e1000e: e1000e_cyclecounter_read(): incvalue is 32 bits, not 64
"incvalue" variable holds a result of "er32(TIMINCA) & E1000_TIMINCA_INCVALUE_MASK" and used in "do_div(temp, incvalue)" as a divisor. Thus, "u64 incvalue" declaration is probably a mistake. Even though it seems to be a harmless one, let's fix it. Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
8008f68cb8
commit
fb5277f2c2
|
@ -4300,7 +4300,8 @@ static cycle_t e1000e_cyclecounter_read(const struct cyclecounter *cc)
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if ((hw->mac.type == e1000_82574) || (hw->mac.type == e1000_82583)) {
|
if ((hw->mac.type == e1000_82574) || (hw->mac.type == e1000_82583)) {
|
||||||
u64 incvalue, time_delta, rem, temp;
|
u64 time_delta, rem, temp;
|
||||||
|
u32 incvalue;
|
||||||
int i;
|
int i;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* errata for 82574/82583 possible bad bits read from SYSTIMH/L
|
/* errata for 82574/82583 possible bad bits read from SYSTIMH/L
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue