DPCD 2009h "Synchronization latency in sink" has bits that tell us the
maximum number of frames sink can take to resynchronize to source timing
when exiting PSR. More importantly, as per eDP 1.4b, this is the "Minimum
number of frames following PSR exit that the Source device needs to
wait for PSR entry."
We currently use this value only to setup the number frames to wait before
PSR2 selective update. But, based on the above description it makes more
sense to use this to configure idle frames for both PSR1 and and PSR2. This
will ensure we wait the required number of frames before
activation whether it is PSR1 or PSR2.
The minimum number of idle frames remains 6, while allowing sink
synchronization latency and VBT to increase this value.
This also solves the flip-flop between sink and source frames that I
noticed on my Thinkpad X260 during PSR exit. This specific panel has a
value of 8h, which according to the spec means the "Source device must
wait for more than eight active frames after PSR exit before initiating PSR
entry. (In this case, should be provided by the panel supplier.)" VBT
however has a value of 0.
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Jose Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180525033047.7596-1-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
While touching the code around this, I noticed that absence of ALPM
capability does not stop us from enabling PSR2. But, the spec
unambiguously states that ALPM is required for PSR2 and so does this
commit that introduced this code
drm/i915/psr: enable ALPM for psr2
As per edp1.4 spec , alpm is required for psr2 operation as it's
used for all psr2 main link power down management and alpm enable
bit must be set for psr2 operation.
Cc: Jose Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tarun Vyas <tarun.vyas@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180511195145.3829-6-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
Noticed that we assume the best case of 0 latency when the DPCD read
fails, reasonable pessimism is safer.
eDP spec does say that if latency is greater than 8, the panel
supplier needs to provide it. I didn't see anything specific in the VBT
for this, so let's go with 8 frames as a fallback.
Cc: Jose Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180511195145.3829-5-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
By moving the check from psr_compute_config() to psr_init_dpcd(), we get
to set the dev_priv->psr.sink_support flag only when the panel is
capable of changing power state. An additional benefit is that the check
will be performed only at init time instead of every atomic_check.
This should change the psr_basic IGT failures on HSW to skips.
v2: Return early when SET_POWER_CAPABLE bit is 0 (Jose)
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106217
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106346
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180511195145.3829-2-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
Ville noticed that we are unncessarily reading DPCD's after knowing
panel did not support PSR. Looks like this check that was present
earlier got removed unintentionally, let's put it back.
While we do this, add the PSR version number in the debug print.
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tarun Vyas <tarun.vyas@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180511195145.3829-1-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
PSR hardware and hence the driver code for VLV and CHV deviates a lot from
their DDI counterparts. While the feature has been disabled for a long time
now, retaining support for these platforms is a maintenance burden. There
have been multiple refactoring commits to just keep the existing code for
these platforms in line with the rest. There are known issues that need to
be fixed to enable PSR on these platforms, and there is no PSR capable
platform in CI to ensure the code does not break again if we get around to
fixing the existing issues. On account of all these reasons, let's nuke
this code for now and bring it back if a need arises in the future.
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180511230059.19387-1-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
For psr block #9, the vbt description has moved to options [0-3] for
TP1,TP2,TP3 Wakeup time from decimal value without any change to vbt
structure. Since spec does not mention from which VBT version this
change was added to vbt.bsf file, we cannot depend on bdb->version check
to change for all the platforms.
There is RCR inplace for GOP team to provide the version number
to make generic change. Since Kabylake with bdb version 209 is having this
change, limiting this change to gen9_bc and version 209+ to unblock google.
Tested on skl(bdb version 203,without options) and
kabylake(bdb version 209,212) having new options.
bspec 20131
v2: (Jani and Rodrigo)
move the 165 version check to intel_bios.c
v3: Jani
Move the abstraction to intel_bios.
v4: Jani
Rename tp*_wakeup_time to have "us" suffix.
For values outside range[0-3],default to max 2500us.
Old decimal value was wake up time in multiples of 100us.
v5: Jani and Rodrigo
Handle option 2 in default condition.
Print oustide range value.
For negetive values default to 2500us.
v6: Jani
Handle default first and then fall through for case 2.
v7: Rodrigo
Apply this change for IS_GEN9_BC and vbt version > 209
v8: Puthik
Add new function vbt_psr_to_us.
v9: Jani
Change to v7 version as it's more readable.
DK
add comment /*fall through*/ after case2.
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Puthikorn Voravootivat <puthik@chromium.org>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Maulik V Vaghela <maulik.v.vaghela@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1526981243-2745-1-git-send-email-vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com
Driver features data block has a boolean flag for PSR, use this to decide
whether PSR should be enabled on a platform. The module parameter can
still be used to override this.
Note: The feature currently remains disabled by default for all platforms
irrespective of what VBT says.
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180509003524.3199-1-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
This was my bad, spec says that the name of this bit is
'Y-coordinate valid' but the values for it is:
0: Include Y-coordinate valid eDP1.4a
1: Do not include Y-coordinate valid eDP 1.4
So not setting it.
BSpec: 7713
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180425212334.21109-4-jose.souza@intel.com
This will be helpful to debug what hardware is actually tracking
and causing PSR to exit.
BSpec: 7721
v4:
- Using _MMIO_TRANS2() in PSR_EVENT
- Cleaning events before printing
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180425212334.21109-2-jose.souza@intel.com
Any write in any display register was causing HW to exit PSR,
masking it to allow more power savings. Writes to pipe related
registers will still cause HW to exit PSR.
This is already masked for PSR2.
It also do not break the Display WA #0884, writes to CURSURFLIVE
are still causing hardware to exit PSR. This was tested in CNL machine
by triggering a write to CURSURFLIVE when a debugfs was read by user.
Bspec: 7721 and 8042
v4: Checked that it do not breaks WA #0884 and added this information
to the commit message.
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180425212334.21109-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Timestamps are useful for IGT tests that trigger PSR exit and/or wait for
PSR entry.
v2: Removed seqlock (Ville)
Removed erroneous warning in irq loop (Chris)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jose Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180403212420.25007-4-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
Interrupts other than the one for AUX errors are required only for debug,
so unmask them via debugfs when the user requests debug.
User can make such a request with
echo 1 > <DEBUG_FS>/dri/0/i915_edp_psr_debug
There are no locks to serialize PSR debug enabling from
irq_postinstall() and debugfs for simplicity. As irq_postinstall() is
called only during module initialization/resume and IGT subtests
aren't expected to modify PSR debug at those times, we should be safe.
v2: Unroll loops (Ville)
Avoid resetting error mask bits.
v3: Unmask interrupts in postinstall() if debug was still enabled.
Avoid RMW (Ville)
v4: Avoid extra IMR write introduced in the previous version.(Jose)
Style changes, renames (Jose).
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jose Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180405013717.24254-1-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
Inside the psr work function, we want to wait for PSR to idle first and
wish to do so without blocking the normal modeset path, so we do so
without holding the PSR lock. However, we first have to find which pipe
PSR was enabled on, which requires chasing into the PSR struct and
requires locking to prevent intel_psr_disable() from concurrently
setting our pointer to NULL.
Fixes: 995d304774 ("drm/i915: VLV/CHV PSR Software timer mode")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.0+
Reviewed-by: Jose Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180405114915.29609-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
In the 2 eDP1.4a pannels tested set or not set bit have no effect
but is better set it and comply with specification.
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180328223046.16125-9-jose.souza@intel.com
This value do not change overtime so better cache it than
fetch it every PSR enable.
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180328223046.16125-8-jose.souza@intel.com
Sink can support our PSR2 requirements but userspace can request
a resolution that PSR2 hardware do not support, in this case it
was overwritten the PSR2 sink support.
Adding another flag here, this way if requested resolution changed
to a value that PSR2 hardware can handle, PSR2 can be enabled.
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180328223046.16125-6-jose.souza@intel.com
For Geminilake and Cannonlake+ the Y-coordinate support must be
enabled in PSR2_CTL too.
Spec: 7713 and 7720
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180328223046.16125-5-jose.souza@intel.com
Although i915 don't implement aux sync frame through tests was
findout that pannels can do selective update when the y-coordinate
is also included in SDP, that is why it is required to run PSR2 in
i915.
So moving to only one place the sink requirements that the actual
driver needs to enable PSR2.
Also intel_psr2_config_valid() is called every time the crtc config
is computed, wasting some time every time it was checking for
Y coordinate requirement.
This allow us to nuke y_cord_support and some of VSC setup code that
was handling a scenario that would never happen(PSR2 without Y
coordinate).
Also here renaming intel_dp_get_y_cord_status() to
intel_dp_get_y_coord_required() as it more accurate to the name and
function of bit according to eDP spec.
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180328223046.16125-4-jose.souza@intel.com
eDP spec states that aux frame is required to do PSR2 selective
update but i915 don't fully implement it. It sends the aux frame
sync messages but the value is always zero as the GTC is not enabled
in driver.
Through tests was findout that pannels can do selective update when
the y-coordinate is also included in SDP, that is why it is required
to run PSR2 in i915.
A dummy value is not useful at all to sink, so removing everything
related to aux frame sync, if GTC is enabled we can bring this back.
Cc: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180328223046.16125-3-jose.souza@intel.com
HSW and BDW have SRD_AUX_{CTL, STATUS} registers that the driver needs to
setup for the HW to use whenever exiting PSR. SKL+ hardware use hardcoded
values for the same and do not need any registers to be setup. So, use
drm_dp_dpcd_writeb() for a one-time write during PSR enable and setup the
PSR aux registers on HSW and BDW for later use by HW.
We also end up writing to reserved bits in SRD_AUX_CTL by reusing
intel_dp->get_aux_send_ctl() for HSW and BDW, fix this.
Since the AUX register setup is source side programming, move the call
to enable_source() from enable_sink().
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jose Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180313034646.3721-2-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
No functional change. But let's keep definitions clean
and cursor related register definitions together.
v2: Fix caps x no caps on same reg. Change name to match
original reg name. (by Ville).
Also fix name on code s/surlive/surflive and on subject
s/cur_surlife/cur surflive/.
Suggested-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180312210528.7905-1-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
So far we are using frontbuffer tracking for everything
and ignoring that PSR has a HW capable HW tracking for many
modern usages of GPU on Core platforms and newer Atom ones.
One reason for that is that we were trying to keep same
infrastructure in place for VLV/CHV than the rest of platforms.
But also because when this infrastructure was created
the front-buffer-tracking origin wasn't that good and stable
how it is today after Paulo reworked it to attend FBC cases.
However this PSR implementation without HW tracking died
on gen8LP. And newer platforms are starting to demand more HW
tracking specially with PSR2 cases in mind.
By disabling and re-enabling PSR totally every time we believe
someone is going to change the front buffer content we don't
allow PSR HW tracking to do this job and specially compromising
the whole idea of PSR2 case where the HW tracking detect only
the damaged area and do a partial screen update.
So, from now on, on the platforms that has hw_tracking let's
rely more on HW tracking.
This also is the case in used by other drivers and more validated
by SV teams. So I hope that this will lead us to less misterious
bugs.
v2: Only do this for platform that actually has hw tracking.
v3 from DK
Do this only for flips, small gradual changes are better.
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jose Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180307033420.3086-3-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
WA 0884:bxt:all,cnl:*:A - "When FBC is enabled with eDP PSR,
the CPU host modify writes may not get updated on the Display
as expected.
WA: Write 0x00000000 to CUR_SURFLIVE_A with every CPU
host modify write to trigger PSR exit."
We can also find on spec other cases where they describe
bogus writes to cursor registers to force PSR exit with
HW tracking. And it was confirmed by HW engineers that
this Wa can be safely applied for any frontbuffer activity.
So let's use this more and more here instead of forcibly
disable and re-enable PSR everytime that we have a simple
reliable flush case.
Other commits improve the fbcon/fbdev use a lot, but this
approach is the only when where we can get a fully reliable
console with no slowness or missed frames and PSR still
enabled and active.
v2: - Rebase on drm-tip
- (DK) Add a comment to explain that WA
tells about writing 0 to CUR_SURFLIVE_A but we write to
CUR_SURFLIVE(pipe).
v3: Wa doesn't work on PSR2.
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180309005218.26772-1-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
In fact, apply the Cannonlake resolution check for all >= Gen-10 platforms
to be safe.
v3: Update GLK too. (Ville)
Longer variable names.
if-else in place of ternary operator.
v2: Use local variables for resolution limits and print them (Ville)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Elio Martinez Monroy <elio.martinez.monroy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180306203355.29292-1-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
We can still use PSR1 when PSR2 conditions are not met.
So, let's split the check in a way that we make sure has_psr
gets set independently of PSR2 criteria.
v2: Duh! Handle proper return to avoid breaking PSR2.
v3: (DK):
- better name for psr2 conditions check function
- Don't remove FIXME block and psr2.support check.
- Add a debug message to show us what PSR or PSR2 is
getting enabled now we have ways to enabled PSR on
PSR2 panels.
- s/PSR2 disabled/PSR2 not enabled
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180227212913.14083-2-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
According to spec:
"PSR2 is supported for pipe active sizes up to
3640 pixels wide and 2304 lines tall."
BSpec: 7713
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180227212913.14083-1-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
eDP spec says - "If PSR/PSR2 is supported, the SET_POWER_CAPABLE bit in the
EDP_GENERAL_CAPABILITY_1 register (DPCD Address 00701h, bit d7) must be set
to 1."
Reject PSR on panels without this cap bit set as such panels cannot be
controlled via SET_POWER & SET_DP_PWR_VOLTAGE register and the DP source
needs to be able to do that for PSR.
Thanks to Nathan for debugging this.
Panel cap checks like this can be done just once, let's fix this
when PSR dpcd init movement lands.
Cc: Nathan D Ciobanu <nathan.d.ciobanu@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Tested-by: Nathan Ciobanu <nathan.d.ciobanu@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180227032723.15474-1-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
The cap check should be specifically for bit 0 instead of any bit.
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Fixes: 474d1ec4a3 ("drm/i915/skl: Enabling PSR2 SU with frame sync")
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180223221520.18464-4-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
intel_edp_init_dpcd() is cluttered with PSR specific DPCD checks and
intel_dp.c is huge.
No functional change intended.
v2: Rebased.
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: David Weinehall <david.weinehall@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180223221520.18464-3-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
PSR on CNL requires AUX IO wells to be kept on and the existing AUX domain
for AUX-A enables DC_OFF well too. This is not required, so add a new
AUX_IO_A domain for AUX-A to allow DC states to remain enabled. Other AUX
channels re-use the existing AUX domains.
v4: Reword comment (Rodrigo and Ville)
Rename _get and _put functions to include aux_io substring(Rodrigo)
Remove unnecessary diff that got included.
v3: Extract aux domain selection into a function (Ville)
v2: Add AUX IO domain only for AUX-A
Rebased on top of Ville's AUX series.
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Suggested-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180223221520.18464-1-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
DPCD read for the eDP is complete by the time intel_psr_init() is
called, which means we can avoid initializing PSR structures and state
if there is no sink support.
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180103213824.1405-3-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
The global variable dev_priv->psr.sink_support is set if an eDP sink
supports PSR. Use this instead of redoing the check with is_edp_psr().
Combine source and sink support checks into a macro that can be used to
return early from psr_{invalidate, single_frame_update, flush}.
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180103213824.1405-2-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
This flag has become redundant since
commit 4d90f2d507 ("drm/i915: Start tracking PSR state in crtc state")
It is set at the same place as psr.enabled, which is also exposed via
debugfs.
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180103213824.1405-1-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
Commit 77affa3172 ("drm/i915/psr: Fix compiler warnings for
hsw_psr_disable()") swapped status and control registers while fixing
indentation. The _ctl at the end of the status register name must have to
led to this.
Fixes: 77affa3172 ("drm/i915/psr: Fix compiler warnings for hsw_psr_disable()")
References: https://www.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/people/matt.davis/cmabridge/
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171220043520.2599-1-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Now that the infoframe hooks are part of the intel_dig_port, we can use
the normal .write_infoframe() hook to update the VSC SDP. We do need to
deal with the size difference between the VSC DIP and the others though.
Another minor snag is that the compiler will complain to use if we keep
using enum hdmi_infoframe_type type and passing in the DP define instead,
so et's just change to unsigned int all over for the inforframe type.
v2: Rebase due to other PSR changes
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171013194051.19286-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Add the minimal amount of PSR tracking into the crtc state. This allows
precomputing the possibility of using PSR correctly, and it means we can
safely call the psr enable/disable functions for any DP endcoder.
As a nice bonus we get rid of some more crtc->config usage, which we
want to kill off eventually.
v2: Fix 'goto unlock' fail in intel_psr_enable() (Jani)
Check intel_dp_is_edp() in is_edp_psr() (Jani)
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171012130201.21318-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Our global struct with params is named exactly the same way
as new preferred name for the drm_i915_private function parameter.
To avoid such name reuse lets use different name for the global.
v5: pure rename
v6: fix
Credits-to: Coccinelle
@@
identifier n;
@@
(
- i915.n
+ i915_modparams.n
)
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170919193846.38060-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
Some platforms do not support PSR and DRRS simultaneously.
Visual artifacts and flickering were reported on BDW HP Spectre
x360 Convertible. Deferring to PSR when both PSR and DRRS are
supported by the panel.
V2: Minor code-style changes suggested by Rodrigo
V3: Add a WARN_ON during PSR init suggested by Dhinakaran
Correct debug message,title suggested by Jani
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101111
Cc: Nicholas Stommel <nicholas.stommel@gmail.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Clinton Taylor <clinton.a.taylor@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170914181641.24393-1-radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com
DK had pointed out a comment there was hard to understand, so I
tried to read back again and I couldn't understand that as well.
So let me re-phrase that in a way that anyone can understand
later, even myself.
Also fixed the comment block style.
v2: Accept DK's suggestion on PSR_state 2 and PSR_state 3 named
as spec.
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170912183059.5086-1-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
Continue on VLV PSR split with vfunc, let's also create one
for enabling source.
Also since we are touching *_enable_source functions let's
fix a comment with wrong name for vlv's one.
v2: Fix typo on commit message (DK).
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170907230041.22978-12-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
Continue on VLV PSR split with vfunc, let's also create
one for setting up VSC.
v2: Rebased on top of commit d2419ffc10 ("drm/i915: Plumb
crtc_state to PSR enable/disable")
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170907230041.22978-10-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
Let's move the activation calls together after enable is done.
No real functional change should be expected here. Just an attempt
to get it clear when we are really activating PSR after enabling it.
v2: Add braces on if/else because commit message there is too long
as suggested by Jani.
v3: Rebased on top of commit d2419ffc10 ("drm/i915: Plumb
crtc_state to PSR enable/disable")
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170907230041.22978-9-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
No functional change is expected here since at this point
PSR is not allowed to go to any active state. In other
words, not really enabled.
However let's do in a separated patch so it gets clear
on what is change and specially it can helps on bisect
case if we figure something has caused changes in behaviour.
But this needs to be done before we make the vfunc to
enable source to be in parity with VLV implementation.
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170907230041.22978-8-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
This sequence is part of enable source anyways, but they
only need to be executed once and not on every activation,
So let's re-create hsw_enable_source.
v2: Avoid changing order here to avoid changing behaviour
as suggested by Jani.
v3: Rebased on top of commit d2419ffc10 ("drm/i915: Plumb
crtc_state to PSR enable/disable")
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170907230041.22978-7-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
VSC package is decided per eDP spec for psr1 or psr2,
and not per platform, so let's unify it and kill "skl"
func.
v2: Rebased on top of commit d2419ffc10 ("drm/i915: Plumb
crtc_state to PSR enable/disable")
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170907230041.22978-6-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
On HSW+ the real activate of PSR is decided by the source
after certain amount of configured idle frames.
However for the driver perspective where we track psr.active
variable this function here is the actual activate one. So
let's rename it before moving to vfunc with that.
v2: Fix typo on commit message (DK).
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170907230041.22978-4-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
VLV/CHV has a total different PSR implementation than the
other platforms, so let's start moving that to vfuncs.
Let's start with disable_src one.
v2: Rebased on top of commit d2419ffc10 ("drm/i915: Plumb
crtc_state to PSR enable/disable")
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170907230041.22978-3-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
We really don't want to setup vfuncs and lock mutexes on
platforms that has no support to PSR.
Also we know what platforms they are so let's do it quietly.
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170907230041.22978-2-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
The PSR enable/disable need to know things about the crtc state, so
plumb it through. This will become even more important when we start
to reuse the generic infoframe code for the VSC DIP programming as the
infoframe code wants the crtc state as well.
v2: Fix kernel docs
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170818134958.15502-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Bit 29 of SRD_CTL needs to have its value preserved according to the
B-Spec, so right before we write out the register we go ahead and read
the register and preserve the value of that bit before we write out
the configured register value.
v2: Spaces => tabs, minor name change, and commit message wording (Rodrigo)
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1502229094-13392-1-git-send-email-jim.bride@linux.intel.com
psr1 is also disabled for panel resolution greater than 32X20.
Added psr2 check to disable only for psr2 panels having resolution
greater than 32X20.
issue was introduced by
commit-id : "acf45d11050abd751dcec986ab121cb2367dcbba"
commit message: "PSR2 is restricted to work with panel resolutions
upto 3200x2000, move the check to intel_psr_match_conditions and fully
block psr."
v2: (Rodrigo)
Add previous commit details which introduced the issue
Fixes: acf45d1105 ("drm/i915/psr: disable psr2 for resolution greater than 32X20")
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Yaroslav Shabalin <yaroslav.shabalin@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Yaroslav Shabalin <yaroslav.shabalin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: vathsala nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/49935bdff896ee3140bed471012b9f9110a863a4.1495729964.git.vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com
Psr2 is enabled only for y cordinate panels.Once GTC (global time code)
is implemented,this restriction is removed so that psr2
can work on panels without y cordinate support.
v2: (Rodrigo)
- Move the check to intel_psr_match_conditions
v3: (Rodrigo)
- add return false
v4: rebase
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Patil Deepti <deepti.patil@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1484173710-3138-1-git-send-email-vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com
Program EDP_PSR_DEBUG_CTL (PSR_MASK) to enable system
to go to deep sleep while in psr2.PSR2_STATUS bit 31:28
should report value 8 , if system enters deep sleep state.
Also, EDP_FRAMES_BEFORE_SU_ENTRY is set 1 , if not set,
flickering is observed on psr2 panel.
v2: (Ilia Mirkin)
- Remove duplicate bit definition 25:27
v3: rebase
v4: rebase
v5: rebase
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Patil Deepti <deepti.patil@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1484267484-21843-1-git-send-email-vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com
As per bpsec, CHICKEN_TRANS_EDP bit 12 ,15 must be programmed in
psr2 enable sequence.
bit 12 : Program Transcoder EDP VSC DIP header with a valid setting for
PSR2 and Set CHICKEN_TRANS_EDP(0x420cc) bit 12 for programmable
header packet.
bit 15 : Set CHICKEN_TRANS_EDP(0x420cc) bit 15 if Y coordinate is supported
v2: (Rodrigo)
- move CHICKEN_TRANS_EDP bit set logic right after setup_vsc
v3:(Rodrigo)
- initialize chicken_trans to CHICKEN_TRANS_BIT12 instead of 0
v4:(chris wilson)
- use BIT(12), remove CHICKEN_TRANS_BIT12
- remove unnecessary comments
- update commit message
v5:
- rename bit 12 PSR2_VSC_ENABLE_PROG_HEADER
- rename bit 15 PSR2_ADD_VERTICAL_LINE_COUNT
v6:(Rodrigo)
- remove TRANS_EDP=3, use cpu_transcoder
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: vathsala nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Patil Deepti <deepti.patil@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1484247691-20930-1-git-send-email-vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com
As per edp1.4 spec , alpm is required for psr2 operation as it's
used for all psr2 main link power down management and alpm enable
bit must be set for psr2 operation.
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: vathsala nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Patil Deepti <deepti.patil@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1483356663-32668-6-git-send-email-vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com
Screen freeze observed if AUX_FRAME_SYNC is not disabled
on psr2 exit.AUX_FRAME_SYNC needed for psr2 is enabled during
psr2 entry. It must be disabled on psr2 exit.
v2: rebase
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Patil Deepti <deepti.patil@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1484147673-2044-1-git-send-email-vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com
Psr1 and psr2 are mutually exclusive,ie when psr2 is enabled,
psr1 should be disabled.When psr2 is exited , bit 31 of reg
PSR2_CTL must be set to 0 but currently bit 31 of SRD_CTL
(psr1 control register)is set to 0.
Also ,PSR2_IDLE state is looked up from SRD_STATUS(psr1 register)
instead of PSR2_STATUS register, which has wrong data, resulting
in blankscreen.
hsw_enable_source is split into hsw_enable_source_psr1 and
hsw_enable_source_psr2 for easier code review and maintenance,
as suggested by rodrigo and jim.
v2: (Rodrigo)
- Rename hsw_enable_source_psr* to intel_enable_source_psr*
v3: (Rodrigo)
- In hsw_psr_disable ,
1) for psr active case, handle psr2 followed by psr1.
2) psr inactive case, handle psr2 followed by psr1
v4:(Rodrigo)
- move psr2 restriction(32X20) to match_conditions function
returning false and fully blocking PSR to a new patch before
this one.
v5: in source_psr2, removed val = EDP_PSR_ENABLE
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Patil Deepti <deepti.patil@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1484244059-9201-1-git-send-email-vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com
In commit c39055b072 ("drm/i915: Pass dev_priv to
intel_setup_outputs()"), I forgot to update the kerneldoc for
intel_psr_init() init, leading to warnings when building the
documentation:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c:822: warning: No description found for parameter 'dev_priv'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c:822: warning: Excess function parameter 'dev' description in 'intel_psr_init'
Fixes: c39055b072 ("drm/i915: Pass dev_priv to intel_setup_outputs()")
Cc: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Signed-off-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1480420127-11382-1-git-send-email-ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com
Pass dev_priv to intel_setup_outputs() and functions called by it, since
those are all intel i915 specific functions. Also, in the majority of
the functions dev_priv is used more often than dev. In the rare cases
where there are a few calls back into drm core, a local dev variable was
added.
v2: Don't convert dev to &dev_priv->drm in intel_dsi_init. (Ville)
Signed-off-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1479910904-11005-1-git-send-email-ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com
A bunch of source files with just a few instances of the
incorrect INTEL_INFO use.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
A small selection of macros which can only accept dev_priv from
now on and a resulting trickle of fixups.
v2: Keep original order. (Ville Syrjala)
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: David Weinehall <david.weinehall@linux.intel.com>
Saves 864 bytes of .rodata strings and ~100 of .text.
v2: Add parantheses around dev_priv. (Ville Syrjala)
v3: Rebase.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: David Weinehall <david.weinehall@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
This saves 3248 bytes of .rodata strings.
v2: Add parantheses around dev_priv. (Ville Syrjala)
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: David Weinehall <david.weinehall@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
This reverts
commit 1c80c25fb6
Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Date: Wed May 18 18:47:12 2016 +0200
drm/i915/psr: Make idle_frames sensible again
There are panels that needs 4 idle frames before entering PSR,
but VBT is unproperly set.
Also lately it was identified that idle frame count calculated at HW
can be off by 1, what makes the minimum of 2, at least.
Without the current vbt+1 we are with the risk of having HW calculating
0 idle frames and entering PSR when it shouldn't. Regardless the lack
of link training.
[Jani: there is some disagreement on the explanation, but the commit
regresses so revert it is.]
References: http://marc.info/?i=20160904191153.GA2328@light.dominikbrodowski.net
Cc: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Fixes: 1c80c25fb6 ("drm/i915/psr: Make idle_frames sensible again")
Cc: drm-intel-fixes@lists.freedesktop.org # v4.8-rc1+
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1473295351-8766-1-git-send-email-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
- refactor ddi buffer programming a bit (Ville)
- large-scale renaming to untangle naming in the gem code (Chris)
- rework vma/active tracking for accurately reaping idle mappings of shared
objects (Chris)
- misc dp sst/mst probing corner case fixes (Ville)
- tons of cleanup&tunings all around in gem
- lockless (rcu-protected) request lookup, plus use it everywhere for
non(b)locking waits (Chris)
- pipe crc debugfs fixes (Rodrigo)
- random fixes all over
* tag 'drm-intel-next-2016-08-08' of git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel: (222 commits)
drm/i915: Update DRIVER_DATE to 20160808
drm/i915: fix aliasing_ppgtt leak
drm/i915: Update comment before i915_spin_request
drm/i915: Use drm official vblank_no_hw_counter callback.
drm/i915: Fix copy_to_user usage for pipe_crc
Revert "drm/i915: Track active streams also for DP SST"
drm/i915: fix WaInsertDummyPushConstPs
drm/i915: Assert that the request hasn't been retired
drm/i915: Repack fence tiling mode and stride into a single integer
drm/i915: Document and reject invalid tiling modes
drm/i915: Remove locking for get_tiling
drm/i915: Remove pinned check from madvise ioctl
drm/i915: Reduce locking inside swfinish ioctl
drm/i915: Remove (struct_mutex) locking for busy-ioctl
drm/i915: Remove (struct_mutex) locking for wait-ioctl
drm/i915: Do a nonblocking wait first in pread/pwrite
drm/i915: Remove unused no-shrinker-steal
drm/i915: Tidy generation of the GTT mmap offset
drm/i915/shrinker: Wait before acquiring struct_mutex under oom
drm/i915: Simplify do_idling() (Ironlake vt-d w/a)
...
Rather than a mismash of struct drm_device *dev and struct
drm_i915_private *dev_priv being used freely within a function, be
consistent and only pass along dev_priv.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470324762-2545-22-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Bspec says:
"Restriction : SRD must not be enabled when the PSR Setup time from DPCD
00071h is greater than the time for vertical blank minus one line."
Let's check for that and disallow PSR if we exceed the limit.
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Since we now subclass struct drm_device, we can save pointer dances by
noting the equivalence of struct drm_device and struct drm_i915_private,
i.e. by using to_i915().
text data bss dec hex filename
1073824 4562 416 1078802 107612 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1068976 4562 416 1073954 106322 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
Created by the coccinelle script:
@@
expression E;
identifier p;
@@
- struct drm_i915_private *p = E->dev_private;
+ struct drm_i915_private *p = to_i915(E);
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467628477-25379-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can
efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we
avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):
text data bss dec hex filename
1078551 4557 416 1083524 108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1070775 4557 416 1075748 106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-45-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can
efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we
avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):
text data bss dec hex filename
1078551 4557 416 1083524 108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1070775 4557 416 1075748 106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-44-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can
efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we
avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):
text data bss dec hex filename
1078551 4557 416 1083524 108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1070775 4557 416 1075748 106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-43-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
I just wanted to get rid of the rmw cycle for gen9, but this also
fixes some bugs we haven't carried over, like using recommended
precharge and timeout values.
Also I noticed that we don't set the fastwake sync length on skl, and
that's used by PSR2 selective updates. Fix that.
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal@intel.com>
Cc: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Cc: "Pandiyan, Dhinakaran" <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1463590036-17824-6-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
On bdw/hsw we have a separate psr dp aux registers to set up, but on
bdw it's shared with the main dp aux thing. Which means any subsequent
dp aux transaction will trample over it, and hence must be done
beforehand.
Also this means we can't do any dp aux transactions while PSR is
active, or at least we must restore the old state.
Probably need a psr disable/enable pair around dp aux transactions in
general.
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal@intel.com>
Cc: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Cc: "Pandiyan, Dhinakaran" <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1463590036-17824-5-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
This reverts
commit dfaf37baa0
Author: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Date: Mon Dec 7 14:45:20 2015 -0800
drm/i915: Fix idle_frames counter.
and
commit 97173eaf5f
Author: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Date: Tue Jul 7 16:28:55 2015 -0700
drm/i915: PSR: Increase idle_frames
and implements
commit d44b4dcbd1
Author: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Date: Fri Nov 14 08:52:31 2014 -0800
drm/i915: HSW/BDW PSR Set idle_frames = VBT + 1
without the hack to use 2 idle frames when VBT says 1. We keep the + 1
just for safety, although I haven't really figured out why that one
exists.
It's nonsense. idle_frames = number of frames where the screen is
entirely idle before we think about entering PSR.
idle_patter = part of link training, and we probably totally butchered
link training because we told the hw to entirely skip it. No wonder
PSR occasionally just fell over.
I suspect the reason we've increased idle frames is that it makes PSR
entry slightly less likely, and more likely to happen in a quite
system, which probably increased the changes the panel came back up
without link training. The proper fix is to implement link training
for PSR.
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal@intel.com>
Cc: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Cc: "Pandiyan, Dhinakaran" <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1463590036-17824-3-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
The default of 0 is 500us of link training, but that's not enough for
some platforms. Decoding this correctly means we're using 2.5ms of
link training on these platforms, which fixes flickering issues
associated with enabling PSR.
v2: Unbotch the math a bit.
v3: Drop debug hunk.
v4: Improve commit message.
Tested-by: Lyude <cpaul@redhat.com>
Cc: Lyude <cpaul@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95176
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal@intel.com>
Cc: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Cc: "Pandiyan, Dhinakaran" <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Tested-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: fritsch@kodi.tv
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1463590036-17824-2-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
dev_priv is what the macro works hard to extract, pass it directly.
> sed 's/\([A-Z].*(dev_priv\)->dev)/\1)/g'
v2:
- Include all wrapper macros too (Chris)
v3:
- Include sed cmdline (Chris)
v4:
- Break long line
- Rebase
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1460016485-8089-1-git-send-email-joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com
This is for callers who want micro-second precision but are not
waiting from the atomic context.
v2:
* Fix atomic waits. (Dave Gordon)
* Use USEC_PER_SEC and USEC_PER_MSEC. (Chris Wilson)
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
With a reliable frontbuffer tracking and all instability corner cases
on Haswell and Broadwell solved let's re-enabled PSR by default on
these platforms.
In case a new issue is found and PSR is the main suspect, please check
if i915.enable_psr=0 really makes your problem go away. If this is the case
PSR is the culprit so after that please check if i915.enable_psr=2
or i915.enable_psr=3 solves your issue and please let us know.
There are many panels out there and not all implementations apparently
work as we would expect.
In case you needed to force it on standby or disabled or in case of any
PSR related bug please report it at bugs.freedesktop.org.
In a bugzilla entry for PSR is desirable:
- dmesg (drm.debug=0xe)
- output of /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/i915_edp_psr_status
- Platform information. Vendor, model, id, pci id.
- Graphical environment: Gnome, KDE, openbox, etc...
- Details how to reproduce.
- Also good if you could run PSR test cases of Intel-gpu-tools
- Please mention if forcing main link standby or main link off helps you.
There are Intel-gpu-tools test cases that can be helpful to
determine if PSR is working as expected:
kms_psr_sink_crc and kms_psr_frontbuffer_tracking.
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1455278893-1307-2-git-send-email-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
With a reliable frontbuffer tracking and all instability corner cases
solved for this platform let's re-enabled PSR by default.
In case a new issue is found and PSR is the main suspect, please check
if i915.enable_psr=0 really makes your problem go away,
please report it at bugs.freedesktop.org.
In a bugzilla entry for PSR is desirable:
- dmesg (drm.debug=0xe)
- output of /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/i915_edp_psr_status
- Platform information. Vendor, model, id, pci id.
- Graphical environment: Gnome, KDE, openbox, etc...
- Details how to reproduce.
- Also good if you could run PSR test cases of Intel-gpu-tools
- Please mention if forcing main link standby or main link off helps you.
There are Intel-gpu-tools test cases that can be helpful to
determine if PSR is working as expected:
kms_psr_sink_crc and kms_psr_frontbuffer_tracking.
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This will give us flexibility to enable PSR by default independently so
issues and corner cases in one platform won't affect others were we have
it working properly.
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Unfortunately we don't know all panels and platforms out there and we
found internal prototypes without VBT proper set but where only
link in standby worked well.
So, before enable PSR by default let's instrument the PSR parameter
in a way that we can identify different panels out there that might
require or work better with link standby mode.
It is also useful to say that for backward compatibility I'm not
changing the meaning of this flag. So "0" still means disabled
and "1" means enabled with full support and maximum power savings.
v2: Use positive value instead of negative for different operation mode
as suggested by Daniel.
v3: As Paulo suggested use 2 to force link standby and 3 to force link
fully on. Also split the link_standby introduction in a separated patch.
v4: Use DRM_ERROR for link off request on platforms that don't support and
Remove the quirk promise.
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1454356928-19779-1-git-send-email-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
Link standby support has been deprecated with 'commit 89251b177
("drm/i915: PSR: deprecate link_standby support for core platforms.")'
The reason for that is that main link in full off offers more power
savings and on HSW and BDW implementations on source side had known
bugs with link standby.
However that same HSD report only mentions BDW and HSW and tells that
a fix was going to new platforms. Since on Skylake link standby
didn't cause the bad blank flickering screens seen on HSW and BDW
let's respect VBT again for this and future platforms.
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Current code not just block link_standby for non DDI platforms but also
block PSR from work on other ports B/C/D/E.
So, besides change any behaviour let's just fix the mess a bit here and
reuse HSW check to block the other ports and reduce the second if only to
link stadnby request.
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Dhinakaran Pandiyan