xfrm_user: validate XFRM_MSG_NEWAE incoming ESN size harder
Kees Cook has pointed out that xfrm_replay_state_esn_len() is subject to wrapping issues. To ensure we are correctly ensuring that the two ESN structures are the same size compare both the overall size as reported by xfrm_replay_state_esn_len() and the internal length are the same. CVE-2017-7184 Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com> Acked-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
677e806da4
commit
f843ee6dd0
|
@ -412,7 +412,11 @@ static inline int xfrm_replay_verify_len(struct xfrm_replay_state_esn *replay_es
|
|||
up = nla_data(rp);
|
||||
ulen = xfrm_replay_state_esn_len(up);
|
||||
|
||||
if (nla_len(rp) < ulen || xfrm_replay_state_esn_len(replay_esn) != ulen)
|
||||
/* Check the overall length and the internal bitmap length to avoid
|
||||
* potential overflow. */
|
||||
if (nla_len(rp) < ulen ||
|
||||
xfrm_replay_state_esn_len(replay_esn) != ulen ||
|
||||
replay_esn->bmp_len != up->bmp_len)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
if (up->replay_window > up->bmp_len * sizeof(__u32) * 8)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue