drm/i915: Drop debugfs/i915_gem_pin_display

It has now lost its meaning (it shows more than just pin_display), I do
not believe that we are using in preference to the complete listing from
i915_gem_gtt, or the listing from i915_gem_framebuffer, or the listing
of active display objects in i915_display_info.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171013202621.7276-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
This commit is contained in:
Chris Wilson 2017-10-13 21:26:15 +01:00
parent bd3d2252f9
commit f46250e477
1 changed files with 0 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@ -568,7 +568,6 @@ static int i915_gem_gtt_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
struct drm_info_node *node = m->private;
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = node_to_i915(node);
struct drm_device *dev = &dev_priv->drm;
bool show_pin_display_only = !!node->info_ent->data;
struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
u64 total_obj_size, total_gtt_size;
int count, ret;
@ -579,9 +578,6 @@ static int i915_gem_gtt_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
total_obj_size = total_gtt_size = count = 0;
list_for_each_entry(obj, &dev_priv->mm.bound_list, global_link) {
if (show_pin_display_only && !obj->pin_global)
continue;
seq_puts(m, " ");
describe_obj(m, obj);
seq_putc(m, '\n');
@ -4751,7 +4747,6 @@ static const struct drm_info_list i915_debugfs_list[] = {
{"i915_capabilities", i915_capabilities, 0},
{"i915_gem_objects", i915_gem_object_info, 0},
{"i915_gem_gtt", i915_gem_gtt_info, 0},
{"i915_gem_pin_display", i915_gem_gtt_info, 0, (void *)1},
{"i915_gem_stolen", i915_gem_stolen_list_info },
{"i915_gem_request", i915_gem_request_info, 0},
{"i915_gem_seqno", i915_gem_seqno_info, 0},