Given bpf_probe_read{,str}() BPF helpers are now only available under
CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_NON_OVERLAPPING_ADDRESS_SPACE, we need to add the drop-in
replacements of bpf_probe_read_{kernel,user}_str() to do_refine_retval_range()
as well to avoid hitting the same issue as in 849fa50662 ("bpf/verifier:
refine retval R0 state for bpf_get_stack helper").
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200515101118.6508-3-daniel@iogearbox.net
Currently, tracing/fentry and tracing/fexit prog
return values are not enforced. In trampoline codes,
the fentry/fexit prog return values are ignored.
Let us enforce it to be 0 to avoid confusion and
allows potential future extension.
This patch also explicitly added return value
checking for tracing/raw_tp, tracing/fmod_ret,
and freplace programs such that these program
return values can be anything. The purpose are
two folds:
1. to make it explicit about return value expectations
for these programs in verifier.
2. for tracing prog_type, if a future attach type
is added, the default is -ENOTSUPP which will
enforce to specify return value ranges explicitly.
Fixes: fec56f5890 ("bpf: Introduce BPF trampoline")
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200514053206.1298415-1-yhs@fb.com
mmap() subsystem allows user-space application to memory-map region with
initial page offset. This wasn't taken into account in initial implementation
of BPF array memory-mapping. This would result in wrong pages, not taking into
account requested page shift, being memory-mmaped into user-space. This patch
fixes this gap and adds a test for such scenario.
Fixes: fc9702273e ("bpf: Add mmap() support for BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200512235925.3817805-1-andriin@fb.com
Fix to return negative error code -EFAULT from the copy_to_user() error
handling case instead of 0, as done elsewhere in this function.
Fixes: bd513cd08f ("bpf: add MAP_LOOKUP_AND_DELETE_ELEM syscall")
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200430081851.166996-1-weiyongjun1@huawei.com
Fix the following sparse warning:
kernel/bpf/syscall.c:2289:30: warning: symbol 'bpf_link_fops' was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Zou Wei <zou_wei@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1587609160-117806-1-git-send-email-zou_wei@huawei.com
For some program types, the verifier relies on the expected_attach_type of
the program being verified in the verification process. However, for
freplace programs, the attach type was not propagated along with the
verifier ops, so the expected_attach_type would always be zero for freplace
programs.
This in turn caused the verifier to sometimes make the wrong call for
freplace programs. For all existing uses of expected_attach_type for this
purpose, the result of this was only false negatives (i.e., freplace
functions would be rejected by the verifier even though they were valid
programs for the target they were replacing). However, should a false
positive be introduced, this can lead to out-of-bounds accesses and/or
crashes.
The fix introduced in this patch is to propagate the expected_attach_type
to the freplace program during verification, and reset it after that is
done.
Fixes: be8704ff07 ("bpf: Introduce dynamic program extensions")
Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/158773526726.293902.13257293296560360508.stgit@toke.dk
Fix bug of not putting bpf_link in LINK_UPDATE command.
Also enforce zeroed old_prog_fd if no BPF_F_REPLACE flag is specified.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200424052045.4002963-1-andriin@fb.com
check_xadd() can cause check_ptr_to_btf_access() to be executed with
atype==BPF_READ and value_regno==-1 (meaning "just check whether the access
is okay, don't tell me what type it will result in").
Handle that case properly and skip writing type information, instead of
indexing into the registers at index -1 and writing into out-of-bounds
memory.
Note that at least at the moment, you can't actually write through a BTF
pointer, so check_xadd() will reject the program after calling
check_ptr_to_btf_access with atype==BPF_WRITE; but that's after the
verifier has already corrupted memory.
This patch assumes that BTF pointers are not available in unprivileged
programs.
Fixes: 9e15db6613 ("bpf: Implement accurate raw_tp context access via BTF")
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200417000007.10734-2-jannh@google.com
When check_xadd() verifies an XADD operation on a pointer to a stack slot
containing a spilled pointer, check_stack_read() verifies that the read,
which is part of XADD, is valid. However, since the placeholder value -1 is
passed as `value_regno`, check_stack_read() can only return a binary
decision and can't return the type of the value that was read. The intent
here is to verify whether the value read from the stack slot may be used as
a SCALAR_VALUE; but since check_stack_read() doesn't check the type, and
the type information is lost when check_stack_read() returns, this is not
enforced, and a malicious user can abuse XADD to leak spilled kernel
pointers.
Fix it by letting check_stack_read() verify that the value is usable as a
SCALAR_VALUE if no type information is passed to the caller.
To be able to use __is_pointer_value() in check_stack_read(), move it up.
Fix up the expected unprivileged error message for a BPF selftest that,
until now, assumed that unprivileged users can use XADD on stack-spilled
pointers. This also gives us a test for the behavior introduced in this
patch for free.
In theory, this could also be fixed by forbidding XADD on stack spills
entirely, since XADD is a locked operation (for operations on memory with
concurrency) and there can't be any concurrency on the BPF stack; but
Alexei has said that he wants to keep XADD on stack slots working to avoid
changes to the test suite [1].
The following BPF program demonstrates how to leak a BPF map pointer as an
unprivileged user using this bug:
// r7 = map_pointer
BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_7, small_map),
// r8 = launder(map_pointer)
BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, BPF_REG_7, -8),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
((struct bpf_insn) {
.code = BPF_STX | BPF_DW | BPF_XADD,
.dst_reg = BPF_REG_FP,
.src_reg = BPF_REG_1,
.off = -8
}),
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_FP, -8),
// store r8 into map
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_ARG1, BPF_REG_7),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_ARG2, BPF_REG_FP),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_ARG2, -4),
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_ARG2, 0, 0),
BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_8, 0),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN()
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200416211116.qxqcza5vo2ddnkdq@ast-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com/
Fixes: 17a5267067 ("bpf: verifier (add verifier core)")
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200417000007.10734-1-jannh@google.com
When the kernel is built with CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS, the cpumap code
can trigger a spurious warning if CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK is also set. This
happens because in this configuration, NR_CPUS can be larger than
nr_cpumask_bits, so the initial check in cpu_map_alloc() is not sufficient
to guard against hitting the warning in cpumask_check().
Fix this by explicitly checking the supplied key against the
nr_cpumask_bits variable before calling cpu_possible().
Fixes: 6710e11269 ("bpf: introduce new bpf cpu map type BPF_MAP_TYPE_CPUMAP")
Reported-by: Xiumei Mu <xmu@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Xiumei Mu <xmu@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200416083120.453718-1-toke@redhat.com
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software:
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:1259:16-21: WARNING: conversion to bool not needed here
The conversion to bool is unneeded, remove it.
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Zou Wei <zou_wei@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1586779076-101346-1-git-send-email-zou_wei@huawei.com
VM_MAYWRITE flag during initial memory mapping determines if already mmap()'ed
pages can be later remapped as writable ones through mprotect() call. To
prevent user application to rewrite contents of memory-mapped as read-only and
subsequently frozen BPF map, remove VM_MAYWRITE flag completely on initially
read-only mapping.
Alternatively, we could treat any memory-mapping on unfrozen map as writable
and bump writecnt instead. But there is little legitimate reason to map
BPF map as read-only and then re-mmap() it as writable through mprotect(),
instead of just mmap()'ing it as read/write from the very beginning.
Also, at the suggestion of Jann Horn, drop unnecessary refcounting in mmap
operations. We can just rely on VMA holding reference to BPF map's file
properly.
Fixes: fc9702273e ("bpf: Add mmap() support for BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY")
Reported-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200410202613.3679837-1-andriin@fb.com
Add new operation (LINK_UPDATE), which allows to replace active bpf_prog from
under given bpf_link. Currently this is only supported for bpf_cgroup_link,
but will be extended to other kinds of bpf_links in follow-up patches.
For bpf_cgroup_link, implemented functionality matches existing semantics for
direct bpf_prog attachment (including BPF_F_REPLACE flag). User can either
unconditionally set new bpf_prog regardless of which bpf_prog is currently
active under given bpf_link, or, optionally, can specify expected active
bpf_prog. If active bpf_prog doesn't match expected one, no changes are
performed, old bpf_link stays intact and attached, operation returns
a failure.
cgroup_bpf_replace() operation is resolving race between auto-detachment and
bpf_prog update in the same fashion as it's done for bpf_link detachment,
except in this case update has no way of succeeding because of target cgroup
marked as dying. So in this case error is returned.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200330030001.2312810-3-andriin@fb.com
Implement new sub-command to attach cgroup BPF programs and return FD-based
bpf_link back on success. bpf_link, once attached to cgroup, cannot be
replaced, except by owner having its FD. Cgroup bpf_link supports only
BPF_F_ALLOW_MULTI semantics. Both link-based and prog-based BPF_F_ALLOW_MULTI
attachments can be freely intermixed.
To prevent bpf_cgroup_link from keeping cgroup alive past the point when no
BPF program can be executed, implement auto-detachment of link. When
cgroup_bpf_release() is called, all attached bpf_links are forced to release
cgroup refcounts, but they leave bpf_link otherwise active and allocated, as
well as still owning underlying bpf_prog. This is because user-space might
still have FDs open and active, so bpf_link as a user-referenced object can't
be freed yet. Once last active FD is closed, bpf_link will be freed and
underlying bpf_prog refcount will be dropped. But cgroup refcount won't be
touched, because cgroup is released already.
The inherent race between bpf_cgroup_link release (from closing last FD) and
cgroup_bpf_release() is resolved by both operations taking cgroup_mutex. So
the only additional check required is when bpf_cgroup_link attempts to detach
itself from cgroup. At that time we need to check whether there is still
cgroup associated with that link. And if not, exit with success, because
bpf_cgroup_link was already successfully detached.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200330030001.2312810-2-andriin@fb.com
Further refine return values range in do_refine_retval_range by noting
these are int return types (We will assume here that int is a 32-bit type).
Two reasons to pull this out of original patch. First it makes the original
fix impossible to backport. And second I've not seen this as being problematic
in practice unlike the other case.
Fixes: 849fa50662 ("bpf/verifier: refine retval R0 state for bpf_get_stack helper")
Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/158560421952.10843.12496354931526965046.stgit@john-Precision-5820-Tower
It is not possible for the current verifier to track ALU32 and JMP ops
correctly. This can result in the verifier aborting with errors even though
the program should be verifiable. BPF codes that hit this can work around
it by changin int variables to 64-bit types, marking variables volatile,
etc. But this is all very ugly so it would be better to avoid these tricks.
But, the main reason to address this now is do_refine_retval_range() was
assuming return values could not be negative. Once we fixed this code that
was previously working will no longer work. See do_refine_retval_range()
patch for details. And we don't want to suddenly cause programs that used
to work to fail.
The simplest example code snippet that illustrates the problem is likely
this,
53: w8 = w0 // r8 <- [0, S32_MAX],
// w8 <- [-S32_MIN, X]
54: w8 <s 0 // r8 <- [0, U32_MAX]
// w8 <- [0, X]
The expected 64-bit and 32-bit bounds after each line are shown on the
right. The current issue is without the w* bounds we are forced to use
the worst case bound of [0, U32_MAX]. To resolve this type of case,
jmp32 creating divergent 32-bit bounds from 64-bit bounds, we add explicit
32-bit register bounds s32_{min|max}_value and u32_{min|max}_value. Then
from branch_taken logic creating new bounds we can track 32-bit bounds
explicitly.
The next case we observed is ALU ops after the jmp32,
53: w8 = w0 // r8 <- [0, S32_MAX],
// w8 <- [-S32_MIN, X]
54: w8 <s 0 // r8 <- [0, U32_MAX]
// w8 <- [0, X]
55: w8 += 1 // r8 <- [0, U32_MAX+1]
// w8 <- [0, X+1]
In order to keep the bounds accurate at this point we also need to track
ALU32 ops. To do this we add explicit ALU32 logic for each of the ALU
ops, mov, add, sub, etc.
Finally there is a question of how and when to merge bounds. The cases
enumerate here,
1. MOV ALU32 - zext 32-bit -> 64-bit
2. MOV ALU64 - copy 64-bit -> 32-bit
3. op ALU32 - zext 32-bit -> 64-bit
4. op ALU64 - n/a
5. jmp ALU32 - 64-bit: var32_off | upper_32_bits(var64_off)
6. jmp ALU64 - 32-bit: (>> (<< var64_off))
Details for each case,
For "MOV ALU32" BPF arch zero extends so we simply copy the bounds
from 32-bit into 64-bit ensuring we truncate var_off and 64-bit
bounds correctly. See zext_32_to_64.
For "MOV ALU64" copy all bounds including 32-bit into new register. If
the src register had 32-bit bounds the dst register will as well.
For "op ALU32" zero extend 32-bit into 64-bit the same as move,
see zext_32_to_64.
For "op ALU64" calculate both 32-bit and 64-bit bounds no merging
is done here. Except we have a special case. When RSH or ARSH is
done we can't simply ignore shifting bits from 64-bit reg into the
32-bit subreg. So currently just push bounds from 64-bit into 32-bit.
This will be correct in the sense that they will represent a valid
state of the register. However we could lose some accuracy if an
ARSH is following a jmp32 operation. We can handle this special
case in a follow up series.
For "jmp ALU32" mark 64-bit reg unknown and recalculate 64-bit bounds
from tnum by setting var_off to ((<<(>>var_off)) | var32_off). We
special case if 64-bit bounds has zero'd upper 32bits at which point
we can simply copy 32-bit bounds into 64-bit register. This catches
a common compiler trick where upper 32-bits are zeroed and then
32-bit ops are used followed by a 64-bit compare or 64-bit op on
a pointer. See __reg_combine_64_into_32().
For "jmp ALU64" cast the bounds of the 64bit to their 32-bit
counterpart. For example s32_min_value = (s32)reg->smin_value. For
tnum use only the lower 32bits via, (>>(<<var_off)). See
__reg_combine_64_into_32().
Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/158560419880.10843.11448220440809118343.stgit@john-Precision-5820-Tower
do_refine_retval_range() is called to refine return values from specified
helpers, probe_read_str and get_stack at the moment, the reasoning is
because both have a max value as part of their input arguments and
because the helper ensure the return value will not be larger than this
we can set smax values of the return register, r0.
However, the return value is a signed integer so setting umax is incorrect
It leads to further confusion when the do_refine_retval_range() then calls,
__reg_deduce_bounds() which will see a umax value as meaning the value is
unsigned and then assuming it is unsigned set the smin = umin which in this
case results in 'smin = 0' and an 'smax = X' where X is the input argument
from the helper call.
Here are the comments from _reg_deduce_bounds() on why this would be safe
to do.
/* Learn sign from unsigned bounds. Signed bounds cross the sign
* boundary, so we must be careful.
*/
if ((s64)reg->umax_value >= 0) {
/* Positive. We can't learn anything from the smin, but smax
* is positive, hence safe.
*/
reg->smin_value = reg->umin_value;
reg->smax_value = reg->umax_value = min_t(u64, reg->smax_value,
reg->umax_value);
But now we incorrectly have a return value with type int with the
signed bounds (0,X). Suppose the return value is negative, which is
possible the we have the verifier and reality out of sync. Among other
things this may result in any error handling code being falsely detected
as dead-code and removed. For instance the example below shows using
bpf_probe_read_str() causes the error path to be identified as dead
code and removed.
>From the 'llvm-object -S' dump,
r2 = 100
call 45
if r0 s< 0 goto +4
r4 = *(u32 *)(r7 + 0)
But from dump xlate
(b7) r2 = 100
(85) call bpf_probe_read_compat_str#-96768
(61) r4 = *(u32 *)(r7 +0) <-- dropped if goto
Due to verifier state after call being
R0=inv(id=0,umax_value=100,var_off=(0x0; 0x7f))
To fix omit setting the umax value because its not safe. The only
actual bounds we know is the smax. This results in the correct bounds
(SMIN, X) where X is the max length from the helper. After this the
new verifier state looks like the following after call 45.
R0=inv(id=0,smax_value=100)
Then xlated version no longer removed dead code giving the expected
result,
(b7) r2 = 100
(85) call bpf_probe_read_compat_str#-96768
(c5) if r0 s< 0x0 goto pc+4
(61) r4 = *(u32 *)(r7 +0)
Note, bpf_probe_read_* calls are root only so we wont hit this case
with non-root bpf users.
v3: comment had some documentation about meta set to null case which
is not relevant here and confusing to include in the comment.
v2 note: In original version we set msize_smax_value from check_func_arg()
and propagated this into smax of retval. The logic was smax is the bound
on the retval we set and because the type in the helper is ARG_CONST_SIZE
we know that the reg is a positive tnum_const() so umax=smax. Alexei
pointed out though this is a bit odd to read because the register in
check_func_arg() has a C type of u32 and the umax bound would be the
normally relavent bound here. Pulling in extra knowledge about future
checks makes reading the code a bit tricky. Further having a signed
meta data that can only ever be positive is also a bit odd. So dropped
the msize_smax_value metadata and made it a u64 msize_max_value to
indicate its unsigned. And additionally save bound from umax value in
check_arg_funcs which is the same as smax due to as noted above tnumx_cont
and negative check but reads better. By my analysis nothing functionally
changes in v2 but it does get easier to read so that is win.
Fixes: 849fa50662 ("bpf/verifier: refine retval R0 state for bpf_get_stack helper")
Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/158560417900.10843.14351995140624628941.stgit@john-Precision-5820-Tower
The bounds checking for the arguments accessed in the BPF program breaks
when the expected_attach_type is not BPF_TRACE_FEXIT, BPF_LSM_MAC or
BPF_MODIFY_RETURN resulting in no check being done for the default case
(the programs which do not receive the return value of the attached
function in its arguments) when the index of the argument being accessed
is equal to the number of arguments (nr_args).
This was a result of a misplaced "else if" block introduced by the
Commit 6ba43b761c ("bpf: Attachment verification for
BPF_MODIFY_RETURN")
Fixes: 6ba43b761c ("bpf: Attachment verification for BPF_MODIFY_RETURN")
Reported-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200330144246.338-1-kpsingh@chromium.org
reg_set_min_max_inv() contains exactly the same logic as reg_set_min_max(),
just flipped around. While this makes sense in a cBPF verifier (where ALU
operations are not symmetric), it does not make sense for eBPF.
Replace reg_set_min_max_inv() with a helper that flips the opcode around,
then lets reg_set_min_max() do the complicated work.
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200330160324.15259-4-daniel@iogearbox.net
The BPF verifier tried to track values based on 32-bit comparisons by
(ab)using the tnum state via 581738a681 ("bpf: Provide better register
bounds after jmp32 instructions"). The idea is that after a check like
this:
if ((u32)r0 > 3)
exit
We can't meaningfully constrain the arithmetic-range-based tracking, but
we can update the tnum state to (value=0,mask=0xffff'ffff'0000'0003).
However, the implementation from 581738a681 didn't compute the tnum
constraint based on the fixed operand, but instead derives it from the
arithmetic-range-based tracking. This means that after the following
sequence of operations:
if (r0 >= 0x1'0000'0001)
exit
if ((u32)r0 > 7)
exit
The verifier assumed that the lower half of r0 is in the range (0, 0)
and apply the tnum constraint (value=0,mask=0xffff'ffff'0000'0000) thus
causing the overall tnum to be (value=0,mask=0x1'0000'0000), which was
incorrect. Provide a fixed implementation.
Fixes: 581738a681 ("bpf: Provide better register bounds after jmp32 instructions")
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200330160324.15259-3-daniel@iogearbox.net
Anatoly has been fuzzing with kBdysch harness and reported a hang in
one of the outcomes:
0: (b7) r0 = 808464432
1: (7f) r0 >>= r0
2: (14) w0 -= 808464432
3: (07) r0 += 808464432
4: (b7) r1 = 808464432
5: (de) if w1 s<= w0 goto pc+0
R0_w=invP(id=0,umin_value=808464432,umax_value=5103431727,var_off=(0x30303020;0x10000001f)) R1_w=invP808464432 R10=fp0
6: (07) r0 += -2144337872
7: (14) w0 -= -1607454672
8: (25) if r0 > 0x30303030 goto pc+0
R0_w=invP(id=0,umin_value=271581184,umax_value=271581311,var_off=(0x10300000;0x7f)) R1_w=invP808464432 R10=fp0
9: (76) if w0 s>= 0x303030 goto pc+2
12: (95) exit
from 8 to 9: safe
from 5 to 6: R0_w=invP(id=0,umin_value=808464432,umax_value=5103431727,var_off=(0x30303020;0x10000001f)) R1_w=invP808464432 R10=fp0
6: (07) r0 += -2144337872
7: (14) w0 -= -1607454672
8: (25) if r0 > 0x30303030 goto pc+0
R0_w=invP(id=0,umin_value=271581184,umax_value=271581311,var_off=(0x10300000;0x7f)) R1_w=invP808464432 R10=fp0
9: safe
from 8 to 9: safe
verification time 589 usec
stack depth 0
processed 17 insns (limit 1000000) [...]
The underlying program was xlated as follows:
# bpftool p d x i 9
0: (b7) r0 = 808464432
1: (7f) r0 >>= r0
2: (14) w0 -= 808464432
3: (07) r0 += 808464432
4: (b7) r1 = 808464432
5: (de) if w1 s<= w0 goto pc+0
6: (07) r0 += -2144337872
7: (14) w0 -= -1607454672
8: (25) if r0 > 0x30303030 goto pc+0
9: (76) if w0 s>= 0x303030 goto pc+2
10: (05) goto pc-1
11: (05) goto pc-1
12: (95) exit
The verifier rewrote original instructions it recognized as dead code with
'goto pc-1', but reality differs from verifier simulation in that we're
actually able to trigger a hang due to hitting the 'goto pc-1' instructions.
Taking different examples to make the issue more obvious: in this example
we're probing bounds on a completely unknown scalar variable in r1:
[...]
5: R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0) R10=fp0
5: (18) r2 = 0x4000000000
7: R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0) R2_w=inv274877906944 R10=fp0
7: (18) r3 = 0x2000000000
9: R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0) R2_w=inv274877906944 R3_w=inv137438953472 R10=fp0
9: (18) r4 = 0x400
11: R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0) R2_w=inv274877906944 R3_w=inv137438953472 R4_w=inv1024 R10=fp0
11: (18) r5 = 0x200
13: R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0) R2_w=inv274877906944 R3_w=inv137438953472 R4_w=inv1024 R5_w=inv512 R10=fp0
13: (2d) if r1 > r2 goto pc+4
R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=274877906944,var_off=(0x0; 0x7fffffffff)) R2_w=inv274877906944 R3_w=inv137438953472 R4_w=inv1024 R5_w=inv512 R10=fp0
14: R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=274877906944,var_off=(0x0; 0x7fffffffff)) R2_w=inv274877906944 R3_w=inv137438953472 R4_w=inv1024 R5_w=inv512 R10=fp0
14: (ad) if r1 < r3 goto pc+3
R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0,umin_value=137438953472,umax_value=274877906944,var_off=(0x0; 0x7fffffffff)) R2_w=inv274877906944 R3_w=inv137438953472 R4_w=inv1024 R5_w=inv512 R10=fp0
15: R0=inv1 R1=inv(id=0,umin_value=137438953472,umax_value=274877906944,var_off=(0x0; 0x7fffffffff)) R2=inv274877906944 R3=inv137438953472 R4=inv1024 R5=inv512 R10=fp0
15: (2e) if w1 > w4 goto pc+2
R0=inv1 R1=inv(id=0,umin_value=137438953472,umax_value=274877906944,var_off=(0x0; 0x7f00000000)) R2=inv274877906944 R3=inv137438953472 R4=inv1024 R5=inv512 R10=fp0
16: R0=inv1 R1=inv(id=0,umin_value=137438953472,umax_value=274877906944,var_off=(0x0; 0x7f00000000)) R2=inv274877906944 R3=inv137438953472 R4=inv1024 R5=inv512 R10=fp0
16: (ae) if w1 < w5 goto pc+1
R0=inv1 R1=inv(id=0,umin_value=137438953472,umax_value=274877906944,var_off=(0x0; 0x7f00000000)) R2=inv274877906944 R3=inv137438953472 R4=inv1024 R5=inv512 R10=fp0
[...]
We're first probing lower/upper bounds via jmp64, later we do a similar
check via jmp32 and examine the resulting var_off there. After fall-through
in insn 14, we get the following bounded r1 with 0x7fffffffff unknown marked
bits in the variable section.
Thus, after knowing r1 <= 0x4000000000 and r1 >= 0x2000000000:
max: 0b100000000000000000000000000000000000000 / 0x4000000000
var: 0b111111111111111111111111111111111111111 / 0x7fffffffff
min: 0b010000000000000000000000000000000000000 / 0x2000000000
Now, in insn 15 and 16, we perform a similar probe with lower/upper bounds
in jmp32.
Thus, after knowing r1 <= 0x4000000000 and r1 >= 0x2000000000 and
w1 <= 0x400 and w1 >= 0x200:
max: 0b100000000000000000000000000000000000000 / 0x4000000000
var: 0b111111100000000000000000000000000000000 / 0x7f00000000
min: 0b010000000000000000000000000000000000000 / 0x2000000000
The lower/upper bounds haven't changed since they have high bits set in
u64 space and the jmp32 tests can only refine bounds in the low bits.
However, for the var part the expectation would have been 0x7f000007ff
or something less precise up to 0x7fffffffff. A outcome of 0x7f00000000
is not correct since it would contradict the earlier probed bounds
where we know that the result should have been in [0x200,0x400] in u32
space. Therefore, tests with such info will lead to wrong verifier
assumptions later on like falsely predicting conditional jumps to be
always taken, etc.
The issue here is that __reg_bound_offset32()'s implementation from
commit 581738a681 ("bpf: Provide better register bounds after jmp32
instructions") makes an incorrect range assumption:
static void __reg_bound_offset32(struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
{
u64 mask = 0xffffFFFF;
struct tnum range = tnum_range(reg->umin_value & mask,
reg->umax_value & mask);
struct tnum lo32 = tnum_cast(reg->var_off, 4);
struct tnum hi32 = tnum_lshift(tnum_rshift(reg->var_off, 32), 32);
reg->var_off = tnum_or(hi32, tnum_intersect(lo32, range));
}
In the above walk-through example, __reg_bound_offset32() as-is chose
a range after masking with 0xffffffff of [0x0,0x0] since umin:0x2000000000
and umax:0x4000000000 and therefore the lo32 part was clamped to 0x0 as
well. However, in the umin:0x2000000000 and umax:0x4000000000 range above
we'd end up with an actual possible interval of [0x0,0xffffffff] for u32
space instead.
In case of the original reproducer, the situation looked as follows at
insn 5 for r0:
[...]
5: R0_w=invP(id=0,umin_value=808464432,umax_value=5103431727,var_off=(0x0; 0x1ffffffff)) R1_w=invP808464432 R10=fp0
0x30303030 0x13030302f
5: (de) if w1 s<= w0 goto pc+0
R0_w=invP(id=0,umin_value=808464432,umax_value=5103431727,var_off=(0x30303020; 0x10000001f)) R1_w=invP808464432 R10=fp0
0x30303030 0x13030302f
[...]
After the fall-through, we similarly forced the var_off result into
the wrong range [0x30303030,0x3030302f] suggesting later on that fixed
bits must only be of 0x30303020 with 0x10000001f unknowns whereas such
assumption can only be made when both bounds in hi32 range match.
Originally, I was thinking to fix this by moving reg into a temp reg and
use proper coerce_reg_to_size() helper on the temp reg where we can then
based on that define the range tnum for later intersection:
static void __reg_bound_offset32(struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
{
struct bpf_reg_state tmp = *reg;
struct tnum lo32, hi32, range;
coerce_reg_to_size(&tmp, 4);
range = tnum_range(tmp.umin_value, tmp.umax_value);
lo32 = tnum_cast(reg->var_off, 4);
hi32 = tnum_lshift(tnum_rshift(reg->var_off, 32), 32);
reg->var_off = tnum_or(hi32, tnum_intersect(lo32, range));
}
In the case of the concrete example, this gives us a more conservative unknown
section. Thus, after knowing r1 <= 0x4000000000 and r1 >= 0x2000000000 and
w1 <= 0x400 and w1 >= 0x200:
max: 0b100000000000000000000000000000000000000 / 0x4000000000
var: 0b111111111111111111111111111111111111111 / 0x7fffffffff
min: 0b010000000000000000000000000000000000000 / 0x2000000000
However, above new __reg_bound_offset32() has no effect on refining the
knowledge of the register contents. Meaning, if the bounds in hi32 range
mismatch we'll get the identity function given the range reg spans
[0x0,0xffffffff] and we cast var_off into lo32 only to later on binary
or it again with the hi32.
Likewise, if the bounds in hi32 range match, then we mask both bounds
with 0xffffffff, use the resulting umin/umax for the range to later
intersect the lo32 with it. However, _prior_ called __reg_bound_offset()
did already such intersection on the full reg and we therefore would only
repeat the same operation on the lo32 part twice.
Given this has no effect and the original commit had false assumptions,
this patch reverts the code entirely which is also more straight forward
for stable trees: apparently 581738a681 got auto-selected by Sasha's
ML system and misclassified as a fix, so it got sucked into v5.4 where
it should never have landed. A revert is low-risk also from a user PoV
since it requires a recent kernel and llc to opt-into -mcpu=v3 BPF CPU
to generate jmp32 instructions. A proper bounds refinement would need a
significantly more complex approach which is currently being worked, but
no stable material [0]. Hence revert is best option for stable. After the
revert, the original reported program gets rejected as follows:
1: (7f) r0 >>= r0
2: (14) w0 -= 808464432
3: (07) r0 += 808464432
4: (b7) r1 = 808464432
5: (de) if w1 s<= w0 goto pc+0
R0_w=invP(id=0,umin_value=808464432,umax_value=5103431727,var_off=(0x0; 0x1ffffffff)) R1_w=invP808464432 R10=fp0
6: (07) r0 += -2144337872
7: (14) w0 -= -1607454672
8: (25) if r0 > 0x30303030 goto pc+0
R0_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=808464432,var_off=(0x0; 0x3fffffff)) R1_w=invP808464432 R10=fp0
9: (76) if w0 s>= 0x303030 goto pc+2
R0=invP(id=0,umax_value=3158063,var_off=(0x0; 0x3fffff)) R1=invP808464432 R10=fp0
10: (30) r0 = *(u8 *)skb[808464432]
BPF_LD_[ABS|IND] uses reserved fields
processed 11 insns (limit 1000000) [...]
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/158507130343.15666.8018068546764556975.stgit@john-Precision-5820-Tower/T/
Fixes: 581738a681 ("bpf: Provide better register bounds after jmp32 instructions")
Reported-by: Anatoly Trosinenko <anatoly.trosinenko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200330160324.15259-2-daniel@iogearbox.net
JITed BPF programs are dynamically attached to the LSM hooks
using BPF trampolines. The trampoline prologue generates code to handle
conversion of the signature of the hook to the appropriate BPF context.
The allocated trampoline programs are attached to the nop functions
initialized as LSM hooks.
BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM programs must have a GPL compatible license and
and need CAP_SYS_ADMIN (required for loading eBPF programs).
Upon attachment:
* A BPF fexit trampoline is used for LSM hooks with a void return type.
* A BPF fmod_ret trampoline is used for LSM hooks which return an
int. The attached programs can override the return value of the
bpf LSM hook to indicate a MAC Policy decision.
Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Florent Revest <revest@google.com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Acked-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200329004356.27286-5-kpsingh@chromium.org
When CONFIG_BPF_LSM is enabled, nop functions, bpf_lsm_<hook_name>, are
generated for each LSM hook. These functions are initialized as LSM
hooks in a subsequent patch.
Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Florent Revest <revest@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Acked-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200329004356.27286-4-kpsingh@chromium.org
Introduce types and configs for bpf programs that can be attached to
LSM hooks. The programs can be enabled by the config option
CONFIG_BPF_LSM.
Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Florent Revest <revest@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Acked-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200329004356.27286-2-kpsingh@chromium.org
Enable the bpf_get_current_cgroup_id() helper for connect(), sendmsg(),
recvmsg() and bind-related hooks in order to retrieve the cgroup v2
context which can then be used as part of the key for BPF map lookups,
for example. Given these hooks operate in process context 'current' is
always valid and pointing to the app that is performing mentioned
syscalls if it's subject to a v2 cgroup. Also with same motivation of
commit 7723628101 ("bpf: Introduce bpf_skb_ancestor_cgroup_id helper")
enable retrieval of ancestor from current so the cgroup id can be used
for policy lookups which can then forbid connect() / bind(), for example.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/d2a7ef42530ad299e3cbb245e6c12374b72145ef.1585323121.git.daniel@iogearbox.net
In Cilium we're mainly using BPF cgroup hooks today in order to implement
kube-proxy free Kubernetes service translation for ClusterIP, NodePort (*),
ExternalIP, and LoadBalancer as well as HostPort mapping [0] for all traffic
between Cilium managed nodes. While this works in its current shape and avoids
packet-level NAT for inter Cilium managed node traffic, there is one major
limitation we're facing today, that is, lack of netns awareness.
In Kubernetes, the concept of Pods (which hold one or multiple containers)
has been built around network namespaces, so while we can use the global scope
of attaching to root BPF cgroup hooks also to our advantage (e.g. for exposing
NodePort ports on loopback addresses), we also have the need to differentiate
between initial network namespaces and non-initial one. For example, ExternalIP
services mandate that non-local service IPs are not to be translated from the
host (initial) network namespace as one example. Right now, we have an ugly
work-around in place where non-local service IPs for ExternalIP services are
not xlated from connect() and friends BPF hooks but instead via less efficient
packet-level NAT on the veth tc ingress hook for Pod traffic.
On top of determining whether we're in initial or non-initial network namespace
we also have a need for a socket-cookie like mechanism for network namespaces
scope. Socket cookies have the nice property that they can be combined as part
of the key structure e.g. for BPF LRU maps without having to worry that the
cookie could be recycled. We are planning to use this for our sessionAffinity
implementation for services. Therefore, add a new bpf_get_netns_cookie() helper
which would resolve both use cases at once: bpf_get_netns_cookie(NULL) would
provide the cookie for the initial network namespace while passing the context
instead of NULL would provide the cookie from the application's network namespace.
We're using a hole, so no size increase; the assignment happens only once.
Therefore this allows for a comparison on initial namespace as well as regular
cookie usage as we have today with socket cookies. We could later on enable
this helper for other program types as well as we would see need.
(*) Both externalTrafficPolicy={Local|Cluster} types
[0] https://github.com/cilium/cilium/blob/master/bpf/bpf_sock.c
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/c47d2346982693a9cf9da0e12690453aded4c788.1585323121.git.daniel@iogearbox.net
Factor out logic mapping expected program attach type to program type and
subsequent handling of program attach/detach. Also list out all supported
cgroup BPF program types explicitly to prevent accidental bugs once more
program types are added to a mapping. Do the same for prog_query API.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200325065746.640559-3-andriin@fb.com
Refactor cgroup attach/detach code to abstract away common operations
performed on all types of cgroup storages. This makes high-level logic more
apparent, plus allows to reuse more code across multiple functions.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200325065746.640559-2-andriin@fb.com
Currently, for all op verification we call __red_deduce_bounds() and
__red_bound_offset() but we only call __update_reg_bounds() in bitwise
ops. However, we could benefit from calling __update_reg_bounds() in
BPF_ADD, BPF_SUB, and BPF_MUL cases as well.
For example, a register with state 'R1_w=invP0' when we subtract from
it,
w1 -= 2
Before coerce we will now have an smin_value=S64_MIN, smax_value=U64_MAX
and unsigned bounds umin_value=0, umax_value=U64_MAX. These will then
be clamped to S32_MIN, U32_MAX values by coerce in the case of alu32 op
as done in above example. However tnum will be a constant because the
ALU op is done on a constant.
Without update_reg_bounds() we have a scenario where tnum is a const
but our unsigned bounds do not reflect this. By calling update_reg_bounds
after coerce to 32bit we further refine the umin_value to U64_MAX in the
alu64 case or U32_MAX in the alu32 case above.
Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/158507151689.15666.566796274289413203.stgit@john-Precision-5820-Tower
Pull per op ALU logic into individual functions. We are about to add
u32 versions of each of these by pull them out the code gets a bit
more readable here and nicer in the next patch.
Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/158507149518.15666.15672349629329072411.stgit@john-Precision-5820-Tower
Overlapping header include additions in macsec.c
A bug fix in 'net' overlapping with the removal of 'version'
string in ena_netdev.c
Overlapping test additions in selftests Makefile
Overlapping PCI ID table adjustments in iwlwifi driver.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Trying to initialize a structure with "= {};" will not always clean out
all padding locations in a structure. So be explicit and call memset to
initialize everything for a number of bpf information structures that
are then copied from userspace, sometimes from smaller memory locations
than the size of the structure.
Reported-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200320162258.GA794295@kroah.com
For the bpf syscall, we are relying on the compiler to properly zero out
the bpf_attr union that we copy userspace data into. Unfortunately that
doesn't always work properly, padding and other oddities might not be
correctly zeroed, and in some tests odd things have been found when the
stack is pre-initialized to other values.
Fix this by explicitly memsetting the structure to 0 before using it.
Reported-by: Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@google.com>
Reported-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Reported-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Reported-by: Alistair Delva <adelva@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://android-review.googlesource.com/c/kernel/common/+/1235490
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200320094813.GA421650@kroah.com
Simplify gen_btf logic to make it work with llvm-objcopy. The existing
'file format' and 'architecture' parsing logic is brittle and does not
work with llvm-objcopy/llvm-objdump.
'file format' output of llvm-objdump>=11 will match GNU objdump, but
'architecture' (bfdarch) may not.
.BTF in .tmp_vmlinux.btf is non-SHF_ALLOC. Add the SHF_ALLOC flag
because it is part of vmlinux image used for introspection. C code
can reference the section via linker script defined __start_BTF and
__stop_BTF. This fixes a small problem that previous .BTF had the
SHF_WRITE flag (objcopy -I binary -O elf* synthesized .data).
Additionally, `objcopy -I binary` synthesized symbols
_binary__btf_vmlinux_bin_start and _binary__btf_vmlinux_bin_stop (not
used elsewhere) are replaced with more commonplace __start_BTF and
__stop_BTF.
Add 2>/dev/null because GNU objcopy (but not llvm-objcopy) warns
"empty loadable segment detected at vaddr=0xffffffff81000000, is this intentional?"
We use a dd command to change the e_type field in the ELF header from
ET_EXEC to ET_REL so that lld will accept .btf.vmlinux.bin.o. Accepting
ET_EXEC as an input file is an extremely rare GNU ld feature that lld
does not intend to support, because this is error-prone.
The output section description .BTF in include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
avoids potential subtle orphan section placement issues and suppresses
--orphan-handling=warn warnings.
Fixes: df786c9b94 ("bpf: Force .BTF section start to zero when dumping from vmlinux")
Fixes: cb0cc635c7 ("powerpc: Include .BTF section")
Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Tested-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Tested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> (powerpc)
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/871
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200318222746.173648-1-maskray@google.com
The bpf_struct_ops tcp-cc name should be sanitized in order to
avoid problematic chars (e.g. whitespaces).
This patch reuses the bpf_obj_name_cpy() for accepting the same set
of characters in order to keep a consistent bpf programming experience.
A "size" param is added. Also, the strlen is returned on success so
that the caller (like the bpf_tcp_ca here) can error out on empty name.
The existing callers of the bpf_obj_name_cpy() only need to change the
testing statement to "if (err < 0)". For all these existing callers,
the err will be overwritten later, so no extra change is needed
for the new strlen return value.
v3:
- reverse xmas tree style
v2:
- Save the orig_src to avoid "end - size" (Andrii)
Fixes: 0baf26b0fc ("bpf: tcp: Support tcp_congestion_ops in bpf")
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200314010209.1131542-1-kafai@fb.com
Sparse reports a warning at __bpf_prog_enter() and __bpf_prog_exit()
warning: context imbalance in __bpf_prog_enter() - wrong count at exit
warning: context imbalance in __bpf_prog_exit() - unexpected unlock
The root cause is the missing annotation at __bpf_prog_enter()
and __bpf_prog_exit()
Add the missing __acquires(RCU) annotation
Add the missing __releases(RCU) annotation
Signed-off-by: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200311010908.42366-2-jbi.octave@gmail.com
Now that we have all the objects (bpf_prog, bpf_trampoline,
bpf_dispatcher) linked in bpf_tree, there's no need to have
separate bpf_image tree for images.
Reverting the bpf_image tree together with struct bpf_image,
because it's no longer needed.
Also removing bpf_image_alloc function and adding the original
bpf_jit_alloc_exec_page interface instead.
The kernel_text_address function can now rely only on is_bpf_text_address,
because it checks the bpf_tree that contains all the objects.
Keeping bpf_image_ksym_add and bpf_image_ksym_del because they are
useful wrappers with perf's ksymbol interface calls.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200312195610.346362-13-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Adding dispatchers to kallsyms. It's displayed as
bpf_dispatcher_<NAME>
where NAME is the name of dispatcher.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200312195610.346362-12-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Adding trampolines to kallsyms. It's displayed as
bpf_trampoline_<ID> [bpf]
where ID is the BTF id of the trampoline function.
Adding bpf_image_ksym_add/del functions that setup
the start/end values and call KSYMBOL perf events
handlers.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200312195610.346362-11-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Separating /proc/kallsyms add/del code and adding bpf_ksym_add/del
functions for that.
Moving bpf_prog_ksym_node_add/del functions to __bpf_ksym_add/del
and changing their argument to 'struct bpf_ksym' object. This way
we can call them for other bpf objects types like trampoline and
dispatcher.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200312195610.346362-10-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Adding 'prog' bool flag to 'struct bpf_ksym' to mark that
this object belongs to bpf_prog object.
This change allows having bpf_prog objects together with
other types (trampolines and dispatchers) in the single
bpf_tree. It's used when searching for bpf_prog exception
tables by the bpf_prog_ksym_find function, where we need
to get the bpf_prog pointer.
>From now we can safely add bpf_ksym support for trampoline
or dispatcher objects, because we can differentiate them
from bpf_prog objects.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200312195610.346362-9-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Adding bpf_ksym_find function that is used bpf bpf address
lookup functions:
__bpf_address_lookup
is_bpf_text_address
while keeping bpf_prog_kallsyms_find to be used only for lookup
of bpf_prog objects (will happen in following changes).
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200312195610.346362-8-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Moving ksym_tnode list node to 'struct bpf_ksym' object,
so the symbol itself can be chained and used in other
objects like bpf_trampoline and bpf_dispatcher.
We need bpf_ksym object to be linked both in bpf_kallsyms
via lnode for /proc/kallsyms and in bpf_tree via tnode for
bpf address lookup functions like __bpf_address_lookup or
bpf_prog_kallsyms_find.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200312195610.346362-7-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Adding lnode list node to 'struct bpf_ksym' object,
so the struct bpf_ksym itself can be chained and used
in other objects like bpf_trampoline and bpf_dispatcher.
Changing iterator to bpf_ksym in bpf_get_kallsym function.
The ksym->start is holding the prog->bpf_func value,
so it's ok to use it as value in bpf_get_kallsym.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200312195610.346362-6-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Adding name to 'struct bpf_ksym' object to carry the name
of the symbol for bpf_prog, bpf_trampoline, bpf_dispatcher
objects.
The current benefit is that name is now generated only when
the symbol is added to the list, so we don't need to generate
it every time it's accessed.
The future benefit is that we will have all the bpf objects
symbols represented by struct bpf_ksym.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200312195610.346362-5-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Adding 'struct bpf_ksym' object that will carry the
kallsym information for bpf symbol. Adding the start
and end address to begin with. It will be used by
bpf_prog, bpf_trampoline, bpf_dispatcher objects.
The symbol_start/symbol_end values were originally used
to sort bpf_prog objects. For the address displayed in
/proc/kallsyms we are using prog->bpf_func value.
I'm using the bpf_func value for program symbol start
instead of the symbol_start, because it makes no difference
for sorting bpf_prog objects and we can use it directly as
an address to display it in /proc/kallsyms.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200312195610.346362-4-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Daniel Borkmann