05 18:00:41 +01:00
Qu Wenruo 7248e0cebb btrfs: skip update of block group item if used bytes are the same
[BACKGROUND]

When committing a transaction, we will update block group items for all
dirty block groups.

But in fact, dirty block groups don't always need to update their block
group items.
It's pretty common to have a metadata block group which experienced
several COW operations, but still have the same amount of used bytes.

In that case, we may unnecessarily COW a tree block doing nothing.

[ENHANCEMENT]

This patch will introduce btrfs_block_group::commit_used member to
remember the last used bytes, and use that new member to skip
unnecessary block group item update.

This would be more common for large filesystems, where metadata block
group can be as large as 1GiB, containing at most 64K metadata items.

In that case, if COW added and then deleted one metadata item near the
end of the block group, then it's completely possible we don't need to
touch the block group item at all.

[BENCHMARK]

The change itself can have quite a high chance (20~80%) to skip block
group item updates in lot of workloads.

As a result, it would result shorter time spent on
btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups(), and overall reduce the execution time
of the critical section of btrfs_commit_transaction().

Here comes a fio command, which will do random writes in 4K block size,
causing a very heavy metadata updates.

fio --filename=$mnt/file --size=512M --rw=randwrite --direct=1 --bs=4k \
    --ioengine=libaio --iodepth=64 --runtime=300 --numjobs=4 \
    --name=random_write --fallocate=none --time_based --fsync_on_close=1

The file size (512M) and number of threads (4) means 2GiB file size in
total, but during the full 300s run time, my dedicated SATA SSD is able
to write around 20~25GiB, which is over 10 times the file size.

Thus after we fill the initial 2G, we should not cause much block group
item updates.

Please note, the fio numbers by themselves don't have much change, but
if we look deeper, there is some reduced execution time, especially for
the critical section of btrfs_commit_transaction().

I added extra trace_printk() to measure the following per-transaction
execution time:

- Critical section of btrfs_commit_transaction()
  By re-using the existing update_commit_stats() function, which
  has already calculated the interval correctly.

- The while() loop for btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups()
  Although this includes the execution time of btrfs_run_delayed_refs(),
  it should still be representative overall.

Both result involves transid 7~30, the same amount of transaction
committed.

The result looks like this:

                      |      Before       |     After      |  Diff
----------------------+-------------------+----------------+--------
Transaction interval  | 229247198.5       | 215016933.6    | -6.2%
Block group interval  | 23133.33333       | 18970.83333    | -18.0%

The change in block group item updates is more obvious, as skipped block
group item updates also mean less delayed refs.

And the overall execution time for that block group update loop is
pretty small, thus we can assume the extent tree is already mostly
cached.  If we can skip an uncached tree block, it would cause more
obvious change.

Unfortunately the overall reduction in commit transaction critical
section is much smaller, as the block group item updates loop is not
really the major part, at least not for the above fio script.

But still we have a observable reduction in the critical section.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-12-05 18:00:40 +01:00
Boris Burkov 81531225e5 btrfs: re-check reclaim condition in reclaim worker
I have observed the following case play out and lead to unnecessary
relocations:

1. write a file across multiple block groups
2. delete the file
3. several block groups fall below the reclaim threshold
4. reclaim the first, moving extents into the others
5. reclaim the others which are now actually very full, leading to poor
   reclaim behavior with lots of writing, allocating new block groups,
   etc.

I believe the risk of missing some reasonable reclaims is worth it
when traded off against the savings of avoiding overfull reclaims.

Going forward, it could be interesting to make the check more advanced
(zoned aware, fragmentation aware, etc...) so that it can be a really
strong signal both at extent delete and reclaim time.

Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-12-05 18:00:39 +01:00
Boris Burkov cc4804bfd6 btrfs: skip reclaim if block_group is empty
As we delete extents from a block group, at some deletion we cross below
the reclaim threshold. It is possible we are still in the middle of
deleting more extents and might soon hit 0. If the block group is empty
by the time the reclaim worker runs, we will still relocate it.

This works just fine, as relocating an empty block group ultimately
results in properly deleting it. However, we have more direct ways of
removing empty block groups in the cleaner thread. Those are either
async discard or the unused_bgs list. In fact, when we decide whether to
relocate a block group during extent deletion, we do check for emptiness
and prefer the discard/unused_bgs mechanisms when possible.

Not using relocation for this case reduces some modest overhead from
empty bg relocation:

- extra transactions
- extra metadata use/churn for creating relocation metadata
- trying to read the extent tree to look for extents (and in this case
  finding none)

Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-12-05 18:00:39 +01:00
Josef Bacik 06d61cb101 btrfs: move btrfs_should_fragment_free_space into block-group.c
This function uses functions that are not defined in block-group.h, move
it into block-group.c in order to keep the header clean.

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-12-05 18:00:37 +01:00
David Sterba 295a53ccc4 btrfs: delete stale comments after merge conflict resolution
There are two comments in btrfs_cache_block_group that I left when
resolving conflict between commits ced8ecf026 "btrfs: fix space cache
corruption and potential double allocations" and 527c490f44 "btrfs:
delete btrfs_wait_space_cache_v1_finished".

The former reworked the caching logic to wait until the caching ends in
btrfs_cache_block_group while the latter only open coded the waiting.
Both removed btrfs_wait_space_cache_v1_finished, the correct code is
with the waiting and returning error. Thus the conflict resolution was
OK.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-10-11 14:47:54 +02:00
Josef Bacik 1daedb1d6b btrfs: add the ability to use NO_FLUSH for data reservations
In order to accommodate NOWAIT IOCB's we need to be able to do NO_FLUSH
data reservations, so plumb this through the delalloc reservation
system.

Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roesch <shr@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-29 17:08:28 +02:00
Josef Bacik c29abab4f9 btrfs: move btrfs_full_stripe_locks_tree into block-group.h
This is actually embedded in struct btrfs_block_group, so move this
definition to block-group.h, and then open-code the init of the tree
where we init the rest of the block group instead of using a helper.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-26 12:28:06 +02:00
Qu Wenruo 81d5d61454 btrfs: enhance unsupported compat RO flags handling
Currently there are two corner cases not handling compat RO flags
correctly:

- Remount
  We can still mount the fs RO with compat RO flags, then remount it RW.
  We should not allow any write into a fs with unsupported RO flags.

- Still try to search block group items
  In fact, behavior/on-disk format change to extent tree should not
  need a full incompat flag.

  And since we can ensure fs with unsupported RO flags never got any
  writes (with above case fixed), then we can even skip block group
  items search at mount time.

This patch will enhance the unsupported RO compat flags by:

- Reject read-write remount if there are unsupported RO compat flags

- Go dummy block group items directly for unsupported RO compat flags
  In fact, only changes to chunk/subvolume/root/csum trees should go
  incompat flags.

The latter part should allow future change to extent tree to be compat
RO flags.

Thus this patch also needs to be backported to all stable trees.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.9+
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-26 12:28:00 +02:00
Josef Bacik fc80f7aca5 btrfs: remove use btrfs_remove_free_space_cache instead of variant
We are calling __btrfs_remove_free_space_cache everywhere to cleanup the
block group free space, however we can just use
btrfs_remove_free_space_cache and pass in the block group in all of
these places.  Then we can remove __btrfs_remove_free_space_cache and
rename __btrfs_remove_free_space_cache_locked to
__btrfs_remove_free_space_cache.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-26 12:27:58 +02:00
Omar Sandoval 48ff70830b btrfs: get rid of block group caching progress logic
struct btrfs_caching_ctl::progress and struct
btrfs_block_group::last_byte_to_unpin were previously needed to ensure
that unpin_extent_range() didn't return a range to the free space cache
before the caching thread had a chance to cache that range. However, the
commit "btrfs: fix space cache corruption and potential double
allocations" made it so that we always synchronously cache the block
group at the time that we pin the extent, so this machinery is no longer
necessary.

Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-26 12:27:58 +02:00
Josef Bacik 527c490f44 btrfs: delete btrfs_wait_space_cache_v1_finished
We used to use this in a few spots, but now we only use it directly
inside of block-group.c, so remove the helper and just open code where
we were using it.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-26 12:27:55 +02:00
Josef Bacik 7b9c293b05 btrfs: remove BLOCK_GROUP_FLAG_HAS_CACHING_CTL
This is used mostly to determine if we need to look at the caching ctl
list and clean up any references to this block group.  However we never
clear this flag, specifically because we need to know if we have to
remove a caching ctl we have for this block group still.  This is in the
remove block group path which isn't a fast path, so the optimization
doesn't really matter, simplify this logic and remove the flag.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-26 12:27:54 +02:00
Josef Bacik 50c31eaa4c btrfs: simplify block group traversal in btrfs_put_block_group_cache
We're breaking out and re-searching for the next block group while
evicting any of the block group cache inodes.  This is not needed, the
block groups aren't disappearing here, we can simply loop through the
block groups like normal and iput any inode that we find.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-26 12:27:54 +02:00
Josef Bacik 3349b57fd4 btrfs: convert block group bit field to use bit helpers
We use a bit field in the btrfs_block_group for different flags, however
this is awkward because we have to hold the block_group->lock for any
modification of any of these fields, and makes the code clunky for a few
of these flags.  Convert these to a properly flags setup so we can
utilize the bit helpers.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-26 12:27:54 +02:00