Sync code to the same with tk4 pub/lts/0017-kabi, except deleted rue
and wujing. Partners can submit pull requests to this branch, and we
can pick the commits to tk4 pub/lts/0017-kabi easly.
Signed-off-by: Jianping Liu <frankjpliu@tencent.com>
Based on 1 normalized pattern(s):
this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by
the free software foundation version 2 of the license
extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier
GPL-2.0-only
has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 315 file(s).
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>
Reviewed-by: Armijn Hemel <armijn@tjaldur.nl>
Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190531190115.503150771@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Yauheni Kaliuta pointed out that PTR_TO_STACK store/load verifier test
was failing on powerpc64 BE, and rightfully indicated that the PPC_LD()
macro is not masking away the last two bits of the offset per the ISA,
resulting in the generation of 'lwa' instruction instead of the intended
'ld' instruction.
Segher also pointed out that we can't simply mask away the last two bits
as that will result in loading/storing from/to a memory location that
was not intended.
This patch addresses this by using ldx/stdx if the offset is not
word-aligned. We load the offset into a temporary register (TMP_REG_2)
and use that as the index register in a subsequent ldx/stdx. We fix
PPC_LD() macro to mask off the last two bits, but enhance PPC_BPF_LL()
and PPC_BPF_STL() to factor in the offset value and generate the proper
instruction sequence. We also convert all existing users of PPC_LD() and
PPC_STD() to use these macros. All existing uses of these macros have
been audited to ensure that TMP_REG_2 can be clobbered.
Fixes: 156d0e290e ("powerpc/ebpf/jit: Implement JIT compiler for extended BPF")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.9+
Reported-by: Yauheni Kaliuta <yauheni.kaliuta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Since LD_ABS/LD_IND instructions are now removed from the core and
reimplemented through a combination of inlined BPF instructions and
a slow-path helper, we can get rid of the complexity from ppc64 JIT.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Take advantage of stack_depth tracking, originally introduced for
x64, in powerpc JIT as well. Round up allocated stack by 16 bytes
to make sure it stays aligned for functions called from JITed bpf
program.
Signed-off-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Tail calls allow JIT'ed eBPF programs to call into other JIT'ed eBPF
programs. This can be achieved either by:
(1) retaining the stack setup by the first eBPF program and having all
subsequent eBPF programs re-using it, or,
(2) by unwinding/tearing down the stack and having each eBPF program
deal with its own stack as it sees fit.
To ensure that this does not create loops, there is a limit to how many
tail calls can be done (currently 32). This requires the JIT'ed code to
maintain a count of the number of tail calls done so far.
Approach (1) is simple, but requires every eBPF program to have (almost)
the same prologue/epilogue, regardless of whether they need it. This is
inefficient for small eBPF programs which may not sometimes need a
prologue at all. As such, to minimize impact of tail call
implementation, we use approach (2) here which needs each eBPF program
in the chain to use its own prologue/epilogue. This is not ideal when
many tail calls are involved and when all the eBPF programs in the chain
have similar prologue/epilogue. However, the impact is restricted to
programs that do tail calls. Individual eBPF programs are not affected.
We maintain the tail call count in a fixed location on the stack and
updated tail call count values are passed in through this. The very
first eBPF program in a chain sets this up to 0 (the first 2
instructions). Subsequent tail calls skip the first two eBPF JIT
instructions to maintain the count. For programs that don't do tail
calls themselves, the first two instructions are NOPs.
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
While at it, ensure that the location of the local save area is
consistent whether or not we setup our own stackframe. This property is
utilised in the next patch that adds support for tail calls.
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
PPC64 eBPF JIT compiler.
Enable with:
echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
or
echo 2 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
... to see the generated JIT code. This can further be processed with
tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm.
With CONFIG_TEST_BPF=m and 'modprobe test_bpf':
test_bpf: Summary: 305 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [297/297 JIT'ed]
... on both ppc64 BE and LE.
The details of the approach are documented through various comments in
the code.
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Jianping Liu