This makes the driver use the data pointer added to the gpio_chip
to store a pointer to the state container instead of relying on
container_of().
Cc: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
This makes the driver use the data pointer added to the gpio_chip
to store a pointer to the state container instead of relying on
container_of().
Cc: YD Tseng <ltyu101@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
This makes the driver use the data pointer added to the gpio_chip
to store a pointer to the state container instead of relying on
container_of().
Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
This makes the driver use the data pointer added to the gpio_chip
to store a pointer to the state container instead of relying on
container_of().
Cc: Tien Hock Loh <thloh@altera.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
This makes the driver use the data pointer added to the gpio_chip
to store a pointer to the state container instead of relying on
container_of().
Cc: Jean-Francois Dagenais <jeff.dagenais@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
This makes the driver use the data pointer added to the gpio_chip
to store a pointer to the state container instead of relying on
container_of().
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
This makes the driver use the data pointer added to the gpio_chip
to store a pointer to the state container instead of relying on
container_of().
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
This makes the driver use the data pointer added to the gpio_chip
to store a pointer to the state container instead of relying on
container_of().
Cc: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
This makes the driver use the data pointer added to the gpio_chip
to store a pointer to the state container instead of relying on
container_of().
Acked-by: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
This makes the driver use the data pointer added to the gpio_chip
to store a pointer to the state container instead of relying on
container_of().
Acked-by: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
The separate struct bgpio_chip has been a pain to handle, both
by being confusingly similar in name to struct gpio_chip and
for being contained inside a struct so that struct gpio_chip
is contained in a struct contained in a struct, making several
steps of dereferencing necessary.
Make things simpler: include the fields directly into
<linux/gpio/driver.h>, #ifdef:ed for CONFIG_GENERIC_GPIO, and
get rid of the <linux/basic_mmio_gpio.h> altogether. Prefix
some of the member variables with bgpio_* and add proper
kerneldoc while we're at it.
Modify all users to handle the change and use a struct
gpio_chip directly. And while we're at it: replace all
container_of() dereferencing by gpiochip_get_data() and
registering the gpio_chip with gpiochip_add_data().
Cc: arm@kernel.org
Cc: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>
Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com>
Cc: Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com
Acked-by: Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
Acked-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
In the same spirit as we add an optional void *data argument
to the gpiochip_add_data() call, we need this also for
of_mm_gpiochip_add().
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
This adds a void * pointer to gpio_chip so that driver can
assign and retrieve some states. This is done to get rid of
container_of() calls for gpio_chips embedded inside state
containers, so we can remove the need to have the gpio_chip
or later (planned) struct gpio_device be dynamically allocated
at registration time, so that its struct device can be properly
reference counted and not bound to its parent device (e.g.
a platform_device) but instead live on after unregistration
if it is opened by e.g. a char device or sysfs.
The data is added with the new function gpiochip_add_data()
and for compatibility we add static inline wrapper function
gpiochip_add() that will call gpiochip_add_data() with
NULL as argument. The latter will be removed once we have
exorcised gpiochip_add() from the kernel.
gpiochip_get_data() is added as a static inline accessor
for drivers to quickly get their data out.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
cppcheck reports this:
(style) int result is returned as long value. If the return
value is long to avoid loss of information, then you have
loss of information.
This can be fixed with (1UL << pin) but that is the same
as using <linux/bitops.h> that already use 1UL so take
this approach.
Reported-by: David Binderman <dcb314@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.
Cc: Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
This fixes up:
commit 464231fb1f
"pinctrl: ssbi-gpio: Be sure to clamp return value"
commit b9164f0493
"gpio: ssbi-mpp: Be sure to clamp return value"
as I managed to screw up some of the logic when clamping
the return values.
Cc: Björn Andersson <bjorn@kryo.se>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
The of_get_named_gpio_flags() function does nothing other than returning
an error when CONFIG_OF_GPIO is disabled, but that causes spurious
warnings about possible use of uninitialized variables in any code that
does not check the of_get_named_gpio_flags() return value before trying
to use the flags:
drivers/input/misc/rotary_encoder.c: In function 'rotary_encoder_probe':
drivers/input/misc/rotary_encoder.c:223:28: warning: 'flags' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
drivers/power/bq24735-charger.c: In function 'bq24735_charger_probe':
drivers/power/bq24735-charger.c:227:12: warning: 'flags' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
drivers/power/sbs-battery.c: In function 'sbs_probe':
drivers/power/sbs-battery.c:782:17: warning: 'gpio_flags' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
This changes the behavior of the inline helper to set the flags to zero
when OF_GPIO is disabled, to avoid the warnings. In all cases I've
encountered, we don't actually get to the place that uses the flags
if CONFIG_OF is disabled because we won't enter the DT parser code.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
We were getting build warning about "iterator" being used uninitialized.
Use iterator properly to fix the build warning and in the process remove
the variable "pos" which is not required now.
Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Since gpiochip .get() callback may return a negative error value, it
strictly limits the range of possible non-error returned values to
a subset of [30:0] bitmask, however on practice on success all
gpiochip drivers return either 0 for low signal or 1 for high signal,
this is assured by "gpio: *: Be sure to clamp return value" series of
changes. To avoid any confusion, misinterpretation and potential
errors while developing gpiochip drivers in future convert this
implicit assumption to a mandatory rule.
For output signals with unknown output signal state gpiochip drivers
should return a negative error instead of 0.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
This reverts commit 45ad7db90b.
We have fixed all the drivers that were returning ambious values
not clamped to [0,1] or an error code, so return the error
propagating behaviour of the API.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.
Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.
This code was also double-inverting a bool which makes no sense
so I removed that code and moved clamping toward the end.
Cc: Björn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.
Also, this code was double-inverting a bool. That makes no
sense whatsoever, so I removed the double-invert.
Cc: Björn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.
Cc: Björn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com>
Cc: Ivan T. Ivanov <ivan.ivanov@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.
Cc: Ivan T. Ivanov <ivan.ivanov@linaro.org>
Cc: Björn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.
Cc: Pramod Gurav <pramod.gurav@smartplayin.com>
Cc: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.
Cc: Lars Poeschel <poeschel@lemonage.de>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.
Acked-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.
Acked-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.
This also makes the driver start to return the error code, as the
end of the series make this work.
Cc: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.
This also starts to propagate the error code from the I2C
transaction as the end of the series adds support for that.
Cc: Wei Chen <Wei.Chen@csr.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.
Cc: Alessandro Rubini <rubini@gnudd.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.
Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
Cc: Kristoffer Ericson <kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.
Cc: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Cc: Daniel Krueger <daniel.krueger@systec-electronic.com>
Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.
Also start returning the error code if something fails, as the
end of the series augment the core to support this.
Cc: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Cc: George Cherian <george.cherian@ti.com>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.
Acked-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.
Cc: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
Cc: Tomoya MORINAGA <tomoya-linux@dsn.okisemi.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.
Also start to propagate the error code here as the end of the
series fixes this to work for all drivers.
Cc: Semen Protsenko <semen.protsenko@globallogic.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Reviewed-by:Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.
Cc: Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>
Cc: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.
Cc: Brunner Michael <Michael.Brunner@kontron.com>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.
Cc: Ira W. Snyder <iws@ovro.caltech.edu>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.
Acked-by: David Cohen <david.a.cohen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.
Cc: Magnus Damm <damm@opensource.se>
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.
Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Linus Walleij