i2c: slave-eeprom: Add comment about address handling
The behaviour of the EEPROM in the case where we only send an 8bit address to a 16bit address EEPROM is not defined. Added comment about that the slave-eeprom might behave differently from how an actual device does (only one model measured). Reported-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> Signed-off-by: Björn Ardö <bjorn.ardo@axis.com> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
41d529d622
commit
fe050f9907
|
@ -11,6 +11,12 @@
|
||||||
* pointer, yet implementation is deferred until the need actually arises.
|
* pointer, yet implementation is deferred until the need actually arises.
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/*
|
||||||
|
* FIXME: What to do if only 8 bits of a 16 bit address are sent?
|
||||||
|
* The ST-M24C64 sends only 0xff then. Needs verification with other
|
||||||
|
* EEPROMs, though. We currently use the 8 bit as a valid address.
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#include <linux/bitfield.h>
|
#include <linux/bitfield.h>
|
||||||
#include <linux/i2c.h>
|
#include <linux/i2c.h>
|
||||||
#include <linux/init.h>
|
#include <linux/init.h>
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue