rcu: Adjust force_quiescent_state() locking, step 1
This causes rnp->lock to be held on entry to force_quiescent_state()'s switch statement. This is a first step towards prohibiting starting grace periods while force_quiescent_state() is executing, which will reduce the number and complexity of races that force_quiescent_state() is involved in. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: laijs@cn.fujitsu.com Cc: dipankar@in.ibm.com Cc: mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca Cc: josh@joshtriplett.org Cc: dvhltc@us.ibm.com Cc: niv@us.ibm.com Cc: peterz@infradead.org Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Cc: dhowells@redhat.com LKML-Reference: <12626465501455-git-send-email-> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
parent
7284ce6c9f
commit
f96e9232e0
|
@ -1204,7 +1204,7 @@ static void force_quiescent_state(struct rcu_state *rsp, int relaxed)
|
|||
}
|
||||
if (relaxed &&
|
||||
(long)(rsp->jiffies_force_qs - jiffies) >= 0)
|
||||
goto unlock_ret; /* no emergency and done recently. */
|
||||
goto unlock_fqs_ret; /* no emergency and done recently. */
|
||||
rsp->n_force_qs++;
|
||||
spin_lock(&rnp->lock);
|
||||
lastcomp = rsp->gpnum - 1;
|
||||
|
@ -1213,31 +1213,32 @@ static void force_quiescent_state(struct rcu_state *rsp, int relaxed)
|
|||
if(!rcu_gp_in_progress(rsp)) {
|
||||
rsp->n_force_qs_ngp++;
|
||||
spin_unlock(&rnp->lock);
|
||||
goto unlock_ret; /* no GP in progress, time updated. */
|
||||
goto unlock_fqs_ret; /* no GP in progress, time updated. */
|
||||
}
|
||||
spin_unlock(&rnp->lock);
|
||||
switch (signaled) {
|
||||
case RCU_GP_IDLE:
|
||||
case RCU_GP_INIT:
|
||||
|
||||
spin_unlock(&rnp->lock);
|
||||
break; /* grace period idle or initializing, ignore. */
|
||||
|
||||
case RCU_SAVE_DYNTICK:
|
||||
|
||||
spin_unlock(&rnp->lock);
|
||||
if (RCU_SIGNAL_INIT != RCU_SAVE_DYNTICK)
|
||||
break; /* So gcc recognizes the dead code. */
|
||||
|
||||
/* Record dyntick-idle state. */
|
||||
if (rcu_process_dyntick(rsp, lastcomp,
|
||||
dyntick_save_progress_counter))
|
||||
goto unlock_ret;
|
||||
goto unlock_fqs_ret;
|
||||
spin_lock(&rnp->lock);
|
||||
/* fall into next case. */
|
||||
|
||||
case RCU_SAVE_COMPLETED:
|
||||
|
||||
/* Update state, record completion counter. */
|
||||
forcenow = 0;
|
||||
spin_lock(&rnp->lock);
|
||||
if (lastcomp + 1 == rsp->gpnum &&
|
||||
lastcomp == rsp->completed &&
|
||||
rsp->signaled == signaled) {
|
||||
|
@ -1245,23 +1246,31 @@ static void force_quiescent_state(struct rcu_state *rsp, int relaxed)
|
|||
rsp->completed_fqs = lastcomp;
|
||||
forcenow = signaled == RCU_SAVE_COMPLETED;
|
||||
}
|
||||
spin_unlock(&rnp->lock);
|
||||
if (!forcenow)
|
||||
if (!forcenow) {
|
||||
spin_unlock(&rnp->lock);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* fall into next case. */
|
||||
|
||||
case RCU_FORCE_QS:
|
||||
|
||||
/* Check dyntick-idle state, send IPI to laggarts. */
|
||||
spin_unlock(&rnp->lock);
|
||||
if (rcu_process_dyntick(rsp, rsp->completed_fqs,
|
||||
rcu_implicit_dynticks_qs))
|
||||
goto unlock_ret;
|
||||
goto unlock_fqs_ret;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Leave state in case more forcing is required. */
|
||||
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
default:
|
||||
|
||||
spin_unlock(&rnp->lock);
|
||||
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
unlock_ret:
|
||||
unlock_fqs_ret:
|
||||
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rsp->fqslock, flags);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue