lkdtm/stackleak: Fix noinstr violation
Fixes the following warning: vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: check_stackleak_irqoff+0x2b6: call to _printk() leaves .noinstr.text section Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ee5209f53aa0a62aea58be18f2b78b17606779a6.1681320026.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org
This commit is contained in:
parent
e0b081d17a
commit
f571da059f
|
@ -43,12 +43,14 @@ static void noinstr check_stackleak_irqoff(void)
|
|||
* STACK_END_MAGIC, and in either casee something is seriously wrong.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (current_sp < task_stack_low || current_sp >= task_stack_high) {
|
||||
instrumentation_begin();
|
||||
pr_err("FAIL: current_stack_pointer (0x%lx) outside of task stack bounds [0x%lx..0x%lx]\n",
|
||||
current_sp, task_stack_low, task_stack_high - 1);
|
||||
test_failed = true;
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (lowest_sp < task_stack_low || lowest_sp >= task_stack_high) {
|
||||
instrumentation_begin();
|
||||
pr_err("FAIL: current->lowest_stack (0x%lx) outside of task stack bounds [0x%lx..0x%lx]\n",
|
||||
lowest_sp, task_stack_low, task_stack_high - 1);
|
||||
test_failed = true;
|
||||
|
@ -86,11 +88,14 @@ static void noinstr check_stackleak_irqoff(void)
|
|||
if (*(unsigned long *)poison_low == STACKLEAK_POISON)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
instrumentation_begin();
|
||||
pr_err("FAIL: non-poison value %lu bytes below poison boundary: 0x%lx\n",
|
||||
poison_high - poison_low, *(unsigned long *)poison_low);
|
||||
test_failed = true;
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
instrumentation_begin();
|
||||
pr_info("stackleak stack usage:\n"
|
||||
" high offset: %lu bytes\n"
|
||||
" current: %lu bytes\n"
|
||||
|
@ -113,6 +118,7 @@ out:
|
|||
} else {
|
||||
pr_info("OK: the rest of the thread stack is properly erased\n");
|
||||
}
|
||||
instrumentation_end();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void lkdtm_STACKLEAK_ERASING(void)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue