start with something simple: both take an integer value, both
need to be mirrored to all subflows.
Acked-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Paolo Abeni suggested to avoid re-syncing new subflows because
they inherit options from listener. In case options were set on
listener but are not set on mptcp-socket there is no need to
do any synchronisation for new subflows.
This change sets sockopt_seq of new mptcp sockets to the seq of
the mptcp listener sock.
Subflow sequence is set to the embedded tcp listener sk.
Add a comment explaing why sk_state is involved in sockopt_seq
generation.
Acked-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Handle following cases:
1. setsockopt is called with multiple subflows.
Change might have to be mirrored to all of them.
This is done directly in process context/setsockopt call.
2. Outgoing subflow is created after one or several setsockopt()
calls have been made. Old setsockopt changes should be
synced to the new socket.
3. Incoming subflow, after setsockopt call(s).
Cases 2 and 3 are handled right after the join list is spliced to the conn
list.
Not all sockopt values can be just be copied by value, some require
helper calls. Those can acquire socket lock (which can sleep).
If the join->conn list splicing is done from preemptible context,
synchronization can be done right away, otherwise its deferred to work
queue.
Acked-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Unrolling mcast state at msk dismantel time is bug prone, as
syzkaller reported:
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.11.0-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor905/8822 is trying to acquire lock:
ffffffff8d678fe8 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ipv6_sock_mc_close+0xd7/0x110 net/ipv6/mcast.c:323
but task is already holding lock:
ffff888024390120 (sk_lock-AF_INET6){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1600 [inline]
ffff888024390120 (sk_lock-AF_INET6){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp6_release+0x57/0x130 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3507
which lock already depends on the new lock.
Instead we can simply forbid any mcast-related setsockopt.
Let's do the same with all other non supported sockopts.
Fixes: 717e79c867 ("mptcp: Add setsockopt()/getsockopt() socket operations")
Co-developed-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The MPTCP sockopt implementation is going to be much
more big and complex soon. Let's move it to a different
source file.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Florian Westphal