scsi: lpfc: lpfc_hbadisc: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Notice that, in this particular case, I replaced "Drop thru" with a "fall through" annotation, which is what GCC is expecting to find. Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114976 ("Missing break in switch") Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114977 ("Missing break in switch") Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
bf9598bdb3
commit
f60deecb96
|
@ -4667,9 +4667,11 @@ lpfc_check_sli_ndlp(struct lpfc_hba *phba,
|
|||
case CMD_GEN_REQUEST64_CR:
|
||||
if (iocb->context_un.ndlp == ndlp)
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
/* fall through */
|
||||
case CMD_ELS_REQUEST64_CR:
|
||||
if (icmd->un.elsreq64.remoteID == ndlp->nlp_DID)
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
/* fall through */
|
||||
case CMD_XMIT_ELS_RSP64_CX:
|
||||
if (iocb->context1 == (uint8_t *) ndlp)
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
|
@ -5856,7 +5858,7 @@ restart_disc:
|
|||
|
||||
case LPFC_LINK_UP:
|
||||
lpfc_issue_clear_la(phba, vport);
|
||||
/* Drop thru */
|
||||
/* fall through */
|
||||
case LPFC_LINK_UNKNOWN:
|
||||
case LPFC_WARM_START:
|
||||
case LPFC_INIT_START:
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue