The div_factor* helpers calculate fraction or percentage fraction. The
name is a bit confusing, we use it only for percentage calculations and
there are two helpers.
There's a helper mult_frac that's for general fractions, that tries to
be accurate but we multiply and divide by small numbers so we can use
the div_u64 helper.
Rename the div_factor* helpers and use 1..100 percentage range, also drop
the case checking for percentage == 100, it's never hit.
The conversions:
* div_factor calculates tenths and the numbers need to be adjusted
* div_factor_fine is direct replacement
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
There's several structures that are embedded inside of fs_info.h, so if
we don't have all the proper includes when we include fs.h we'll get a
variety of compile errors. I fixed this by adding a temporary c file
that just had #include "fs.h" and then added include files until the
compiler stopped complaining.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The last user of this was removed in 7f9fe61440 ("btrfs: improve
global reserve stealing logic"), drop this code as it's no longer called
by anybody.
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
KCSAN reports that there's unlocked access mixed with locked access,
which is technically correct but is not a bug. To avoid false alerts at
least from KCSAN, add annotation and use a wrapper whenever ->full is
accessed for read outside of lock.
It is used as a fast check and only advisory. In the worst case the
block reserve is found !full and becomes full in the meantime, but
properly handled.
Depending on the value of ->full, btrfs_block_rsv_release decides
where to return the reservation, and block_rsv_release_bytes handles a
NULL pointer for block_rsv and if it's not NULL then it double checks
the full status under a lock.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAAwBoOJDjei5Hnem155N_cJwiEkVwJYvgN-tQrwWbZQGhFU=cA@mail.gmail.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/YvHU/vsXd7uz5V6j@hungrycats.org
Reported-by: Zygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The number of block group reserve types BTRFS_BLOCK_RSV_* is small and
fits to u8 and there's enough left in case we want to add more.
For type safety use the enum but make it 8 bits in the structure to save
space.
The structure size is now 48 on release build, making a slight
improvement in structures where it's embedded, like btrfs_fs_info or
btrfs_inode.
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Use simple bool type for the block reserve failfast status, there's
short to save space as there used to be int but there's no reason for
that.
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Use simple bool type for the block reserve full status, there's short to
save space as there used to be int but there's no reason for that.
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
In the future we're going to have multiple csum and extent root trees,
so init the roots block_rsv at setup_root time based on their root key
objectid.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We used to need the root for btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes to check the
orphan cleanup state, but we no longer need that, we simply need the
fs_info. Change btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes() to use the fs_info, and
change both btrfs_block_rsv_refill() and btrfs_block_rsv_add() to do the
same as they simply call btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes() and then
manipulate the block_rsv that is being used.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Currently the non-prefixed version is a simple wrapper used to hide
the 4th argument of the prefixed version. This doesn't bring much value
in practice and only makes the code harder to follow by adding another
level of indirection. Rectify this by removing the __ prefix and
have only one public function to release bytes from a block reservation.
No semantic changes.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The delalloc reserve stuff calls this directly because it cares about
the qgroup accounting stuff, so export it so we can move it around. Fix
btrfs_block_rsv_release() to just be a static inline since it just calls
__btrfs_block_rsv_release() with NULL for the qgroup stuff.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This is used in a few places, we need to make sure it's exported so we
can move it around.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Prep work for separating out all of the block_rsv related code into its
own file.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
David Sterba