Commit Graph

35 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Kirill A. Shutemov 7a3a401874 x86/tdx: Drop flags from __tdx_hypercall()
After TDX_HCALL_ISSUE_STI got dropped, the only flag left is
TDX_HCALL_HAS_OUTPUT. The flag indicates if the caller wants to see
tdx_hypercall_args updated based on the hypercall output.

Drop the flags and provide __tdx_hypercall_ret() that matches
TDX_HCALL_HAS_OUTPUT semantics.

Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230321003511.9469-1-kirill.shutemov%40linux.intel.com
2023-03-22 11:36:05 -07:00
Linus Torvalds d8e473182a - Fixup comment typo
- Prevent unexpected #VE's from:
   - Hosts removing perfectly good guest mappings (SEPT_VE_DISABLE
   - Excessive #VE notifications (NOTIFY_ENABLES) which are
     delivered via a #VE.
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEV76QKkVc4xCGURexaDWVMHDJkrAFAmP1WzMACgkQaDWVMHDJ
 krAqig/+MzIYmUIkuYbluektxPdzI6zhY/Z+eD5DDH9OFZX5e0WQrmHpQbJ3i4Q6
 LT5JQ+yAI2ox/mhPfyCeDXqdRiatJJExUDUepc0qsOEW9gTsJ+edYwUsJg8HII61
 +TLz/BiMSF6xCUk46b4CqzhoeEk1dupFAG204uc4vGwSfXdysN3buAcciJc1rOTS
 7G9hI9fdLSjEJ8yyFebSDMPxSmdnjJPrDK3LF/leGJEpAQ/eMU0entG4ZH3Uyh2s
 3EnDpOdRjX56LAEixB4e5igXyS7wesCun4ytOnwndzW8p4gPIsypcJUEbVt84BfA
 HQaSWP35BFAn0JshJnFPmj4r4jV2EB8l630dVTOKdNSiIa3YjyB5nbzy+mMPFl4f
 8vcrHEZ6boEcRhgz0zFG0RfnDsjdbqKgFBXdRt0vYB/CG+EfmYaPoDXsb/8A7dtc
 8IQ9wLk2AqG0L8blZVS2kjFxNa/9lkDcMsAbfZmlORTQTF2WN2Jlbxri87vuBpRy
 8sqMUhgvHoffd/SIiDzJJIBjOH5/RhXLKhGzXQHI1vpZdU6ps9KIvohiycgx1mUQ
 lXXQwN5OWSHdUXZ7TFBIGXy9n32Ak/k5GCzCJSqvsMJDDdbycGVB+YCaKX6QK30+
 HAHrPy/FQ3FFvZWdsDMD5Pn4RkF4LYH/k4QZwqBFMs9+/Sdzwxc=
 =UpyL
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'x86_tdx_for_6.3' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

Pull Intel Trust Domain Extensions (TDX) updates from Dave Hansen:
 "Other than a minor fixup, the content here is to ensure that TDX
  guests never see virtualization exceptions (#VE's) that might be
  induced by the untrusted VMM.

  This is a highly desirable property. Without it, #VE exception
  handling would fall somewhere between NMIs, machine checks and total
  insanity. With it, #VE handling remains pretty mundane.

  Summary:

   - Fixup comment typo

   - Prevent unexpected #VE's from:
      - Hosts removing perfectly good guest mappings (SEPT_VE_DISABLE)
      - Excessive #VE notifications (NOTIFY_ENABLES) which are delivered
        via a #VE"

* tag 'x86_tdx_for_6.3' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
  x86/tdx: Do not corrupt frame-pointer in __tdx_hypercall()
  x86/tdx: Disable NOTIFY_ENABLES
  x86/tdx: Relax SEPT_VE_DISABLE check for debug TD
  x86/tdx: Use ReportFatalError to report missing SEPT_VE_DISABLE
  x86/tdx: Expand __tdx_hypercall() to handle more arguments
  x86/tdx: Refactor __tdx_hypercall() to allow pass down more arguments
  x86/tdx: Add more registers to struct tdx_hypercall_args
  x86/tdx: Fix typo in comment in __tdx_hypercall()
2023-02-25 09:11:30 -08:00
Kirill A. Shutemov 1e70c68037 x86/tdx: Do not corrupt frame-pointer in __tdx_hypercall()
If compiled with CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y, objtool is not happy that
__tdx_hypercall() messes up RBP:

  objtool: __tdx_hypercall+0x7f: return with modified stack frame

Rework the function to store TDX_HCALL_ flags on stack instead of RBP.

[ dhansen: minor changelog tweaks ]

Fixes: c30c4b2555 ("x86/tdx: Refactor __tdx_hypercall() to allow pass down more arguments")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/202301290255.buUBs99R-lkp@intel.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230130135354.27674-1-kirill.shutemov%40linux.intel.com
2023-02-02 16:31:25 -08:00
Ingo Molnar 57a30218fa Linux 6.2-rc6
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iQFSBAABCAA8FiEEq68RxlopcLEwq+PEeb4+QwBBGIYFAmPW7E8eHHRvcnZhbGRz
 QGxpbnV4LWZvdW5kYXRpb24ub3JnAAoJEHm+PkMAQRiGf7MIAI0JnHN9WvtEukSZ
 E6j6+cEGWxsvD6q0g3GPolaKOCw7hlv0pWcFJFcUAt0jebspMdxV2oUGJ8RYW7Lg
 nCcHvEVswGKLAQtQSWw52qotW6fUfMPsNYYB5l31sm1sKH4Cgss0W7l2HxO/1LvG
 TSeNHX53vNAZ8pVnFYEWCSXC9bzrmU/VALF2EV00cdICmfvjlgkELGXoLKJJWzUp
 s63fBHYGGURSgwIWOKStoO6HNo0j/F/wcSMx8leY8qDUtVKHj4v24EvSgxUSDBER
 ch3LiSQ6qf4sw/z7pqruKFthKOrlNmcc0phjiES0xwwGiNhLv0z3rAhc4OM2cgYh
 SDc/Y/c=
 =zpaD
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'v6.2-rc6' into sched/core, to pick up fixes

Pick up fixes before merging another batch of cpuidle updates.

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2023-01-31 15:01:20 +01:00
Kirill A. Shutemov 8de62af018 x86/tdx: Disable NOTIFY_ENABLES
== Background ==

There is a class of side-channel attacks against SGX enclaves called
"SGX Step"[1]. These attacks create lots of exceptions inside of
enclaves. Basically, run an in-enclave instruction, cause an exception.
Over and over.

There is a concern that a VMM could attack a TDX guest in the same way
by causing lots of #VE's. The TDX architecture includes new
countermeasures for these attacks. It basically counts the number of
exceptions and can send another *special* exception once the number of
VMM-induced #VE's hits a critical threshold[2].

== Problem ==

But, these special exceptions are independent of any action that the
guest takes. They can occur anywhere that the guest executes. This
includes sensitive areas like the entry code. The (non-paranoid) #VE
handler is incapable of handling exceptions in these areas.

== Solution ==

Fortunately, the special exceptions can be disabled by the guest via
write to NOTIFY_ENABLES TDCS field. NOTIFY_ENABLES is disabled by
default, but might be enabled by a bootloader, firmware or an earlier
kernel before the current kernel runs.

Disable NOTIFY_ENABLES feature explicitly and unconditionally. Any
NOTIFY_ENABLES-based #VE's that occur before this point will end up
in the early #VE exception handler and die due to unexpected exit
reason.

[1] https://github.com/jovanbulck/sgx-step
[2] https://intel.github.io/ccc-linux-guest-hardening-docs/security-spec.html#safety-against-ve-in-kernel-code

Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230126221159.8635-8-kirill.shutemov%40linux.intel.com
2023-01-27 09:46:05 -08:00
Kirill A. Shutemov 47e67cf317 x86/tdx: Relax SEPT_VE_DISABLE check for debug TD
A "SEPT #VE" occurs when a TDX guest touches memory that is not properly
mapped into the "secure EPT".  This can be the result of hypervisor
attacks or bugs, *OR* guest bugs.  Most notably, buggy guests might
touch unaccepted memory for lots of different memory safety bugs like
buffer overflows.

TDX guests do not want to continue in the face of hypervisor attacks or
hypervisor bugs.  They want to terminate as fast and safely as possible.
SEPT_VE_DISABLE ensures that TDX guests *can't* continue in the face of
these kinds of issues.

But, that causes a problem.  TDX guests that can't continue can't spit
out oopses or other debugging info.  In essence SEPT_VE_DISABLE=1 guests
are not debuggable.

Relax the SEPT_VE_DISABLE check to warning on debug TD and panic() in
the #VE handler on EPT-violation on private memory. It will produce
useful backtrace.

Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230126221159.8635-7-kirill.shutemov%40linux.intel.com
2023-01-27 09:46:05 -08:00
Kirill A. Shutemov 71acdcd7cd x86/tdx: Use ReportFatalError to report missing SEPT_VE_DISABLE
Linux TDX guests require that the SEPT_VE_DISABLE "attribute" be set.
If it is not set, the kernel is theoretically required to handle
exceptions anywhere that kernel memory is accessed, including places
like NMI handlers and in the syscall entry gap.

Rather than even try to handle these exceptions, the kernel refuses to
run if SEPT_VE_DISABLE is unset.

However, the SEPT_VE_DISABLE detection and refusal code happens very
early in boot, even before earlyprintk runs.  Calling panic() will
effectively just hang the system.

Instead, call a TDX-specific panic() function.  This makes a very simple
TDVMCALL which gets a short error string out to the hypervisor without
any console infrastructure.

Use TDG.VP.VMCALL<ReportFatalError> to report the error. The hypercall
can encode message up to 64 bytes in eight registers.

[ dhansen: tweak comment and remove while loop brackets. ]

Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230126221159.8635-6-kirill.shutemov%40linux.intel.com
2023-01-27 09:45:55 -08:00
Kirill A. Shutemov 752d13305c x86/tdx: Expand __tdx_hypercall() to handle more arguments
So far __tdx_hypercall() only handles six arguments for VMCALL.
Expanding it to six more register would allow to cover more use-cases
like ReportFatalError() and Hyper-V hypercalls.

With all preparations in place, the expansion is pretty straight
forward.

Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230126221159.8635-5-kirill.shutemov%40linux.intel.com
2023-01-27 09:42:09 -08:00
Kirill A. Shutemov c30c4b2555 x86/tdx: Refactor __tdx_hypercall() to allow pass down more arguments
RDI is the first argument to __tdx_hypercall() that used to pass pointer
to struct tdx_hypercall_args. RSI is the second argument that contains
flags, such as TDX_HCALL_HAS_OUTPUT and TDX_HCALL_ISSUE_STI.

RDI and RSI can also be used as arguments to TDVMCALL leafs. Move RDI to
RAX and RSI to RBP to free up them for the hypercall arguments.

RAX saved on stack during TDCALL as it returns status code in the
register.

RBP value has to be restored before returning from __tdx_hypercall() as
it is callee-saved register.

This is preparatory patch. No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230126221159.8635-4-kirill.shutemov%40linux.intel.com
2023-01-27 09:42:09 -08:00
Kirill A. Shutemov 3543f8830b x86/tdx: Fix typo in comment in __tdx_hypercall()
Comment in __tdx_hypercall() points that RAX==0 indicates TDVMCALL
failure which is opposite of the truth: RAX==0 is success.

Fix the comment. No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230126221159.8635-2-kirill.shutemov%40linux.intel.com
2023-01-27 09:42:09 -08:00
Peter Zijlstra c3982c1a36 cpuidle, tdx: Make TDX code noinstr clean
objtool found a few cases where this code called out into instrumented
code:

  vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: __halt+0x2c: call to hcall_func.constprop.0() leaves .noinstr.text section
  vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: __halt+0x3f: call to __tdx_hypercall() leaves .noinstr.text section
  vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: __tdx_hypercall+0x66: call to __tdx_hypercall_failed() leaves .noinstr.text section

Fix it by:

  - moving TDX tdcall assembly methods into .noinstr.text (they are already noistr-clean)
  - marking __tdx_hypercall_failed() as 'noinstr'
  - annotating hcall_func() as __always_inline

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Tested-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230112195541.111485720@infradead.org
2023-01-13 11:48:16 +01:00
Peter Zijlstra e80a48bade x86/tdx: Remove TDX_HCALL_ISSUE_STI
Now that arch_cpu_idle() is expected to return with IRQs disabled,
avoid the useless STI/CLI dance.

Per the specs this is supposed to work, but nobody has yet relied up
this behaviour so broken implementations are possible.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Tested-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230112195540.682137572@infradead.org
2023-01-13 11:48:15 +01:00
Peter Zijlstra 89b3098703 arch/idle: Change arch_cpu_idle() behavior: always exit with IRQs disabled
Current arch_cpu_idle() is called with IRQs disabled, but will return
with IRQs enabled.

However, the very first thing the generic code does after calling
arch_cpu_idle() is raw_local_irq_disable(). This means that
architectures that can idle with IRQs disabled end up doing a
pointless 'enable-disable' dance.

Therefore, push this IRQ disabling into the idle function, meaning
that those architectures can avoid the pointless IRQ state flipping.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Tested-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> [arm64]
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230112195540.618076436@infradead.org
2023-01-13 11:48:15 +01:00
Jason A. Donenfeld 72bb8f8cc0 x86/insn: Avoid namespace clash by separating instruction decoder MMIO type from MMIO trace type
Both <linux/mmiotrace.h> and <asm/insn-eval.h> define various MMIO_ enum constants,
whose namespace overlaps.

Rename the <asm/insn-eval.h> ones to have a INSN_ prefix, so that the headers can be
used from the same source file.

Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230101162910.710293-2-Jason@zx2c4.com
2023-01-03 18:46:06 +01:00
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan 51acfe89af x86/tdx: Add a wrapper to get TDREPORT0 from the TDX Module
To support TDX attestation, the TDX guest driver exposes an IOCTL
interface to allow userspace to get the TDREPORT0 (a.k.a. TDREPORT
subtype 0) from the TDX module via TDG.MR.TDREPORT TDCALL.

In order to get the TDREPORT0 in the TDX guest driver, instead of using
a low level function like __tdx_module_call(), add a
tdx_mcall_get_report0() wrapper function to handle it.

This is a preparatory patch for adding attestation support.

Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Wander Lairson Costa <wander@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221116223820.819090-2-sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy%40linux.intel.com
2022-11-17 11:03:09 -08:00
Kirill A. Shutemov 373e715e31 x86/tdx: Panic on bad configs that #VE on "private" memory access
All normal kernel memory is "TDX private memory".  This includes
everything from kernel stacks to kernel text.  Handling
exceptions on arbitrary accesses to kernel memory is essentially
impossible because they can happen in horribly nasty places like
kernel entry/exit.  But, TDX hardware can theoretically _deliver_
a virtualization exception (#VE) on any access to private memory.

But, it's not as bad as it sounds.  TDX can be configured to never
deliver these exceptions on private memory with a "TD attribute"
called ATTR_SEPT_VE_DISABLE.  The guest has no way to *set* this
attribute, but it can check it.

Ensure ATTR_SEPT_VE_DISABLE is set in early boot.  panic() if it
is unset.  There is no sane way for Linux to run with this
attribute clear so a panic() is appropriate.

There's small window during boot before the check where kernel
has an early #VE handler. But the handler is only for port I/O
and will also panic() as soon as it sees any other #VE, such as
a one generated by a private memory access.

[ dhansen: Rewrite changelog and rebase on new tdx_parse_tdinfo().
	   Add Kirill's tested-by because I made changes since
	   he wrote this. ]

Fixes: 9a22bf6deb ("x86/traps: Add #VE support for TDX guest")
Reported-by: ruogui.ygr@alibaba-inc.com
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221028141220.29217-3-kirill.shutemov%40linux.intel.com
2022-11-01 16:02:40 -07:00
Dave Hansen a6dd6f3900 x86/tdx: Prepare for using "INFO" call for a second purpose
The TDG.VP.INFO TDCALL provides the guest with various details about
the TDX system that the guest needs to run.  Only one field is currently
used: 'gpa_width' which tells the guest which PTE bits mark pages shared
or private.

A second field is now needed: the guest "TD attributes" to tell if
virtualization exceptions are configured in a way that can harm the guest.

Make the naming and calling convention more generic and discrete from the
mask-centric one.

Thanks to Sathya for the inspiration here, but there's no code, comments
or changelogs left from where he started.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
2022-11-01 10:07:15 -07:00
Kirill A. Shutemov 1e7769653b x86/tdx: Handle load_unaligned_zeropad() page-cross to a shared page
load_unaligned_zeropad() can lead to unwanted loads across page boundaries.
The unwanted loads are typically harmless. But, they might be made to
totally unrelated or even unmapped memory. load_unaligned_zeropad()
relies on exception fixup (#PF, #GP and now #VE) to recover from these
unwanted loads.

In TDX guests, the second page can be shared page and a VMM may configure
it to trigger #VE.

The kernel assumes that #VE on a shared page is an MMIO access and tries to
decode instruction to handle it. In case of load_unaligned_zeropad() it
may result in confusion as it is not MMIO access.

Fix it by detecting split page MMIO accesses and failing them.
load_unaligned_zeropad() will recover using exception fixups.

The issue was discovered by analysis and reproduced artificially. It was
not triggered during testing.

[ dhansen: fix up changelogs and comments for grammar and clarity,
	   plus incorporate Kirill's off-by-one fix]

Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220614120135.14812-4-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
2022-06-17 15:37:33 -07:00
Kirill A. Shutemov cdd85786f4 x86/tdx: Clarify RIP adjustments in #VE handler
After successful #VE handling, tdx_handle_virt_exception() has to move
RIP to the next instruction. The handler needs to know the length of the
instruction.

If the #VE happened due to instruction execution, the GET_VEINFO TDX
module call provides info on the instruction in R10, including its length.

For #VE due to EPT violation, the info in R10 is not populand and the
kernel must decode the instruction manually to find out its length.

Restructure the code to make it explicit that the instruction length
depends on the type of #VE. Make individual #VE handlers return
the instruction length on success or -errno on failure.

[ dhansen: fix up changelog and comments ]

Suggested-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220614120135.14812-3-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
2022-06-15 11:05:16 -07:00
Kirill A. Shutemov 60428d8bc2 x86/tdx: Fix early #VE handling
tdx_early_handle_ve() does not increment RIP after successfully
handling the exception.  That leads to infinite loop of exceptions.

Move RIP when exceptions are successfully handled.

[ dhansen: make problem statement more clear ]

Fixes: 32e72854fa ("x86/tdx: Port I/O: Add early boot support")
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220614120135.14812-2-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
2022-06-15 10:52:59 -07:00
Peter Zijlstra c796f02162 x86/tdx: Fix RETs in TDX asm
Because build-testing is over-rated, fix a few trivial objtool complaints:

  vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: __tdx_module_call+0x3e: missing int3 after ret
  vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: __tdx_hypercall+0x6e: missing int3 after ret

Fixes: eb94f1b6a7 ("x86/tdx: Add __tdx_module_call() and __tdx_hypercall() helper functions")
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220520083839.GR2578@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net
2022-05-20 12:53:22 +02:00
Borislav Petkov 5af14c29f7 x86/tdx: Annotate a noreturn function
objdump complains:

  vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: __tdx_hypercall()+0x74: unreachable instruction

because __tdx_hypercall_failed() won't return but panic the guest.
Annotate that that is ok and desired.

Fixes: eb94f1b6a7 ("x86/tdx: Add __tdx_module_call() and __tdx_hypercall() helper functions")
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220420115025.5448-1-bp@alien8.de
2022-04-21 12:54:08 +02:00
Kirill A. Shutemov 7dbde76316 x86/mm/cpa: Add support for TDX shared memory
Intel TDX protects guest memory from VMM access. Any memory that is
required for communication with the VMM must be explicitly shared.

It is a two-step process: the guest sets the shared bit in the page
table entry and notifies VMM about the change. The notification happens
using MapGPA hypercall.

Conversion back to private memory requires clearing the shared bit,
notifying VMM with MapGPA hypercall following with accepting the memory
with AcceptPage hypercall.

Provide a TDX version of x86_platform.guest.* callbacks. It makes
__set_memory_enc_pgtable() work right in TDX guest.

Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-27-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
2022-04-07 08:27:53 -07:00
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan cfb8ec7a31 x86/tdx: Wire up KVM hypercalls
KVM hypercalls use the VMCALL or VMMCALL instructions. Although the ABI
is similar, those instructions no longer function for TDX guests.

Make vendor-specific TDVMCALLs instead of VMCALL. This enables TDX
guests to run with KVM acting as the hypervisor.

Among other things, KVM hypercall is used to send IPIs.

Since the KVM driver can be built as a kernel module, export
tdx_kvm_hypercall() to make the symbols visible to kvm.ko.

Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-20-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
2022-04-07 08:27:52 -07:00
Andi Kleen 32e72854fa x86/tdx: Port I/O: Add early boot support
TDX guests cannot do port I/O directly. The TDX module triggers a #VE
exception to let the guest kernel emulate port I/O by converting them
into TDCALLs to call the host.

But before IDT handlers are set up, port I/O cannot be emulated using
normal kernel #VE handlers. To support the #VE-based emulation during
this boot window, add a minimal early #VE handler support in early
exception handlers. This is similar to what AMD SEV does. This is
mainly to support earlyprintk's serial driver, as well as potentially
the VGA driver.

The early handler only supports I/O-related #VE exceptions. Unhandled or
failed exceptions will be handled via early_fixup_exceptions() (like
normal exception failures). At runtime I/O-related #VE exceptions (along
with other types) handled by virt_exception_kernel().

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-19-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
2022-04-07 08:27:52 -07:00
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan 0314994883 x86/tdx: Port I/O: Add runtime hypercalls
TDX hypervisors cannot emulate instructions directly. This includes
port I/O which is normally emulated in the hypervisor. All port I/O
instructions inside TDX trigger the #VE exception in the guest and
would be normally emulated there.

Use a hypercall to emulate port I/O. Extend the
tdx_handle_virt_exception() and add support to handle the #VE due to
port I/O instructions.

String I/O operations are not supported in TDX. Unroll them by declaring
CC_ATTR_GUEST_UNROLL_STRING_IO confidential computing attribute.

== Userspace Implications ==

The ioperm() facility allows userspace access to I/O instructions like
inb/outb.  Among other things, this allows writing userspace device
drivers.

This series has no special handling for ioperm(). Users will be able to
successfully request I/O permissions but will induce a #VE on their
first I/O instruction which leads SIGSEGV. If this is undesirable users
can enable kernel lockdown feature with 'lockdown=integrity' kernel
command line option. It makes ioperm() fail.

More robust handling of this situation (denying ioperm() in all TDX
guests) will be addressed in follow-on work.

Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-18-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
2022-04-07 08:27:52 -07:00
Kirill A. Shutemov 31d58c4e55 x86/tdx: Handle in-kernel MMIO
In non-TDX VMs, MMIO is implemented by providing the guest a mapping
which will cause a VMEXIT on access and then the VMM emulating the
instruction that caused the VMEXIT. That's not possible for TDX VM.

To emulate an instruction an emulator needs two things:

  - R/W access to the register file to read/modify instruction arguments
    and see RIP of the faulted instruction.

  - Read access to memory where instruction is placed to see what to
    emulate. In this case it is guest kernel text.

Both of them are not available to VMM in TDX environment:

  - Register file is never exposed to VMM. When a TD exits to the module,
    it saves registers into the state-save area allocated for that TD.
    The module then scrubs these registers before returning execution
    control to the VMM, to help prevent leakage of TD state.

  - TDX does not allow guests to execute from shared memory. All executed
    instructions are in TD-private memory. Being private to the TD, VMMs
    have no way to access TD-private memory and no way to read the
    instruction to decode and emulate it.

In TDX the MMIO regions are instead configured by VMM to trigger a #VE
exception in the guest.

Add #VE handling that emulates the MMIO instruction inside the guest and
converts it into a controlled hypercall to the host.

This approach is bad for performance. But, it has (virtually) no impact
on the size of the kernel image and will work for a wide variety of
drivers. This allows TDX deployments to use arbitrary devices and device
drivers, including virtio. TDX customers have asked for the capability
to use random devices in their deployments.

In other words, even if all of the work was done to paravirtualize all
x86 MMIO users and virtio, this approach would still be needed. There
is essentially no way to get rid of this code.

This approach is functional for all in-kernel MMIO users current and
future and does so with a minimal amount of code and kernel image bloat.

MMIO addresses can be used with any CPU instruction that accesses
memory. Address only MMIO accesses done via io.h helpers, such as
'readl()' or 'writeq()'.

Any CPU instruction that accesses memory can also be used to access
MMIO.  However, by convention, MMIO access are typically performed via
io.h helpers such as 'readl()' or 'writeq()'.

The io.h helpers intentionally use a limited set of instructions when
accessing MMIO.  This known, limited set of instructions makes MMIO
instruction decoding and emulation feasible in KVM hosts and SEV guests
today.

MMIO accesses performed without the io.h helpers are at the mercy of the
compiler.  Compilers can and will generate a much more broad set of
instructions which can not practically be decoded and emulated.  TDX
guests will oops if they encounter one of these decoding failures.

This means that TDX guests *must* use the io.h helpers to access MMIO.

This requirement is not new.  Both KVM hosts and AMD SEV guests have the
same limitations on MMIO access.

=== Potential alternative approaches ===

== Paravirtualizing all MMIO ==

An alternative to letting MMIO induce a #VE exception is to avoid
the #VE in the first place. Similar to the port I/O case, it is
theoretically possible to paravirtualize MMIO accesses.

Like the exception-based approach offered here, a fully paravirtualized
approach would be limited to MMIO users that leverage common
infrastructure like the io.h macros.

However, any paravirtual approach would be patching approximately 120k
call sites. Any paravirtual approach would need to replace a bare memory
access instruction with (at least) a function call. With a conservative
overhead estimation of 5 bytes per call site (CALL instruction),
it leads to bloating code by 600k.

Many drivers will never be used in the TDX environment and the bloat
cannot be justified.

== Patching TDX drivers ==

Rather than touching the entire kernel, it might also be possible to
just go after drivers that use MMIO in TDX guests *and* are performance
critical to justify the effrort. Right now, that's limited only to virtio.

All virtio MMIO appears to be done through a single function, which
makes virtio eminently easy to patch.

This approach will be adopted in the future, removing the bulk of
MMIO #VEs. The #VE-based MMIO will remain serving non-virtio use cases.

Co-developed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-12-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
2022-04-07 08:27:51 -07:00
Kirill A. Shutemov c141fa2c2b x86/tdx: Handle CPUID via #VE
In TDX guests, most CPUID leaf/sub-leaf combinations are virtualized
by the TDX module while some trigger #VE.

Implement the #VE handling for EXIT_REASON_CPUID by handing it through
the hypercall, which in turn lets the TDX module handle it by invoking
the host VMM.

More details on CPUID Virtualization can be found in the TDX module
specification, the section titled "CPUID Virtualization".

Note that VMM that handles the hypercall is not trusted. It can return
data that may steer the guest kernel in wrong direct. Only allow  VMM
to control range reserved for hypervisor communication.

Return all-zeros for any CPUID outside the hypervisor range. It matches
CPU behaviour for non-supported leaf.

Co-developed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-11-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
2022-04-07 08:27:51 -07:00
Kirill A. Shutemov ae87f609cd x86/tdx: Add MSR support for TDX guests
Use hypercall to emulate MSR read/write for the TDX platform.

There are two viable approaches for doing MSRs in a TD guest:

1. Execute the RDMSR/WRMSR instructions like most VMs and bare metal
   do. Some will succeed, others will cause a #VE. All of those that
   cause a #VE will be handled with a TDCALL.
2. Use paravirt infrastructure.  The paravirt hook has to keep a list
   of which MSRs would cause a #VE and use a TDCALL.  All other MSRs
   execute RDMSR/WRMSR instructions directly.

The second option can be ruled out because the list of MSRs was
challenging to maintain. That leaves option #1 as the only viable
solution for the minimal TDX support.

Kernel relies on the exception fixup machinery to handle MSR access
errors. #VE handler uses the same exception fixup code as #GP. It
covers MSR accesses along with other types of fixups.

For performance-critical MSR writes (like TSC_DEADLINE), future patches
will replace the WRMSR/#VE sequence with the direct TDCALL.

RDMSR and WRMSR specification details can be found in
Guest-Host-Communication Interface (GHCI) for Intel Trust Domain
Extensions (Intel TDX) specification, sec titled "TDG.VP.
VMCALL<Instruction.RDMSR>" and "TDG.VP.VMCALL<Instruction.WRMSR>".

Co-developed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-10-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
2022-04-07 08:27:51 -07:00
Kirill A. Shutemov bfe6ed0c67 x86/tdx: Add HLT support for TDX guests
The HLT instruction is a privileged instruction, executing it stops
instruction execution and places the processor in a HALT state. It
is used in kernel for cases like reboot, idle loop and exception fixup
handlers. For the idle case, interrupts will be enabled (using STI)
before the HLT instruction (this is also called safe_halt()).

To support the HLT instruction in TDX guests, it needs to be emulated
using TDVMCALL (hypercall to VMM). More details about it can be found
in Intel Trust Domain Extensions (Intel TDX) Guest-Host-Communication
Interface (GHCI) specification, section TDVMCALL[Instruction.HLT].

In TDX guests, executing HLT instruction will generate a #VE, which is
used to emulate the HLT instruction. But #VE based emulation will not
work for the safe_halt() flavor, because it requires STI instruction to
be executed just before the TDCALL. Since idle loop is the only user of
safe_halt() variant, handle it as a special case.

To avoid *safe_halt() call in the idle function, define the
tdx_guest_idle() and use it to override the "x86_idle" function pointer
for a valid TDX guest.

Alternative choices like PV ops have been considered for adding
safe_halt() support. But it was rejected because HLT paravirt calls
only exist under PARAVIRT_XXL, and enabling it in TDX guest just for
safe_halt() use case is not worth the cost.

Co-developed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-9-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
2022-04-07 08:27:51 -07:00
Kirill A. Shutemov 9a22bf6deb x86/traps: Add #VE support for TDX guest
Virtualization Exceptions (#VE) are delivered to TDX guests due to
specific guest actions which may happen in either user space or the
kernel:

 * Specific instructions (WBINVD, for example)
 * Specific MSR accesses
 * Specific CPUID leaf accesses
 * Access to specific guest physical addresses

Syscall entry code has a critical window where the kernel stack is not
yet set up. Any exception in this window leads to hard to debug issues
and can be exploited for privilege escalation. Exceptions in the NMI
entry code also cause issues. Returning from the exception handler with
IRET will re-enable NMIs and nested NMI will corrupt the NMI stack.

For these reasons, the kernel avoids #VEs during the syscall gap and
the NMI entry code. Entry code paths do not access TD-shared memory,
MMIO regions, use #VE triggering MSRs, instructions, or CPUID leaves
that might generate #VE. VMM can remove memory from TD at any point,
but access to unaccepted (or missing) private memory leads to VM
termination, not to #VE.

Similarly to page faults and breakpoints, #VEs are allowed in NMI
handlers once the kernel is ready to deal with nested NMIs.

During #VE delivery, all interrupts, including NMIs, are blocked until
TDGETVEINFO is called. It prevents #VE nesting until the kernel reads
the VE info.

TDGETVEINFO retrieves the #VE info from the TDX module, which also
clears the "#VE valid" flag.  This must be done before anything else as
any #VE that occurs while the valid flag is set escalates to #DF by TDX
module. It will result in an oops.

Virtual NMIs are inhibited if the #VE valid flag is set. NMI will not be
delivered until TDGETVEINFO is called.

For now, convert unhandled #VE's (everything, until later in this
series) so that they appear just like a #GP by calling the
ve_raise_fault() directly. The ve_raise_fault() function is similar
to #GP handler and is responsible for sending SIGSEGV to userspace
and CPU die and notifying debuggers and other die chain users.

Co-developed-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-8-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
2022-04-07 08:27:51 -07:00
Kirill A. Shutemov 65fab5bc03 x86/tdx: Exclude shared bit from __PHYSICAL_MASK
In TDX guests, by default memory is protected from host access. If a
guest needs to communicate with the VMM (like the I/O use case), it uses
a single bit in the physical address to communicate the protected/shared
attribute of the given page.

In the x86 ARCH code, __PHYSICAL_MASK macro represents the width of the
physical address in the given architecture. It is used in creating
physical PAGE_MASK for address bits in the kernel. Since in TDX guest,
a single bit is used as metadata, it needs to be excluded from valid
physical address bits to avoid using incorrect addresses bits in the
kernel.

Enable DYNAMIC_PHYSICAL_MASK to support updating the __PHYSICAL_MASK.

Co-developed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-6-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
2022-04-07 08:27:51 -07:00
Kirill A. Shutemov 41394e33f3 x86/tdx: Extend the confidential computing API to support TDX guests
Confidential Computing (CC) features (like string I/O unroll support,
memory encryption/decryption support, etc) are conditionally enabled
in the kernel using cc_platform_has() API. Since TDX guests also need
to use these CC features, extend cc_platform_has() API and add TDX
guest-specific CC attributes support.

CC API also provides an interface to deal with encryption mask. Extend
it to cover TDX.

Details about which bit in the page table entry to be used to indicate
shared/private state is determined by using the TDINFO TDCALL.

Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-5-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
2022-04-07 08:27:50 -07:00
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan eb94f1b6a7 x86/tdx: Add __tdx_module_call() and __tdx_hypercall() helper functions
Guests communicate with VMMs with hypercalls. Historically, these
are implemented using instructions that are known to cause VMEXITs
like VMCALL, VMLAUNCH, etc. However, with TDX, VMEXITs no longer
expose the guest state to the host. This prevents the old hypercall
mechanisms from working. So, to communicate with VMM, TDX
specification defines a new instruction called TDCALL.

In a TDX based VM, since the VMM is an untrusted entity, an intermediary
layer -- TDX module -- facilitates secure communication between the host
and the guest. TDX module is loaded like a firmware into a special CPU
mode called SEAM. TDX guests communicate with the TDX module using the
TDCALL instruction.

A guest uses TDCALL to communicate with both the TDX module and VMM.
The value of the RAX register when executing the TDCALL instruction is
used to determine the TDCALL type. A leaf of TDCALL used to communicate
with the VMM is called TDVMCALL.

Add generic interfaces to communicate with the TDX module and VMM
(using the TDCALL instruction).

__tdx_module_call()  - Used to communicate with the TDX module (via
		       TDCALL instruction).
__tdx_hypercall()    - Used by the guest to request services from
		       the VMM (via TDVMCALL leaf of TDCALL).

Also define an additional wrapper _tdx_hypercall(), which adds error
handling support for the TDCALL failure.

The __tdx_module_call() and __tdx_hypercall() helper functions are
implemented in assembly in a .S file.  The TDCALL ABI requires
shuffling arguments in and out of registers, which proved to be
awkward with inline assembly.

Just like syscalls, not all TDVMCALL use cases need to use the same
number of argument registers. The implementation here picks the current
worst-case scenario for TDCALL (4 registers). For TDCALLs with fewer
than 4 arguments, there will end up being a few superfluous (cheap)
instructions. But, this approach maximizes code reuse.

For registers used by the TDCALL instruction, please check TDX GHCI
specification, the section titled "TDCALL instruction" and "TDG.VP.VMCALL
Interface".

Based on previous patch by Sean Christopherson.

Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-4-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
2022-04-07 08:27:50 -07:00
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan 59bd54a84d x86/tdx: Detect running as a TDX guest in early boot
In preparation of extending cc_platform_has() API to support TDX guest,
use CPUID instruction to detect support for TDX guests in the early
boot code (via tdx_early_init()). Since copy_bootdata() is the first
user of cc_platform_has() API, detect the TDX guest status before it.

Define a synthetic feature flag (X86_FEATURE_TDX_GUEST) and set this
bit in a valid TDX guest platform.

Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-2-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
2022-04-07 08:27:50 -07:00