Replace of_get_property() and of_translate_address() calls with a single
call to of_address_to_resource().
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230406010738.1269781-1-robh@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The tegra and tegra needs to be freed in the error handling path, otherwise
it will be leaked.
Fixes: 2db04f16b5 ("clk: tegra: Add EMC clock driver")
Signed-off-by: Yuan Can <yuancan@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221209094124.71043-1-yuancan@huawei.com
Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Smatch detected this potential error pointer dereference
clk_wzrd_register_divider(). If devm_clk_hw_register() fails then
it sets "hw" to an error pointer and then dereferences it on the
next line. Return the error directly instead.
Fixes: 5a853722eb ("staging: clocking-wizard: Add support for dynamic reconfiguration")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/f0e39b5c-4554-41e0-80d9-54ca3fabd060@kili.mountain
Reviewed-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
sparse points out an embarrasing bug in an older patch of mine,
which uses the register offset instead of an __iomem pointer:
drivers/clk/pxa/clk-pxa3xx.c:167:9: sparse: sparse: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
Unlike sparse, gcc and clang ignore this bug and fail to warn
because a literal '0' is considered a valid representation of
a NULL pointer.
Fixes: 3c816d950a ("ARM: pxa: move clk register definitions to driver")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202305111301.RAHohdob-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230511105845.299859-1-arnd@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Smatch detected an off by one in this code:
drivers/clk/bcm/clk-raspberrypi.c:374 raspberrypi_discover_clocks()
error: buffer overflow 'data->hws' 16 <= 16
The data->hws[] array has RPI_FIRMWARE_NUM_CLK_ID elements so the >
comparison needs to changed to >=.
Fixes: 12c90f3f27 ("clk: bcm: rpi: Add variant structure")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5a850b08-d2f5-4794-aceb-a6b468965139@kili.mountain
Reviewed-by: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Convert platform_get_resource(),devm_ioremap_resource() to a single
call to devm_platform_ioremap_resource(), as this is exactly what this
function does.
Signed-off-by: Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230428070005.41192-1-yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The sprd_div_helper_round_rate() function calls divider_round_rate()
which calls divider_round_rate_parent() which calls
divider_determine_rate(). This call chain converts back and forth from
the rate request structure to make a determine_rate clk_op fit with a
round_rate clk_op. Simplify the code here by directly calling
divider_determine_rate() instead.
This fixes a smatch warning where an unsigned long is compared to less
than zero, which is impossible. This makes sprd_div_helper_round_rate()
unnecessary as well so simply remove it and fold it into the only caller
left.
Reported-by: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/45fdc54e-7ab6-edd6-d55a-473485608473@oracle.com
Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Fixes: 302d2f836d ("clk: sprd: composite: Switch to determine_rate")
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230613195443.1555132-1-sboyd@kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
The GPUCC block on SM6375 is powered by VDD_CX and VDD_GX. If the latter
rail is not online, GX_GDSC will never turn on. Enable runtime pm so that
we can reference VDD_GX from the dt to ensure that.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230529-topic-sm6375gpuccpd-v1-2-8d57c41a6066@linaro.org
When the driver was ported upstream, PLL ctl register values were omitted.
Add them to ensure the PLLs are fully configured like we expect them to.
Fixes: cbe63bfdc5 ("clk: qcom: Add Global Clock controller (GCC) driver for SM6115")
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Iskren Chernev <me@iskren.info>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230601-topic-alpha_ctl-v1-2-b6a932dfcf68@linaro.org
The "vanilla" Alpha PLL configs are sometimes provided with an intention
to only update certain bits of th register.
Do so if a mask is found.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Iskren Chernev <me@iskren.info>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230601-topic-alpha_ctl-v1-1-b6a932dfcf68@linaro.org
A recent change added new initializers for .config_ctl_val and
.config_ctl_hi_val but left the old values in place:
drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-ipq6018.c:4155:27: error: initialized field overwritten [-Werror=override-init]
4155 | .config_ctl_val = 0x240d4828,
| ^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-ipq6018.c:4156:30: error: initialized field overwritten [-Werror=override-init]
4156 | .config_ctl_hi_val = 0x6,
| ^~~
Remove the unused ones now to avoid confusion.
Fixes: f4f0c8acee ("clk: qcom: gcc-ipq6018: update UBI32 PLL")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230601213416.3373599-1-arnd@kernel.org
best_parent_rate entry is still being used in the code and needs to be
always updated regardless of the CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT flag.
Fixes: 1b4e99fda7 ("clk: Move no reparent case into a separate function")
Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230613131631.270192-1-m.szyprowski@samsung.com
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Add support for the lpass audio clock controller found on SC8280XP based
devices. This would allow lpass peripheral loader drivers to control the
clocks and bring the subsystems out of reset.
Currently this patch only supports resets as the Q6DSP is in control of
LPASS IP which manages most of the clocks via Q6PRM service on GPR rpmsg
channel.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230608125315.11454-5-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Add support for the lpass clock controller found on SC8280XP based devices.
This would allow lpass peripheral loader drivers to control the clocks and
bring the subsystems out of reset.
Currently this patch only supports resets as the Q6DSP is in control of
LPASS IP which manages most of the clocks via Q6PRM service on GPR rpmsg
channel.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230608125315.11454-4-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Smatch reports:
drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mtk.c:583 mtk_clk_simple_probe() warn:
'base' from of_iomap() not released on lines: 496.
This problem was also found in linux-next. In mtk_clk_simple_probe(),
base is not released when handling errors
if clk_data is not existed, which may cause a leak.
So free_base should be added here to release base.
Fixes: c58cd0e40f ("clk: mediatek: Add mtk_clk_simple_probe() to simplify clock providers")
Signed-off-by: Bosi Zhang <u201911157@hust.edu.cn>
Reviewed-by: Dongliang Mu <dzm91@hust.edu.cn>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230422084331.47198-1-u201911157@hust.edu.cn
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The infra_ao reset is needed for MT8188.
- Add mtk_clk_rst_desc for MT8188.
- Add register reset controller function for MT8188 infra_ao.
- Add infra_ao_idx_map for MT8188.
Signed-off-by: Runyang Chen <runyang.chen@mediatek.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230525075011.7032-3-runyang.chen@mediatek.com
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Various MSDC core clocks, used for multiple MSDC controller instances,
share the same parent(s): in order to add parents selection in the
mtk-sd driver to achieve an accurate clock rate for all modes, remove
the CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT flag from all MSDC clocks for all SoCs: this
will make sure that a clk_set_rate() call performed for a clock on
a secondary controller will not change the rate of a common parent,
which would result in an overclock or underclock of one of the
controllers.
Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230516135205.372951-3-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com
Tested-by: Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@baylibre.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The clk-mux driver was forcing the CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT flag even for
the GATE_CLK_SET_UPD_FLAGS() macro, as in mtk_clk_register_mux() the
flag was unconditionally added.
In preparation for a change on MSDC clock muxes, stop forcing this
flag and, where necessary, update clock drivers to add it so that
with this commit we introduce no functional changes for the currently
supported SoCs.
Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230516135205.372951-2-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com
Tested-by: Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@baylibre.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
After commit b8a1a4cd5a ("i2c: Provide a temporary .probe_new()
call-back type"), all drivers being converted to .probe_new() and then
03c835f498 ("i2c: Switch .probe() to not take an id parameter")
convert back to (the new) .probe() to be able to eventually drop
.probe_new() from struct i2c_driver.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230526060955.1130253-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The given operations are inverted for the wrong registers which makes
multiple of the mt8365 hardware units unusable. In my setup at least usb
did not work.
Fixed by swapping the operations with the inverted ones.
Reported-by: Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@baylibre.com>
Fixes: 905b7430d3 ("clk: mediatek: mt8365: Convert simple_gate to mtk_gate clocks")
Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230511133226.913600-1-msp@baylibre.com
Tested-by: Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@baylibre.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@baylibre.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
ULONG_MAX is used by a few drivers to figure out the highest available
clock rate via clk_round_rate(clk, ULONG_MAX). Since abs() takes a
signed value as input, the current logic effectively calculates with
ULONG_MAX = -1, which results in the worst parent clock being chosen
instead of the best one.
For example on Rockchip RK3588 the eMMC driver tries to figure out
the highest available clock rate. There are three parent clocks
available resulting in the following rate diffs with the existing
logic:
GPLL: abs(18446744073709551615 - 1188000000) = 1188000001
CPLL: abs(18446744073709551615 - 1500000000) = 1500000001
XIN24M: abs(18446744073709551615 - 24000000) = 24000001
As a result the clock framework will promote a maximum supported
clock rate of 24 MHz, even though 1.5GHz are possible. With the
updated logic any casting between signed and unsigned is avoided
and the numbers look like this instead:
GPLL: 18446744073709551615 - 1188000000 = 18446744072521551615
CPLL: 18446744073709551615 - 1500000000 = 18446744072209551615
XIN24M: 18446744073709551615 - 24000000 = 18446744073685551615
As a result the parent with the highest acceptable rate is chosen
instead of the parent clock with the lowest one.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 4950240800 ("mmc: sdhci-of-dwcmshc: properly determine max clock on Rockchip")
Tested-by: Christopher Obbard <chris.obbard@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230526171057.66876-2-sebastian.reichel@collabora.com
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Before the patch [1], the clock probe was done directly in the
clk-mt8365 driver. In this probe function, the array which stores the
data clocks is sized using the higher defined numbers (*_NR_CLOCK) in
the clock lists [2]. Currently, with the patch [1], the specific
clk-mt8365 probe function is replaced by the mtk generic one [3], which
size the clock data array by adding all the clock descriptor array size
provided by the clk-mt8365 driver.
Actually, all clock indexes come from the header file [2], that mean, if
there are more clock (then more index) in the header file [2] than the
number of clock declared in the clock descriptor arrays (which is the
case currently), the clock data array will be undersized and then the
generic probe function will overflow when it will try to write in
"clk_data[CLK_INDEX]". Actually, instead of crashing at boot, the probe
function returns an error in the log which looks like:
"of_clk_hw_onecell_get: invalid index 135", then this clock isn't
enabled.
Solve this issue by adding in the driver the missing clocks declared in
the header clock file [2].
[1]: Commit ffe91cb28f ("clk: mediatek: mt8365: Convert to
mtk_clk_simple_{probe,remove}()")
[2]: include/dt-bindings/clock/mediatek,mt8365-clk.h
[3]: drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mtk.c
Fixes: ffe91cb28f ("clk: mediatek: mt8365: Convert to mtk_clk_simple_{probe,remove}()")
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@baylibre.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230517-fix-clk-index-v3-1-be4df46065c4@baylibre.com
Tested-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
When CONFIG_OF is disabled, build testing on x86 runs into a couple of
objtool warnings from functions that unconditionally call panic() but
have no __noreturn annotation:
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: exynos3250_cmu_isp_probe+0x17: samsung_cmu_register_one() is missing a __noreturn annotation
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: exynos7885_cmu_probe+0x16: exynos_arm64_register_cmu() is missing a __noreturn annotation
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: exynos850_cmu_probe+0x16: exynos_arm64_register_cmu() is missing a __noreturn annotation
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: exynosautov9_cmu_probe+0x16: exynos_arm64_register_cmu() is missing a __noreturn annotation
The objtool analysis is correct, and this could be addressed by just
returning success whenever CONFIG_OF is disabled to let all that code
be eliminated, but since the driver is no use without CONFIG_OF,
just add that as a dependency. It will still get compile tested on
all architectures since CONFIG_OF is enabled in allmodconfig and most
randconfig builds.
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230609081559.915867-1-arnd@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Replace of_iomap() and kzalloc() with devm_of_iomap() and devm_kzalloc()
which can automatically release the related memory when the device
or driver is removed or unloaded to avoid potential memory leak.
In this case, iounmap(anatop_base) in line 427,433 are removed
as manual release is not required.
Besides, referring to clk-imx8mq.c, check the return code of
of_clk_add_hw_provider, if it returns negtive, print error info
and unregister hws, which makes the program more robust.
Fixes: 9c140d9926 ("clk: imx: Add support for i.MX8MP clock driver")
Signed-off-by: Yuxing Liu <lyx2022@hust.edu.cn>
Reviewed-by: Dongliang Mu <dzm91@hust.edu.cn>
Reviewed-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230503070607.2462-1-lyx2022@hust.edu.cn
Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
In function probe(), it returns directly without unregistered hws
when error occurs.
Fix this by adding 'goto unregister_hws;' on line 295 and
line 310.
Use devm_kzalloc() instead of kzalloc() to automatically
free the memory using devm_kfree() when error occurs.
Replace of_iomap() with devm_of_iomap() to automatically
handle the unused ioremap region and delete 'iounmap(anatop_base);'
in unregister_hws.
Fixes: 24defbe194 ("clk: imx: add i.MX93 clk")
Signed-off-by: Zhanhao Hu <zero12113@hust.edu.cn>
Reviewed-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230601033825.336558-1-zero12113@hust.edu.cn
Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
Use devm_of_iomap() instead of of_iomap() to automatically handle
the unused ioremap region.
If any error occurs, regions allocated by kzalloc() will leak,
but using devm_kzalloc() instead will automatically free the memory
using devm_kfree().
Fixes: daeb145455 ("clk: imx: imx8mn: Switch to clk_hw based API")
Fixes: 96d6392b54 ("clk: imx: Add support for i.MX8MN clock driver")
Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <m202171776@hust.edu.cn>
Reviewed-by: Dongliang Mu <dzm91@hust.edu.cn>
Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230411015107.2645-1-m202171776@hust.edu.cn
Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
Use devm_of_iomap() instead of of_iomap() to automatically
handle the unused ioremap region. If any error occurs, regions allocated by
kzalloc() will leak, but using devm_kzalloc() instead will automatically
free the memory using devm_kfree().
Also, fix error handling of hws by adding unregister_hws label, which
unregisters remaining hws when iomap failed.
Fixes: 7154b046d8 ("clk: imx: Add initial support for i.MXRT1050 clock driver")
Signed-off-by: Kai Ma <kaima@hust.edu.cn>
Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Acked-by: Jesse Taube <Mr.Bossman075@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230418113451.151312-1-kaima@hust.edu.cn
Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
Currently, certain clocks are derrived as a divider from their
parent clock. For some clocks, even when CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT
is set, the parent clock is not properly set which can lead
to some relatively inaccurate clock values.
Unlike imx/clk-composite-93 and imx/clk-divider-gate, it
cannot rely on calling a standard determine_rate function,
because the 8m composite clocks have a pre-divider and
post-divider. Because of this, a custom determine_rate
function is necessary to determine the maximum clock
division which is equivalent to pre-divider * the
post-divider.
With this added, the system can attempt to adjust the parent rate
when the proper flags are set which can lead to a more precise clock
value.
On the imx8mplus, no clock changes are present.
On the Mini and Nano, this can help achieve more accurate
lcdif clocks. When trying to get a pixel clock of 31.500MHz
on an imx8m Nano, the clocks divided the 594MHz down, but
left the parent rate untouched which caused a calulation error.
Before:
video_pll 594000000
video_pll_bypass 594000000
video_pll_out 594000000
disp_pixel 31263158
disp_pixel_clk 31263158
Variance = -236842 Hz
After this patch:
video_pll 31500000
video_pll_bypass 31500000
video_pll_out 31500000
disp_pixel 31500000
disp_pixel_clk 31500000
Variance = 0 Hz
All other clocks rates and parent were the same.
Similar results on imx8mm were found.
Fixes: 690dccc4a0 ("Revert "clk: imx: composite-8m: Add support to determine_rate"")
Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230506195325.876871-1-aford173@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
Turn CBF into the interconnect provider. Scale CBF frequency (bandwidth)
according to CPU frequencies.
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Yassine Oudjana <y.oudjana@protonmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230512001334.2983048-4-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Georgi Djakov <djakov@kernel.org>
The determine_rate hook allows to select the proper parent and its rate
for a given clock configuration. On another hand, set_parent is there to
change the parent of a mux.
Some clocks provide a set_parent hook but don't implement
determine_rate. In such a case, set_parent is pretty much useless since
the clock framework will always assume the current parent is to be used,
and we will thus never change it.
This situation can be solved in two ways:
- either we don't need to change the parent, and we thus shouldn't
implement set_parent;
- or we don't want to change the parent, in this case we should set
CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT;
- or we're missing a determine_rate implementation.
The latter is probably just an oversight from the driver's author, and
we should thus raise their awareness about the fact that the current
state of the driver is confusing.
All the drivers in-tree have been converted by now, so let's prevent any
clock with set_parent but without determine_rate to register so that it
can't sneak in again in the future.
Cc: Abel Vesa <abelvesa@kernel.org>
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>
Cc: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Cc: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com>
Cc: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Cc: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>
Cc: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>
Cc: Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>
Cc: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@nvidia.com>
Cc: Miles Chen <miles.chen@mediatek.com>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
Cc: Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Cc: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
Cc: Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@nvidia.com>
Cc: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
Cc: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-actions@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com
Cc: linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev
Cc: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Cc: NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>
Cc: patches@opensource.cirrus.com
Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-68-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Tegra super clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.
However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.
Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an
oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on.
Cc: Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Cc: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
Cc: Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@nvidia.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-65-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Tegra periph clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.
However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.
Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an
oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on.
Cc: Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Cc: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
Cc: Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@nvidia.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-64-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The STM32 composite clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.
However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.
Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an
oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on.
Cc: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>
Cc: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-63-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The ST Flexgen clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.
However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.
Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an
oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-62-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Spreadtrum composite clocks implements a mux with a set_parent
hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.
However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.
Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an
oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on.
Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com>
Cc: Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-61-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Ingenic TCU clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.
However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.
Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an
oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on.
Cc: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-60-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Ingenic CGU clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.
However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.
Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an
oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on.
Cc: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-59-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The iMX SCU clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but doesn't
provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.
However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.
Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. The round_rate()
implementation being shared with other clocks, it's not removed.
And if it was an oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later
on.
Cc: Abel Vesa <abelvesa@kernel.org>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>
Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-58-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The TI DA8xx USB0 clk48 clocks implements a mux with a set_parent
hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.
However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.
Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an
oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on.
Cc: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Acked-by: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-57-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The SI5351 clkout clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.
However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.
Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an
oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-56-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The SI5351 msynth clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.
However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.
Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an
oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-55-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The SI5351 PLL clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.
However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.
Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an
oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-54-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The SI5341 output clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.
However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.
Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an
oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-53-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The cdce706 clkout clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.
However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.
Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an
oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on.
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-52-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The cdce706 divider clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.
However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.
Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an
oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on.
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-51-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The AXI clkgen clocks implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.
However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.
Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an
oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-50-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Atmel SAM9x5 SMD clocks implements a mux with a set_parent
hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.
However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.
Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an
oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on.
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-49-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Actions composite factor clocks implements a mux with a set_parent
hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.
However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.
Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an
oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on.
Cc: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-actions@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-48-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Actions composite divider clocks implements a mux with a set_parent
hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The driver does implement round_rate() though, which means that we can
change the rate of the clock, but we will never get to change the
parent.
However, It's hard to tell whether it's been done on purpose or not.
Since we'll start mandating a determine_rate() implementation, let's
convert the round_rate() implementation to a determine_rate(), which
will also make the current behavior explicit. And if it was an
oversight, the clock behaviour can be adjusted later on.
Cc: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-actions@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-47-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Versatile sp810 "timerclken" clock implements a mux with a
set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
This mismatch is probably due to the fact that the driver introduction
predates the determine_rate introduction, and it was never revised since
then.
The default, implicit, behaviour that has been in use so far has thus
been to simply keep using the current parent in all cases. This is also
the behaviour of the new clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent() helper, so
we can simply use it to make our expectation explicit.
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-39-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The UX500 sysctrl "set_parent" clocks implement a mux with a set_parent
hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-38-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The UX500 PRCMU "clkout" clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook,
but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The PRCMU binding also allows to specify the default clock parent
through a device tree cell. This will be enforced at prepare time by the
driver.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
The result is that the driver relies on prepare to set the default
parent, and thus the set_parent hook is effectively unused by design.
We can make that decision explicit by setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent() that will keep the
same behaviour. Indeed, if no determine_rate implementation is provided,
clk_round_rate() (through clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself
on the parent if CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the
clock rate otherwise.
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-37-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Tegra periph nodiv clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
However, the upstream device trees seem to use assigned-clock-parents on
that clock to force the parent at boot time, so it's likely that the
author intent was to force the parent through the device tree and
prevent any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
This case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
Cc: Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Cc: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
Cc: Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@nvidia.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-36-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Tegra super mux clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
However, the upstream device trees seem to use assigned-clock-parents on
that clock to force the parent at boot time, so it's likely that the
author intent was to force the parent through the device tree and
prevent any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
This case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
Cc: Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Cc: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
Cc: Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@nvidia.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-35-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Tegra BPMP mux clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
However, the upstream device trees seem to use assigned-clock-parents on
that clock to force the parent at boot time, so it's likely that the
author intent was to force the parent through the device tree and
prevent any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
This case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
Cc: Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Cc: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
Cc: Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@nvidia.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-34-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The STM32 mux clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the flag
CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT, together with setting our determine_rate hook
to __clk_mux_determine_rate(). Indeed, if no determine_rate
implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Since the CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT flag was already set though, it seems
unlikely.
Cc: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>
Cc: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-33-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The SoCFGPA gate clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-32-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Renesas r9a06g032 bitselect clock implements a mux with a set_parent
hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-31-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The PXA "CKEN" clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-30-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Mediatek cpumux clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-29-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The iMX SCU mux clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: Abel Vesa <abelvesa@kernel.org>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>
Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-28-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>:
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The iMX fixup mux clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
However, the upstream device trees seem to use assigned-clock-parents on
that clock to force the parent at boot time, so it's likely that the
author intent was to force the parent through the device tree and
prevent any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
This case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
Cc: Abel Vesa <abelvesa@kernel.org>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>
Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-27-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The iMX busy clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: Abel Vesa <abelvesa@kernel.org>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>
Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-26-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Davinci DA8xxx cfgchip "clk48" clock implements a mux with a
set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Acked-by: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-25-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Davinci DA8xxx cfgchip mux clock implements a mux with a set_parent
hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
However, the upstream device trees seem to use assigned-clock-parents on
that clock to force the parent at boot time, so it's likely that the
author intent was to force the parent through the device tree and
prevent any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
This case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
Cc: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Acked-by: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-24-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The WM381x "clkout" clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook,
but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: patches@opensource.cirrus.com
Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-23-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>:
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Versaclock5 "clkout" clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook,
but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-22-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Versaclock5 mux clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-21-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The STM32F4 mux clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
However, the upstream device trees seem to use assigned-clock-parents on
that clock to force the parent at boot time, so it's likely that the
author intent was to force the parent through the device tree and
prevent any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
This case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
Cc: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>
Cc: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-20-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The SI5341 clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-19-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Qoriq mux clocks implement a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-18-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The lochnagar clocks implement a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Since there's no upstream device tree using that driver, it's a bit hard
to tell if it uses the assigned-clock properties. The binding and its
example uses them though, so it's likely that the author intent was to
force the parent through the device tree and prevent any reparenting but
through an explicit call to clk_set_parent().
This case is equivalent to setting the determine_rate implementation to
clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no determine_rate
implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
Cc: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
Cc: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
Cc: patches@opensource.cirrus.com
Tested-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-17-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>:
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>:
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The LKM04832 "CLKOUT" clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidate to
trigger that parent change is a call to clk_set_rate(), with
determine_rate() figuring out which parent is the best suited for a
given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the flag
CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT, together with setting our determine_rate hook
to __clk_mux_determine_rate(). Indeed, if no determine_rate
implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Since the CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT flag was already set though, it seems
unlikely.
Reviewed-by: Liam Beguin <liambeguin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-16-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The K210 mux clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-15-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The K210 ACLK clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-14-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The K210 PLL clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-13-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The cdce706 "clkin" clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-12-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>:
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Berlin2 divider clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-11-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The SAM9x5 slow clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-10-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The SAM9x5 main clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties on that clock.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-9-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The Actions "Pass" clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but
doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is a bit odd, since set_parent() is there to, as its name implies,
change the parent of a clock. However, the most likely candidates to
trigger that parent change are either the assigned-clock-parents device
tree property or a call to clk_set_rate(), with determine_rate()
figuring out which parent is the best suited for a given rate.
The other trigger would be a call to clk_set_parent(), but it's far less
used, and it doesn't look like there's any obvious user for that clock.
Similarly, it doesn't look like the device tree using that clock driver
uses any of the assigned-clock properties.
So, the set_parent hook is effectively unused, possibly because of an
oversight. However, it could also be an explicit decision by the
original author to avoid any reparenting but through an explicit call to
clk_set_parent().
The latter case would be equivalent to setting the determine_rate
implementation to clk_hw_determine_rate_no_reparent(). Indeed, if no
determine_rate implementation is provided, clk_round_rate() (through
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()) will call itself on the parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, and will not change the clock rate
otherwise.
And if it was an oversight, then we are at least explicit about our
behavior now and it can be further refined down the line.
Cc: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-actions@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-8-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The single parent clock in our kunit tests implements a mux with a
set_parent hook, but doesn't provide a determine_rate implementation.
This is not entirely unexpected, since its whole purpose it to have a
single parent. When determine_rate is missing, and since
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set for all its instances, the default behaviour
of the framework will be to forward it to the current parent.
This is totally fine as far as the tests are concerned, but we'll start
to mandate a determine_rate implementation when set_parent is set, so
let's fill it with __clk_mux_determine_rate() which will have the same
behavior.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-7-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The nodrv clock implements a mux with a set_parent hook, but doesn't
provide a determine_rate implementation.
Even though it's a mock clock and the missing function is harmless,
we'll start to require a determine_rate implementation when set_parent
is set, so let's fill it.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-6-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The lan966x driver registers a gck clock with both a determine_rate and
a round_rate implementation. Both are equivalent, and are only called by
clk_core_determine_round_nolock() which favors determine_rate.
Thus, lan966x_gck_round_rate() is never called, so we can just remove
it.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-5-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Some clock drivers do not want to allow any reparenting on a given
clock, but usually do so by not providing any determine_rate
implementation.
Whenever we call clk_round_rate() or clk_set_rate(), this leads to
clk_core_can_round() returning false and thus the rest of the function
either forwarding the rate request to its current parent if
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set, or just returning the current clock rate.
This behaviour happens implicitly, and as we move forward to making a
determine_rate implementation required for muxes, we need some way to
explicitly opt-in for that behaviour.
Fortunately, this is exactly what the clk_core_determine_rate_no_reparent()
function is doing, so we can simply make it available to drivers.
Cc: Abel Vesa <abelvesa@kernel.org>
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>
Cc: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Cc: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com>
Cc: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Cc: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>
Cc: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>
Cc: Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>
Cc: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@nvidia.com>
Cc: Miles Chen <miles.chen@mediatek.com>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
Cc: Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Cc: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
Cc: Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@nvidia.com>
Cc: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
Cc: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-actions@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com
Cc: linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev
Cc: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Cc: NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>
Cc: patches@opensource.cirrus.com
Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-4-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>:
clk_round_rate() may return a negative error code, but most of the
variables we defined to store its returned value are unsigned.
This obviously leads to issues on error.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-2-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Commit 262ca38f4b ("clk: Stop forwarding clk_rate_requests to the
parent") introduced the public clk_hw_forward_rate_request() function,
but didn't export the symbol. Make sure it's the case.
Fixes: 262ca38f4b ("clk: Stop forwarding clk_rate_requests to the parent")
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018-clk-range-checks-fixes-v4-1-971d5077e7d2@cerno.tech
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Use device_get_match_data() which, unlike of_device_get_match_data(),
is compatible with other firmware interfaces than just OF.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230514191959.706269-2-marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Use device_get_match_data() which, unlike of_device_get_match_data(),
is compatible with other firmware interfaces than just OF.
Reviewed-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230514191959.706269-1-marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
The clock controller generates clocks for the whole chip, including
system clocks and all peripheral clocks. This driver support ma35d1
clock gating, divider, and individual PLL configuration.
There are 6 PLLs in ma35d1 SoC:
- CA-PLL for the two Cortex-A35 CPU clock
- SYS-PLL for system bus, which comes from the companion MCU
and cannot be programmed by clock controller.
- DDR-PLL for DDR
- EPLL for GMAC and GFX, Display, and VDEC IPs.
- VPLL for video output pixel clock
- APLL for SDHC, I2S audio, and other IPs.
CA-PLL has only one operation mode.
DDR-PLL, EPLL, VPLL, and APLL are advanced PLLs which have 3
operation modes: integer mode, fraction mode, and spread specturm mode.
Signed-off-by: Jacky Huang <ychuang3@nuvoton.com>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Introduce Peripherals clock controller for Amlogic A1 SoC family.
A1 SoC has four clock controllers on the board: PLL, Peripherals, CPU,
and Audio.
This patchset adds support for Amlogic A1 Peripherals clock driver and
allows to generate clocks for all A1 SoC peripheral IPs.
Signed-off-by: Jian Hu <jian.hu@amlogic.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Rokosov <ddrokosov@sberdevices.ru>
Reviewed-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230523135351.19133-7-ddrokosov@sberdevices.ru
Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
Introduce PLL clock controller for Amlogic A1 SoC family.
The clock unit is an APB slave module that is designed for generating all
of the internal and system clocks.
The SoC uses an external 24MHz crystal; there are 4 internal PLLs:
SYS_PLL/HIFI_PLL/USB_PLL/(FIXPLL), these PLLs generate 27 clock sources.
Signed-off-by: Jian Hu <jian.hu@amlogic.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Rokosov <ddrokosov@sberdevices.ru>
Reviewed-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230523135351.19133-5-ddrokosov@sberdevices.ru
Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
Jiapeng Chong