The logic for calculating the input rate used when figuring out the
proper dynamic steps for pllx was incorrect. It is supposed to be
calculated using parent_rate / m but it was just using the parent rate
directly, therefore using the wrong step values.
Signed-off-by: Rhyland Klein <rklein@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Some register for PLLM and PLLMB were named MISC0 but according to the
TRM, they have different names. Sync up the names to make it easier to
understand which register they are really referring to.
Signed-off-by: Rhyland Klein <rklein@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Most PLL's don't actually have LOCK_ENABLE bits. However, most PLL's
also had that flag set, which meant that the clk code was trying to
enable locks, and inadvertantly flipping bits in other fields.
For PLLM, ensure the correct register is used for the misc_register.
PLL_MISC0 contains the EN_LCKDET bit which should be used for enabling
the lock, and PLLM_MISC1 shouldn't be used at all.
Lastly, remove some of the settings which would point to the EN_LCKDET
bits for some PLLs. There is no need to enable the locks, and that is
done as part of the set_defaults logic already.
Signed-off-by: Rhyland Klein <rklein@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Rhyland Klein