In order to build-test the same unit-test files using fdtoverlay tool,
move the device nodes from the existing overlay_base.dts and
testcases_common.dts files to .dtsi counterparts. The .dts files now
include the new .dtsi files, resulting in exactly the same behavior as
earlier.
The .dtsi files can now be reused for compile time tests using
fdtoverlay (will be done by a later commit).
This is required because the base files passed to fdtoverlay tool
shouldn't be overlays themselves (i.e. shouldn't have the /plugin/;
tag).
Note that this commit also moves "testcase-device2" node to
testcases.dts from tests-interrupts.dtsi, as this node has a deliberate
error in it and is only relevant for runtime testing done with
unittest.c.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com>
Tested-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/c3354a042ba34a03fd563061cbaa7fc96cb2d71a.1615354376.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org
The functions for parsing 'dma-ranges' ranges are buggy and fail to
handle several conditions. Add new tests for of_dma_get_range() and
for_each_of_pci_range().
With this test, we get 5 new failures which are fixed in subsequent
commits:
OF: translation of DMA address(0) to CPU address failed node(/testcase-data/address-tests/device@70000000)
FAIL of_unittest_dma_ranges_one():798 of_dma_get_range failed on node /testcase-data/address-tests/device@70000000 rc=-22
OF: translation of DMA address(10000000) to CPU address failed node(/testcase-data/address-tests/bus@80000000/device@1000)
FAIL of_unittest_dma_ranges_one():798 of_dma_get_range failed on node /testcase-data/address-tests/bus@80000000/device@1000 rc=-22
OF: translation of DMA address(0) to CPU address failed node(/testcase-data/address-tests/pci@90000000)
FAIL of_unittest_dma_ranges_one():798 of_dma_get_range failed on node /testcase-data/address-tests/pci@90000000 rc=-22
FAIL of_unittest_pci_dma_ranges():851 for_each_of_pci_range wrong CPU addr (d0000000) on node /testcase-data/address-tests/pci@90000000
FAIL of_unittest_pci_dma_ranges():861 for_each_of_pci_range wrong CPU addr (ffffffffffffffff) on node /testcase-data/address-tests/pci@90000000
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Tested-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Remove the manually added __local_fixups__ because dtc can now generate
them. This also fixes a new warning in the process:
drivers/of/unittest-data/testcases.dtb: Warning (interrupts_extended_property): Could not get phandle node for /__local_fixups__/testcase-data/interrupts/interrupts-extended0:interrupts-extended(cell 3)
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which
makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license.
By default all files without license information are under the default
license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2.
Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0'
SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding
shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text.
This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and
Philippe Ombredanne.
How this work was done:
Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of
the use cases:
- file had no licensing information it it.
- file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it,
- file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information,
Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases
where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license
had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords.
The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to
a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the
output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX
tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the
base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files.
The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files
assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner
results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s)
to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not
immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was:
- Files considered eligible had to be source code files.
- Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5
lines of source
- File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5
lines).
All documentation files were explicitly excluded.
The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license
identifiers to apply.
- when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was
considered to have no license information in it, and the top level
COPYING file license applied.
For non */uapi/* files that summary was:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 11139
and resulted in the first patch in this series.
If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH
Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930
and resulted in the second patch in this series.
- if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one
of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if
any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in
it (per prior point). Results summary:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270
GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17
LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15
GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14
((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5
LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4
LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1
and that resulted in the third patch in this series.
- when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became
the concluded license(s).
- when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a
license but the other didn't, or they both detected different
licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred.
- In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file
resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and
which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics).
- When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was
confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
- If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier,
the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later
in time.
In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the
spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the
source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation
by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from
FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners
disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The
Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so
they are related.
Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets
for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the
files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks
in about 15000 files.
In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have
copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the
correct identifier.
Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual
inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch
version early this week with:
- a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected
license ids and scores
- reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+
files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct
- reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license
was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied
SPDX license was correct
This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This
worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the
different types of files to be modified.
These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to
parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the
format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg
based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to
distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different
comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to
generate the patches.
Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Add unittests for OF overlays.
It tests overlay device addition/removal and whether
the apply revert sequence is correct.
Changes since V1:
* Added local fixups entries.
Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
The original resolver format is way too cryptic, switch
to using a tree based format that gets rid of repetitions,
is more compact and readable.
At the same time, update the selftests to using the new local fixups
format.
Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com>
[grant.likely: Squashed in testcase changes and merged similar functions]
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
This is unit testing code. It should use that name because it makes more
sense than 'selftest'. Rename the files to match and rename the config
variable.
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
Viresh Kumar