habanalabs: share a single ctx-mutex between all MMUs
Multiple locks are usually a source of problems, which in the MMU case can be avoided since it is relatively rare that both MMU tables are updated at the same time. Therefore, use a single shared lock instead of two separate ones. Signed-off-by: Moti Haimovski <mhaimovski@habana.ai> Reviewed-by: Oded Gabbay <ogabbay@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Oded Gabbay <ogabbay@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
412c41fcd5
commit
fe2bc2d249
|
@ -81,6 +81,8 @@ int hl_mmu_ctx_init(struct hl_ctx *ctx)
|
|||
if (!hdev->mmu_enable)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_init(&ctx->mmu_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
if (hdev->mmu_func[MMU_DR_PGT].ctx_init != NULL) {
|
||||
rc = hdev->mmu_func[MMU_DR_PGT].ctx_init(ctx);
|
||||
if (rc)
|
||||
|
@ -115,6 +117,8 @@ void hl_mmu_ctx_fini(struct hl_ctx *ctx)
|
|||
|
||||
if (hdev->mmu_func[MMU_HR_PGT].ctx_fini != NULL)
|
||||
hdev->mmu_func[MMU_HR_PGT].ctx_fini(ctx);
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_destroy(&ctx->mmu_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -481,9 +481,7 @@ static void hl_mmu_v1_fini(struct hl_device *hdev)
|
|||
*/
|
||||
static int hl_mmu_v1_ctx_init(struct hl_ctx *ctx)
|
||||
{
|
||||
mutex_init(&ctx->mmu_lock);
|
||||
hash_init(ctx->mmu_shadow_hash);
|
||||
|
||||
return dram_default_mapping_init(ctx);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -516,8 +514,6 @@ static void hl_mmu_v1_ctx_fini(struct hl_ctx *ctx)
|
|||
pgt_info->phys_addr, ctx->asid, pgt_info->num_of_ptes);
|
||||
_free_hop(ctx, pgt_info);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_destroy(&ctx->mmu_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int _hl_mmu_v1_unmap(struct hl_ctx *ctx,
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue