The SB IOAPIC is on the device 0xb from Hygon family 18h model 4h.
Signed-off-by: Pu Wen <puwen@hygon.cn>
Signed-off-by: Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Bin Lai <robinlai@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: caelli <caelli@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Jianping Liu <frankjpliu@tencent.com>
Add dedicated functions to initialize the northbridge for Hygon family
18h model 4h processors.
Signed-off-by: Pu Wen <puwen@hygon.cn>
Signed-off-by: Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Bin Lai <robinlai@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: caelli <caelli@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Jianping Liu <frankjpliu@tencent.com>
Add the PCI device IDs for Hygon family 18h model 4h processors.
Signed-off-by: Pu Wen <puwen@hygon.cn>
Signed-off-by: Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Bin Lai <robinlai@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: caelli <caelli@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Jianping Liu <frankjpliu@tencent.com>
Add support for loading Hygon microcode, which is compatible with AMD one.
Signed-off-by: Pu Wen <puwen@hygon.cn>
Signed-off-by: Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Bin Lai <robinlai@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: caelli <caelli@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Jianping Liu <frankjpliu@tencent.com>
Hygon processors before model 4h have not use the CPUID leaf 0xB, so use
commit e0ceeae708 ("x86/CPU/hygon: Fix phys_proc_id calculation logic
for multi-die processors") to derive the socket ID when running on host.
If kernel running on guest, use the hypervisor's default.
For model 4h, Hygon processors use CPUID leaf 0xB to identify SMT and
CORE level types, so use function detect_extended_topology() to derive
the core ID, socket ID and APIC ID. But it still set __max_die_per_package
to nodes_per_socket because it lacks the DIE level type.
Signed-off-by: Pu Wen <puwen@hygon.cn>
Signed-off-by: Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Bin Lai <robinlai@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: caelli <caelli@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Jianping Liu <frankjpliu@tencent.com>
commit 4c1cdec319 upstream.
Thee maximum number of MCA banks is 64 (MAX_NR_BANKS), see
a0bc32b3ca ("x86/mce: Increase maximum number of banks to 64").
However, the bank_map which contains a bitfield of which banks to
initialize is of type unsigned int and that overflows when those bit
numbers are >= 32, leading to UBSAN complaining correctly:
UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c:1365:38
shift exponent 32 is too large for 32-bit type 'int'
Change the bank_map to a u64 and use the proper BIT_ULL() macro when
modifying bits in there.
[ bp: Rewrite commit message. ]
Fixes: a0bc32b3ca ("x86/mce: Increase maximum number of banks to 64")
Signed-off-by: Muralidhara M K <muralimk@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230127151601.1068324-1-muralimk@amd.com
[fix conflict during backport]
Signed-off-by: Pu Wen <puwen@hygon.cn>
Signed-off-by: Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Bin Lai <robinlai@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: caelli <caelli@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Jianping Liu <frankjpliu@tencent.com>
commit 02a2484cf8 upstream.
Tdie is an offset calculation that should only be shown when temp_offset
is actually put into a table. This is useless to show for all CPU/APU.
Show it only when necessary.
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Pu Wen <puwen@hygon.cn>
Signed-off-by: Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Bin Lai <robinlai@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: caelli <caelli@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Jianping Liu <frankjpliu@tencent.com>
commit 280b68a3b3 upstream.
Hygon systems support the MONITOR/MWAIT instructions and these can be
used for ACPI C1 in the same way as on AMD and Intel systems.
The BIOS declares a C1 state in _CST to use FFH and CPUID_Fn00000005_EDX
is non-zero on Hygon systems.
Allow ffh_cstate_init() to succeed on Hygon systems to default using FFH
MWAIT instead of HALT for ACPI C1.
Signed-off-by: Pu Wen <puwen@hygon.cn>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210528081417.31474-1-puwen@hygon.cn
Signed-off-by: Pu Wen <puwen@hygon.cn>
Signed-off-by: Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Bin Lai <robinlai@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: caelli <caelli@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Jianping Liu <frankjpliu@tencent.com>
commit 59eca2fa19 upstream.
Set the maximum DIE per package variable on Hygon using the
nodes_per_socket value in order to do per-DIE manipulations for drivers
such as powercap.
Signed-off-by: Pu Wen <puwen@hygon.cn>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210302020217.1827-1-puwen@hygon.cn
Signed-off-by: Pu Wen <puwen@hygon.cn>
Signed-off-by: Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Bin Lai <robinlai@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: caelli <caelli@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Jianping Liu <frankjpliu@tencent.com>
commit cb09a37972 upstream.
CPUID Leaf 0x1F defines a DIE_TYPE level (nb: ECX[8:15] level type == 0x5),
but CPUID Leaf 0xB does not. However, detect_extended_topology() will
set struct cpuinfo_x86.cpu_die_id regardless of whether a valid Die ID
was found.
Only set cpu_die_id if a DIE_TYPE level is found. CPU topology code may
use another value for cpu_die_id, e.g. the AMD NodeId on AMD-based
systems. Code ordering should be maintained so that the CPUID Leaf 0x1F
Die ID value will take precedence on systems that may use another value.
Suggested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Signed-off-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201109210659.754018-5-Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Pu Wen <puwen@hygon.cn>
Signed-off-by: Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Bin Lai <robinlai@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: caelli <caelli@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Jianping Liu <frankjpliu@tencent.com>
commit a0bc32b3ca upstream.
...because future AMD systems will support up to 64 MCA banks per CPU.
MAX_NR_BANKS is used to allocate a number of data structures, and it is
used as a ceiling for values read from MCG_CAP[Count]. Therefore, this
change will have no functional effect on existing systems with 32 or
fewer MCA banks per CPU.
However, this will increase the size of the following structures:
Global bitmaps:
- core.c / mce_banks_ce_disabled
- core.c / all_banks
- core.c / valid_banks
- core.c / toclear
- Total: 32 new bits * 4 bitmaps = 16 new bytes
Per-CPU bitmaps:
- core.c / mce_poll_banks
- intel.c / mce_banks_owned
- Total: 32 new bits * 2 bitmaps = 8 new bytes
The bitmaps are arrays of longs. So this change will only affect 32-bit
execution, since there will be one additional long used. There will be
no additional memory use on 64-bit execution, because the size of long
is 64 bits.
Global structs:
- amd.c / struct smca_bank smca_banks[]: 16 bytes per bank
- core.c / struct mce_bank_dev mce_bank_devs[]: 56 bytes per bank
- Total: 32 new banks * (16 + 56) bytes = 2304 new bytes
Per-CPU structs:
- core.c / struct mce_bank mce_banks_array[]: 16 bytes per bank
- Total: 32 new banks * 16 bytes = 512 new bytes
32-bit
Total global size increase: 2320 bytes
Total per-CPU size increase: 520 bytes
64-bit
Total global size increase: 2304 bytes
Total per-CPU size increase: 512 bytes
This additional memory should still fit within the existing .data
section of the kernel binary. However, in the case where it doesn't
fit, an additional page (4kB) of memory will be added to the binary to
accommodate the extra data which will be the maximum size increase of
vmlinux.
Signed-off-by: Akshay Gupta <Akshay.Gupta@amd.com>
[ Adjust commit message and code comment. ]
Signed-off-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200828192412.320052-1-Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Pu Wen <puwen@hygon.cn>
Signed-off-by: Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Bin Lai <robinlai@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: caelli <caelli@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Jianping Liu <frankjpliu@tencent.com>
commit 384b02d6b8 upstream.
Add device HID HYGO0010 to match the Hygon ACPI Vendor ID (HYGO) that
was registered in http://www.uefi.org/acpi_id_list, and the I2C
controller on Hygon paltform will use the HID.
Signed-off-by: Pu Wen <puwen@hygon.cn>
Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
[fix conflict during backport]
Signed-off-by: Pu Wen <puwen@hygon.cn>
Signed-off-by: Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Bin Lai <robinlai@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: caelli <caelli@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Jianping Liu <frankjpliu@tencent.com>
Qemu not support iommu, PCG want using vfio ko with
enable_unsafe_noiommu_mode=1 to improve the speed.
Signed-off-by: Jianping Liu <frankjpliu@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: aurelianliu <aurelianliu@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Yongliang Gao <leonylgao@tencent.com>
The function of do_machine_check has called nmi_enter before mce_panic,
so it needn't to call nmi_enter at the outside of do_machine_check.
Signed-off-by: Jianping Liu <frankjpliu@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Yongliang Gao <leonylgao@tencent.com>
Some customer want install OS from USB card or BMC. OS treat BMC as a
USB storage device. So, do not put usb storage ko in kernel
modules-public-removable-media rpm, delete kernel-modules-public rpm.
More details:
--story=1020422414120102612
--bug=1020426283131556911
Signed-off-by: Jianping Liu <frankjpliu@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Yongliang Gao <leonylgao@tencent.com>
Currently, uname -r outputs 5.4.241-24-0017.xx, rpm package
is kernel-5.4.241-24.0017.xx, which is not match, fix this
by changing uname outputs to 5.4.241-24.0017.xx.
Signed-off-by: caelli <caelli@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: yuehongwu <yuehongwu@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Jianping Liu <frankjpliu@tencent.com>
commit 222d84a0de0d2dbd75b2c73f469d74868955f3b5 openeuler.
--------------------------------
The sched_domain_shared structure is only used as pointer, and other
drivers don't use it directly.
Signed-off-by: Xue Sinian <tangyuan911@yeah.net>
mainline inclusion
from mainline-v6.0-rc1
commit 70fb5ccf2e upstream.
--------------------------------
[Problem Statement]
select_idle_cpu() might spend too much time searching for an idle CPU,
when the system is overloaded.
The following histogram is the time spent in select_idle_cpu(),
when running 224 instances of netperf on a system with 112 CPUs
per LLC domain:
@usecs:
[0] 533 | |
[1] 5495 | |
[2, 4) 12008 | |
[4, 8) 239252 | |
[8, 16) 4041924 |@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ |
[16, 32) 12357398 |@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ |
[32, 64) 14820255 |@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@|
[64, 128) 13047682 |@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ |
[128, 256) 8235013 |@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ |
[256, 512) 4507667 |@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ |
[512, 1K) 2600472 |@@@@@@@@@ |
[1K, 2K) 927912 |@@@ |
[2K, 4K) 218720 | |
[4K, 8K) 98161 | |
[8K, 16K) 37722 | |
[16K, 32K) 6715 | |
[32K, 64K) 477 | |
[64K, 128K) 7 | |
netperf latency usecs:
=======
case load Lat_99th std%
TCP_RR thread-224 257.39 ( 0.21)
The time spent in select_idle_cpu() is visible to netperf and might have a negative
impact.
[Symptom analysis]
The patch [1] from Mel Gorman has been applied to track the efficiency
of select_idle_sibling. Copy the indicators here:
SIS Search Efficiency(se_eff%):
A ratio expressed as a percentage of runqueues scanned versus
idle CPUs found. A 100% efficiency indicates that the target,
prev or recent CPU of a task was idle at wakeup. The lower the
efficiency, the more runqueues were scanned before an idle CPU
was found.
SIS Domain Search Efficiency(dom_eff%):
Similar, except only for the slower SIS
patch.
SIS Fast Success Rate(fast_rate%):
Percentage of SIS that used target, prev or
recent CPUs.
SIS Success rate(success_rate%):
Percentage of scans that found an idle CPU.
The test is based on Aubrey's schedtests tool, including netperf, hackbench,
schbench and tbench.
Test on vanilla kernel:
schedstat_parse.py -f netperf_vanilla.log
case load se_eff% dom_eff% fast_rate% success_rate%
TCP_RR 28 threads 99.978 18.535 99.995 100.000
TCP_RR 56 threads 99.397 5.671 99.964 100.000
TCP_RR 84 threads 21.721 6.818 73.632 100.000
TCP_RR 112 threads 12.500 5.533 59.000 100.000
TCP_RR 140 threads 8.524 4.535 49.020 100.000
TCP_RR 168 threads 6.438 3.945 40.309 99.999
TCP_RR 196 threads 5.397 3.718 32.320 99.982
TCP_RR 224 threads 4.874 3.661 25.775 99.767
UDP_RR 28 threads 99.988 17.704 99.997 100.000
UDP_RR 56 threads 99.528 5.977 99.970 100.000
UDP_RR 84 threads 24.219 6.992 76.479 100.000
UDP_RR 112 threads 13.907 5.706 62.538 100.000
UDP_RR 140 threads 9.408 4.699 52.519 100.000
UDP_RR 168 threads 7.095 4.077 44.352 100.000
UDP_RR 196 threads 5.757 3.775 35.764 99.991
UDP_RR 224 threads 5.124 3.704 28.748 99.860
schedstat_parse.py -f schbench_vanilla.log
(each group has 28 tasks)
case load se_eff% dom_eff% fast_rate% success_rate%
normal 1 mthread 99.152 6.400 99.941 100.000
normal 2 mthreads 97.844 4.003 99.908 100.000
normal 3 mthreads 96.395 2.118 99.917 99.998
normal 4 mthreads 55.288 1.451 98.615 99.804
normal 5 mthreads 7.004 1.870 45.597 61.036
normal 6 mthreads 3.354 1.346 20.777 34.230
normal 7 mthreads 2.183 1.028 11.257 21.055
normal 8 mthreads 1.653 0.825 7.849 15.549
schedstat_parse.py -f hackbench_vanilla.log
(each group has 28 tasks)
case load se_eff% dom_eff% fast_rate% success_rate%
process-pipe 1 group 99.991 7.692 99.999 100.000
process-pipe 2 groups 99.934 4.615 99.997 100.000
process-pipe 3 groups 99.597 3.198 99.987 100.000
process-pipe 4 groups 98.378 2.464 99.958 100.000
process-pipe 5 groups 27.474 3.653 89.811 99.800
process-pipe 6 groups 20.201 4.098 82.763 99.570
process-pipe 7 groups 16.423 4.156 77.398 99.316
process-pipe 8 groups 13.165 3.920 72.232 98.828
process-sockets 1 group 99.977 5.882 99.999 100.000
process-sockets 2 groups 99.927 5.505 99.996 100.000
process-sockets 3 groups 99.397 3.250 99.980 100.000
process-sockets 4 groups 79.680 4.258 98.864 99.998
process-sockets 5 groups 7.673 2.503 63.659 92.115
process-sockets 6 groups 4.642 1.584 58.946 88.048
process-sockets 7 groups 3.493 1.379 49.816 81.164
process-sockets 8 groups 3.015 1.407 40.845 75.500
threads-pipe 1 group 99.997 0.000 100.000 100.000
threads-pipe 2 groups 99.894 2.932 99.997 100.000
threads-pipe 3 groups 99.611 4.117 99.983 100.000
threads-pipe 4 groups 97.703 2.624 99.937 100.000
threads-pipe 5 groups 22.919 3.623 87.150 99.764
threads-pipe 6 groups 18.016 4.038 80.491 99.557
threads-pipe 7 groups 14.663 3.991 75.239 99.247
threads-pipe 8 groups 12.242 3.808 70.651 98.644
threads-sockets 1 group 99.990 6.667 99.999 100.000
threads-sockets 2 groups 99.940 5.114 99.997 100.000
threads-sockets 3 groups 99.469 4.115 99.977 100.000
threads-sockets 4 groups 87.528 4.038 99.400 100.000
threads-sockets 5 groups 6.942 2.398 59.244 88.337
threads-sockets 6 groups 4.359 1.954 49.448 87.860
threads-sockets 7 groups 2.845 1.345 41.198 77.102
threads-sockets 8 groups 2.871 1.404 38.512 74.312
schedstat_parse.py -f tbench_vanilla.log
case load se_eff% dom_eff% fast_rate% success_rate%
loopback 28 threads 99.976 18.369 99.995 100.000
loopback 56 threads 99.222 7.799 99.934 100.000
loopback 84 threads 19.723 6.819 70.215 100.000
loopback 112 threads 11.283 5.371 55.371 99.999
loopback 140 threads 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
loopback 168 threads 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
loopback 196 threads 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
loopback 224 threads 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
According to the test above, if the system becomes busy, the
SIS Search Efficiency(se_eff%) drops significantly. Although some
benchmarks would finally find an idle CPU(success_rate% = 100%), it is
doubtful whether it is worth it to search the whole LLC domain.
[Proposal]
It would be ideal to have a crystal ball to answer this question:
How many CPUs must a wakeup path walk down, before it can find an idle
CPU? Many potential metrics could be used to predict the number.
One candidate is the sum of util_avg in this LLC domain. The benefit
of choosing util_avg is that it is a metric of accumulated historic
activity, which seems to be smoother than instantaneous metrics
(such as rq->nr_running). Besides, choosing the sum of util_avg
would help predict the load of the LLC domain more precisely, because
SIS_PROP uses one CPU's idle time to estimate the total LLC domain idle
time.
In summary, the lower the util_avg is, the more select_idle_cpu()
should scan for idle CPU, and vice versa. When the sum of util_avg
in this LLC domain hits 85% or above, the scan stops. The reason to
choose 85% as the threshold is that this is the imbalance_pct(117)
when a LLC sched group is overloaded.
Introduce the quadratic function:
y = SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE - p * x^2
and y'= y / SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE
x is the ratio of sum_util compared to the CPU capacity:
x = sum_util / (llc_weight * SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE)
y' is the ratio of CPUs to be scanned in the LLC domain,
and the number of CPUs to scan is calculated by:
nr_scan = llc_weight * y'
Choosing quadratic function is because:
[1] Compared to the linear function, it scans more aggressively when the
sum_util is low.
[2] Compared to the exponential function, it is easier to calculate.
[3] It seems that there is no accurate mapping between the sum of util_avg
and the number of CPUs to be scanned. Use heuristic scan for now.
For a platform with 112 CPUs per LLC, the number of CPUs to scan is:
sum_util% 0 5 15 25 35 45 55 65 75 85 86 ...
scan_nr 112 111 108 102 93 81 65 47 25 1 0 ...
For a platform with 16 CPUs per LLC, the number of CPUs to scan is:
sum_util% 0 5 15 25 35 45 55 65 75 85 86 ...
scan_nr 16 15 15 14 13 11 9 6 3 0 0 ...
Furthermore, to minimize the overhead of calculating the metrics in
select_idle_cpu(), borrow the statistics from periodic load balance.
As mentioned by Abel, on a platform with 112 CPUs per LLC, the
sum_util calculated by periodic load balance after 112 ms would
decay to about 0.5 * 0.5 * 0.5 * 0.7 = 8.75%, thus bringing a delay
in reflecting the latest utilization. But it is a trade-off.
Checking the util_avg in newidle load balance would be more frequent,
but it brings overhead - multiple CPUs write/read the per-LLC shared
variable and introduces cache contention. Tim also mentioned that,
it is allowed to be non-optimal in terms of scheduling for the
short-term variations, but if there is a long-term trend in the load
behavior, the scheduler can adjust for that.
When SIS_UTIL is enabled, the select_idle_cpu() uses the nr_scan
calculated by SIS_UTIL instead of the one from SIS_PROP. As Peter and
Mel suggested, SIS_UTIL should be enabled by default.
This patch is based on the util_avg, which is very sensitive to the
CPU frequency invariance. There is an issue that, when the max frequency
has been clamp, the util_avg would decay insanely fast when
the CPU is idle. Commit addca28512 ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Handle no_turbo
in frequency invariance") could be used to mitigate this symptom, by adjusting
the arch_max_freq_ratio when turbo is disabled. But this issue is still
not thoroughly fixed, because the current code is unaware of the user-specified
max CPU frequency.
[Test result]
netperf and tbench were launched with 25% 50% 75% 100% 125% 150%
175% 200% of CPU number respectively. Hackbench and schbench were launched
by 1, 2 ,4, 8 groups. Each test lasts for 100 seconds and repeats 3 times.
The following is the benchmark result comparison between
baseline:vanilla v5.19-rc1 and compare:patched kernel. Positive compare%
indicates better performance.
Each netperf test is a:
netperf -4 -H 127.0.1 -t TCP/UDP_RR -c -C -l 100
netperf.throughput
=======
case load baseline(std%) compare%( std%)
TCP_RR 28 threads 1.00 ( 0.34) -0.16 ( 0.40)
TCP_RR 56 threads 1.00 ( 0.19) -0.02 ( 0.20)
TCP_RR 84 threads 1.00 ( 0.39) -0.47 ( 0.40)
TCP_RR 112 threads 1.00 ( 0.21) -0.66 ( 0.22)
TCP_RR 140 threads 1.00 ( 0.19) -0.69 ( 0.19)
TCP_RR 168 threads 1.00 ( 0.18) -0.48 ( 0.18)
TCP_RR 196 threads 1.00 ( 0.16) +194.70 ( 16.43)
TCP_RR 224 threads 1.00 ( 0.16) +197.30 ( 7.85)
UDP_RR 28 threads 1.00 ( 0.37) +0.35 ( 0.33)
UDP_RR 56 threads 1.00 ( 11.18) -0.32 ( 0.21)
UDP_RR 84 threads 1.00 ( 1.46) -0.98 ( 0.32)
UDP_RR 112 threads 1.00 ( 28.85) -2.48 ( 19.61)
UDP_RR 140 threads 1.00 ( 0.70) -0.71 ( 14.04)
UDP_RR 168 threads 1.00 ( 14.33) -0.26 ( 11.16)
UDP_RR 196 threads 1.00 ( 12.92) +186.92 ( 20.93)
UDP_RR 224 threads 1.00 ( 11.74) +196.79 ( 18.62)
Take the 224 threads as an example, the SIS search metrics changes are
illustrated below:
vanilla patched
4544492 +237.5% 15338634 sched_debug.cpu.sis_domain_search.avg
38539 +39686.8% 15333634 sched_debug.cpu.sis_failed.avg
128300000 -87.9% 15551326 sched_debug.cpu.sis_scanned.avg
5842896 +162.7% 15347978 sched_debug.cpu.sis_search.avg
There is -87.9% less CPU scans after patched, which indicates lower overhead.
Besides, with this patch applied, there is -13% less rq lock contention
in perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp._raw_spin_lock.raw_spin_rq_lock_nested
.try_to_wake_up.default_wake_function.woken_wake_function.
This might help explain the performance improvement - Because this patch allows
the waking task to remain on the previous CPU, rather than grabbing other CPUs'
lock.
Each hackbench test is a:
hackbench -g $job --process/threads --pipe/sockets -l 1000000 -s 100
hackbench.throughput
=========
case load baseline(std%) compare%( std%)
process-pipe 1 group 1.00 ( 1.29) +0.57 ( 0.47)
process-pipe 2 groups 1.00 ( 0.27) +0.77 ( 0.81)
process-pipe 4 groups 1.00 ( 0.26) +1.17 ( 0.02)
process-pipe 8 groups 1.00 ( 0.15) -4.79 ( 0.02)
process-sockets 1 group 1.00 ( 0.63) -0.92 ( 0.13)
process-sockets 2 groups 1.00 ( 0.03) -0.83 ( 0.14)
process-sockets 4 groups 1.00 ( 0.40) +5.20 ( 0.26)
process-sockets 8 groups 1.00 ( 0.04) +3.52 ( 0.03)
threads-pipe 1 group 1.00 ( 1.28) +0.07 ( 0.14)
threads-pipe 2 groups 1.00 ( 0.22) -0.49 ( 0.74)
threads-pipe 4 groups 1.00 ( 0.05) +1.88 ( 0.13)
threads-pipe 8 groups 1.00 ( 0.09) -4.90 ( 0.06)
threads-sockets 1 group 1.00 ( 0.25) -0.70 ( 0.53)
threads-sockets 2 groups 1.00 ( 0.10) -0.63 ( 0.26)
threads-sockets 4 groups 1.00 ( 0.19) +11.92 ( 0.24)
threads-sockets 8 groups 1.00 ( 0.08) +4.31 ( 0.11)
Each tbench test is a:
tbench -t 100 $job 127.0.0.1
tbench.throughput
======
case load baseline(std%) compare%( std%)
loopback 28 threads 1.00 ( 0.06) -0.14 ( 0.09)
loopback 56 threads 1.00 ( 0.03) -0.04 ( 0.17)
loopback 84 threads 1.00 ( 0.05) +0.36 ( 0.13)
loopback 112 threads 1.00 ( 0.03) +0.51 ( 0.03)
loopback 140 threads 1.00 ( 0.02) -1.67 ( 0.19)
loopback 168 threads 1.00 ( 0.38) +1.27 ( 0.27)
loopback 196 threads 1.00 ( 0.11) +1.34 ( 0.17)
loopback 224 threads 1.00 ( 0.11) +1.67 ( 0.22)
Each schbench test is a:
schbench -m $job -t 28 -r 100 -s 30000 -c 30000
schbench.latency_90%_us
========
case load baseline(std%) compare%( std%)
normal 1 mthread 1.00 ( 31.22) -7.36 ( 20.25)*
normal 2 mthreads 1.00 ( 2.45) -0.48 ( 1.79)
normal 4 mthreads 1.00 ( 1.69) +0.45 ( 0.64)
normal 8 mthreads 1.00 ( 5.47) +9.81 ( 14.28)
*Consider the Standard Deviation, this -7.36% regression might not be valid.
Also, a OLTP workload with a commercial RDBMS has been tested, and there
is no significant change.
There were concerns that unbalanced tasks among CPUs would cause problems.
For example, suppose the LLC domain is composed of 8 CPUs, and 7 tasks are
bound to CPU0~CPU6, while CPU7 is idle:
CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3 CPU4 CPU5 CPU6 CPU7
util_avg 1024 1024 1024 1024 1024 1024 1024 0
Since the util_avg ratio is 87.5%( = 7/8 ), which is higher than 85%,
select_idle_cpu() will not scan, thus CPU7 is undetected during scan.
But according to Mel, it is unlikely the CPU7 will be idle all the time
because CPU7 could pull some tasks via CPU_NEWLY_IDLE.
lkp(kernel test robot) has reported a regression on stress-ng.sock on a
very busy system. According to the sched_debug statistics, it might be caused
by SIS_UTIL terminates the scan and chooses a previous CPU earlier, and this
might introduce more context switch, especially involuntary preemption, which
impacts a busy stress-ng. This regression has shown that, not all benchmarks
in every scenario benefit from idle CPU scan limit, and it needs further
investigation.
Besides, there is slight regression in hackbench's 16 groups case when the
LLC domain has 16 CPUs. Prateek mentioned that we should scan aggressively
in an LLC domain with 16 CPUs. Because the cost to search for an idle one
among 16 CPUs is negligible. The current patch aims to propose a generic
solution and only considers the util_avg. Something like the below could
be applied on top of the current patch to fulfill the requirement:
if (llc_weight <= 16)
nr_scan = nr_scan * 32 / llc_weight;
For LLC domain with 16 CPUs, the nr_scan will be expanded to 2 times large.
The smaller the CPU number this LLC domain has, the larger nr_scan will be
expanded. This needs further investigation.
There is also ongoing work[2] from Abel to filter out the busy CPUs during
wakeup, to further speed up the idle CPU scan. And it could be a following-up
optimization on top of this change.
Suggested-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>
Tested-by: Mohini Narkhede <mohini.narkhede@intel.com>
Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220612163428.849378-1-yu.c.chen@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Xue Sinian <tangyuan911@yeah.net>
commit aff649361671b432570e94c9056932f50dd6f101 openeuler.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In the past configuration, CONFIG_SCHED_CLUSTER was not set. Now, we need
to open the configuration.
Signed-off-by: Xue Sinian <tangyuan911@yeah.net>
commit 6afb257d6dd71085344e1472ea6e820b5dc0a8e3 openeuler.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Disable cluster scheduling by default since it's not a universal win.
User can choose to enable it through sysctl or at boot time according to
their scenario.
Signed-off-by: Xue Sinian <tangyuan911@yeah.net>
commit 8ce3e706b31409147f035c037055caa68e450ce5 openeuler.
Reference: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1638563225.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Allow run time configuration of the scheduler to use cluster
scheduling. Configuration can be changed via the sysctl variable
/proc/sys/kernel/sched_cluster. Setting it to 1 enable cluster
scheduling and setting it to 0 turns it off.
Cluster scheduling should benefit independent tasks by load balancing
them between clusters. It reaps the most benefit when the system's CPUs
are not fully busy, so we can spread the tasks out between the clusters to
reduce contention on cluster resource (e.g. L2 cache).
However, if the system is expected to operate close to full utilization,
the system admin could turn this feature off so as not to incur
extra load balancing overhead between the cluster domains.
Signed-off-by: Xue Sinian <tangyuan911@yeah.net>
commit 211b6fb7d5a8558a453475a08a697e651ca2d0cb openeuler.
Reference: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1638563225.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A system admin may not want to use cluster scheduling. Make changes to
allow cluster topology level to be skipped when building sched domains.
Create SDTL_SKIP bit on the sched_domain_topology_level flag so we can
check if the cluster topology level should be skipped when building
sched domains.
Signed-off-by: Xue Sinian <tangyuan911@yeah.net>
Reference: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220915073423.25535-1-yangyicong@huawei.com/
commit 0c3a4f986962ed94da6e26ba3ec0bdf700945894 openeuler.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For platforms having clusters like Kunpeng920, CPUs within the same cluster
have lower latency when synchronizing and accessing shared resources like
cache. Thus, this patch tries to find an idle cpu within the cluster of the
target CPU before scanning the whole LLC to gain lower latency.
Testing has been done on Kunpeng920 by pinning tasks to one numa and two
numa. On Kunpeng920, Each numa has 8 clusters and each cluster has 4 CPUs.
With this patch, We noticed enhancement on tbench within one numa or cross
two numa.
On numa 0:
6.0-rc1 patched
Hmean 1 351.20 ( 0.00%) 396.45 * 12.88%*
Hmean 2 700.43 ( 0.00%) 793.76 * 13.32%*
Hmean 4 1404.42 ( 0.00%) 1583.62 * 12.76%*
Hmean 8 2833.31 ( 0.00%) 3147.85 * 11.10%*
Hmean 16 5501.90 ( 0.00%) 6089.89 * 10.69%*
Hmean 32 10428.59 ( 0.00%) 10619.63 * 1.83%*
Hmean 64 8223.39 ( 0.00%) 8306.93 * 1.02%*
Hmean 128 7042.88 ( 0.00%) 7068.03 * 0.36%*
On numa 0-1:
6.0-rc1 patched
Hmean 1 363.06 ( 0.00%) 397.13 * 9.38%*
Hmean 2 721.68 ( 0.00%) 789.84 * 9.44%*
Hmean 4 1435.15 ( 0.00%) 1566.01 * 9.12%*
Hmean 8 2776.17 ( 0.00%) 3007.05 * 8.32%*
Hmean 16 5471.71 ( 0.00%) 6103.91 * 11.55%*
Hmean 32 10164.98 ( 0.00%) 11531.81 * 13.45%*
Hmean 64 17143.28 ( 0.00%) 20078.68 * 17.12%*
Hmean 128 14552.70 ( 0.00%) 15156.41 * 4.15%*
Hmean 256 12827.37 ( 0.00%) 13326.86 * 3.89%*
Note neither Kunpeng920 nor x86 Jacobsville supports SMT, so the SMT branch
in the code has not been tested but it supposed to work.
Signed-off-by: Xue Sinian <tangyuan911@yeah.net>
Reference: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220915073423.25535-1-yangyicong@huawei.com/
commit 53ad6bf76d9c646e3c8494ed82d90f304c50de1f openeuler.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Add per-cpu cluster domain info and cpus_share_lowest_cache() API.
This is the preparation for the optimization of select_idle_cpu()
on platforms with cluster scheduler level.
Signed-off-by: Xue Sinian <tangyuan911@yeah.net>
mainline inclusion
from mainline-v6.0-rc5
commit 5ac251c8a0 upstream.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Currently cpu_clustergroup_mask() will return CPU mask if cluster span more
or the same CPUs as cpu_coregroup_mask(). This will result topology borken
on non-Cluster SMT machines when building with CONFIG_SCHED_CLUSTER=y.
Test with:
qemu-system-aarch64 -enable-kvm -machine virt \
-net none \
-cpu host \
-bios ./QEMU_EFI.fd \
-m 2G \
-smp 48,sockets=2,cores=12,threads=2 \
-kernel $Image \
-initrd $Rootfs \
-nographic
-append "rdinit=init console=ttyAMA0 sched_verbose loglevel=8"
We'll get below error:
[ 3.084568] BUG: arch topology borken
[ 3.084570] the SMT domain not a subset of the CLS domain
Since cluster is a level higher than SMT, fix this by making cluster
spans at least SMT CPUs.
Fixes: bfcc439743 ("arch_topology: Limit span of cpu_clustergroup_mask()")
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220905122615.12946-1-yangyicong@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Xue Sinian <tangyuan911@yeah.net>
mainline inclusion
from mainline-v6.0-rc1
commit bfcc439743 upstream.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Currently the cluster identifier is not set on DT based platforms.
The reset or default value is -1 for all the CPUs. Once we assign the
cluster identifier values correctly, the cluster_sibling mask will be
populated and returned by cpu_clustergroup_mask() to contribute in the
creation of the CLS scheduling domain level, if SCHED_CLUSTER is
enabled.
To avoid topologies that will result in questionable or incorrect
scheduling domains, impose restrictions regarding the span of clusters,
as presented to scheduling domains building code: cluster_sibling should
not span more or the same CPUs as cpu_coregroup_mask().
This is needed in order to obtain a strict separation between the MC and
CLS levels, and maintain the same domains for existing platforms in
the presence of CONFIG_SCHED_CLUSTER, where the new cluster information
is redundant and irrelevant for the scheduler.
While previously the scheduling domain builder code would have removed MC
as redundant and kept CLS if SCHED_CLUSTER was enabled and the
cpu_coregroup_mask() and cpu_clustergroup_mask() spanned the same CPUs,
now CLS will be removed and MC kept.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220704101605.1318280-18-sudeep.holla@arm.com
Cc: Darren Hart <darren@os.amperecomputing.com>
Tested-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Acked-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Xue Sinian <tangyuan911@yeah.net>
mainline inclusion
from mainline-v5.19-rc1
commit 15f214f9bd upstream.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
default_topology[] uses cpu_clustergroup_mask() for the CLS level
(guarded by CONFIG_SCHED_CLUSTER) which is currently provided by x86
(arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c) and arm64 (drivers/base/arch_topology.c).
Fixes: 778c558f49 ("sched: Add cluster scheduler level in core and related Kconfig for ARM64")
Acked-by: Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220513093433.425163-1-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Xue Sinian <tangyuan911@yeah.net>
mainline inclusion
from mainline-v5.17-rc1
commit e795707703 upstream.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The cluster_id and cluster_cpus topology sysfs attributes have been
added with commit c5e22feffd ("topology: Represent clusters of CPUs
within a die").
They are currently only used for x86, arm64, and riscv (via generic
arch topology), however they are still present with bogus default
values for all other architectures. Instead of enforcing such new
sysfs attributes to all architectures, make them only optional visible
if an architecture opts in by defining both the topology_cluster_id
and topology_cluster_cpumask attributes.
This is similar to what was done when the book and drawer topology
levels were introduced: avoid useless and therefore confusing sysfs
attributes for architectures which cannot make use of them.
This should not break any existing applications, since this is a
new interface introduced with the v5.16 merge window.
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211129130309.3256168-3-hca@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Xue Sinian <tangyuan911@yeah.net>
mainline inclusion
from mainline-v5.16-rc1
commit c5e22feffd upstream.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Both ACPI and DT provide the ability to describe additional layers of
topology between that of individual cores and higher level constructs
such as the level at which the last level cache is shared.
In ACPI this can be represented in PPTT as a Processor Hierarchy
Node Structure [1] that is the parent of the CPU cores and in turn
has a parent Processor Hierarchy Nodes Structure representing
a higher level of topology.
For example Kunpeng 920 has 6 or 8 clusters in each NUMA node, and each
cluster has 4 cpus. All clusters share L3 cache data, but each cluster
has local L3 tag. On the other hand, each clusters will share some
internal system bus.
+-----------------------------------+ +---------+
| +------+ +------+ +--------------------------+ |
| | CPU0 | | cpu1 | | +-----------+ | |
| +------+ +------+ | | | | |
| +----+ L3 | | |
| +------+ +------+ cluster | | tag | | |
| | CPU2 | | CPU3 | | | | | |
| +------+ +------+ | +-----------+ | |
| | | |
+-----------------------------------+ | |
+-----------------------------------+ | |
| +------+ +------+ +--------------------------+ |
| | | | | | +-----------+ | |
| +------+ +------+ | | | | |
| | | L3 | | |
| +------+ +------+ +----+ tag | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| +------+ +------+ | +-----------+ | |
| | | |
+-----------------------------------+ | L3 |
| data |
+-----------------------------------+ | |
| +------+ +------+ | +-----------+ | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| +------+ +------+ +----+ L3 | | |
| | | tag | | |
| +------+ +------+ | | | | |
| | | | | | +-----------+ | |
| +------+ +------+ +--------------------------+ |
+-----------------------------------| | |
+-----------------------------------| | |
| +------+ +------+ +--------------------------+ |
| | | | | | +-----------+ | |
| +------+ +------+ | | | | |
| +----+ L3 | | |
| +------+ +------+ | | tag | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| +------+ +------+ | +-----------+ | |
| | | |
+-----------------------------------+ | |
+-----------------------------------+ | |
| +------+ +------+ +--------------------------+ |
| | | | | | +-----------+ | |
| +------+ +------+ | | | | |
| | | L3 | | |
| +------+ +------+ +---+ tag | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| +------+ +------+ | +-----------+ | |
| | | |
+-----------------------------------+ | |
+-----------------------------------+ | |
| +------+ +------+ +--------------------------+ |
| | | | | | +-----------+ | |
| +------+ +------+ | | | | |
| | | L3 | | |
| +------+ +------+ +--+ tag | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| +------+ +------+ | +-----------+ | |
| | +---------+
+-----------------------------------+
That means spreading tasks among clusters will bring more bandwidth
while packing tasks within one cluster will lead to smaller cache
synchronization latency. So both kernel and userspace will have
a chance to leverage this topology to deploy tasks accordingly to
achieve either smaller cache latency within one cluster or an even
distribution of load among clusters for higher throughput.
This patch exposes cluster topology to both kernel and userspace.
Libraried like hwloc will know cluster by cluster_cpus and related
sysfs attributes. PoC of HWLOC support at [2].
Note this patch only handle the ACPI case.
Special consideration is needed for SMT processors, where it is
necessary to move 2 levels up the hierarchy from the leaf nodes
(thus skipping the processor core level).
Note that arm64 / ACPI does not provide any means of identifying
a die level in the topology but that may be unrelate to the cluster
level.
[1] ACPI Specification 6.3 - section 5.2.29.1 processor hierarchy node
structure (Type 0)
[2] https://github.com/hisilicon/hwloc/tree/linux-cluster
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Tian Tao <tiantao6@hisilicon.com>
Signed-off-by: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210924085104.44806-2-21cnbao@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Xue Sinian <tangyuan911@yeah.net>
commit 4ee4ea443a upstream.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
In preparation of cleaning up the sd_degenerate*() functions, mark flags
used in sd_degenerate() with the new SDF_NEEDS_GROUPS flag. With this,
build a compile-time mask of those SD flags.
Note that sd_parent_degenerate() uses an extra flag in its mask,
SD_PREFER_SIBLING, which remains singled out for now.
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200817113003.20802-8-valentin.schneider@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Xue Sinian <tangyuan911@yeah.net>
commit b6e862f386 upstream.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are some expectations regarding how sched domain flags should be laid
out, but none of them are checked or asserted in
sched_domain_debug_one(). After staring at said flags for a while, I've
come to realize there's two repeating patterns:
- Shared with children: those flags are set from the base CPU domain
upwards. Any domain that has it set will have it set in its children. It
hints at "some property holds true / some behaviour is enabled until this
level".
- Shared with parents: those flags are set from the topmost domain
downwards. Any domain that has it set will have it set in its parents. It
hints at "some property isn't visible / some behaviour is disabled until
this level".
There are two outliers that (currently) do not map to either of these:
o SD_PREFER_SIBLING, which is cleared below levels with
SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY. The change was introduced by commit:
9c63e84db2 ("sched/core: Disable SD_PREFER_SIBLING on asymmetric CPU capacity domains")
as it could break misfit migration on some systems. In light of this, we
might want to change it back to make it fit one of the two categories and
fix the issue another way.
o SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY, which gets set on a single level and isn't
propagated up nor down. From a topology description point of view, it
really wants to be SDF_SHARED_PARENT; this will be rectified in a later
patch.
Tweak the sched_domain flag declaration to assign each flag an expected
layout, and include the rationale for each flag "meta type" assignment as a
comment. Consolidate the flag metadata into an array; the index of a flag's
metadata can easily be found with log2(flag), IOW __ffs(flag).
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200817113003.20802-5-valentin.schneider@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Xue Sinian <tangyuan911@yeah.net>
commit d54a9658a7 upstream.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To associate the SD flags with some metadata, we need some more structure
in the way they are declared.
Rather than shove that in a free-standing macro list, move the declaration
in a separate file that can be re-imported with different SD_FLAG
definitions. This is inspired by what is done with the syscall
table (see uapi/asm/unistd.h and sys_call_table).
The value assigned to a given SD flag now depends on the order it appears
in sd_flags.h. No change in functionality.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200817113003.20802-4-valentin.schneider@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Xue Sinian <tangyuan911@yeah.net>
commit cfe7ddcbd7 upstream.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This flag was introduced in 2014 by commit:
d77b3ed5c9 ("sched: Add a new SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN for sched_domain")
but AFAIA it was never leveraged by the scheduler. The closest thing I can
think of is EAS caring about frequency domains, and it does that by
leveraging performance domains.
Remove the flag. No change in functionality is expected.
Suggested-by: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200817113003.20802-2-valentin.schneider@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Xue Sinian <tangyuan911@yeah.net>
commit 36c5bdc438 upstream.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
That flag is set unconditionally in sd_init(), and no one checks for it
anymore. Remove it.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200415210512.805-5-valentin.schneider@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Xue Sinian <tangyuan911@yeah.net>
commit e669ac8ab9 upstream.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The SD_LOAD_BALANCE flag is set unconditionally for all domains in
sd_init(). By making the sched_domain->flags syctl interface read-only, we
have removed the last piece of code that could clear that flag - as such,
it will now be always present. Rather than to keep carrying it along, we
can work towards getting rid of it entirely.
cpusets don't need it because they can make CPUs be attached to the NULL
domain (e.g. cpuset with sched_load_balance=0), or to a partitioned
root_domain, i.e. a sched_domain hierarchy that doesn't span the entire
system (e.g. root cpuset with sched_load_balance=0 and sibling cpusets with
sched_load_balance=1).
isolcpus apply the same "trick": isolated CPUs are explicitly taken out of
the sched_domain rebuild (using housekeeping_cpumask()), so they get the
NULL domain treatment as well.
Remove the checks against SD_LOAD_BALANCE.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200415210512.805-4-valentin.schneider@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Xue Sinian <tangyuan911@yeah.net>
Pu Wen