gpio: mvebu: fix gpio bank registration when pwm is used
If more than one gpio bank has the "pwm" property, only one will be
registered successfully, all the others will fail with:
mvebu-gpio: probe of f1018140.gpio failed with error -17
That's because in alloc_pwms(), the chip->base (aka "int pwm"), was not
set (thus, ==0) ; and 0 is a meaningful start value in alloc_pwm().
What was intended is mvpwm->chip->base = -1.
Like that, the numbering will be done auto-magically
Moreover, as the region might be already occupied by another pwm, we
shouldn't force:
mvpwm->chip->base = 0
nor
mvpwm->chip->base = id * MVEBU_MAX_GPIO_PER_BANK;
Tested on clearfog-pro (Marvell 88F6828)
Fixes: 757642f9a5
("gpio: mvebu: Add limited PWM support")
Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c528eb27a3
commit
fc7a906867
|
@ -768,6 +768,13 @@ static int mvebu_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
|
|||
mvpwm->chip.dev = dev;
|
||||
mvpwm->chip.ops = &mvebu_pwm_ops;
|
||||
mvpwm->chip.npwm = mvchip->chip.ngpio;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* There may already be some PWM allocated, so we can't force
|
||||
* mvpwm->chip.base to a fixed point like mvchip->chip.base.
|
||||
* So, we let pwmchip_add() do the numbering and take the next free
|
||||
* region.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
mvpwm->chip.base = -1;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock_init(&mvpwm->lock);
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue