rt2800_write_beacon is the only function which uses
EXPORT_SYMBOL instead of EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL. All symbols
in rt2x00 should however use the GPL restricted export.
Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
While scanning the link tuner must be disabled. Otherwise
it will interfere with receiving all beacons for each channel
due to changing sensitivity levels.
Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
The RSSI values in the RXWI descriptor aren't true RSSI
values. Instead they are more like the AGC values similar
to rt61pci. And as such, it needs the same conversion
before it can be passed to rt2x00lib/mac80211.
This requires the struct queue_entry to be passed to
rt2800_process_rxwi rather then the skb structure which
is contained in the queue_entry. This is required to
obtain the lna_gain information from the rt2x00_dev structure.
This fixes connection problems when using wpa_supplicant
which would try to connect to the worst AP's rather then the
best ones.
Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Limit the txpower per rate by the approriate values in the eeprom.
This avoids too high txpower values resulting in bad tx performance.
Signed-off-by: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
CC [M] drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.o
drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c: In function 'rt2800_ampdu_action':
drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c:2821: warning: unused variable 'rt2x00dev'
Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Latest rt2870 legacy driver also sets BBP_CSR_CFG_BBP_RW_MODE to 1
when reading or writing the EEPROM. This means we can make the
BBP reading and writing completely equal on all platforms.
Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Legacy driver indicates that BBP1_TX_ANTENNA must be set
to 0 for TXPATH values of 1 and 3. So the previous statement
that nothing should be done for TXPATH = 3, is false.
Furthermore, remove the false BBP3_RX_ANTENNA initialization
when TXPATH is 1 for PCI and SOC devices. This field will always
be overridden in the next switch statement, making this initialization
bogus. History of this line indicates it was there from the beginning,
and was once caught as typo. Instead of replacing the line with the
correct line, the correct line was added...
Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
IEEE80211_HT_CAP_RX_STBC is a 2 bit flag, and should thus
never be set as normal flag. Instead we must read the number
of RX paths from the EEPROM and set the IEEE80211_HT_CAP_RX_STBC
with the correct value (using the same logic as the number of TX
streams).
Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
When an interface is removed the according beacon entry should be reset.
The current approach to only clear the first word is not enough to stop
the device from sending out the beacon, hence resulting in beacons being
sent out for already removed interfaces.
Fix this by invalidating the entire TXWI in front of the beacon instead
of only the first word.
Also clear all beacons during startup in the same way.
Signed-off-by: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
MAC_BSSID_DW1_BSS_ID_MASK must be set to the mask 3, to
enable 8 BSSID's. The MAC_BSSID_DW1_BSS_BCN_NUM is initialized
to 7 to enable the 8 beacons.
Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Align with the latest versions of the Ralink legacy driver(s).
Signed-off-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
In order to implement tx mpdu aggregation we only have to implement
the ampdu_action callback such that mac80211 allows negotiation of
blockack sessions.
The hardware will handle everything on its own as long as the ampdu
flag in the TXWI struct is set up correctly and we translate the tx
status correctly.
For now, refuse requests to start rx aggregation.
Signed-off-by: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Legacy rt2870 driver handles WCID differently then we expected,
the BSSID and Cipher value are 3 bit values, while the 4th bit
should be set elsewhere in an extended field.
After this, rt2800usb reports frames have been decrypted
successfully, indicating that the Hardware decryption now is
working correctly.
Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
rt2800lib has been under development of the rt2x00 project,
so add it to the author string for the module information.
Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Set up max_rates and max_rate_tries with suitable values even if we do not
support the whole functionality.
As rt2800 has a global fallback table we cannot specify more then one tx rate
per frame but since the hw will try several different rates (based on the
fallback table) we should still initialize max_rates to the maximum number of
rates we are going to try. Otherwise mac80211 will truncate our reported tx
rates and the rc algortihm will end up with incorrect data choosing unsuitable
rates for tx.
This improves throughput on rt2800 devices considerable.
Signed-off-by: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
Acked-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Fix typo in rt2800_config_txpower.
Signed-off-by: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
Acked-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Remove suspicious register write as the reg variable is never filled
with an TX_SW_CFG2 associated value before.
Signed-off-by: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
Acked-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Update TX_SW_CFG initvals for 305x SoC to match with the appropriate
legacy driver.
Signed-off-by: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
Acked-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Disable TX STBC for 1 stream devices as a minimum of 2 streams is needed for TX STBC.
Signed-off-by: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Closer inspection of the legacy Ralink driver reveals that in case of HT40+
or HT40- we must adjust the frequency settings that we program to the device.
Implement the same adjustment in the rt2x00 code.
With this HT40 seems to work for all devices supported by rt2800pci and
rt2800usb.
Signed-off-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
This prevents us having common code depend on PCI or USB specific code.
Signed-off-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Instead of parsing the EEPROM information, use the flag that was set during
device initialization.
Signed-off-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
There is no point on having them separated across 3 files.
At the same time rename USB_CYC_CFG to its proper name US_CYC_CNT
(as per the datasheet).
Signed-off-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
There is no evidence, either in adapters or in the Ralink code, that such
a device actually exists. All so-call RT2870 adapter identify themselves
as RT2860.
Signed-off-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
The beacon writing functions of rt2800pci and rt2800usb are now identical.
Move them to rt2800lib to only have one central function.
Signed-off-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Instead of fiddling with the skb->data pointer and thereby risking
out of bounds accesses, properly reserve the space needed in an
skb for descriptors.
Signed-off-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
RXWI processing is exactly the same for rt2800pci and rt2800usb, so
make it common code.
Signed-off-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
TXWI writing is exactly the same for rt2800pci and rt2800usb, so
make it common code.
Signed-off-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Update channel initialization for the RF3052 chipset.
According to the Ralink drivers, the rt3x array must be
used for this chipset, rather then the rt2x array.
Furthermore RF3052 supports the 5GHz band, extend
the rt3x array with the 5GHz channels, and use them
for the RF3052 chip.
Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
The SIFS value is a constant and doesn't need to be updated on erp changes.
Furthermore the code used 10us for both, the OFDM SIFS and CCK SIFS time
which broke CTS protected 11g connections (see patch "rt2x00: rt2800: update
initial SIFS values" for details).
Signed-off-by: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Currently the CCK and OFDM SIFS value is set to 32us. This value is neither
used by the Ralink driver nor specified in 802.11.
Instead of using 10us for CCK SIFS (as defined in 802.11) use 16us like in the
Ralink drivers. And indeed using a SIFS value of 10us breaks connectivity with
11g + CTS protected connections. Add a comment to the code why we don't use 10us
for CCK SIFS value.
The OFDM SIFS value is set to 16us (as defined in 802.11 and also used by the
Ralink drivers).
Signed-off-by: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Inspection of the Ralink vendor driver shows that the TX_BAND_CFG register
and BBP register 3 are about HT40- indication, not about HT40+ indication.
Inverse the meaning of these fields in the code.
Signed-off-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
PCI specific code has been remove quite some time ago.
Signed-off-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Update the rfcsr and bbp init code for SoC devices to match with the
latest Ralink driver.
To have better control over which values are used for the register
initialization create a new function rt2800_is_305x_soc which checks
for SoC interface type, the correct RT chipset and the correct RF
chipset. This is based on the assumption that all rt305x SoC devices
use a rt2872 and rf3020/rf3021/rf3022.
In case an unknown RF chipset is found on a SoC device with a rt2872
don't treat it as rt305x and just print a message.
Signed-off-by: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
Acked-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Restore the rfcsr initialization for RT305x SoC devices which was removed
by "rt2x00: Finish rt3070 support in rt2800 register initialization.".
This fixes the rx path on SoC devices.
Signed-off-by: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Get closer to what the ralink driver does by setting the rf register 13
to tx_power2 during channel switch.
Signed-off-by: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
Acked-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Disable HT40 support for now as it causes rx problems with HT40 capable
11n APs (when mac80211 enables HT40, rx is completely disfunctional).
Once the rt2800 HT code is capable of using HT40 we should enable the
flag again.
I only tested this patch with a rt305x SoC device, nevertheless the
patch disables HT40 also on PCI and USB rt2800 devices.
Signed-off-by: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
Acked-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Add RT3390 specific register initializations to rt2x00, based on the latest
Ralink rt3390 vendor driver.
Untested as I don't actually own an RT3390 based device, but given experiences
on rt3070/rt3071 very hopeful that this will actually work..
Signed-off-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Add RT3090 specific register initializations to rt2x00, based on the latest
Ralink rt3090 vendor driver.
Untested as I don't actually own an RT3090 based device, but given experiences
on rt3070/rt3071 very hopeful that this will actually work..
Signed-off-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Add RT3071 specific register initializations to rt2x00, based on the latest
Ralink rt3070 vendor driver.
With this patch my RT3071 based devices start showing a sign of life.
Signed-off-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
rt2x00 had preliminary support for RT3070 based devices, but the support was
incomplete.
Update the RT3070 register initialization to be similar to the latest Ralink
vendor driver.
With this patch my rt3070 based devices start showing a sign of life.
Signed-off-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Align the rt2800 register initializations with the latest versions of the
Ralink vendor driver.
This patch is also preparation for the addition of support for RT3070 /
RT3071 / RT3090 / RT3390 based devices.
Signed-off-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
The rt2800 version constants are inconsistent, and the version number don't
mean a lot of things anyway. Refactor the constants to have some more
meaningful names, and introduce and use some new helpers to check these
chipset revisions. At the same time rename to revision, as they are more
revision numbers rather than version numbers.
Signed-off-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Only include definitions for RT chipsets that are also used inside the
Ralink vendor drivers.
Signed-off-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Definitions taken from the latest rt2860 / rt2870 / rt3070 / rt3090 Ralink
vendor drivers.
Signed-off-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
It seems that the distinction between RF channel switch method is solely based
on the RF chipset that is used.
Refactor the channel switch decision to just take the RF chipset into account,
thereby greatly simplifying the check.
Signed-off-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Ivo van Doorn