During Device Tree enablement of the ab8500 and db8500-prcmu drivers,
a decision was made to omit registration through the MFD API and use
Device Tree directly. However, because MFD devices have a different
address space and the ab8500 and db8500 both use I2C to communicate,
this causes issues with address translation during execution of
of_platform_populate(). So the solution is to make the MFD core aware
of Device Tree and have it assign the correct node pointers instead.
To make this work the MFD core also needs to be awere of IRQ domains,
as Device Tree insists on IRQ domain compatibility. So, instead of
providing an irq-base via platform code, in the DT case we simply
look up the IRQ domain and map to the correct virtual IRQ.
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Cell pointers are passed through device->mfd_cell and platform data
is passed through the MFD cell platform_data pointer.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Now that we have a way to pass MFD cells down to the sub drivers,
we can gradually get rid of mfd_data by putting the platform pointer
back in place.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
In order for MFD drivers to fetch their cell pointer but also their
platform data one, an mfd cell pointer is added to the platform_device
structure.
That allows all MFD sub devices drivers to be MFD agnostic, unless
they really need to access their MFD cell data. Most of them don't,
especially the ones for IPs used by both MFD and non MFD SoCs.
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Acked-by: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Replace mfd_shared_platform_driver_register with mfd_clone_cell. The
former was called by an mfd client, and registered both a platform driver
and device. The latter is called by an mfd driver, and registers only a
platform device.
The downside of this is that mfd drivers need to be modified whenever
new clients are added that share a cell; the upside is that it fits
Linux's driver model better. It's also simpler.
This also converts cs5535-mfd/olpc-xo1 from the old API. cs5535-mfd
now creates the olpc-xo1-{acpi,pms} devices, while olpc-xo1 binds to
them via platform drivers.
Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
As requested by Samuel, there's not really any reason to have "shared"
in the name.
This also modifies the only user of the function, as well.
Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
This adds functions to enable platform_device sharing for mfd clients.
Each platform driver (mfd client) that wants to share an mfd_cell's
platform_device uses the mfd_shared_platform_driver_{un,}register()
functions instead of platform_driver_{un,}register(). Along with
registering the platform driver, these also register a new platform
device with the same characteristics as the original cell, but a different
name. Given an mfd_cell with the name "foo", drivers that want to
share access to its resources can call mfd_shared_platform_driver_register
with platform drivers named (for example) "bar" and "baz". This
will register two platform devices and drivers named "bar" and "baz"
that share the same cell as the platform device "foo". The drivers
can then call "foo" cell's enable hooks (or mfd_shared_cell_enable)
to enable resources, and obtain platform resources as they normally
would.
This deals with platform handling only; mfd driver-specific details,
hardware handling, refcounting, etc are all dealt with separately.
Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
This provides convenience functions for sharing of cells across
multiple mfd clients. Mfd drivers can provide enable/disable hooks
to actually tweak the hardware, and clients can call
mfd_shared_cell_{en,dis}able without having to worry about whether
or not another client happens to have enabled or disabled the
cell/hardware.
Note that this is purely optional; drivers can continue to use
the mfd_cell's enable/disable hooks for their own purposes, if
desired.
Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
All users of this have now been switched over to using mfd_data;
it can go away now.
Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Rename the platform_data variable to imply a distinction between
common platform_data driver usage (typically accessed via
pdev->dev.platform_data) and the way MFD passes data down to
clients (using a wrapper named mfd_get_data).
All clients have already been changed to use the wrapper function,
so this can be a quick single-commit change that only touches things
in drivers/mfd.
Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Now that there are no more users of this, drop it.
Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Previously, one would set the mfd_cell's platform_data/data_size to point
to the current mfd_cell in order to pass that information along to drivers.
This causes the current mfd_cell to always be available to drivers. It
also adds a wrapper function for fetching the mfd cell from a platform
device, similar to what originally existed for mfd devices.
Drivers who previously used platform_data for other purposes can still
use it; the difference is that mfd_get_data() must be used to
access it (and the pdata structure is no longer allocated in
mfd_add_devices).
Note that mfd_get_data is intentionally vague (in name) about where
the data is stored; variable name changes can come later without having
to touch brazillions of drivers.
Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Allow MFD cells to have pm_runtime_no_callbacks() called on them during
registration. This causes the runtime PM framework to ignore them,
allowing use of runtime PM to suspend the device as a whole even if
not all drivers for the MFD can usefully implement runtime PM. For
example, RTCs are likely to run continuously regardless of the power
state of the system.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
The upcoming VIA VX855 MFD driver needs to communicate resources
to subdevices where the resources may be claimed by ACPI.
Add a flag to mfd_cell to request that resources are not policed.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Drake <dsd@laptop.org>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Provide basic support for MFDs having multiple cells of a given
type with different IDs by adding an id to the mfd_cell structure
and then adding that to the id passed in to mfd_add_devices().
As it stands this approach requires that MFDs using this feature
deal with ensuring that there aren't any ID collisions resulting
from multiple MFDs of the same type being instantiated. This needs
to happen with the existing code too, but with this approach there
is a knock on effect on the IDs for non-duplicated devices.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Adding platform_data to mfd_cell allows passing of platform data directly
to the platform_device created for each cell and thus reuse of existing
drivers.
On the other side it can be used as a hook to mfd_cell itself
removing the need in mfd_get_cell method.
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <mike@compulab.co.il>
Acked-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@openedhand.com>
This patch provides a common subdevice registration system for MFD type
chips, using platfrom device.
Signed-off-by: Ian Molton <spyro@f2s.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Lee Jones